Race: How the Post-Genomic Era Has Unmasked a Misconception Promoted by Healthcare.

The term "race" has been employed to categorize human beings into distinct groups based on some perceived biological distinctions. This concept was debunked with the completion of the Human Genome Project and its revolutionary findings that all humans are >99% genetically identical, subsequently making the term "race" obsolete. Unfortunately, the previous misconception is being propagated by the continued use of the term to capture demographic information in healthcare in an attempt to improve equity. This paper seeks to review the history of the term "race", analyze the current policy, and discuss its limitations. It is important to note that our analysis was exclusively focused on the United States healthcare system and the Affordable Care Act; as such, it may not reflect other regions' policies, including those in Africa, Asia, and the Middle East. However, we feel that this policy analysis may serve as a model to recommend alterations that mirror the post-genomic era. The need for this policy change was recently highlighted in the 2022 ASHG presidential address, One Human Race: Billions of Genomes, and will reflect the knowledge gleaned by the scientific community through the conclusions of the Human Genome Project.

A Longitudinal Exploration of CACNA1A -related Hemiplegic Migraine in Children.

Introduction: Since the initial description of CACNA1A- related hemiplegic migraine (HM), the phenotypic spectrum has expanded from mild episodes in neurotypical individuals to potentially life-threatening events frequently seen in individuals with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. However, the overall longitudinal course throughout childhood remains unknown. Methods: We analyzed HM and seizure history in individuals with CACNA1A -related HM, delineating frequency and severity of events in monthly increments through a standardized approach. Combining these data with medication prescription information, we assessed the response of HM to different agents. Results: Our cohort involved 15 individuals between 3 and 29 years (163 patient years) and included 11 unique and two recurrent variants (p.R1349Q and p.V1393M; both n= 2). The age of first confirmed HM ranged from 14 months to 13 years (average 3 years). 25% of all HM events were severe (lasting >3 days) and 73% of individuals had at least 1 severe occurrence. Spacing of HM events ranged from 1 month to 14 years and changes in HM severity over time of showed increases or decreases of >2 severity levels in 12/122 events. Eight individuals had epilepsy, but severity of epilepsy did not correlate with frequency and severity of HM events. While levetiracetam ( n= 6) and acetazolamide ( n= 5) were the most frequently used medications, they did not show efficacy in HM prevention or HM severity reduction. However, verapamil ( n= 3) showed efficacy in preventing HM episodes (OR 2.68, CI 1.39-5.67). Significance: The longitudinal course of CACNA1A -related HM lacks recognizable patterns for timing and severity of HM events or correlation with seizure patterns. Our data underscores the unpredictability of CACNA1A -related HM, highlighting the need for close surveillance for reoccurring HM events even in individuals with symptom-free periods. Key points: 24% of hemiplegic migraines (HM) in CACNA1A- related disorders are severe, involving cerebral edema and greater than 4 days to recover Timing and severity of HM are unpredictable, with large changes in severity between events, and age of onset ranging from 1-13 yearsEpilepsy occurred in 53% of individuals, with neither the timing nor severity of seizures correlated with HM.

Concomitant Calcium Channelopathies Involving CACNA1A and CACNA1F: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.

Calcium channels are an integral component in maintaining cellular function. Alterations may lead to channelopathies, primarily manifested in the central nervous system. This study describes the clinical and genetic features of a unique 12-year-old boy harboring two congenital calcium channelopathies, involving the CACNA1A and CACNA1F genes, and provides an unadulterated view of the natural history of sporadic hemiplegic migraine type 1 (SHM1) due to the patient's inability to tolerate any preventative medication. The patient presents with episodes of vomiting, hemiplegia, cerebral edema, seizure, fever, transient blindness, and encephalopathy. He is nonverbal, nonambulatory, and forced to have a very limited diet due to abnormal immune responses. The SHM1 manifestations apparent in the subject are consistent with the phenotype described in the 48 patients identified as part of a systematic literature review. The ocular symptoms of CACNA1F align with the family history of the subject. The presence of multiple pathogenic variants make it difficult to identify a clear phenotype-genotype correlation in the present case. Moreover, the detailed case description and natural history along with the comprehensive review of the literature contribute to the understanding of this complex disorder and point to the need for comprehensive clinical assessments of SHM1.

Incidental Findings in Study Participants: What Is the Researcher's Obligation?

BACKGROUND: As technology advances and genomic testing becomes commonplace, incidental findings, or the discovery of unrelated results, have increased. The American College of Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) established recommendations for the return of pathologic variants in 78 genes in the clinical setting based on medically actionable conditions from genes linked with preventable or treatable diseases. However, the lack of policy in the research setting poses a serious ethical dilemma for researchers, potentially threatening the participant's trust and willingness to contribute to a process with more significant risk than benefit. PURPOSE: Our goal was to determine the preferred ethical approach to handling incidental research findings and suggest a new standard for investigators and participants. METHODS: By employing Wueste's IAJD Framework of ethical evaluation, the current research policy, as well as a proposed policy, were analyzed, and then a policy analysis was employed to ascertain feasibility. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The current policy of leaving the decision of returning incidental findings up to the researcher's discretion is an ethical failure from the consequential, deontological, and intellectual freedom perspectives. However, the proposed policy of implementing the ACMG guidance for researchers to satisfy ethical demands reinforces its moral fortitude. In a period of increasing public awareness, the community, which is the prospective research pool, has increased demands for autonomy and less paternalistic behavior from medicine and science. This paper synthesizes recommendations by numerous organizations to establish a mutually beneficial policy that will ensure the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) goal, stated in the 2014 Joint Rule, of making participants "partners" in research a reality.