Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 131
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Intern Med ; 177(5_Supplement): S47-S56, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621240

RESUMEN

This article highlights a selection of important nephrology studies published in 2023 that have relevance for nonnephrologist physicians. Four studies examined progression of chronic kidney disease or cardiovascular disease with respect to finerenone use, magnesium supplementation, iron markers, and COVID-19. Two studies examined treatments to improve specific aspects of chronic kidney disease management, including daprodustat to address anemia and patiromer to address hyperphosphatemia. One study showed that acetazolamide added to loop diuretics increased diuresis in acute decompensated heart failure across a wide range of renal function. Another study found that once-daily hydrochlorothiazide did not prevent kidney stone recurrence. Finally, an antibiotic stewardship intervention safely reduced antibiotic prescribing for suspected urinary tract infection in frail older adults.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Nefrología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control
2.
Ren Fail ; 46(2): 2350767, 2024 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39091090

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Screening for depression can be challenging among hemodialysis patients due to the overlap of depressive symptoms with dialysis or kidney disease related symptoms. The aim of this study was to understand these overlapping symptoms and develop a depression screening tool for better clinical assessment of depressive symptoms in dialysis patients. METHODS: We surveyed 1,085 dialysis patients between March 1, 2018 and February 28, 2023 at 15 dialysis facilities in Northeast Ohio with the 9-item patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9) and kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. To evaluate overlap across questionnaire items, we used structural equation modeling (SEM). We predicted and transformed factor scores to create a hemodialysis-adjusted PHQ-9 (hdPHQ-9). In exploratory analysis (N = 173), we evaluated the performance of the hdPHQ-9 relative to the PHQ-9 that also received a Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. RESULTS: Our study sample included a high percentage of Black patients (74.6%) and 157 (14.5%) survey participants screened positive for depression (PHQ-9 ≥ 10). The magnitude of overlap was small for (respectively, PHQ-9 item with KDQOLTM item) fatigue with washed out, guilt with burden on family, appetite with nausea and movement with lightheaded. The hdPHQ-9 showed reasonably high sensitivity (0.81 with 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.58, 0.95) and specificity (0.84 with 95% CI 0.77, 0.89); however, this was not a significant improvement from the PHQ-9. CONCLUSION: There is little overlap between depressive symptoms and dialysis or kidney disease symptoms. The PHQ-9 was found to be an appropriate depression screening instrument for dialysis patients.


Asunto(s)
Depresión , Calidad de Vida , Diálisis Renal , Humanos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/psicología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Depresión/etiología , Depresión/diagnóstico , Anciano , Ohio/epidemiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Fallo Renal Crónico/psicología , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos
3.
J Gen Intern Med ; 38(6): 1393-1401, 2023 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36163530

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Community members may provide useful perspectives on manuscripts submitted to medical journals. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of community members reviewing medical journal manuscripts. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial involving 578 original research manuscripts submitted to two medical journals from June 2018 to November 2021. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-eight community members who were trained, supervised, and compensated. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 289 randomly selected control manuscripts were reviewed by scientific reviewers only. And 289 randomly selected intervention manuscripts were reviewed by scientific reviewers and one community member. Journal editorial teams used all reviews to make decisions about acceptance, revision, or rejection of manuscripts. MAIN MEASURES: Usefulness of reviews to editors, content of community reviews, and changes made to published articles in response to community reviewer comments. KEY RESULTS: Editor ratings of community and scientific reviews averaged 3.1 and 3.3, respectively (difference 0.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1 to 0.3), on a 5-point scale where a higher score indicates a more useful review. Qualitative analysis of the content of community reviews identified two taxonomies of themes: study attributes and viewpoints. Study attributes are the sections, topics, and components of manuscripts commented on by reviewers. Viewpoints are reviewer perceptions and perspectives on the research described in manuscripts and consisted of four major themes: (1) diversity of study participants, (2) relevance to patients and communities, (3) cultural considerations and social context, and (4) implementation of research by patients and communities. A total of 186 community reviewer comments were integrated into 64 published intervention group articles. Viewpoint themes were present more often in 66 published intervention articles compared to 54 published control articles (2.8 vs. 1.7 themes/article, difference 1.1, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.8). CONCLUSIONS: With training, supervision, and compensation, community members are able to review manuscripts submitted to medical journals. Their comments are useful to editors, address topics relevant to patients and communities, and are reflected in published articles. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03432143.

4.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 33(9): 1790-1795, 2022 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35654600

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Greenhouse gas emissions from hemodialysis treatment in the United States have not been quantified. In addition, no previous studies have examined how much emissions vary across facilities, treatments, and emission contributors. METHODS: To estimate the magnitude and sources of variation in the carbon footprint of hemodialysis treatment, we estimated life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions in carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2-eq) associated with 209,481 hemodialysis treatments in 2020 at 15 Ohio hemodialysis facilities belonging to the same organization. We considered emissions from electricity, natural gas, water, and supply use; patient and staff travel distance; and biohazard and landfill waste. RESULTS: Annual emissions per facility averaged 769,374 kg CO2-eq (95% CI, 709,388 to 848,180 kg CO2-eq). The three largest contributors to total emissions were patient and staff transportation (28.3%), electricity (27.4%), and natural gas (15.2%). Emissions per treatment were 58.9 kg CO2-eq, with a three-fold variation across facilities. The contributors with the largest variation in emissions per treatment were transportation, natural gas, and water (coefficients of variation, 62.5%, 42.4%, and 37.7%, respectively). The annual emissions per hemodialysis facility are equivalent to emissions from the annual energy use in 93 homes; emissions per treatment are equivalent to driving an average automobile for 238 km (149 miles). CONCLUSIONS: Similar medical treatments provided in a single geographic region by facilities that are part of the same organization may be expected to have small variations in the determinants of greenhouse gas emissions. However, we found substantial variation in carbon footprints across facilities, treatments, and emission contributors. Understanding the magnitude and variation in greenhouse gas emissions may help identify measures to reduce the environmental effect of hemodialysis treatment.


Asunto(s)
Huella de Carbono , Gases de Efecto Invernadero , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Dióxido de Carbono , Gas Natural , Diálisis Renal
5.
J Ren Nutr ; 32(1): 112-119, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34465503

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study described the job responsibilities and modalities of care among dialysis dietitians in the United States and their observations regarding the nutrition needs of their patients, during the COVID-19 pandemic. DESIGN AND METHODS: Cross-sectional online survey captures dietitian characteristics and responsibilities, dialysis facility characteristics, and patient needs. We recruited US dialysis dietitians. We used chi-square tests to compare respondent stress and facility-level policies regarding eating/drinking and oral nutrition supplements based on facility ownership type. RESULTS: We received 191 complete or partial survey responses. Sixty-three percent of respondents stated that their center banned eating/drinking during dialysis due to COVID-19 masking policies. DaVita and non-profit facilities were significantly more likely to still allow eating/drinking during dialysis (31% and 29%, respectively) compared to Fresenius facilities (7%). A common theme in open-ended responses regarding nutrition care for COVID-19-positive patients was providing less care to these patients. A majority of respondents admitted to stress from working in healthcare during COVID-19. The majority of respondents indicated that patients were taking precautions such as having a family member or friend grocery shop for them (69%) or going to the store less often (60%). Just over a quarter of respondents indicated that affordability of food was a concern among patients. Seventy-two percent reported that patients were cooking at home more often, 60% had observed an increase in serum phosphorus, and 72% an increase in interdialytic weight gain. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the increased risk of malnutrition and symptoms that can affect dietary intake in COVID-positive patients, and the economic conditions leading to increased rates of food insecurity, dietitians must be proactive in preventing and/or treating malnutrition through adequate protein and energy intake. Eating/drinking bans should not become permanent and dialysis centers should take precautions to allow intradialytic meals and oral nutrition supplement protocols to continue during the pandemic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Nutricionistas , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Pandemias , Diálisis Renal , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
6.
J Community Health ; 46(1): 1-12, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32170531

RESUMEN

Living in a low-income neighborhood with low access to healthy food retailers is associated with increased risk for chronic disease. The U.S. Healthy Food Financing Initiative (HFFI) provides resources to support the development of infrastructure to improve neighborhood food environments. This natural experiment examined a HFFI funded food hub that was designed to be implemented by a community development corporation in an urban neighborhood in Cleveland, Ohio. It was intended to increase access to affordable, local, and healthy foods; establish programs to increase social connections and support for healthy eating; and create job opportunities for residents. We used a quasi-experimental, longitudinal design to externally evaluate food hub implementation and its impact on changes to the built and social environment and dietary patterns among residents living in the intervention neighborhood (n = 179) versus those in a comparison (n = 150) neighborhood. Overall, many of the food hub components were not implemented fully, and dose and reach of the executed food hub components was low. There were statistically significant improvements in observed availability of healthy foods in the intervention neighborhood versus the comparison neighborhood. There were no changes over time in diet quality scores, total caloric intake, or fruit and vegetable intake in the intervention neighborhood. In conclusion, low dose implementation of a food hub led to small improvements in availability of healthy foods but not in dietary patterns. Findings highlight challenges to implementing a food hub in neighborhoods with low access to healthy food retailers.


Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable/estadística & datos numéricos , Dieta/estadística & datos numéricos , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Características de la Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta Alimentaria , Frutas , Humanos , Ohio , Pobreza/estadística & datos numéricos , Medio Social , Verduras
7.
Int J Psychiatry Med ; 56(1): 3-13, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32216496

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The antidepressant medication fluoxetine at 90 mg dosed weekly is as effective and safe as standard formulation fluoxetine 20 mg dosed daily in patients with major depressive disorder. Weekly fluoxetine has not been well studied in hemodialysis patients, and doses beyond 90 mg/week have not been described in this population. This case series, derived from a larger study on depression in hemodialysis patients, describes the use of weekly fluoxetine at dosages beyond 90 mg/week. METHOD: Hemodialysis patients with depressive symptom severity scored ≥10 on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire and major depressive disorder confirmed with Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview were initially prescribed daily fluoxetine for two weeks and then transitioned to weekly fluoxetine. Dosage titration was made at the discretion of the prescribing clinician. Fluoxetine was continued for a total of 12 weeks. RESULTS: Four women, aged 24 to 65 years, on hemodialysis for 1 to 18 years, were started on weekly fluoxetine that was increased over several weeks up to 180 mg. Side effects included restlessness, dry mouth, sedation, and lightheadedness. Two patients ultimately had their weekly fluoxetine decreased back to 90 mg. However, all four continued weekly fluoxetine as part of poststudy aftercare and no longer met diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder, current episode. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly fluoxetine at doses of 180 mg may be a reasonable treatment consideration for hemodialysis patients who have partial or insufficient antidepressant response. Side effects may limit tolerance of the 180 mg dose in some individuals. Future research should investigate longer term health outcomes of weekly fluoxetine in this population.


Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Fluoxetina , Antidepresivos/uso terapéutico , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Fluoxetina/efectos adversos , Humanos , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Diálisis Renal , Inhibidores Selectivos de la Recaptación de Serotonina/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc ; 27(2): 148-155, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052677

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study examined interview data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey from 2005 to 2016. AIM: To determine national trends in self-reported depressive symptoms. METHOD: Depressive symptoms were assessed using self-reported data on the nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), with a total score ≥10 and an individual item score of 2 or 3, indicating greater severity. RESULTS: A total of 31,191 individuals contributed PHQ-9 data from 2005 to 2016. The absolute proportion of individuals with total PHQ-9 score ≥10 increased from 6.2% to 8.1%. After adjustment for participant demographic characteristics and comorbid conditions, the odds ratio for high PHQ-9 score at the end versus the beginning of the study interval was 1.27 (95% confidence interval [CI: 1.07, 1.50]). Anhedonia, guilt/worthlessness, appetite, and hypoactivity/hyperactivity had the largest increases in individual item risk after adjusting for demographic and comorbid characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: There were sizeable increases in the prevalence of self-reported depressive symptoms in the United States over an 11-year period. Further work is needed to understand the reasons for and implications of this increase. However, the results suggest greater efforts should be made by health care providers to screen for depressive symptoms that may warrant further assessment, treatment, or referral to mental health services as needed.


Asunto(s)
Depresión , Adulto , Depresión/epidemiología , Humanos , Encuestas Nutricionales , Prevalencia , Autoinforme , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
9.
Am J Nephrol ; 50(3): 161-167, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31311008

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Failure of a previously transplanted kidney is a common cause of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and represents 5% of incident dialysis patients in the United States. Patients with native kidney failure ESRD (Nat-ESRD) who receive predialysis care from a nephrologist have better outcomes in the first 12 months on dialysis than those who don't. Because many patients with a failed kidney transplant ESRD (Tx-ESRD) receive care from nephrologists, they would also be expected to have good dialysis outcomes. We sought to compare the quality metrics of Tx-ESRD patients and Nat-ESRD patients during the first 12 months of hemodialysis. METHODS: We used data from the United States Renal Data System to identify hemodialysis patients who began treatment between May 2012 and December 2013 and who received nephrology care prior to starting hemodialysis. Quality metrics by quarter for the first 12 months of treatment were dichotomized according to practice guidelines to determine the percentage of patients in each quarter who met quality of care goals. RESULTS: Compared to Nat-ESRD (n = 96,063) patients, Tx-ESRD (n = 5,528) patients had 10-19% lower rates of at goal hemoglobin levels, 6-12% lower rates of at goal serum phosphorus, and 3-11% lower rates of at goal albumin levels. Compared to Nat-ESRD patients, -Tx-ESRD patients had a 6% higher rate of fistula use in the first quarter but a 3-7% lower rate in subsequent quarters. CONCLUSIONS: Tx-ESRD patients have worse quality metrics related to anemia, phosphorus, albumin, and vascular access compared to Nat-ESRD patients. Nephrology care for patients with Tx-ESRD should be improved to address these quality metrics gaps.


Asunto(s)
Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal/normas , Anciano , Femenino , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Fósforo/metabolismo , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Riesgo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
10.
Clin Transplant ; 33(4): e13506, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30793375

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of video interventions to increase organ donation willingness remains unclear. METHODS: Three-arm web-based randomized controlled trial involving 2261 students at 3 northeastern Ohio universities. Intervention students watched a live-action (n = 755) or animated (n = 753) donation video. Control students (n = 753) viewed wellness information from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The primary outcome was proportion of students who visited their state electronic donor registry to consent. The secondary outcome was intervention quality. Logistic regression assessed the effects of interventions on visiting the state registry to provide donation consent while controlling for baseline variables. RESULTS: Students in the live-action video arm visited their state registry more frequently than students in the CDC arm (OR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.20-2.88). There was no difference between students in the animated video and CDC arms (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.69-1.76). The quality of the live-action video was rated lower than the animated video and the CDC text (75% ± 18, 84% ± 16, 80% ± 16, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Students who watched the live-action video were more willing to visit their electronic donor registry to register as organ donors, but rated it lower in satisfaction. Future work should identify the most potent components of organ donation interventions.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudiantes/psicología , Donantes de Tejidos/psicología , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Grabación en Video/métodos , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Trasplante de Órganos , Sistema de Registros , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Universidades , Adulto Joven
11.
J Ren Nutr ; 29(5): 416-427, 2019 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30683606

