Effect of anaemia and iron deficiency in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aims to clarify the prevalence and prognostic impact of anaemia and iron deficiency in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF). BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of anaemia and iron deficiency in HFmrEF has not yet been clarified. METHODS: Consecutive patients with HFmrEF were retrospectively included at one institution from 2016 to 2022. Patients with anaemia (i.e. haemoglobin <13 g/dL in males and < 12 g/dL in females) were compared to patients without, respectively patients with or without iron deficiency. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 months (median follow-up), secondary endpoints comprised HF-related rehospitalisation. RESULTS: Two thousand one hundred and fifty four patients with HFmrEF with a median haemoglobin level of 12.2 g/dL were included. Anaemia was present in 52% of patients with HFmrEF and associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (44% vs. 18%; HR = 3.021; 95% CI 2.552-3.576; p =.001) and HF-related rehospitalisation (18% vs. 8%; HR = 2.351; 95% CI 1.819-3.040; p =.001) at 30 months, which was confirmed after multivariable adjustment. Although iron status was infrequently assessed in anaemics with HFmrEF (27%), the presence of iron deficiency was associated with higher risk of rehospitalisation for worsening HF (25% vs. 15%; HR = 1.746; 95% CI 1.024-2.976; p =.038), but not all-cause mortality (p =.279) at 30 months. CONCLUSION: Anaemia and iron deficiency are very common in atleast half of patients with HFmrEF and independently associated with adverse long-term prognosis.

Association of body mass index with 30-day all-cause mortality in cardiogenic shock.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study investigates the prognostic impact of body mass index (BMI) on the risk of 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Due to ongoing epidemiological developments, the characteristics of patients with cardiovascular disease are consistently changing. Especially increasing rates of obesity and associated comorbidities have been observed. However, data regarding the prognostic value of BMI in patients with CS remains inconclusive. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with CS were included from 2019 to 2021. The prognostic value of BMI (i.e., BMI 18.5-<25; 25-30 and >30 kg/m2) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional regression analyses regarding the primary endpoint of 30-day all-cause mortality. Additional risk stratification was performed based on the presence or absence of CS related to acute myocardial infarction (AMI). 256 patients with a median BMI of 26.4 kg/m2 were included. The overall risk of 30-day all-cause mortality was 53.5%. Within the entire study cohort, BMI was not associated with the risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (log rank p ≥ 0.107). In contrast, BMI >30 kg/m2 was associated with higher risk of 30-day all-cause mortality when compared to BMI <25 kg/m2 in patients with AMI-CS (78% vs 47%; log rank p = 0.017), which was confirmed after multivariable adjustment (HR = 2.466; 95% CI 1.126-5.399; p = 0.024). However, BMI was not associated with mortality in patients with non-AMI-CS. CONCLUSION: BMI >30 kg/m2 was associated with increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with AMI-CS, but not in non-AMI-CS.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

OBJECTIVE: The study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic value of the aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Limited data regarding the prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio in patients suffering from sepsis or septic shock is available. METHODS: Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included monocentrically. Blood samples were retrieved from day of disease onset (day 1), day 2, 3, 5 and 7. First, the diagnostic value of the AST/ALT ratio was tested for septic shock compared to sepsis. Second, the prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio was tested for 30-d all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-test, Spearman's correlation, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, as well as multivariable mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA), Cox proportional regression analyses and propensity score matching. RESULTS: A total of 289 patients were included, of which 55% had sepsis and 45% septic shock. The overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 d was 53%. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.651 on day 1 and 0.794 on day 7, the AST/ALT ratio revealed moderate but better diagnostic discrimination of septic shock compared to bilirubin. Furthermore, the AST/ALT ratio was able to discriminate 30-d all-cause mortality (AUC = 0.624; 95% CI 0.559 - 0.689; p = 0.001). Patients with an AST/ALT ratio above the median (>1.8) had higher rates of 30-d all-cause mortality compared to lower values (mortality rate 63 vs. 43%; log-rank p = 0.001), even after multivariable adjustment (HR = 1.703; 95% CI 1.182 - 2.453; p = 0.004) and propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: The AST/ALT was a reliable diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of septic shock as well as a reliable tool to predict 30-d all-cause mortality in patients suffering from sepsis and septic shock.

Diagnostic and prognostic role of platelets in patients with sepsis and septic shock.

Studies investigating the prognostic role of platelets commonly include critically ill patients, whereas data regarding the prognostic impact of platelet count in patients admitted with sepsis and septic shock is limited. Therefore, the study investigates the prognostic role of platelet count in patients with sepsis and septic shock. Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included monocentrically. Blood samples were retrieved from the day of disease onset (day 1), days 2, 3, 5, 7 and 10. Firstly, the diagnostic value of platelet count was tested for septic shock compared to sepsis. Secondly, the prognostic value of platelet count was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-test, Spearman's correlation, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, as well as multivariable mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA), Cox proportional regression analyses and propensity score matching. A total of 358 patients with sepsis and septic shock were included with a median platelet count of 176 × 106/ml. The presence of thrombocytopenia (i.e. <150 × 106/ml) was associated with increased risk of 30-day mortality (HR = 1.409; 95% CI 1.057-1.878; p = .019), which was still demonstrated after propensity score matching. During the course of sepsis, a nadir was observed on sepsis day 5 with a decrease in the mean platelet count by 21.5%. Especially serum lactate, mean arterial pressure and the presence of malignancies were found to predict platelet decline during the course of sepsis/septic shock. The presence of platelet decline >25% was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (HR = 1.484; 95% CI 1.045-2.109; p = .028). Following platelet decline, recovery was observed from day 5 to day 10 (mean increase 7.5%). However, platelet recovery was not found to be associated with 30-day all-cause mortality (HR = 1.072; 95% CI 0.567-2.026; p = .832). In conclusion, both thrombocytopenia and platelet decline during the course of sepsis were associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-mortality in patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock.

What is the context? Despite improved treatment strategies in intensive care medicine, sepsis and septic shock represent one of the major causes of death at intensive care units worldwide.Although it is known that platelets are associated with prognosis, most studies included "critically illness" patients and were not restricted to patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock. Furthermore, studies focusing on patients with sepsis were predominantly published prior to the sepsis-3 criteria. Specifically, the course of the platelet count during ICU hospitalization needs further investigation.What is new? The present study suggests that the platelet count reflects a reliable tool for the diagnosis of septic shock during the first week of ICU hospitalization.Furthermore, platelet count and the platelet-to-white-blood-cell-ratio are predictive for 30-day all-cause mortality in the presence of sepsis or septic shock.Especially, a decrease in platelet count during the first 5 days of ICU hospitalizations was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock, whereas the platelet recovery was not found to be associated with a worse prognosis.What is the impact? This study provides further evidence that the platelet count represents a reliable tool for the diagnosis of septic shock and furthermore predicts short-term prognosis in patients admitted with sepsis or septic shock during the first 10 days of ICU hospitalization.

Effect of Hemoglobin Levels in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock of Any Cause: Insights from a Single-Centre, Prospective Registry.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding the short-term prognostic impact of hemoglobin levels in cardiogenic shock (CS) patients is limited. The study examines the prognostic impact of hemoglobin levels in patients with CS. METHODS: Consecutive patients with CS of any etiology from 2019 to 2021 were included at one institution. Hemoglobin levels were retrieved from the day of admission (i.e., day 1), and on days 2, 3, 4, and 8 of intensive care unit (ICU) treatment thereafter. The primary endpoint was 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman´s correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses as well as multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: From a total of 250 consecutive patients admitted with CS, 54% died within 30 days. Hemoglobin levels on day 4 and on day 8 were associated with moderate discrimination for 30-day all-cause mortality (area under the curve (AUC) 0.598 - 0.666), whereas hemoglobin level on day 1 was not predictive for 30-day all-cause mortality (AUC = 0.504). There was no association with 30-day all-cause mortality when stratified by the presence of anemia (defined as hemoglobin level < 12 g/dL) on day 1 (54% vs. 55%; log rank p = 0.906; HR = 0.981; 95% CI 0.698 - 1.378; p = 0.910). However, a decrease of hemoglobin by > 2 g/dL from day 1 to day 3 of ICU treatment was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (56% vs. 41%; log rank p = 0.014; HR = 1.831; 95% CI 1.108 - 3.026; p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Hemoglobin levels on day 1 were not associated with prognosis in CS. However, an early decrease of hemoglobin levels from day 1 to day 3 indicated impaired short-term prognosis in CS patients.

D-Dimer Levels and the Risk of 30-Day All-Cause Mortality in Cardiogenic Shock Stratified by Etiology.

BACKGROUND: The study investigates the prognostic impact of D-dimer levels in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Although D-dimer levels were found to be associated with prognosis in various clinical settings such as heart failure or acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the prognostic role of D-dimer levels in CS patients has not yet been clarified. METHODS: Consecutive CS patients with and without concomitant AMI were prospectively included from 2019 to 2021. The prognostic impact of D-dimer levels was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality within the entire study cohort and stratified by the presence or absence of AMI. Statistical analyses included C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-three consecutive CS patients were included with an overall all-cause mortality at 30 days of 55%. The median D-dimer level on admission was 8.44 mg/L, whereas D-dimer levels were higher in 30-day non-survivors compared to survivors (median 13.0 vs. 5.2 mg/L; p = 0.011). D-dimer levels above the median were associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality compared to patients with lower D-dimer levels (66% vs. 54%, log rank p = 0.050; HR = 1.594; 95% CI 0.979 - 2.594; p = 0.061), especially in patients with non-AMI-related CS (65% vs. 30%, log rank p = 0.010). The prognostic value of D-dimer levels was still demonstrated after multivariate adjustment (HR = 1.024; 95% CI 1.004 - 1.045; p = 0.020). CONCLUSIONS: D-dimer measurement may be a reliable biomarker to predict the risk of 30-day mortality in CS patients, especially in patients with non-AMI related CS.

The Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte-Ratio as Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool in Sepsis and Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the diagnostic and prognostic value of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in sepsis or septic shock commonly included preselected subgroups of patients or were published prior to the current sepsis-3 criteria. Therefore, this study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic impact of the NLR in patients with sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 from the prospective "MARSS-registry" were included monocentrically. First, the diagnostic value of the NLR compared to established sepsis scores was tested for septic shock compared to sepsis. Second, the diagnostic value of the NLR with regard to positive blood cultures was tested. Thereafter, the prognostic value of the NLR was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman´s correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier analyses, Cox proportional regression analyses as well as uni- and multivariate logistic regression models. RESULTS: A total of 104 patients were included, of which 60% were admitted with sepsis and 40% with septic shock. The overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 56%. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.492, the NLR was shown to have a poor diagnostic value with regard to the diagnosis of septic shock compared to sepsis. However, the NLR was shown to be a reliable parameter to discriminate between patients with negative and positive blood cultures when admitted with septic shock (AUC = 0.714). This was still evident after multivariable adjustment (OR = 1.025; 95% CI 1.000 - 1.050; p = 0.048). In contrast, the NLR revealed a poor prognostic accuracy (AUC = 0.507) with regard to 30-day all-cause mortality. Finally, a higher NLR was not associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (log rank p-value = 0.775). CONCLUSIONS: The NLR was a reliable diagnostic tool for the identification of patients with blood culture confirmed sepsis. Yet, the NLR was not a reliable parameter to discriminate between patients with sepsis and septic shock nor between 30-day survivors and non-survivors.

