Performance of a gelling fibre dressing in management of wounds in a community setting: a sub-analysis of the VIPES study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use and performance of a gelling fibre dressing (Biatain Fiber; Coloplast A/S, Denmark) in the management of wounds in community nursing practice. METHOD: A sub-analysis of the prospective, observational, real-world VIPES (Observatoire en Ville des Plaies ExSudatives) study was conducted. Patients with exuding wounds, for which nurses chose to apply the gelling fibre as a primary dressing, were included. Outcomes included assessments of wound condition and patient/nurse opinion. RESULTS: Overall, 149 patients with acute (n=52; 34.9%) or hard-to-heal (chronic) (n=97; 65.1%) wounds were included. At baseline, mean±standard deviation wound age was 351.5±998.2 days, 108 (72.5%) wounds were moderately-to-highly exuding, and 126 (84.6%) showed exudate pooling in the wound bed. At the last follow-up visit, 29 (19.5%) wounds had healed, within a median of 36 days, and 64 (43.0%) were progressing towards healing. From baseline to the last follow-up visit, significant reductions in wound surface area (p<0.05), depth (p<0.01), exudate level (p<0.0001), and in the proportion of wounds with sloughy tissue (p<0.0001) were observed. Most wounds had no (n=86; 58.5% (two missing values)) or low exudate pooling (n=45; 30.6% (two missing values)) at the last visit and proportions of patients with healthy wound edges/periwound skin increased from baseline. At the last visit, wounds were considered improved by nurses in 71.4% (n=105) of cases, and by patients in 66.7% (n=98) of cases (two patients missing). CONCLUSION: Patients who received treatment with the gelling fibre experienced improvements in the condition of a range of complex wounds. This analysis highlights the importance of adequate exudate management, and indicates how the selection of an appropriate wound dressing can encourage healing progression. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: This study was financially supported by Laboratoires Coloplast SAS, Paris, France. Coloplast A/S funded the writing and editing of the article and contributed to its content. Coloplast A/S and Laboratoires Coloplast SAS reviewed the article for scientific accuracy. Nurses received financial compensation for their participation in the study. NA is a full-time employee of Coloplast A/S. APJ was an employee of Coloplast A/S when this article was written. FA was a full-time employee of Laboratoires Coloplast SAS at the time of publication development. RS and CJ are full-time employees of CEN Biotech. AK received an educational grant from Coloplast A/S to provide scientific input to the publication. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Performance of a silicone foam dressing in management of wounds in a community setting: a sub-analysis of the VIPES study.

OBJECTIVE: Managing the gap between the dressing and the wound bed can facilitate the healing of exuding wounds. A silicone foam dressing (Biatain Silicone; Coloplast A/S, Denmark) was developed for application to exuding wounds. A sub-analysis of the real-world, prospective, observational VIPES (Observatoire en Ville des Plaies ExSudatives) study was conducted to investigate the use and performance of the silicone foam dressing in a community nursing setting in France. METHOD: The sub-analysis included patients from the VIPES study who received the silicone foam dressing as a primary dressing for an acute or hard-to-heal (chronic) wound. Epidemiological and wound healing outcomes were reported via a smartphone application. RESULTS: Overall, 64 patients were included in the sub-analysis. At baseline, most wounds (n=33/40; 82.5%) were in treatment failure (i.e., were stagnant, non-healing or had poor exudate management). At the last follow-up visit, a median of 22.5 (range: 3-151) days post baseline, 48.4% of wounds had healed and 25.0% were progressing towards healing. From baseline to the last follow-up visit, significant reductions in exudate level (p<0.0001) and exudate pooling (p<0.0001), and significant improvements in wound edges (p≤0.0001) and periwound skin (p<0.01) were observed. A total of 62.3% of patients had re-epithelialising wounds at the last follow-up visit. The majority of nurses (88.3%) and patients (85.0%) reported that the wound had improved and, at most dressing removals (93.5%), nurses reported that the dressing conformed closely to the wound bed. CONCLUSION: Overall, the data suggest that use of the silicone foam dressing in community practice supported the healing of wounds, illustrating the importance of exudate and gap management.

The Observatoire en Ville des Plaies ExSudatives (VIPES) study: insight into the patient characteristics, epidemiology, previous management, and features of wounds treated in the French community setting.

BACKGROUND: Wounds that become complex and hard-to-heal are a challenge for all health care systems. Identifying and understanding the nature of these wounds is necessary to allow appropriate intervention. OBJECTIVE: To present the epidemiological outcomes of the VIPES study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The prospective, observational VIPES study aimed to describe the use and investigate the performance of 2 wound dressings-a silicone foam and a gelling fiber-in the management of chronic and acute wounds in a community setting in France. RESULTS: Of 407 patients recorded, 285 were included in the analysis. The 184 chronic wounds included ulcers (venous/arterial/mixed, diabetic foot, and pressure) and malignant wounds. The 101 acute wounds included surgical and traumatic wounds. Of all wounds, 98.2% were exuding and 77.9% showed exudate pooling. Unhealthy wound edges and periwound skin were reported in 57.2% and 35.4% of wounds, respectively. Of all wounds, 78.6% were in treatment failure (poor exudate management or stagnant wound). The silicone foam dressing (n = 86) and the gelling fiber (n = 199) were generally used in wounds with low or moderate exudation, or moderate or high exudation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The VIPES study highlights that wounds can be complex and that community care practices in France warrant improvement. Practical and up-to-date wound management recommendations are needed.

Human factors study of ZENEO® (needle-free autoinjector) and comparison of different user instruction formats.

BACKGROUND: ZENEO® (Crossject, Dijon France) is a novel prefilled, disposable needle-free auto-injector (AI) device under development for drug deliverer in a variety of routine-use or emergency situations. At present, reported user experience and patient preferences are limited. To determine what impact different forms of user instructions may have on successful use of the ZENEO® device. METHODS: We conducted a human factors study on 134 healthy volunteers. On enrolment, subjects were provided with different instructive training material; a device quick guide plus either use of a dummy training device, an illustrated leaflet, or a demonstration video. After 6 weeks, subjects returned and performed an unaided simulated injection, and compliance with specific steps necessary for successful use, and avoidance of actions that interfere with appropriate use was recorded by an investigator. RESULTS: Most subjects (93.3%) successfully performed a simulated injection without major errors (regardless of type of educational instructions), and the great majority (97.5%) reported no difficulty in a range of objective measures of important necessary steps. Compliance with necessary steps and avoidance of detrimental actions was greater in those subjects with prior access to a demonstration video or provided with an illustrated patient leaflet. Prior experience with a dummy training device provided little if any benefit. User satisfaction with the device was high. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that the ZENEO® device can be effectively used with a conventional suite of printed user instructions. Use of a demonstration video provides additional value, whereas use of a dummy training device had limited value.