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify how dialysis dietitians spend their time and whether the activities that were most frequent varied based on the ratio of patient to full-time equivalent (FTE) dietitian. METHODS: This study is a cross-sectional, observational, time-and-motion study carried out using the Work Activity Measurement by Activity Timing software/method for time recording. This study was carried out in 14 dialysis centers in and around Cleveland, Ohio. Fourteen registered dietitian nutritionists participated in this study. The mean time/experience of these nutritionists in dietetics was 26.6 ± 8.5 years. Percent of time in direct care (e.g., patient interaction) versus indirect care (e.g., documentation and plans of care, professional communication) versus other responsibilities (e.g., administrative work, education of self or others). RESULTS: The mean number of tasks recorded per 3-hour observation session was 38.3 ± 14.0, including 18.5 ± 7.7 indirect care tasks, 7.7 ± 6.2 direct care tasks, and 9.7 ± 5.4 other tasks. The mean number of unique patients seen per observation session was 6.9 ± 5.4; the mean direct care time per patient encounter was 6.95 ± 4.05 minutes. Indirect care took the highest proportion of observed time, 56.0 ± 22.2%, followed by direct care, 24.9 ± 18.8%. Increasing the ratio of patient to FTE had a moderate negative correlation with the percent of time spent in direct patient care (r = -0.35, P = .21), but there was no relationship between the ratio of patient to FTE and direct care time per patient (r = 0.02, P = .94). CONCLUSION: About 25% of dietitians' time was available for direct patient care. This is much less than that reported in previous studies and may not be sufficient to improve the nutritional status. Limitations of our study include a small sample size from a single region. Further work is needed to understand the balance of responsibilities among renal dietitians and their impact on patient outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Nutricionistas/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Diálisis Renal , Administración del Tiempo , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Nutricionistas/organización & administración , Ohio , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudios de Tiempo y Movimiento
12.
Nephrol Nurs J ; 46(5): 497-508, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31566345

RESUMEN

Fatigue is a subjective overwhelming feeling of tiredness at rest, exhaustion with activity, lack of energy that impedes daily tasks, lack of endurance, or a loss of vigor. Individuals with end stage renal disease (ESRD) experience a high rate and severity of fatigue. Symptom management of fatigue in this population is critical, since fatigue has been linked with lower quality of life and higher mortality rates. In this article, we present a definition and overview of fatigue, a review of factors contributing to fatigue, and ways to manage fatigue in individuals with ESRD.


Asunto(s)
Fatiga/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/complicaciones , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/enfermería , Factores de Riesgo
14.
J Ren Nutr ; 28(5): 309-316, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29615306

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patient to staff ratios vary based on facility characteristics, and therefore have been proposed as an explanatory factor for the variation in dialysis facility outcomes. This analysis tested that hypothesis. DESIGN AND METHODS: Observational study using Dialysis Facility Report data. Reported staff numbers from the Annual Facility Survey were converted to full time equivalents (FTE). Subsequently, ratios were created for patients per FTE registered dietitian (RD), social worker, nurse, and patient care technician. Bivariate associations and structural equation modeling (SEM) were used to explore relationships between these ratios and patient outcomes: standardized mortality ratio and standardized hospitalization rate, when also considering the impact of non-modifiable facility characteristics (region, chain, profit status). Our focus was on RD staffing; therefore we also included serum phosphorus and normalized protein catabolic ratio in the model, and also conducted a sub-analysis of the 198 facilities that exceeded the KDOQI maximum of 150 patients:FTE RD. SUBJECTS: Dialysis centers in the US with at least 30 adult patients and no pediatric patients. 4035 facilities had complete data for the proposed variables. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Standardized mortality ratio and standardized hospitalization rate were the primary outcomes. RESULTS: The mean and standard deviation for patients per FTE staff were 90.0 ± 34.0, 88.7 ± 32.8, 17.1 ± 20.5 and 11.9 ± 7.0 for RDs, social workers, nurses, and technicians, respectively. Facility characteristics impacted staffing in bivariate analyses and SEM. The only significant paths from staffing ratio to outcomes were for patient:FTE social worker to SMR (standardized beta = -0.09, 95% CI -0.13, -0.04) and Patients:FTE RD to SHR Days (standardized beta = 0.04, 95% CI 0.001, 0.09). In the sub-analysis, there were no significant paths from staffing to outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not provide evidence that patient per staff ratios explain variation in dialysis facility outcomes. While there are some important bivariate relationships, these disappear in more complex models. Future research should investigate the impacts of staffing ratios on individual patients, to overcome the possible ecological fallacy.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
16.
J Ren Nutr ; 27(3): 183-186, 2017 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28283254

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Hemodialysis patients' ability to access food that is both compatible with a renal diet and affordable is affected by the local food environment. Comparisons of the availability and cost of food items suitable for the renal diet versus a typical unrestricted diet were completed using the standard Nutrition Environment Measures Survey and a renal diet-modified Nutrition Environment Measures Survey. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Twelve grocery stores in Northeast Ohio. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Availability and cost of food items in 12 categories. RESULTS: The mean total number of food items available differed significantly (P ≤ .001) between the unrestricted diet (38.9 ± 4.5) and renal diet (32.2 ± 4.7). The mean total cost per serving did not differ significantly (P = 0.48) between the unrestricted diet ($5.67 ± 2.50) and renal diet ($5.76 ± 2.74). CONCLUSION: The availability of renal diet food items is significantly less than that of unrestricted diet food items, but there is no difference in the cost of items that are available in grocery stores. Further work is needed to determine how to improve the food environment for patients with chronic diseases.


Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo , Dieta/economía , Abastecimiento de Alimentos/economía , Enfermedades Renales/dietoterapia , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Política Nutricional , Encuestas Nutricionales , Ohio , Diálisis Renal
17.
Child Welfare ; 95(5): 79-95, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30147115

RESUMEN

This descriptive study examines the prevalence of comorbid physical and mental health issues among young clients at a large mental health agency. Health status data was collected from the intake process of youth seeking mental health services at a Northeast Ohio agency (n = 1,076). The results show a higher prevalence of asthma and obesity among clients with known mental health diagnoses at this agency compared to national averages. The results could help the agency develop strategies for implementation of an integrated care model to better meet the complex needs of the clients served.

18.
J Gen Intern Med ; 31(8): 832-9, 2016 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26921161

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Low organ donation rates remain a major barrier to organ transplantation. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine the effect of a video and patient cueing on organ donation consent among patients meeting with their primary care provider. DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial between February 2013 and May 2014. SETTING: The waiting rooms of 18 primary care clinics of a medical system in Cuyahoga County, Ohio. PATIENTS: The study included 915 patients over 15.5 years of age who had not previously consented to organ donation. INTERVENTIONS: Just prior to their clinical encounter, intervention patients (n = 456) watched a 5-minute organ donation video on iPads and then choose a question regarding organ donation to ask their provider. Control patients (n = 459) visited their provider per usual routine. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who consented for organ donation. Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients who discussed organ donation with their provider and the proportion who were satisfied with the time spent with their provider during the clinical encounter. KEY RESULTS: Intervention patients were more likely than control patients to consent to donate organs (22 % vs. 15 %, OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.10-2.13). Intervention patients were also more likely to have donation discussions with their provider (77 % vs. 18 %, OR 15.1, 95%CI 11.1-20.6). Intervention and control patients were similarly satisfied with the time they spent with their provider (83 % vs. 86 %, OR 0.87, 95%CI 0.61-1.25). LIMITATION: How the observed increases in organ donation consent might translate into a greater organ supply is unclear. CONCLUSION: Watching a brief video regarding organ donation and being cued to ask a primary care provider a question about donation resulted in more organ donation discussions and an increase in organ donation consent. Satisfaction with the time spent during the clinical encounter was not affected. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01697137.


Asunto(s)
Consentimiento Informado/psicología , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Grabación en Video/métodos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA