Binding and functional properties of the novel somatostatin analogue KE 108 at native mouse somatostatin receptors.

Clinically used somatostatin (SRIF) analogs, octreotide and lanreotide, act primarily by binding to SRIF receptor subtype 2 (sst2). In contrast, the recently described multiligand SOM230 binds with high affinity to sst(1-3) and sst5 and KE 108 is characterised as a high affinity ligand for all five SRIF receptors. In tumoural mouse corticotrophs (AtT-20 cells) and in mouse hippocampus, binding and functional features of KE 108 were examined and compared to SRIF-14, octreotide and SOM230. In AtT-20 cells, KE 108 bound with high affinity at [125I]LTT-SRIF-28-labelled sites similarly to SRIF-14, octreotide and SOM230. At the functional level, all four ligands increased guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)-triphosphate binding and decreased cAMP accumulation or intracellular Ca2+ concentration through G(i/o) proteins. In hippocampal slices, KE 108, octreotide and SOM230 also bound with high affinity at [125I]LTT-SRIF-28-labelled sites similarly to SRIF-14, but KE 108, octreotide or SOM230 did not influence spontaneous epileptiform activity which was, in contrast, inhibited by SRIF-14. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that KE 108 has high affinity for native mouse SRIF receptors. Functionally, KE 108 mediates SRIF action at sst(2/5) in corticotrophs whereas it does not mimic the SRIF-induced inhibition of hippocampal excitation suggesting that the high potency and efficacy of a synthetic ligand to all known SRIF receptors may not reproduce entirely the effects of the natural SRIF.

Pharmacological characterisation of native somatostatin receptors in AtT-20 mouse tumour corticotrophs.

1. The mouse corticotroph tumour cell line AtT-20 is a useful model to investigate the physiological role of native somatostatin (SRIF, Somatotropin release inhibitory factor) receptor subtypes (sst(1) - sst(5)). The objective of this study was to characterise the pharmacological features and the functional effects of SRIF receptors expressed by AtT-20 cells using radioligand binding and cAMP accumulation. 2. [(125)I]LTT-SRIF-28, [(125)I]CGP 23996, [(125)I]Tyr(10)-cortistatin-14 and [(125)I]Tyr(3)-octreotide labelled SRIF receptor binding sites with high affinity and in a saturable manner (B(max)=315, 274, 239 and 206 fmol mg(-1), respectively). [(125)I]LTT-SRIF-28 labels significantly more sites than [(125)I]Tyr(10) -cortistatin-14 and [(125)I]Tyr(3) -octreotide as seen previously in cells expressing pure populations of sst(2) or sst(5) receptors. 3. SRIF analogues displaced the binding of the four radioligands. sst(2/5) receptor-selective ligands showed much higher affinity than sst(1/3/4) receptor-selective ligands. The binding profile of [(125)I]Tyr(3)-octreotide was different from that of [(125)I]LTT-SRIF-28, [(125)I]CGP 23996 and [(125)I]Tyr(10)-cortistatin-14. The sst(5/1) receptor-selective ligand L-817,818 identified two binding sites, one with subnanomolar affinity (sst(5) receptors) and one with micromolar affinity (sst(2) receptors); however, the proportions were different: 70 - 80% high affinity with [(125)I]LTT-SRIF-28, [(125)I]CGP 23996, [(125)I]Tyr(10)-cortistatin-14, but only 20% with [(125)I]Tyr(3)-octreotide. 4. SRIF analogues inhibited the forskolin-stimulated cAMP levels depending on concentration. sst(2/5) receptor-selective ligands were highly potent, whereas sst(1/3/4) receptor-selective ligands had no significant effects. The sst(2) receptor antagonist D-Tyr(8)-CYN 154806 competitively antagonised the effects of SRIF-14 and sst(2) receptor-preferring agonists, but not those of L-817,818. 5. The complex binding properties of SRIF receptor analogues indicate that sst(2) and sst(5) receptors are the predominant SRIF receptors expressed on AtT-20 cell membranes with no or only negligible presence of sst(1), sst(3) and sst(4) receptors. In the functional studies using cAMP accumulation, only sst(2) and sst(5) receptors appear to play a role. However, the "predominant" receptor appears to be the sst(2) receptor, although sst(5) receptors can also mediate the effect, when the ligand is not able to activate sst(2) receptors. This clearly adds flexibility to SRIF-mediated functional effects and suggests that the physiological role of SRIF and its analogues may be mediated preferentially via one subtype over another.

Beta(2)/beta(3)-di- and alpha/beta(3)-tetrapeptide derivatives as potent agonists at somatostatin sst(4) receptors.

Four linear beta(2)/beta(3)-di- and alpha/beta(3)-tetrapeptides (1-4) were investigated as somatostatin sst(4) receptor agonists on recombinant human and mouse somatostatin receptors. Human somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5 (sst(1-5)), and mouse somatostatin receptor subtypes 1,3,4 and 5, were characterised using the agonist radioligands [(125)I]LTT-SRIF-28, [(125)I][Tyr(10)]CST(14) and [(125)I]CGP 23996 in stably transfected Chinese hamster lung fibroblast (CCL39) cells. The peptides bound selectively to sst(4) receptors with nanomolar affinity (pK(d)=5.4-7.8). The peptides were investigated on second messenger systems both as agonists, and as antagonists to SRIF-14-mediated effects in CCL39 cells expressing mouse sst(4 )receptors, via measurement of inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity, and stimulation of luciferase expression. The peptides showed full agonism or pronounced partial agonism (40 to 100% relative intrinsic activity) in both inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity (pEC(50)=5.5-6.8), and luciferase expression (pEC(50)=5.5-6.5). The agonist potential was confirmed since antagonism was very difficult to establish. The data show that beta(2)/beta(3)-di- and alpha/beta(3)-tetrapeptide derivatives have agonist potential at recombinant somatostatin sst(4) receptors. Therefore, they may be used to elucidate physiological and biochemical effects mediated by sst(4), and may also have potential as therapeutic agents.

Kinetic properties of "dual" orexin receptor antagonists at OX1R and OX2R orexin receptors.

Orexin receptor antagonists represent attractive targets for the development of drugs for the treatment of insomnia. Both efficacy and safety are crucial in clinical settings and thorough investigations of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics can predict contributing factors such as duration of action and undesirable effects. To this end, we studied the interactions between various "dual" orexin receptor antagonists and the orexin receptors, OX1R and OX2R, over time using saturation and competition radioligand binding with [(3)H]-BBAC ((S)-N-([1,1'-biphenyl]-2-yl)-1-(2-((1-methyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)thio)acetyl)pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide). In addition, the kinetics of these compounds were investigated in cells expressing human, mouse and rat OX1R and OX2R using FLIPR® assays for calcium accumulation. We demonstrate that almorexant reaches equilibrium very slowly at OX2R, whereas SB-649868, suvorexant, and filorexant may take hours to reach steady state at both orexin receptors. By contrast, compounds such as BBAC or the selective OX2R antagonist IPSU ((2-((1H-Indol-3-yl)methyl)-9-(4-methoxypyrimidin-2-yl)-2,9-diazaspiro[5.5]undecan-1-one) bind rapidly and reach equilibrium very quickly in binding and/or functional assays. Overall, the "dual" antagonists tested here tend to be rather unselective under non-equilibrium conditions and reach equilibrium very slowly. Once equilibrium is reached, each ligand demonstrates a selectivity profile that is however, distinct from the non-equilibrium condition. The slow kinetics of the "dual" antagonists tested suggest that in vitro receptor occupancy may be longer lasting than would be predicted. This raises questions as to whether pharmacokinetic studies measuring plasma or brain levels of these antagonists are accurate reflections of receptor occupancy in vivo.

The dual orexin receptor antagonist almorexant induces sleep and decreases orexin-induced locomotion by blocking orexin 2 receptors.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: Orexin peptides activate orexin 1 and orexin 2 receptors (OX(1)R and OX(2)R), regulate locomotion and sleep-wake. The dual OX(1)R/OX(2)R antagonist almorexant reduces activity and promotes sleep in multiple species, including man. The relative contributions of the two receptors in locomotion and sleep/wake regulation were investigated in mice. DESIGN: Mice lacking orexin receptors were used to determine the contribution of OX(1)R and OX(2)R to orexin A-induced locomotion and to almorexant-induced sleep. SETTING: N/A. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: C57BL/6J mice and OX(1)R(+/+), OX(1)R(-/-), OX(2)R(+/+), OX(2)R(-/-) and OX(1)R(-/-)/OX(2)R(-/-) mice. INTERVENTIONS: Intracerebroventricular orexin A; oral dosing of almorexant. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Almorexant attenuated orexin A-induced locomotion. As in other species, almorexant dose-dependently increased rapid eye movement sleep (REM) and nonREM sleep in mice. Almorexant and orexin A were ineffective in OX(1)R(-/-)/OX(2)R(-/-) mice. Both orexin A-induced locomotion and sleep induction by almorexant were absent in OX(2)R(-/-) mice. Interestingly, almorexant did not induce cataplexy in wild-type mice under conditions where cataplexy was seen in mice lacking orexins and in OX(1)R(-/-)/OX(2)R(-/-) mice. Almorexant dissociates very slowly from OX(2)R as measured functionally and in radioligand binding. Under non equilibrium conditions in vitro, almorexant was a dual antagonist whereas at equilibrium, almorexant became OX(2)R selective. CONCLUSIONS: In vivo, almorexant specifically inhibits the actions of orexin A. The two known orexin receptors mediate sleep induction by almorexant and orexin A-induced locomotion. However, OX(2)R activation mediates locomotion induction by orexin A and antagonism of OX(2)R is sufficient to promote sleep in mice.