Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
J Neurooncol ; 161(3): 451-467, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36757526

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Brain tumors cause morbidity and mortality in part through peritumoral brain edema. The current main treatment for peritumoral brain edema are corticosteroids. Due to the increased recognition of their side-effect profile, there is growing interest in finding alternatives to steroids but there is little formal study of animal models of peritumoral brain edema. This study aims to summarize the available literature. METHODS: A systematic search was undertaken of 5 literature databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PubMed and the Cochrane Library). The generic strategy was to search for various terms associated with "brain tumors", "brain edema" and "animal models". RESULTS: We identified 603 reports, of which 112 were identified as relevant for full text analysis that studied 114 peritumoral brain edema animal models. We found significant heterogeneity in the species and strain of tumor-bearing animals, tumor implantation method and edema assessment. Most models did not produce appreciable brain edema and did not test for observable manifestations thereof. CONCLUSION: No animal model currently exists that enable the investigation of novel candidates for the treatment of peritumoral brain edema. With current interest in alternative treatments for peritumoral brain edema, there is an unmet need for clinically relevant animal models.


Asunto(s)
Edema Encefálico , Neoplasias Encefálicas , Animales , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patología , Edema/complicaciones , Edema Encefálico/complicaciones , Encéfalo/patología
2.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 163(7): 1819-1827, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34031774

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Aerosol is a health risk to theatre staff. This laboratory study quantifies the reduction in particulate matter aerosol concentrations produced by electrocautery and drilling when using mitigation strategies such as irrigation, respirator filtration and suction in a lab environment to prepare for future work under live OR conditions. METHODS: We combined one aerosol-generating procedure (monopolar cutting or coagulating diathermy or high-speed diamond- or steel-tipped drilling of cadaveric porcine tissue) with one or multiple mitigation strategies (instrument irrigation, plume suction and filtration using an FFP3 respirator filter) and using an optical particle counter to measure particulate matter aerosol size and concentrations. RESULTS: Significant aerosol concentrations were observed during all aerosol-generating procedures with concentrations exceeding 3 × 106 particles per 100 ml. Considerable reductions in concentrations were observed with mitigation. In drilling, suction, FFP3 filtration and wash alone respectively reduced aerosol by 19.3-31.6%, 65.1-70.8% and 97.2 to > 99.9%. The greatest reduction (97.38 to > 99.9%) was observed when combining irrigation and filtration. Coagulating diathermy reduced concentrations by 88.0-96.6% relative to cutting, but produced larger particles. Suction alone, and suction with filtration reduced aerosol concentration by 41.0-49.6% and 88.9-97.4% respectively. No tested mitigation strategies returned aerosol concentrations to baseline. CONCLUSION: Aerosol concentrations are significantly reduced through the combined use of filtration, suction and irrigation. Further research is required to characterise aerosol concentrations in the live OR and to find acceptable exposure limits, and in their absence, to find methods to further reduce exposure to theatre staff.


Asunto(s)
Material Particulado , Aerosoles/análisis , Animales , Succión , Porcinos , Ventiladores Mecánicos
3.
Childs Nerv Syst ; 36(6): 1295-1299, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32219525

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We describe our technique of using reverse frontal bone graft for FOAR for patients with metopic or coronal synostosis and present our complications using the Leeds classification system for complications in craniosynostosis surgery. METHODS: Since April 2015, seventeen patients have been operated using this technique. We perform a frontal bone graft that is then reversed, and supraorbital margins are drilled out. The orbital bar is then removed and drilled down to make bone dust and on-lay bone grafts which are then used to fill gaps on exposed dura and fill in around the temporal region. RESULTS: All 17 patients who underwent this technique have good cosmetic results. We report 5 (29%) complications and 8 (47%) blood transfusions (7 exposures, 1 cell salvage).


Asunto(s)
Craneosinostosis , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Trasplante Óseo , Craneosinostosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Craneosinostosis/cirugía , Hueso Frontal/diagnóstico por imagen , Hueso Frontal/cirugía , Humanos , Lactante , Órbita/diagnóstico por imagen , Órbita/cirugía
4.
Br J Neurosurg ; 0(0): 1-11, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31407596

RESUMEN

Purpose: Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is a spinal emergency with clinical symptoms and signs that have low diagnostic accuracy. National guidelines in the United Kingdom (UK) state that all patients should undergo an MRI prior to referral to specialist spinal units and surgery should be performed at the earliest opportunity. We aimed to evaluate the current practice of investigating and treating suspected CES in the UK. Materials and Methods: A retrospective, multicentre observational study of the investigation and management of patients with suspected CES was conducted across the UK, including all patients referred to a spinal unit over 6 months between 1st October 2016 and 31st March 2017. Results: A total of 28 UK spinal units submitted data on 4441 referrals. Over half of referrals were made without any previous imaging (n = 2572, 57.9%). Of all referrals, 695 underwent surgical decompression (15.6%). The majority of referrals were made out-of-hours (n = 2229/3517, 63.4%). Patient location and pre-referral imaging were not associated with time intervals from symptom onset or presentation to decompression. Patients investigated outside of the spinal unit experienced longer time intervals from referral to undergoing the MRI scan. Conclusions: This is the largest known study of the investigation and management of suspected CES. We found that the majority of referrals were made without adequate investigations. Most patients were referred out-of-hours and many were transferred for an MRI without subsequently requiring surgery. Adherence to guidelines would reduce the number of referrals to spinal services by 72% and reduce the number of patient transfers by 79%.


Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Cauda Equina/diagnóstico , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Síndrome de Cauda Equina/cirugía , Vías Clínicas , Descompresión Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Transferencia de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA