Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
BMC Cancer ; 20(1): 532, 2020 Jun 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32513138

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is the standard therapy for multiple brain metastases. However, WBRT has a poor local tumor control and is associated with a decline in neurocognitive function (NCF). Aim of this trial is to assess the efficacy and safety of a new treatment method, the WBRT with hippocampus avoidance (HA) combined with the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on metastases/resection cavities (HA-WBRT+SIB). METHODS: This is a prospective, randomized, two-arm phase II multicenter trial comparing the impact of HA on NCF after HA-WBRT+SIB versus WBRT+SIB in patients with multiple brain metastases. The study design is double-blinded. One hundred thirty two patients are to be randomized with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Patients between 18 and 80 years old are recruited, with at least 4 brain metastases of solid tumors and at least one, but not exceeding 10 metastases ≥5 mm. Patients must be in good physical condition and have no metastases/resection cavities in or within 7 mm of the hippocampus. Patients with dementia, meningeal disease, cerebral lymphomas, germ cell tumors, or small cell carcinomas are excluded. Previous irradiation and resection of metastases, as well as the number and size of metastases to be boosted have to comply with certain restrictions. Patients are randomized between the two treatment arms: HA-WBRT+SIB and WBRT+SIB. WBRT is to be performed with 30 Gy in 12 daily fractions and the SIB with 51 Gy/42 Gy in 12 daily fractions on 95% of volume for metastases/resection cavities. In the experimental arm, the dose to the hippocampi is restricted to 9 Gy in 98% of the volume and 17Gy in 2% of the volume. NCF testing is scheduled before WBRT, after 3 (primary endpoint), 9, 18 months and yearly thereafter. Clinical and imaging follow-ups are performed 6 and 12 weeks after WBRT, after 3, 9, 18 months and yearly thereafter. DISCUSSION: This is a protocol of a randomized phase II trial designed to test a new strategy of WBRT for preventing cognitive decline and increasing tumor control in patients with multiple brain metastases. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The HIPPORAD trial is registered with the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00004598, registered 2 June 2016).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Disfunción Cognitiva/prevención & control , Irradiación Craneana/métodos , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/métodos , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Disfunción Cognitiva/diagnóstico , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Irradiación Craneana/efectos adversos , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Alemania , Hipocampo/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipocampo/efectos de la radiación , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/efectos adversos , Órganos en Riesgo/diagnóstico por imagen , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Estudios Prospectivos , Traumatismos por Radiación/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Adulto Joven
2.
BMC Cancer ; 16(1): 769, 2016 10 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27716184

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The higher specificity of amino-acid positron emission tomography (AA-PET) in the diagnosis of gliomas, as well as in the differentiation between recurrence and treatment-related alterations, in comparison to contrast enhancement in T1-weighted MRI was demonstrated in many studies and is the rationale for their implementation into radiation oncology treatment planning. Several clinical trials have demonstrated the significant differences between AA-PET and standard MRI concerning the definition of the gross tumor volume (GTV). A small single-center non-randomized prospective study in patients with recurrent high grade gliomas treated with stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) showed a significant improvement in survival when AA-PET was integrated in target volume delineation, in comparison to patients treated based on CT/MRI alone. METHODS: This protocol describes a prospective, open label, randomized, multi-center phase II trial designed to test if radiotherapy target volume delineation based on FET-PET leads to improvement in progression free survival (PFS) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) treated with re-irradiation, compared to target volume delineation based on T1Gd-MRI. The target sample size is 200 randomized patients with a 1:1 allocation ratio to both arms. The primary endpoint (PFS) is determined by serial MRI scans, supplemented by AA-PET-scans and/or biopsy/surgery if suspicious of progression. Secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), locally controlled survival (time to local progression or death), volumetric assessment of GTV delineated by either method, topography of progression in relation to MRI- or PET-derived target volumes, rate of long term survivors (>1 year), localization of necrosis after re-irradiation, quality of life (QoL) assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C15 PAL questionnaire, evaluation of safety of FET-application in AA-PET imaging and toxicity of re-irradiation. DISCUSSION: This is a protocol of a randomized phase II trial designed to test a new strategy of radiotherapy target volume delineation for improving the outcome of patients with recurrent GBM. Moreover, the trial will help to develop a standardized methodology for the integration of AA-PET and other imaging biomarkers in radiation treatment planning. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The GLIAA trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01252459 , registration date 02.12.2010), German Clinical Trials Registry ( DRKS00000634 , registration date 10.10.2014), and European Clinical Trials Database (EudraCT-No. 2012-001121-27, registration date 27.02.2012).


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/radioterapia , Imagen de Difusión por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Glioblastoma/radioterapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico por imagen , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Reirradiación , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
BMJ Open ; 13(4): e068822, 2023 04 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37080623

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Myopia is a major cause of degenerative eye disease and increases the risk of secondary visual impairment. Mitigating its progression therefore has great potential of clinically relevant benefit as shown by using highly diluted atropine eye drops in children of Asian origin. However, limited evidence is available regarding the efficacy and safety of low-dose atropine therapy in non-Asian populations. Hence, the Low-dose AtropIne for Myopia Control in Children (AIM) study will test the efficacy and safety of 0.02% atropine vs placebo in a German population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: AIM is a national, multicentre, prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial with two parallel arms. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of atropine 0.02% eyedrops for myopia control in children of Caucasian origin. The primary outcome is the change in cycloplegic refraction after 1 year of treatment (D/year). Secondary and tertiary outcome measures comprise the change in axial length (mm/year) in children treated with 0.02% atropine compared with placebo, the myopic progression of participants treated with 0.01% compared with 0.02% atropine (D/year and mm/year), and the safety profile of both 0.02% and 0.01% atropine. Furthermore, the myopic progression 1 year after cessation of therapy with 0.02% atropine will be evaluated. Inclusion criteria are an age of 8-12 years and myopia of -1 D to -6 D with an estimated annual myopia progression of ≥0.5 D. After randomisation, patients will receive either atropine 0.02% (arm A) or placebo eye drops (arm B) in the first year of treatment. In the second year, they will continue to receive atropine 0.02% (arm A) or switch to atropine 0.01% (arm B). In the third year, they will switch to placebo (arm A) or continue with atropine 0.01% (arm B). To achieve a statistical power of 80%, the calculated sample size is 300. The trial has started in October 2021 with a planned recruitment period of 18 months. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: AIM has been approved by the Central Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Freiburg (21-1106), local ethics committees of each participating centre and the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (61-3910-4044659). It complies with the Declaration of Helsinki, local laws and ICH-GCP. Results and underlying data from this trial will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03865160.


Asunto(s)
Atropina , Miopía , Humanos , Niño , Atropina/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Miopía/tratamiento farmacológico , Pruebas de Visión , Método Doble Ciego , Soluciones Oftálmicas/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA