Augmentation of Electroconvulsive Therapy with Oral Caffeine: A Retrospective Analysis of 40 Patients with Major Depression.

OBJECTIVE: Studies have demonstrated the efficacy of injectable caffeine as an augmentation method in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). This study investigated whether orally administered caffeine increases seizure duration during ECT. METHODS: Medical records of 40 patients treated with a series of ECT were retrospectively analyzed. Patients whose electroencephalogram (EEG) seizure duration had dropped<30 s, or motor seizure duration<15 s were included. They subsequently received oral caffeine (0.2 g) before ECT sessions. Primary outcomes were EEG seizure duration and motor seizure duration, compared with those from the last pre-caffeine session (baseline) and the first five caffeine-augmented sessions. The mental state was assessed with the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF). In addition, data on maximum heart rate, maximal arterial pressure, and adverse effects were collected. RESULTS: The EEG seizure duration increased by 14.9 s (52%) on average between baseline and the first caffeine-augmented session. The increased length remained widely stable over the subsequent ECT sessions. EEG seizure duration was>30 s in more than 80% of sessions. A statistically significant increase in motor seizure duration appeared only in the 2nd and 3rd of five sessions with augmentation. Oral caffeine pretreatment was overall well tolerated. The percentage of patients with at least serious mental impairment (GAF score≤50) dropped from 77.5 to 15%. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest the utility of oral caffeine (0.2 g) to increase ECT-induced seizures in patients with durations below clinically significant thresholds.

Patient Perspectives on Pharmacotherapy of Alcohol Dependence.

INTRODUCTION: Pharmacotherapy with drugs like naltrexone or acamprosate is a well-evaluated element in the treatment of alcohol dependence (AD). However, in many countries, these medications are rarely administered. The objective of the present study was to identify from patients' perspective factors that prevent the initiation and compliance with pharmacological treatment of AD. METHODS: Patients from inpatient alcohol withdrawal treatment underwent a standardized interview. Questions included socio-demographic data, history of AD, treatment history, knowledge and personal experience regarding pharmacotherapy of AD, and personal views about the causes of AD. RESULTS: Three hundred patients (mean age 47.3 years, 27.7% female, mean duration of AD 8.9 years, 67% with a history of previous inpatient withdrawal treatment) were included. The majority of patients (58.7%) already knew drugs for the pharmacotherapy of AD. Thirty percent had ever used such medications, most often acamprosate. Except for disulfiram, pharmacotherapy of AD had lasted only a few weeks, on average. Medication usually had been applied without additional psychotherapy. No severe side effects were reported. Patients had often stopped pharmacotherapy on their own, when assuming they had reached stable abstinence. Openness to start pharmacotherapy for AD was currently stated by 67% of the total sample. In multiple logistic regression, openness was predicted by having a concept of AD as a medical disease and by a shorter duration of AD. DISCUSSION: To improve the administration of pharmacotherapy for AD implementation strategies should be systematically developed and evaluated with a focus on the concept of AD as a medical disease.

Effectiveness of Medical Cannabis for the Treatment of Depression: A Naturalistic Outpatient Study.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of studies on the course and effectiveness of medical cannabis in the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD). METHODS: Retrospective longitudinal (18 weeks) study of n=59 outpatients with MDD, treated with medical cannabis via a telemedical platform. Previous treatment with antidepressant medication was required for inclusion into the study. Standardized data collection was carried out at entry and during monthly consultations. Severity of depression was measured on a 0-10 point rating scale. Side-effects were assessed by a checklist. RESULTS: Patients were 20-54 years old; 72.9% were male; one third reported times of regular cannabis consumption within the previous five years. Drop-out rate was 22% after 18 weeks. Mean severity of depression decreased from 6.9 points (SD 1.5) at entry to 3.8 points (2.7) at week 18 (baseline observation carried forward; 95% CI for the mean difference: 2.4 to 3.8; p<0.001). A treatment response (>50% reduction of the initial score) was seen in 50.8% at week 18. One third of patients complained about side effects, none was considered as severe. Concomitant antidepressant medication (31% of patients) was not associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Medical cannabis was well tolerated and dropout rate was comparable to those in clinical trials of antidepressant medication. Patients reported a clinically significant reduction of depression severity. Further research on the effectiveness of medical cannabis for MDD seems warranted. Risks of this medication, such as sustaining or inducing a cannabis use disorder, or side effects such as poor concentration, must be taken into consideration.

[Acceptance by and evaluation of unidirectional hearing systems by patients in outpatient and (partial) inpatient geriatric psychiatric care]. / Akzeptanz und Bewertung unidirektionaler Höranlagen im Rahmen ambulanter sowie (teil-)stationärer gerontopsychiatrischer Versorgung.

AIM OF STUDY: The aim of the present study was to investigate the use and subjective benefit of specific temporary hearing-improvement measures (unidirectional hearing aids) in hearing-impaired, geriatric psychiatric patients. Simultaneously, employees evaluated the handling and acceptance of the hearing-improving measures. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Between October 2022 and July 2023, subjective hearing ability and use of conventional hearing aids were recorded in outpatients and in those in partial inpatient care (n=151) based on a self-assessment questionnaire. After using unidirectional hearing aids in diagnostics and treatment for four to six weeks, the hearing ability of 21 patients who had not used the hearing-improving measures was surveyed again and the experiences of active users (n=34) and employees (n=24) with the hearing-improving measures were analyzed via questionnaires. RESULTS: Of the 151 included patients (79.2 years, 62.1% female), 147 patients and 24 employees (79.2% female) took part in the study. Subjective hearing impairments were reported by 50 patients (34.0%). The hearing of 93 patients (63.2%) had already been assessed once. Treatment with conventional hearing aids was recommended for 34 of those surveyed (23.1%). Likewise, 34 patients (23.1%) took advantage of the offer of hearing-improving measures. All 34 users and all participating employees rated the hearing-improving measures used as mostly positive. CONCLUSION: Hearing impairment in geriatric psychiatric patients is common and often not adequately treated with conventional hearing aids, yet hearing-improving measures are only used to a limited extent. Mostly positive results among the users of hearing-improving measures favor their implementation in patients in routine outpatient and (partial) inpatient geriatric psychiatric care.

Ceramide levels in blood plasma correlate with major depressive disorder severity and its neutralization abrogates depressive behavior in mice.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe disease of unknown pathogenesis that will affect ∼10% of people during their lifetime. Therapy for MDD requires prolonged treatment and often fails, predicating a need for novel treatment strategies. Here, we report increased ceramide levels in the blood plasma of MDD patients and in murine stress-induced models of MDD. These blood plasma ceramide levels correlated with the severity of MDD in human patients and were independent of age, sex, or body mass index. In addition, intravenous injection of anti-ceramide antibodies or neutral ceramidase rapidly abrogated stress-induced MDD, and intravenous injection of blood plasma from mice with MDD induced depression-like behavior in untreated mice, which was abrogated by ex vivo preincubation of the plasma with anti-ceramide antibodies or ceramidase. Mechanistically, we demonstrate that ceramide accumulated in endothelial cells of the hippocampus of stressed mice, evidenced by the quantitative measurement of ceramide in purified hippocampus endothelial cells. We found ceramide inhibited the activity of phospholipase D (PLD) in endothelial cells in vitro and in the hippocampus in vivo and thereby decreased phosphatidic acid in the hippocampus. Finally, we show intravenous injection of PLD or phosphatidic acid abrogated MDD, indicating the significance of this pathway in MDD pathogenesis. Our data indicate that ceramide controls PLD activity and phosphatidic acid formation in hippocampal endothelial cells and thereby mediates MDD. We propose that neutralization of plasma ceramide could represent a rapid-acting targeted treatment for MDD.

Cannabis use, abuse and dependence during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review.

