Lessons Learned from Translating Genome Sequencing to Clinical Routine: Understanding the Accuracy of a Diagnostic Pipeline.

The potential of genome sequencing (GS), which allows detection of almost all types of genetic variation across nearly the entire genome of an individual, greatly expands the possibility for diagnosing genetic disorders. The opportunities provided with this single test are enticing to researchers and clinicians worldwide for human genetic research as well as clinical application. Multiple studies have highlighted the advantages of GS for genetic variant discovery, emphasizing its added value for routine clinical use. We have implemented GS as first-line genetic testing for patients with rare diseases. Here, we report on our experiences in establishing GS as a reliable diagnostic method for almost all types of genetic disorders, from validating diagnostic accuracy of sequencing pipelines to clinical implementation in routine practice.

Germline findings in patients with advanced malignancies screened with paired blood-tumour testing for personalised treatment approaches.

BACKGROUND: Sequencing of tumour tissue with comprehensive gene panels is increasingly used to guide treatment in precision oncology. Analysis of tumour-normal pairs allows in contrast to tumour-only assessment direct discrimination between somatic and germline alterations, which might have important implications not only for the patients but also their families. METHODS: We performed tumour normal sequencing with a large gene panel in 1048 patients with advanced cancer to support treatment decision. Sequencing results were correlated with clinical and family data. RESULTS: We identified 156 likely pathogenic or pathogenic (LP/P) germline variants in cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) in 144 cases (13.7%). Of all patients, 8.8% had a LP/P variant in autosomal-dominant cancer predisposition genes (AD-CPGs), most of them being genes with high or moderate penetrance (ATM, BRCA2, CHEK2 and BRCA1). In 48 cases, the P/LP variant matched the expected tumour spectrum. A second variant in tumour tissue was found in 31 patients with AD-CPG variants. Low frequency mutations in either TP53, ATM or DNMT3A in the normal sample indicated clonal haematopoiesis in five cases. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour-normal testing for personalised treatment identifies germline LP/P variants in a relevant proportion of patients with cancer. The majority of them would not have been referred to genetic counselling based on family history. Indirect functional readouts of tumour-normal sequencing can provide novel links between CPGs and unexpected cancers. The interpretation of increasingly complex datasets in precision oncology is challenging and concepts of interdisciplinary personalised cancer prevention are needed to support patients and their families.

UV-radiation and MC1R germline mutations are risk factors for the development of conventional and spitzoid melanomas in children and adolescents.

BACKGROUND: Genomic characterisation has led to an improved understanding of adult melanoma. However, the aetiology of melanoma in children is still unclear and identifying the correct diagnosis and therapeutic strategies remains challenging. METHODS: Exome sequencing of matched tumour-normal pairs from 26 paediatric patients was performed to study the mutational spectrum of melanomas. The cohort was grouped into different categories: spitzoid melanoma (SM), conventional melanoma (CM), and other melanomas (OT). FINDINGS: In all patients with CM (n = 10) germline variants associated with melanoma were found in low to moderate melanoma risk genes: in 8 patients MC1R variants, in 2 patients variants in MITF, PTEN and BRCA2. Somatic BRAF mutations were detected in 60% of CMs, homozygous deletions of CDKN2A in 20%, TERTp mutations in 30%. In the SM group (n = 12), 5 patients carried at least one MC1R variant; somatic BRAF mutations were detected in 8.3%, fusions in 25% of the cases. No SM showed a homozygous CDKN2A deletion nor a TERTp mutation. In 81.8% of the CM/SM cases the UV damage signatures SBS7 and/or DBS1 were detected. The patient with melanoma arising in giant congenital nevus (CNM) demonstrated the characteristic NRAS Q61K mutation. INTERPRETATION: UV-radiation and MC1R germline variants are risk factors in the development of conventional and spitzoid paediatric melanomas. Paediatric CMs share genomic similarities with adult CMs while the SMs differ genetically from the CM group. Consistent genetic characterization of all paediatric melanomas will potentially lead to better subtype differentiation, treatment, and prevention in the future. FUNDING: Found in Acknowledgement.