D-Dimer Levels and the Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Score to Predict Severity and Outcomes in Sepsis or Septic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Studies investigating the diagnostic and prognostic value of D-dimer levels and the disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) score in sepsis or septic shock commonly include preselected subgroups of patients or were published prior to the current sepsis-3 criteria. Therefore, this study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic impact of D-dimer levels and the DIC score in patients with sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock enrolled in the prospective and monocentric "MARSS" registry from 2019 to 2021 were included. First, the diagnostic value of D-dimer levels was compared to the DIC score to discriminate patients with septic shock from patients with sepsis without shock. Thereafter, the prognostic value of D-dimer levels and the DIC score was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman´s correlations, C-statistics, Kaplan-Meier, as well as uni- and multivariable cox regression analyses. RESULTS: One hundred patients were included (n = 63 with sepsis and n = 37 with septic shock). The overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days was 51%. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.710 and 0.739, both D-dimer level and the DIC score revealed reliable diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of septic shock. However, D-dimer levels and the DIC scores were shown to have poor to moderate prognostic accuracy (AUC 0.590 - 0.610) with regard to 30-day all-cause mortality. Specifically, very high D-dimer levels (i.e., > 30 mg/L) (HR = 2.648; 95% CI 1.147 - 6.112; p = 0.023) and a DIC scores ≥ 3 (HR = 2.095; 95% CI 1.095 - 4.009; p = 0.0258) were associated with highest risk of 30-day all-cause mortality. Finally, both higher D-dimer levels (HR = 1.032; 95% CI 1.005 - 1.060; p = 0.021) and DIC scores (HR = 1.313; 95% CI 1.106 - 1.559; p = 0.002) were associated with increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality after multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: Both D-dimer levels and the DIC scores revealed reliable diagnostic accuracy for the discrimination of septic shock, but a poor to moderate prognostic value for the discrimination of 30-day all-cause mortality. Especially very high D-dimer levels (i.e., > 30 mg/L) and a DIC score ≥ 3 were associated with highest risk of 30-day all-cause mortality.

Does Albumin Predict the Risk of Mortality in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock?

This study investigates the prognostic impact of albumin levels in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Intensive care unit (ICU) related mortality in CS patients remains unacceptably high despite improvement concerning the treatment of CS patients. Limited data regarding the prognostic value of albumin in patients with CS is available. All consecutive patients with CS from 2019 to 2021 were included at one institution. Laboratory values were retrieved from the day of disease onset (day 1) and days 2, 3, 4, and 8 thereafter. The prognostic impact of albumin was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Moreover, the prognostic performance of albumin decline during ICU treatment was examined. Statistical analyses included univariable t-test, Spearman's correlation, Kaplan-Meier analyses, multivariable mixed analysis of variance (ANOVA), C-Statistics, and Cox proportional regression analyses. In total, 230 CS patients were included, with an overall all-cause mortality at 30 days of 54%. The median albumin on day 1 was 30.0 g/L. Albumin on day 1 was able to discriminate between 30-day survivors and non-survivors (area under the curve (AUC) 0.607; 0.535-0.680; p = 0.005). CS patients with albumin < 30.0 g/L were associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (63% vs. 46%; log-rank p = 0.016; HR = 1.517; 95% CI 1.063-2.164; p = 0.021), which was demonstrated even after multivariable adjustment. Moreover, a decrease of albumin levels by ≥20% from day 1 to day 3 was accompanied by a higher risk of 30-days all-cause mortality (56% vs. 39%; log-rank p = 0.036; HR = 1.645; 95% CI 1.014-2.669; p = 0.044). Especially when combined with lactate, creatinine, and cardiac troponin I, reliable discrimination of 30-day all-cause mortality was observed, including albumin in CS risk stratification models (AUC = 0.745; 95% CI 0.677-0.814; p = 0.001). In conclusion, low baseline albumin levels as well as a decay of albumin levels during the course of ICU treatment, deteriorate prognostic outcomes in CS patients. The additional assessment of albumin levels may further improve risk stratification in CS patients.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of Plasma Albumin and Cholinesterase in Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock.

OBJECTIVE: Despite improved risk stratification tools and identification of novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and prognosis in patients with sepsis, sepsis-related mortality has not significantly improved during the past years. This study investigates the diagnostic and prognostic role of the plasma albumin and cholinesterase (ChE) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: Consecutive patients with sepsis and septic shock from 2019 to 2021 were included at one institution. Blood samples were obtained on the day of disease onset (day 1), and on days 2, 3, 5, and 7 thereafter. The diagnostic value of ChE for the diagnosis of a septic shock was compared to albumin and the prognostic value of the albumin and the ChE for 30-day all-cause mortality was tested. RESULTS: 239 patients were included with a median albumin level of 21.4 g/dL and a median ChE of 5004 U/L on admission. With an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.641-0.762 on days 3 and 5, the ChE was associated with moderate but better diagnostic discrimination between sepsis and septic shock than albumin. Furthermore, ChE was able to discriminate between 30-day non-survivors and survivors (range of AUC 0.612-0.686). Patients with a ChE below the median had higher rates of 30-days all-cause mortality in comparison to patients with a ChE above the median (65 vs. 42%, log rank p = 0.001; HR = 1.820; 95% CI = 1.273-2.601; p = 0.001), which was still demonstrated after multivariable adjustment. CONCLUSION: The level of ChE was associated with moderate diagnostic and prognostic accuracy in patients with sepsis and septic shock, whereas albumin was not.

Impact of age on the prognosis of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and aborted cardiac arrest.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the prognostic impact of age on patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) and aborted cardiac arrest. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The present registry-based, monocentric cohort study included all consecutive patients presenting at the University Medical Center Mannheim (UMM) between 2002 and 2016 with ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular fibrillation (VF) and aborted cardiac arrest. Middle-aged (40-60 years old) were compared to older patients (> 60 years old). Furthermore, age was analyzed as a continuous variable. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 2.5 years. The secondary endpoints were cardiac death at 24 h, all-cause mortality at index hospitalization, all-cause mortality after index hospitalization and the composite endpoint at 2.5 years of cardiac death at 24 h, recurrent VTA, and appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) treatment. RESULTS: A total of 2259 consecutive patients were included (28% middle-aged, 72% older). Older patients were more often associated with all-cause mortality at 2.5 years (27% vs. 50%; hazard ratio, HR = 2.137; 95% confidence interval, CI 1.809-2.523, p = 0.001) and the secondary endpoints. Even patient age as a continuous variable was independently associated with mortality at 2.5 years in all types of VTA. Adverse prognosis in older patients was demonstrated by multivariate Cox regression analyses and propensity score matching. Chronic kidney disease (CKD), systolic left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF) < 35%, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and cardiogenic shock worsened the prognosis for both age groups, whereas acute myocardial infarction (STEMI/NSTEMI) and the presence of an ICD improved prognosis. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that increasing age is associated with increased mortality in VTA patients. Compared to the middle-aged, older patients were associated with higher all-cause mortality at 2.5 years and the secondary endpoints.

Cardiac disease and prognosis associated with ventricular tachyarrhythmias in young adults and adults.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates cardiac diseases and prognosis in young adults and adults presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA). METHODS: The present longitudinal, observational, registry-based, monocentric cohort study includes all consecutive patients 45 years old or younger presenting with VTA at admission from 2002 to 2016. Rates of coronary angiography, coronary artery disease (CAD) and need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), cardiac diseases associated with VTA, and differences in long-term prognostic endpoints for young adults (20-34 years old) were analyzed and compared to those of adults (35-45 years old), for whom multivariable risk prediction models were developed. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed according to age and type of VTA. RESULTS: A total of 259 consecutive patients were included in the study (36% young adults and 64% adults). At admission, 38% of young adults had VTA due to CAD that required PCI. Furthermore, VTA in young adults was commonly idiopathic (27%), or had underlying channelopathies (18%), primary cardiomyopathies (13%) or acute myocardial infarction (AMI, 11%). In adults, VTA was mostly associated with AMI (28%), though the rate of idiopathy was still high (20%). A total 41% of all patients received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), for whom AMI (STEMI 17%, NSTEMI 24%) was most frequently observed. Irrespective of the type of VTA, all-cause mortality was similar for young adults and adults. In young adults, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35% (HR = 33.590) was associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: Despite high rates of idiopathic ventricular tachyarrhythmias, CAD and AMI are common causes of VTA and CPR in adults 45 years old and younger. Young adults and adults had comparable survival at index hospitalization and after 2.5 years irrespective of the type of VTA. Clinical trial registration clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02982473.

Digitalis therapy in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Objective. The study sought to assess the prognostic value of treatment with digitalis on long-term prognosis in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias and atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or heart failure (HF). Background. Data regarding the outcome of digitalis therapy following ventricular tachyarrhythmias is limited. Methods. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. Patients treated with digitalis were compared to patients without. The primary prognostic endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years, secondary endpoints comprised a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e. recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies, sudden cardiac death) and cardiac rehospitalization. Kaplan Mayer survival curves, multivariable cox regression, and time trend analyses were applied for statistics. Results. Eight hundred and thirty-one patients were included (20% treated with digitalis and 80% without). At 3 years, digitalis treatment was not associated with all-cause mortality following ventricular tachyarrhythmias (24 vs. 21%, log-rank p = .736; HR = 1.063; 95% CI 0.746-1.515; p = .736). However, digitalis therapy was associated with an increased risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint (38 vs. 23%; log-rank p = .001; HR = 1.719; 95% CI 1.279-2.311; p = .001) and cardiac rehospitalization (31 vs. 18%; log-rank p = .001; HR = 1.829; 95% CI 1.318-2.538; p = .001), which was still evident within multivariable Cox regression analyses. Finally, digitoxin may be associated with a worse prognosis than digoxin. Conclusion. Digitalis therapy was not associated with mortality in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, but with increased risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint and cardiac rehospitalization at 3 years.

Prognostic value of beta-blocker doses in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

The study investigates the prognostic significance of beta-blocker (BB) dose in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Limited data regarding the prognostic impact of BB dose in ventricular tachyarrhythmias is available. A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients on BB treatment with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2015. Discharge BB doses were grouped as > 0-12.5%, > 12.5-25%, > 25-50%, and > 50% according to doses used in randomized trials. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at three years. Secondary endpoints comprised of a composite arrhythmic endpoint (i.e., recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies) and cardiac rehospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied for statistics. A total of 1313 patients with BB were included; most patients were discharged with > 25-50% of BB target dose (59%). At three years, > 12.5-25% of BB target dose was associated with improved long-term mortality as compared to the > 0-12.5% group (HR = 0.489; 95% CI 0.297-0.806; p = 0.005), whereas higher BB doses did not improve survival (> 25-50%: HR = 0.849; p = 0.434; > 50%: HR = 0.735; p = 0.285). In contrast, the composite endpoint and risk of rehospitalization were not affected by BB target dose. In conclusion, > 12.5-25% of BB target dose is associated with best long-term survival among patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In contrast, risk of the composite arrhythmic endpoint and risk of cardiac rehospitalization were not affected by BB dose.

Clinical outcome of out-of-hospital vs. in-hospital cardiac arrest survivors presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Limited data regarding the prognostic impact of ventricular tachyarrhythmias related to out-of-hospital (OHCA) compared to in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is available. A large retrospective single-center observational registry with all patients admitted due to ventricular tachyarrhythmias was used including all consecutive patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) and fibrillation (VF) on admission from 2002 to 2016. Survivors discharged after OHCA were compared to those after IHCA using multivariable Cox regression models and propensity-score matching for evaluation of the primary endpoint of long-term all-cause mortality at 2.5 years. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality at 6 months and cardiac rehospitalization at 2.5 years. From 2.422 consecutive patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, a total of 524 patients survived cardiac arrest and were discharged from hospital (OHCA 62%; IHCA 38%). In about 50% of all cases, acute myocardial infarction was the underlying disease leading to ventricular tachyarrhythmias with consecutive aborted cardiac arrest. Survivors of IHCA were associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality compared to OHCA even after multivariable adjustment (28% vs. 16%; log rank p = 0.001; HR 1.623; 95% CI 1.002-2.629; p = 0.049) and after propensity-score matching (28% vs. 19%; log rank p = 0.045). Rates of cardiac rehospitalization rates at 2.5 years were equally distributed between OHCA and IHCA survivors. In patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, survivors of IHCA were associated with increased risk for all-cause mortality at 2.5 years compared to OHCA survivors.

Effect of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists on the Prognosis of Patients with Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias.

INTRODUCTION: The study sought to assess the effect of treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) on long-term prognosis of patients with systolic heart failure (HF) surviving index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive HF patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <45% and index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2015. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years and secondary endpoints were rehospitalization, as well as the composite endpoint consisting of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, sudden cardiac death and appropriate implantabe cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies at 3 years. RESULTS: 748 patients were included, 20% treated with MRA and 80% without. At 3 years, treatment with MRA was not associated with improved all-cause mortality (22% vs. 24%, log-rank p = 0.968; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.008; 95% CI 0.690-1.472; p = 0.968). Accordingly, risk of the composite endpoint (28% vs. 27%; HR = 1.131; 95% CI 0.806-1.589; p = 0.476) and first cardiac rehospitalization (24% vs. 22%; HR = 1.139; 95% CI 0.788-1.648; p = 0.489) were not affected by treatment with MRA. CONCLUSION: In patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias, treatment with MRA was not associated with improved all-cause mortality at 3 years. The therapeutic effect of MRA treatment in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias needs to be reinvestigated within further randomized controlled trials.

No impact of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on long-term recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of treatment with mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients with systolic heart failure (HF). BACKGROUND: Data regarding the outcome of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with MRA is limited. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive ICD recipients with systolic HF (i.e., left ventricular ejection fraction < 45%) and index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2016. Patients treated with MRA were compared to patients without (non-MRA). Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were applied for the evaluation of the primary endpoint defined as first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at five years. Secondary endpoints were appropriate ICD therapies, first cardiac rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: 366 ICD recipients with systolic HF were included, 20% treated with MRA (spironolactone: 65%; eplerenone: 35%) and 80% without. At five years, treatment with MRA was not associated with the primary endpoint of first recurrence of ventricular tachyarrhythmias [47% vs. 48%, log-rank p = 0.732; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.067; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.736-1.546; p = 0.732]. Accordingly, risk of first appropriate ICD therapies, first cardiac rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality were not affected by the presence of MRA therapy. Finally, patients with spironolactone and eplerenone had comparable risk of first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias (50% vs. 45%; p = 0.255; HR = 2.263; 95% CI 0.495-10.341; p = 0.292). CONCLUSION: Treatment with MRA was not associated with recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias and ICD therapies at five years.

Electrical storm reveals worse prognosis compared to myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients.

Both acute myocardial infarction complicated by ventricular tachyarrhythmias (AMI-VTA) and electrical storm (ES) represent life-threatening clinical conditions. However, a direct comparison of both sub-groups regarding prognostic endpoints has never been investigated. All consecutive implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) recipients were included retrospectively from 2002 to 2016. Patients with ES apart from AMI (ES) were compared to patients with AMI accompanied by ventricular tachyarrhythmias (AMI-VTA). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 3 years, secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, rehospitalization rates and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) at 3 years. A total of 198 consecutive ICD recipients were included (AMI-VTA: 56%; ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI): 22%; non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) 78%; ES: 44%). ES patients were older and had higher rates of severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 35%. ES was associated with increased all-cause mortality at 3 years (37% vs. 19%; p = 0.001; hazard ratio [HR] = 2.242; 95% CI 2.291-3.894; p = 0.004) and with increased risk of first cardiac rehospitalization (44% vs. 12%; p = 0.001; HR = 4.694; 95% CI 2.498-8.823; p = 0.001). This worse prognosis of ES compared to AMI-VTA was still evident after multivariable adjustment (long-term all-cause mortality: HR = 2.504; 95% CI 1.093-5.739; p = 0.030; first cardiac rehospitalization: HR = 2.887; 95% CI 1.240-6.720; p = 0.014). In contrast, the rates of MACE (40% vs. 32%; p = 0.326) were comparable in both groups. At long-term follow-up of 3 years, ES was associated with higher rates of all-cause mortality and rehospitalization compared to patients with AMI-VTA.

Impact of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction on Recurrent Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Recipients of Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates the impact of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in recipients of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). BACKGROUND: Data regarding recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in ICD recipients according to LVEF is limited. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used, including all consecutive ICD recipients with episodes of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) from 2002 to 2016. Patients with LVEF <35% were compared to patients with LVEF ≥35%. The primary end point was first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at 5 years. Secondary end points were ICD-related therapies, rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality at 5 years. Cox regression, Kaplan Meier, and propensity score matching analyses were applied. RESULTS: A total of 528 consecutive ICD recipients were included (51% with LVEF ≥35% and 49% with LVEF <35%). LVEF <35% was associated with reduced freedom from recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (40 vs. 49%, log rank p = 0.014; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.381; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.066-1.788; p = 0.034), mainly attributed to recurrent sustained VT in primary preventive ICD recipients. Accordingly, LVEF <35% was associated with reduced freedom from first appropriate ICD therapies (28 vs. 41%, log rank p = 0.001; HR = 1.810; 95% CI 1.185-2.766; p = 0.001). Finally, LVEF <35% was associated with a higher rate of rehospitalization (23 vs. 34%; p = 0.005) and all-cause mortality at 5 years (13 vs. 29%; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: LVEF <35% was associated with reduced freedom from recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, appropriate device therapies, rehospitalization and all-cause mortality secondary to index ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Hypokalemia but not Hyperkalemia is Associated with Recurrences of Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in ICD Recipients.

BACKGROUND: Only few data evaluating the prognostic impact of blood-derived potassium levels (K) on arrhythmic endpoints in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) is available. Therefore, this study evaluates the prognostic impact of potassium levels on recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in consecutive ICD recipients. METHODS: A large retrospective registry was used including all consecutive patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission from 2002 to 2016 at one institution. Patients were divided into three subgroups: hypokalemia (i.e., K < 3.3 mmol/L), normokalemia (i.e., K 3.3 - 4.5 mmol/L), and hyperkalemia (i.e., K > 4.5 mmol/L). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were applied for the evaluation of the primary endpoint of first recurrences of ventricular tachyarrhythmias at one year. Secondary endpoints comprised of first appropriate ICD therapy, first cardiac rehospitalization, and all-cause mortality at one year. RESULTS: Five hundred and thirty ICD recipients with a median potassium level of 4.23 mmol/L were included (67%: normokalemia, 27%: hyperkalemia, and 6%: hypokalemia). Whereas hyperkalemia was not associated with increasing risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias, hypokalemia was associated with decreasing freedom from recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias (HR = 2.135; 95% CI 1.158 - 3.937; p = 0.015), even after mul-tivariable adjustment (HR = 2.577; 95% CI 1.236 - 5.372; p = 0.012). Higher risk of recurrences was especially attributed to higher rates of electrical storm in the presence of hypokalemia (15% vs. 3 - 4%). Negative impact of hypokalemia was mainly attributed to secondary preventive ICD (HR = 2.637; 95% CI 1.325 - 5.248; p = 0.006). Moreover, hypokalemia was associated with increasing risk of appropriate ICD therapies (HR = 1.920; 95% CI 0.912 - 4.042; statistical trend: p = 0.086), which was still demonstrated after multivariable adjustment. In contrast, risk of first cardiac rehospitalization and all-cause mortality were not affected by potassium levels. CONCLUSIONS: In consecutive ICD recipients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias at index, hypokalemia - but not hyperkalemia - was associated with increasing risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias and appropriate ICD therapies.