The interaction between cannabis use or addiction and SARS-COV-2 infection rates and COVID-19 outcomes is obscure. As of 08/01/2022 among 57 evaluated epidemiological/clinical studies found in Pubmed-database, most evidence for how cannabis use patterns were influenced by the pandemic was given by two systematic reviews and 17 prospective studies, mostly involving adolescents. In this age group, cannabis use patterns have not changed markedly. For adults, several cross-sectional studies reported mixed results with cannabis use having increased, decreased or remained unchanged. Two cross-sectional studies demonstrated that the severity of adults´ cannabis dependence was either increased as a consequence of increasing cannabis use during the pandemic or not changed. Regarding the effect of cannabis use on COVID-19 outcomes, we found only five retrospective/cross-sectional studies. Accordingly, (i) cannabis use did not impact mild COVID-19 symptoms; (ii) cannabis using individuals experienced more COVID-19-related hospitalizations; (iii) cannabis using veterans were associated with reduced SARS-COV-2 infection rates; (iv) frequent cannabis use was significantly associated with COVID-19 mortality, and (v) cannabis dependents were at higher risk of COVID-19 breakthrough after vaccination. It should be outlined that the validity of these retrospective/cross-sectional studies (all self-reports or register/e-health-records) is rather low. Future prospective studies on the effects of cannabis use on SARS-COV-2 infection rates and COVID-19 outcomes are clearly required for conclusive risk-benefit assessments of the role of cannabis on users' health during the pandemic. Moreover, substance dependence (including cannabis) is associated with (often untreated) somatic comorbidity, which severity is a proven key risk factor for worse COVID-19 outcomes.

Prevalence of COVID-19 and Psychotropic Drug Treatment in Psychiatric In-patients in Germany in 2020: Results from a Nationwide Pilot Survey.

INTRODUCTION: In patients with a pre-existing mental disorder, an increased risk for a first manifestation of a psychiatric disorder in COVID-19 patients, a more severe course of COVID-19 and an increased mortality have been described. Conversely, observations of lower COVID-19 incidences in psychiatric in-patients suggested protective effects of psychiatric treatment and/or psychotropic drugs against COVID-19. METHODS: A retrospective multi-center study was conducted in 24 German psychiatric university hospitals. Between April and December 2020 (the first and partly second wave of COVID-19), the effects of COVID-19 were assessed on psychiatric in-patient care, the incidence and course of a SARS-CoV-2 infection, and treatment with psychotropic drugs. RESULTS: Patients (n=36,322) were admitted to the hospitals. Mandatory SARS-CoV-2 tests before/during admission were reported by 23 hospitals (95.8%), while 18 (75%) conducted regular testing during the hospital stay. Two hundred thirty-two (0.6%) patients were tested SARS-CoV-2-positive. Thirty-seven (16%) patients were receiving medical treatment for COVID-19 at the psychiatric hospital, ten (4.3%) were transferred to an intermediate/intensive care unit, and three (1.3%) died. The most common prescription for SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was for second-generation antipsychotics (n=79, 28.2%) and antidepressants (SSRIs (n=38, 13.5%), mirtazapine (n=36, 12.9%) and SNRIs (n=29, 10.4%)). DISCUSSION: Contrary to previous studies, our results showed a low number of infections and mortality in SARS-CoV-2-positive psychiatric patients. Several preventive measures seem effective to protect this vulnerable group. Our observations are compatible with the hypothesis of a protective effect of psychotropic drugs against COVID-19 as the overall mortality and need for specific medical treatment was low.

Factorial, Construct, and Predictive Validity of the Motivation for Treatment Scale in Alcohol-Use Disorder Withdrawal Treatment.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to examine for the first time the factorial, construct, and predictive validity of the motivation for treatment (MfT) scale in a cohort of patients undergoing inpatient-qualified alcohol withdrawal treatment with the goal of referring patients to further treatment. The MfT scale has previously been evaluated in different settings of substance abuse treatment, revealing factorial ambiguity. To the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first study that conducted comprehensive factor analyses versus separate analyses of the factors conducted in prior studies in order to clarify the aforementioned factorial ambiguity. METHODS: A total of 249 patients (mean age 45.2 years (SD = 10.3); 34.4% females) with alcohol dependence were assessed. Data were obtained from four inpatient clinics specialized in qualified alcohol withdrawal treatment in Germany. First, confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to examine the fit of the four models discussed in the literature. Second, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted. Correlations of the new factors with other motivational constructs and referral to a subsequent treatment were investigated as measures of construct and predictive validity. RESULTS: None of the four models showed an acceptable fit to the data in confirmatory analyses. The exploratory analysis suggested to eliminate seven items because of inappropriate factor loadings and resulted in a shortened MfT scale, which consists of three factors based on 17 items. For the latent variables "problem recognition," "desire for help," and "treatment readiness," satisfactory composite reliability was found with 0.82, 0.80, and 0.78, respectively. Evidence for predictive validity was found in the correlation between "treatment readiness" and referral to a subsequent treatment. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: The new shortened MfT scale exhibited remarkable parsimony, which is desirable in settings such as withdrawal treatment, where patients frequently are cognitively or physically impaired. Despite its briefness, construct and predictive validity were better than in the original version of the MfT scale. The factorial validity of the suggested scale needs to be corroborated in further research.

How Effective is a Web-Based Mental Health Intervention (Deprexis) in the Treatment of Moderate and Major Depressive Disorders when started during Routine Psychiatric Inpatient Treatment as an Adjunct Therapy? A Pragmatic Parallel-Group Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Internet-based self-help-programs like deprexis have been increasingly shown to reduce depressive symptoms if added to distinct, primarily outpatient-treatment-settings. There is limited information about the effectiveness of deprexis if started at routine psychiatric hospital inpatient treatment of moderate-to-severe major depressive disorder (MDD). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: To examine, sixty-nine adult MDD-inpatients were randomly assigned to a 12-week-period of treatment-as-usual (TAU, N=33) or TAU plus guided deprexis (TAU-PLUS, N=36). The study was planned as a pragmatic approach considering psychiatric routine conditions, particularly, offering an instant and flexible discharge management when the patients felt stabilized enough for primary/secondary care. Therefore, there was no fixed time frame for the inpatient treatment duration. Post-discharge, patients were followed by structured telephone interviews up to study-endpoint, i. e., 12 weeks after deprexis-initiation. Primary (Beck-Depression-Inventory-II, BDI-II) and secondary outcome-measures (Hamilton-Depression-Scale, Clinical-Global-Impression-Severity, WHO-Well-Being-Index, Helping-Alliance-Questionnaire) were carried out at study entry and every 2 weeks. Furthermore, the working alliance with deprexis as well as the inpatient treatment duration, the daily activity and the utilization of post-hospital care after discharge were determined. RESULTS: At week 12, modified ITT-analyses showed significant between-group differences of BDI-II scores in favor of the TAU-PLUS-patients (p=.03) corresponding to a medium effect size (d=-.73, 95% CI -1.4 to .06). TAU-PLUS-patients showed greater daily activity (p=.04, d=.70, 95% CI -.03 to 1.38) and had been discharged significantly earlier from inpatient treatment (p=.003). Post-discharge, the TAU-PLUS-group reported a lower rate of post-hospital care (p=.01) and re-admissions (p=.04). Secondary outcome-measures including the alliance with the therapists were not significantly different between the groups at study-endpoint. The patients´ working-alliance with deprexis significantly predicted MDD-improvement and wellbeing. Both groups (TAU and TAU plus deprexis) were comparable with regard to the prescribed antidepressant medication. Unfortunately, detailed data on the amount and actual duration of the psychotherapeutic and special therapeutic individual and group settings of the TAU were not collected CONCLUSION: TAU plus deprexis was superior to TAU in improving subjective depression-severity (BDI-II) and daily activity in patients having sought psychiatric inpatient MDD-treatment before. This beneficial effect appeared 12 weeks after inpatient deprexis-initiation, i. e. when the vast majority of patients were back in primary/secondary care. Adjunctive deprexis was associated with earlier discharges and a significant advantage for post-hospital stabilization. In this regard, it could be promising to include deprexis into inpatient treatment conditions, thereby also preparing its continuing outpatient use. We found no evidence that deprexis interfered negatively with the alliance between the patients and their therapists.

The association between the availability of over the counter codeine and the prevalence of non-medical use.

PURPOSE: To investigate the prevalence of non-medical use (NMU) of codeine in Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK and whether availability of OTC codeine has any association with NMU of the drug. METHODS: Data collected in the online Survey of Non-Medical Use of Prescription Drugs, in surveys launched in the second half of 2018 from (Germany (n = 14,969), Italy, (n = 9974), Spain (n = 9912) and the UK (n = 9819) were analysed. For each survey, the estimated prevalence and 95% confidence interval (CI) of respondents reporting NMU of prescription and/or OTC codeine within the last 12 months were calculated and compared. RESULTS: The prevalence of last 12-month NMU in Spain was 12.6% (95% CI 11.7-13.6) for prescription codeine, 6.3% (5.6-7.0) for OTC codeine and 16.1% (15.1-17.3) for any codeine (prescription and/or OTC). The prevalence of last 12-month NMU in the UK was 5.4% (4.9-5.8) for prescription codeine, 4.5% (4.1-5.0) for OTC codeine and 8.3% (7.8-8.9) for any codeine (prescription and/or OTC). The prevalence of last 12-month NMU for prescription codeine was 2.1% (1.9-2.4) in Germany and 1.9% (1.7-2.2) in Italy. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of last 12-month NMU of any codeine product is approximately eight times greater in Spain and four times greater in the UK compared to Germany and Italy where the drug is only available by prescription. While other factors may contribute, these findings suggest that availability of codeine OTC is associated with greater NMU.

Patient-centered placement matching of alcohol-dependent patients based on a standardized intake assessment: process evaluation within an exploratory randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In the implementation of placement matching guidelines, feasibility has been concerned in previous research. Objectives of this process evaluation were to investigate whether the patient-centered matching guidelines (PCPM) are consistently applied in referral decision-making from an inpatient qualified withdrawal program to a level of care in aftercare, which factors affect whether patients actually receive matched aftercare according to PCPM, and whether its use is feasible and accepted by clinic staff. METHODS: The study was conducted as process evaluation within an exploratory randomized controlled trial in four German psychiatric clinics offering a 7-to-21 day qualified withdrawal program for patients suffering from alcohol dependence, and with measurements taken during detoxification treatment and six months after the initial assessment. PCPM were used with patients in the intervention group by feeding back to them a recommendation for a level of care in aftercare that had been calculated from Measurements in the Addictions for Triage and Evaluation (MATE) and discussed with the staff on the treatment unit. As measurements, The MATE, the Client Socio-Demographic and Service Receipt Inventory-European Version, a documentation form, the Control Preference Scale, and the Motivation for Treatment Scale were administered. A workshop for the staff at the participating trial sites was conducted after data collection was finished. RESULTS: Among 250 patients participating in the study, 165 were interviewed at follow-up, and 125 had received aftercare. Although consistency in the application of PCPM was moderate to substantial within the qualified withdrawal program (Cohen's kappa ≥ .41), it was fair from discharge to follow-up. In multifactorial multinomial regression, the number of foregoing substance abuse treatments predicted whether patients received more likely undermatched (Odds Ratio=1.27; p=.018) or overmatched (Odds Ratio=0.78; p=.054) treatment. While the implementation process during the study was evaluated critically by the staff, they stated a potential of quality assurance, more transparency and patient-centeredness in the use of PCPM. CONCLUSIONS: While the use of PCPM has the potential to enhance the quality of referral decision making within treatment, it may not be sufficient to determine referral decisions for aftercare. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005035 . Registered 03/06/2013.

Impact of Psychiatric and Related Somatic Medications on the Duration and Severity of COVID-19: A Retrospective Explorative Multi-center Study from the German Metropolitan Ruhr-area.

INTRODUCTION: Several psychiatric and somatic medications are assumed to improve COVID-19-symptoms. These include antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anticonvulsants as well as anticoagulants, statins, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS)-inhibitors for somatic comorbid conditions. All these agents may reduce the hyperinflammatory response to SARS/CoV-2 or the related negative cardio-cerebrovascular outcomes. METHODS: In a retrospective longitudinal, multi-center inpatient study, we sought to explore the influence of psychiatric medications on COVID-19, comprising the period from diagnosing SARS/CoV-2-infection via PCR (nasopharyngeal swab) up to the next 21 days. Ninety-six psychiatric inpatients (mean age [SD] 65.5 (20.1), 54% females) were included. The primary outcome was the COVID-19-duration. Secondary outcomes included symptom severity and the presence of residual symptoms. RESULTS: COVID-19-related symptoms emerged in 60 (62.5%) patients, lasting 6.5 days on average. Six (6.3%) 56-95 years old patients died from or with COVID-19. COVID-19-duration and residual symptom-presence (n=22, 18%) were not significantly related to any substance. Respiratory and neuro-psychiatric symptom-load was significantly and negatively related to prescription of antidepressants and anticoagulants, respectively. Fatigue was negatively and positively related to RAAS-inhibitors and proton-pump-inhibitors, respectively. These significant relationships disappeared with p-value adjustment owed to multiple testing. The mean total psychiatric burden was not worsened across the study. DISCUSSION: None of the tested medications was significantly associated with the COVID-19-duration and -severity up to the end of post-diagnosing week 3. However, there were a few biologically plausible and promising relationships with antidepressants, anticoagulants, and RAAS-inhibitors before p-value adjustment. These should encourage larger and prospective studies to re-evaluate the influence of somatic and psychiatric routine medications on COVID-19-related health outcomes.

System-level policies on appropriate opioid use, a multi-stakeholder consensus.

BACKGROUND: This consensus statement was developed because there are concerns about the appropriate use of opioids for acute pain management, with opposing views in the literature. Consensus statement on policies for system-level interventions may help inform organisations such as management structures, government agencies and funding bodies. METHODS: We conducted a multi-stakeholder survey using a modified Delphi methodology focusing on policies, at the system level, rather than at the prescriber or patient level. We aimed to provide consensus statements for current developments and priorities for future developments. RESULTS: Twenty-five experts from a variety of fields with experience in acute pain management were invited to join a review panel, of whom 23 completed a modified Delphi survey of policies designed to improve the safety and quality of opioids prescribing for acute pain in the secondary care setting. Strong agreement, defined as consistent among> 75% of panellists, was observed for ten statements. CONCLUSIONS: Using a modified Delphi study, we found agreement among a multidisciplinary panel, including patient representation, on prioritisation of policies for system-level interventions, to improve governance, pain management, patient/consumers care, safety and engagement.

[Psychological Abnormalities in Children from the Perspective of Parents with a Mental Disorder]. / Psychische Auffälligkeiten bei Kindern aus Sicht des psychisch erkrankten Elternteils.

BACKGROUND: There is increased risk for children with a mentally ill parent to get a mental illness. In Germany, it is assumed that the risk for psychological abnormalities in children with a mentally ill parent is increased by a factor of 2,4. The aim of this study was to give an overview of psychological abnormalities in children with mentally ill parents. METHODS: Patients were asked about their children and possible psychological abnormalities in their children during their stay in a psychiatric ward. Data of n=118 children (51,7%) of psychiatric inpatients could be used for analyses. RESULTS: One-fourth of the children showed psychological abnormalities. According to their parent, one fourth was also in psychotherapeutic/psychiatric treatment. There were no differences in the abnormalities associated with sociodemographic factors of the parent. CONCLUSION: Our results show that children of a mentally ill parent also suffer from psychological abnormalities. More explicit analyses of the care situation of these children as well as data from direct interviews with them are needed.

[Comparative Harm/Benefit Analysis of Various Psychotropic Substances from the Perspective of German Drug Users and Addiction Medicine Experts - A Contribution to Psychoeducation of Substance-Addicted Individuals and Restriction/Legalization Debates]. / Vergleichende Risiko/Nutzen-Analyse verschiedener psychotroper Substanzen aus der Perspektive deutscher Drogenkonsumenten und Suchtmediziner ­ Ein Beitrag für die Psychoedukationsarbeit mit Abhängigkeitserkrankten und Restriktions-/Legalisierungsdebatten.

BACKGROUND: To date, we cannot find any current international comparative study on the assessment of a benefit/harm profile of various licit and illicit psychoactive substances conducted by adult drug users and addiction experts as well. Particularly, there is no study from the German-speaking area of Western Europe. METHODS: In addition to the data already published by 101 German addiction medicine experts (published in this journal, [1]), we carried out interviews using a structured questionnaire with 100 German substance dependent users, residing in acute and rehabilitation clinical setting, to evaluate 34 psychoactive substances regarding their health and social harm potential for users and others as well as their potential benefit. RESULTS: Both, users and experts estimated traditional illicit drugs, such as heroin, crack/cocaine and methamphetamine, to be particularly harmful. Synthetic cannabinoids, alcohol and benzodiazepines were in the upper midfield, cannabis and psychotropic mushrooms in the lower midfield, and gabapentinoids at the bottom of the harm rankings of both, users and experts. In comparison with the experts, the users estimated methadone and benzodiazepines to be significantly more harmful. In the benefit analysis, users rated traditional illicit drugs including cannabis and psychotropic mushrooms as well as nicotine as significantly more useful than the experts. In contrast to the experts (traditional illicit drugs), the users did not assess any substance as very harmful and very useless at the same time. Only a few users reported to have experiences with opioid analgesics which, however, did not differ between the users´ and experts´ harm/benefit-assessments. Neither users nor experts predicted cannabis-legalization to change the overall risk potential of cannabis. Specific cognitive valuation biases seemed to be prominent in both groups. CONCLUSION: This study presents first harm/benefit assessments of psychotropic substances from the perspective of German addiction medicine experts and drug users. The results can be valuable to the psychoeducation of substance-addicted individuals and to current restriction or legalization debates.

[Weighing the benefits and harms of psychotropic and analgesic substances - A perspective of German addiction medicine experts]. / Abwägung von Nutzen und Schädlichkeit von berauschenden und schmerzlindernden Substanzen aus der Perspektive von deutschen Suchtmedizinern.

BACKGROUND: In Europe, there have been several addiction-expert rankings of harms related to the use of psychotropic substances in the last 15 years. Among them, only one expert ranking took into account the potential benefits of these drugs. Non-Opioidergic Analgesics (NOAs), such as gabapentinoids and NSAIDs, which have been increasingly the subject of abuse / misuse reports, have not been considered in such expert rankings. Likewise, there is currently no multi-substance comparison as to whether the valuation rank of the harmfulness of an illegal drug may change along with an imagined change in legal status in Germany. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: Using a questionnaire, 101 experienced addiction physicians (first cohort) evaluated 33 psychoactive substances including analgesics with regard to their health and social harms as well as potential usefulness for the consumer and their environment / society ('others'). In addition, this cohort investigated whether the harmfulness assessment of an illegal substance changes if it would be legalized. In order to obtain the average overall harmfulness (overall risk) of a substance, the percentage contribution of each dimension to the overall harmfulness was determined in a second survey (second cohort, 36 experienced addiction medicine experts). Finally, the average benefit and overall risk ratings of each substance were related to each other. RESULTS: Prescription psychoactive substances such as analgesics, NOAs (including gabapentinoids) and opioidergic maintenance medications to treat opiate dependence were judged to have a favorable benefit-harm profile. Cannabis and ketamine were placed in the midfield of both, the harm and benefit rankings. Together with most illicit narcotic drugs, alcohol and nicotine, have been ranked among the most harmful and least useful substances, whereby alcohol was judged on average to be more harmful but also more useful than nicotine. In the event of potential legalization, the overall harm of the traditional illegal drugs methamphetamine, heroin, cocaine and cannabis was estimated to be reduced. This was mainly due to a more favorable valuation of the harm to others under these virtual conditions. CONCLUSION: Prescription substances including opioidergic and non-opioidergic analgesics as well as opioid maintenance therapy medications (methadone and buprenorphine) were assigned a favorable benefit-harm profile. Alcohol, nicotine and traditional illicit drugs (with the exception of cannabis and ketamine) were determined to have an unfavorable profile. The overall harm of traditional illicit drugs was assessed to decrease along with legalization, mainly by decreasing the harm to others in this virtual event.

[Identification of polypharmacy-associated risks among nursing home residents]. / Risikoidentifikation bei Polypharmazie in einer Pflegeheimpopulation.

INTRODUCTION: Multimorbidity in old age is one reason for intensified pharmacotherapy. At the same time, an increase in medications could augment multimorbidity, especially when drug interactions leading to undesired drug effects occur. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study 918 mentally ill seniors living in nursing homes (mean age 79.3 (±11.6) years; 31.8% male) were included. Two different approaches to assess risks due to pharmacotherapy were applied: first mediQ, an online-based clinical decision support software (CDSS) and the PRISCUS list, which indicates potentially inappropriate medication. PRISCUS is the German equivalent to the American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria. RESULTS: Of the patients in the study 76.3% were at clinical risk, 2.2% at potentially high risk for drug interactions regarding the entire medication as tested by mediQ, and about 25% of the studied population received potentially inappropriate medication according to the PRISCUS list. CONCLUSION: This difference clearly underlines the cumbersome complexity of identifying patients at risk by using these exemplary devices. The focus of avoiding undesired drug side effects should be taking medication only after thorough verification of clinical indications and under close monitoring. The CDSS or negative lists may support this process.

Heroin-assisted treatment of heroin-addicted patients normalizes regulatory T cells but does not restore CD4+ T cell proliferation.

Heroin dependence may result in suppression of adaptive immune responses. Previously, we demonstrated an increase in relative numbers of inhibitory CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) and impaired proliferative activity of CD4+ T cells from heroin-addicted patients in contrast to patients in opioid maintenance therapy and healthy controls. However, it remains elusive whether heroin has a direct impact on the CD4+ T cell compartment or whether observed effects result from stressful living conditions. Here, we analyzed the frequencies of Tregs and the proliferation as well as the cytokine production of stimulated CD4+ T cells from heroin-addicted patients with use of illicit heroin, patients in heroin-assisted treatment (HAT), and patients in methadone maintenance therapy (MMT). Relative numbers of CD4+ Tregs were significantly enhanced in patients with illicit heroin abuse compared with patients in HAT or MMT. Notably, CD4+ T cells from patients in HAT and from persons using illicit heroin showed significant reduced proliferation and secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IFN-γ and IL-6 upon stimulation in vitro. From these results, we conclude that structured programs such as HAT and MMT dampen elevated frequencies of Tregs in heroin-addicted patients, whereas chronic heroin administration irrespective of using illicit heroin or receiving HAT has a direct impact on the proliferative activity and cytokine production of CD4+ T cells.

Psychosocial emergency care in times of COVID-19: the Essen University Hospital concept for corona-infected patients, their relatives, and medical staff.

Due to the SARS CoV-2-virus (COVID-19), anxiety, distress, and insecurity occur more frequently. In particular, infected individuals, their relatives, and medical staff face an increased risk of high psychological distress as a result of the ongoing pandemic. Thus, structured psychosocial emergency concepts are needed. The University hospital of Essen has taken up this challenge by creating the PEC concept to reduce psychosocial long-term consequences for infected patients, relatives, and medical staff at the university hospital. The concept includes professional medical as well as psychological support to convey constructive coping strategies and the provision of adequate tools such as the low-threshold online training program (CoPE It), which is accessible via the webpage www.cope-corona.de .

Predictors of attendance in outpatient group treatment for women with posttraumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder.

Objective: The present study investigated predictors of treatment attendance among 226 women with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD). Participants received either an integrated intervention for PTSD and SUD ("Seeking Safety") or a relapse prevention training (RPT) as part of a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Method: Beta-binomial regression was conducted to investigate baseline sociodemographic, motivational, mental health and substance use predictors of session attendance. Treatment by predictor interactions were included to identify treatment-specific predictors. Results: Session attendance was predicted by employment status, drug use severity and abstinence status. Higher drug use severity and unemployment were associated with less session attendance. The effect of abstinence status was treatment-specific, with abstinent participants in RPT attending most sessions. Conclusions: Considering individual characteristics could enhance session attendance in outpatient treatment for women with PTSD and SUD. This might include matching treatment concepts to abstinence status, the identification of attendance barriers in unemployed women and more intensive treatment settings for those with severe drug use.