RESUMEN
It is unknown if solid organ transplant recipients are at higher risk for severe COVID-19. The management of a lung transplantation (LTx) program and the therapeutic strategies to adapt the immunosuppressive regimen and antiviral measures is a major issue in the COVID-19 era, but little is known about worldwide practice. We sent out to 180 LTx centers worldwide in June 2020 a survey with 63 questions, both regarding the management of a LTx program in the COVID-19 era and the therapeutic strategies to treat COVID-19 LTx recipients. We received a total of 78 responses from 15 countries. Among participants, 81% declared a reduction of the activity and 47% restricted LTx for urgent cases only. Sixteen centers observed deaths on waiting listed patients and eight centers performed LTx for COVID-19 disease. In 62% of the centers, COVID-19 was diagnosed in LTx recipients, most of them not severe cases. The most common immunosuppressive management included a decreased dose or pausing of the cell cycle inhibitors. Remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, and azithromycin were the most proposed antiviral strategies. Most of the centers have been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic and proposed an active therapeutic strategy to treat LTx recipients with COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Trasplante de Pulmón , Pandemias , COVID-19/terapia , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Factores de Riesgo , Receptores de Trasplantes , Listas de EsperaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that COVID-19-associated severe respiratory failure (CARDS) might differ from usual acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to failing autoregulation of pulmonary vessels and higher shunt. We sought to investigate pulmonary hemodynamics and ventilation properties in patients with CARDS compared to patients with ARDS of pulmonary origin. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive adults with laboratory-confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 patients treated in our ICU in 04/2020 and a comparison of the data to matched controls with ARDS due to respiratory infections treated in our ICU from 01/2014 to 08/2019 for whom pulmonary artery catheter data were available. RESULTS: CARDS patients (n = 10) had ventilation characteristics similar to those of ARDS (n = 10) patients. Nevertheless, mechanical power applied by ventilation was significantly higher in CARDS patients (23.4 ± 8.9 J/min) than in ARDS (15.9 ± 4.3 J/min; P < 0.05). COVID-19 patients had similar pulmonary artery pressure but significantly lower pulmonary vascular resistance, as cardiac output was higher in CARDS vs. ARDS patients (P < 0.05). Shunt fraction and dead space were similar in CARDS compared to ARDS (P > 0.05) and were correlated with hypoxemia in both groups. The arteriovenous pCO2 difference (âµpCO2) was elevated (CARDS 5.5 ± 2.8 mmHg vs. ARDS 4.7 ± 1.1 mmHg; P > 0.05), as was the P(v-a)CO2/C(a-v)O2 ratio (CARDS mean 2.2 ± 1.5 vs. ARDS 1.7 ± 0.8; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory failure in COVID-19 patients seems to differ only slightly from ARDS regarding ventilation characteristics and pulmonary hemodynamics. Our data indicate microcirculatory dysfunction. More data need to be collected to assure these findings and gain more pathophysiological insights into COVID-19 and respiratory failure.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/fisiopatología , Gasto Cardíaco/fisiología , Respiración Artificial , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/fisiopatología , Resistencia Vascular/fisiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , COVID-19/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Pulmonar , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/virología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is a means to support patients with acute respiratory failure. Initially, recommendations to treat severe cases of pandemic coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with ECLS have been restrained. In the meantime, ECLS has been shown to produce similar outcomes in patients with severe COVID-19 compared to existing data on ARDS mortality. We performed an international email survey to assess how ECLS providers worldwide have previously used ECLS during the treatment of critically ill patients with COVID-19. A questionnaire with 45 questions (covering, e.g., indication, technical aspects, benefit, and reasons for treatment discontinuation), mostly multiple choice, was distributed by email to ECLS centers. The survey was approved by the European branch of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO); 276 ECMO professionals from 98 centers in 30 different countries on four continents reported that they employed ECMO for very severe COVID-19 cases, mostly in veno-venous configuration (87%). The most common reason to establish ECLS was isolated hypoxemic respiratory failure (50%), followed by a combination of hypoxemia and hypercapnia (39%). Only a small fraction of patients required veno-arterial cannulation due to heart failure (3%). Time on ECLS varied between less than 2 and more than 4 weeks. The main reason to discontinue ECLS treatment prior to patient's recovery was lack of clinical improvement (53%), followed by major bleeding, mostly intracranially (13%). Only 4% of respondents reported that triage situations, lack of staff or lack of oxygenators, were responsible for discontinuation of ECLS support. Most ECLS physicians (51%, IQR 30%) agreed that patients with COVID-19-induced ARDS (CARDS) benefitted from ECLS. Overall mortality of COVID-19 patients on ECLS was estimated to be about 55%. ECLS has been utilized successfully during the COVID-19 pandemic to stabilize CARDS patients in hypoxemic or hypercapnic lung failure. Age and multimorbidity limited the use of ECLS. Triage situations were rarely a concern. ECLS providers stated that patients with severe COVID-19 benefitted from ECLS.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/terapia , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Internacionalidad , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/virología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/virología , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Effective antimicrobial treatment is key to reduce mortality associated with bacterial sepsis in patients on intensive care units (ICUs). Dose adjustments are often necessary to account for pathophysiological changes or renal replacement therapy. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is increasingly being used for the treatment of respiratory and/or cardiac failure. However, it remains unclear whether dose adjustments are necessary to avoid subtherapeutic drug levels in septic patients on ECMO support. Here, we aimed to evaluate and comparatively assess serum concentrations of continuously applied antibiotics in intensive care patients being treated with and without ECMO. METHODS: Between October 2018 and December 2019, we prospectively enrolled patients on a pneumological ICU in southwest Germany who received antibiotic treatment with piperacillin/tazobactam, ceftazidime, meropenem, or linezolid. All antibiotics were applied using continuous infusion, and therapeutic drug monitoring of serum concentrations (expressed as mg/L) was carried out using high-performance liquid chromatography. Target concentrations were defined as fourfold above the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of susceptible bacterial isolates, according to EUCAST breakpoints. RESULTS: The final cohort comprised 105 ICU patients, of whom 30 were treated with ECMO. ECMO patients were significantly younger (mean age: 47.7 vs. 61.2 years; p < 0.001), required renal replacement therapy more frequently (53.3% vs. 32.0%; p = 0.048) and had an elevated ICU mortality (60.0% vs. 22.7%; p < 0.001). Data on antibiotic serum concentrations derived from 112 measurements among ECMO and 186 measurements from non-ECMO patients showed significantly lower median serum concentrations for piperacillin (32.3 vs. 52.9; p = 0.029) and standard-dose meropenem (15.0 vs. 17.8; p = 0.020) in the ECMO group. We found high rates of insufficient antibiotic serum concentrations below the pre-specified MIC target among ECMO patients (piperacillin: 48% vs. 13% in non-ECMO; linezolid: 35% vs. 15% in non-ECMO), whereas no such difference was observed for ceftazidime and meropenem. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO treatment was associated with significantly reduced serum concentrations of specific antibiotics. Future studies are needed to assess the pharmacokinetic characteristics of antibiotics in ICU patients on ECMO support.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/análisis , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/sangre , Ceftazidima/administración & dosificación , Ceftazidima/análisis , Ceftazidima/sangre , Monitoreo de Drogas/instrumentación , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Femenino , Alemania , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/organización & administración , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Linezolid/administración & dosificación , Linezolid/análisis , Linezolid/sangre , Masculino , Meropenem/administración & dosificación , Meropenem/análisis , Meropenem/sangre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/administración & dosificación , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/análisis , Combinación Piperacilina y Tazobactam/sangre , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The combination of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with a higher prevalence of comorbidities and increased mortality. The impact of kidney function on patient-centered outcomes in COPD has not been evaluated. METHODS: Patients from the German COPD and Systemic Consequences - Comorbidities Network (COSYCONET) cohort COPD were analysed. CKD was diagnosed if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) measurements were < 60 mL/min/1.73m2 at study inclusion and six month later. The effect of CKD, on comorbidities, symptoms [modified British Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale], physical capacity [six-minute walk test, and timed up and go] and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire were analysed. Restricted cubic spline models were used to evaluate a nonlinear relationship between eGFR with patient-centered outcomes, cox survival analysis was applied to evaluate mortality. RESULTS: 2274 patients were analysed, with CKD diagnosed in 161 (7.1%). Spline models adjusted for age, gender, BMI, FEV1 and cardiovascular comorbidities revealed independent associations between eGFR with modified British Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale, St George's Respiratory Questionnaire, (p < 0.001 and p = 0.011), six-minute walk test (p = 0.015) and timed up and go (p < 0.001). CKD was associated with increased mortality, independently from for other cardiovascular comorbidities (hazard ratio 2.3; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These data show that CKD is a relevant comorbidity in COPD patients which impacts on patient-centered outcomes and mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01245933.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria/métodos , Prueba de Paso/métodosRESUMEN
Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vvECMO) is increasingly used as rescue therapy in severe respiratory failure. In patients with pre-existent lung diseases or persistent lung injury weaning from vvECMO can be challenging. This study sought to investigate outcomes of patients transferred to a specialized ECMO center after prolonged ECMO therapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients admitted to our medical intensive care unit (ICU) between 01/2013 and 12/2016 who were transferred from an external ICU after > 8 days on vvECMO. 12 patients on ECMO for > 8 days were identified. Prior to transfer, patients underwent ECMO therapy for 18 ± 9.5 days. Total time on ECMO was 60 ± 46.6 days. 11/12 patients could be successfully weaned from ECMO, 7/12 in the first 28 days after transfer (8 ± 8.8 ECMO-free days at day 28). In 7 patients, ECMO could be terminated after at least partial lung recovery, in 4 patients after salvage lung transplant. No patient died or needed re-initiation of ECMO therapy at day 28. In summary, weaning from vvECMO was feasible even after prolonged ECMO courses and salvage lung transplant could be avoided in most cases. Patients may benefit from transfer to a specialized ECMO center.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Hospitales Especializados , Transferencia de Pacientes , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
RATIONALE: Patients with interstitial lung disease and acute respiratory failure have a poor prognosis especially if mechanical ventilation is required. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the outcome of patients with acute respiratory failure in interstitial lung disease undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as a bridge to recovery or transplantation. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of all patients with interstitial lung disease and acute respiratory failure treated with or without ECMO from March 2012 to August 2015. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty patients with interstitial lung disease referred to our intensive care unit for acute respiratory failure were included in the analysis. Twenty-one were treated with ECMO. Eight patients were transferred by air from other hospitals within a range of 320 km (linear distance) for extended intensive care including the option of lung transplant. In total, 13 patients were evaluated, and eight were finally found to be suitable for lung transplantation from an ECMO bridge. Four patients from external hospitals were de novo listed during acute respiratory failure. Six patients underwent lung transplant, and two died on the waiting list after 9 and 63 days on ECMO, respectively. A total of 14 of 15 patients who did not undergo lung transplantation (93.3%) died after 40.3 ± 27.8 days on ECMO. Five out of six patients (83.3%) receiving a lung transplant could be discharged from hospital. CONCLUSIONS: ECMO is a lifesaving option for patients with interstitial lung disease and acute respiratory failure provided they are candidates for lung transplantation. ECMO is not able to reverse the poor prognosis in patients that do not qualify for lung transplantation.
Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/terapia , Trasplante de Pulmón , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Enfermedad Aguda , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedades del Tejido Conjuntivo/complicaciones , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas/mortalidad , Neumonías Intersticiales Idiopáticas/terapia , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/etiología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Lung epithelial cells are suggested to promote pathogen-induced pulmonary inflammation by the release of chemokines, resulting in enhanced recruitment of circulating leukocytes. Recent studies have shown that the interleukin-17C (IL-17C) regulates innate immune functions of epithelial cells in an autocrine manner. The aim of this study was to investigate the contribution of IL-17C to pulmonary inflammation in a mouse model of acute Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Infection with P. aeruginosa resulted in an increased expression of IL-17C in lung tissue of wild-type mice. Numbers of neutrophils and the expression of the neutrophil-recruiting chemokines keratinocyte-derived chemokine and macrophage inflammatory protein 2 were significantly decreased in lungs of IL-17C-deficient (IL-17C-/-) mice infected with P. aeruginosa at 24 h. Systemic concentrations of interleukin-6 (IL-6) were significantly decreased in infected IL-17C-/- mice at 24 h and the survival of IL-17C-/- mice was significantly increased at 48 h. The expression of IL-17C was reduced in infected mice deficient for interleukin-17A (IL-17A), whereas pulmonary concentrations of IL-17A were not affected by the deficiency for IL-17C. Stimulation of primary alveolar epithelial cells with IL-17A resulted in a significantly increased expression of IL-17C in vitro. Our data suggest that IL-17A-mediated expression of epithelial IL-17C amplifies the release of chemokines by epithelial cells and thereby contributes to the recruitment of neutrophils and systemic inflammation during acute P. aeruginosa pneumonia.
Asunto(s)
Células Epiteliales Alveolares/metabolismo , Interleucina-17/metabolismo , Neumonía/metabolismo , Neumonía/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/fisiología , Células Epiteliales Alveolares/patología , Animales , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Ratones Noqueados , Viabilidad Microbiana , Infiltración Neutrófila , Neumonía/complicaciones , Neumonía/patología , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Bacterial pathogens are a leading cause of lung infections and contribute to acute exacerbations in patients with chronic respiratory diseases. The innate immune system of the respiratory tract controls and prevents colonization of the lung with bacterial pathogens. Forkhead box transcription factor family O (FOXO) transcription factors are key regulators of cellular metabolism, proliferation, and stress resistance. In this study, our aim was to investigate the role of FOXO transcription factors in innate immune functions of respiratory epithelial cells. We show that bacterial pathogens potently activate FOXO transcription factors in cultured human respiratory epithelial cells in vitro. Infection of mice with bacterial pathogens resulted in the activation of FOXO transcription factors in alveolar and bronchial epithelial cells in vivo. Active FOXO was also detectable in human bronchial tissue obtained from subjects with different infection-related lung diseases. Small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of FOXO in bronchial epithelial cells resulted in reduced expression of factors of the innate immune system such as antimicrobial peptides and proinflammatory cytokines, both under basal conditions and upon infection. FOXO deficiency further affected internalization of Haemophilus influenzae in bronchial epithelial cells. Finally, we show that TLR3 activates innate immune responses in a FOXO-dependent manner. In conclusion, FOXO transcription factors are involved in the cellular responses to bacterial stimuli and act as central regulators of innate immune functions in respiratory epithelial cells.
Asunto(s)
Factores de Transcripción Forkhead/fisiología , Mucosa Respiratoria/inmunología , Mucosa Respiratoria/metabolismo , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Enfermedad Crónica , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Proteína Forkhead Box O3 , Humanos , Inmunidad Innata , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Células Mieloides/inmunología , Células Mieloides/metabolismo , Células Mieloides/patología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/inmunología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/metabolismo , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/patología , Mucosa Respiratoria/patología , Transducción de Señal/inmunología , Células Tumorales CultivadasRESUMEN
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition affecting >10% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients worldwide with a mortality of up to 59% depending on severity. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a potentially life-saving procedure in severe ARDS but is technically and financially challenging. In recent years, various scoring systems have been proposed to select patients most likely to benefit from ECMO, with the PREdiction of Survival on ECMO Therapy (PRESET) score being one of the most used. We collected data from 283 patients with ARDS of various etiology who underwent veno-venous (V-V) ECMO therapy at a German tertiary care ICU from January 2012 to December 2022. Median age in the cohort was 56 years, and 64.31% were males. The in-hospital mortality rate was 50.88% (n = 144). The median (25%; 75% quartile) severity scores were 38 (31; 49) for Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, 12 (10; 13) for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and 7 (5; 8) for PRESET. Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II displayed the best prognostic value (area under the receiver operating characteristic [AUROC]: 0.665 [confidence interval (CI): 0.574-0.756; p = 0.046]). Prediction performance was weak in all analyzed scores despite good calibration. Simplified Acute Physiology Score-II had the best discrimination after adjustment of our original cohort. The use of scores explored in this study for patient selection for eligibility for V-V ECMO is not recommendable.
RESUMEN
Target values for arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) are unknown. We hypothesized that lower PaCO2 values on ECMO would be associated with lighter sedation. We used data from two independent patient cohorts with ARDS spending 1,177 days (discovery cohort, 69 patients) and 516 days (validation cohort, 70 patients) on ECMO and evaluated the associations between daily PaCO2, pH, and bicarbonate (HCO3) with sedation. Median PaCO2 was 41 (interquartile range [IQR] = 37-46) mm Hg and 41 (IQR = 37-45) mm Hg in the discovery and the validation cohort, respectively. Lower PaCO2 and higher pH but not bicarbonate (HCO3) served as significant predictors for reaching a Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) target range of -2 to +1 (lightly sedated to restless). After multivariable adjustment for mortality, tracheostomy, prone positioning, vasoactive inotropic score, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II or Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score and day on ECMO, only PaCO2 remained significantly associated with the RASS target range (adjusted odds ratio 1.1 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01-1.21], p = 0.032 and 1.29 [95% CI = 1.1-1.51], p = 0.001 per mm Hg decrease in PaCO2 for the discovery and the validation cohort, respectively). A PaCO2 ≤40 mm Hg, as determined by the concordance probability method, was associated with a significantly increased probability of a sedation level within the RASS target range in both patient cohorts (adjusted odds ratio = 2.92 [95% CI = 1.17-7.24], p = 0.021 and 6.82 [95% CI = 1.50-31.0], p = 0.013 for the discovery and the validation cohort, respectively).
RESUMEN
The IL-17 family of cytokines consists of at least six members (IL-17A to -F). IL-17 directly activates epithelial cells leading to the expression of inflammatory mediators and antimicrobial factors. Recent studies showed that IL-17C is expressed by epithelial cells. It was the purpose of this study to examine the expression of IL-17 family members in respiratory epithelial cells during bacterial infection. We show that common bacterial pathogens, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Haemophilus influenzae, and ligands of Toll-like receptors 3 and 5 (flagellin, polyI:C) induced the expression and release of IL-17C in cultured human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs). The expression of IL-17A, -B, -D, or -E was not induced by bacterial stimuli in HBECs. IL-17C enhanced inflammatory responses of respiratory epithelial cells infected with P. aeruginosa. Furthermore, we demonstrate that cigarette smoke suppressed the expression of IL-17C in HBECs in response to bacterial infection and in vivo in the upper airways of mice colonized with H. influenzae. IL-17C could also be detected in bronchial tissue of subjects with infection-related lung diseases. These data show that IL-17C is involved in the innate immune response of respiratory epithelial cells and is suppressed by cigarette smoke.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Haemophilus/inmunología , Haemophilus influenzae/inmunología , Inmunidad Innata , Interleucina-17/inmunología , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/inmunología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/inmunología , Mucosa Respiratoria/inmunología , Animales , Bronquios/inmunología , Bronquios/patología , Línea Celular , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Regulación de la Expresión Génica/inmunología , Infecciones por Haemophilus/patología , Humanos , Inflamación/inmunología , Inflamación/patología , Ratones , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/patología , Mucosa Respiratoria/patología , Fumar/inmunología , Fumar/patología , Contaminación por Humo de Tabaco/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an important rescue therapy method for the treatment of severe hypoxic lung injury. In some cases, oxygen saturation and oxygen partial pressure in the arterial blood are low despite ECMO therapy. There are case reports in which patients with such instances of refractory hypoxemia received a second membrane lung, either in series or in parallel, to overcome the hypoxemia. It remains unclear whether the parallel or serial connection is more effective. Therefore, we used an improved version of our full-flow ECMO mock circuit to test this. The measurements were performed under conditions in which the membrane lungs were unable to completely oxygenate the blood. As a result, only the photometric pre- and post-oxygenator saturations, blood flow and hemoglobin concentration were required for the calculation of oxygen transfer rates. The results showed that for a pre-oxygenator saturation of 45% and a total blood flow of 10 L/min, the serial connection of two identical 5 L rated oxygenators is 17% more effective in terms of oxygen transfer than the parallel connection. Although the idea of using a second membrane lung if refractory hypoxia occurs is intriguing from a physiological point of view, due to the invasiveness of the solution, further investigations are needed before this should be used in a wider clinical setting.
RESUMEN
Interhospital transport of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients bears transport-associated risks. It is unknown how interhospital extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) transfer of COVID-19 patients by mobile ECMO units affects ARDS mortality. We compared the outcome of 94 COVID-19 patients cannulated in primary care hospitals and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams to that of 84 patients cannulated at five German ECMO centers. Patients were recruited from March 2020 to November 2021. Twenty-six transports were airborne, 68 were land-based. Age, sex, body-mass-index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, days invasively ventilated, and P/F-Ratio before ECMO initiation were similar in both groups. Counting only regional transports (≤250 km), mean transport distance was 139.5 km ± 17.7 km for helicopter (duration 52.5 ± 10.6 minutes) and 69.8 km ± 44.1 km for ambulance or mobile intensive care unit (duration 57.6 ± 29.4 minutes). Overall time of vvECMO support (20.4 ± 15.2 ECMO days for transported patients vs. 21.0 ± 20.5 for control, p = 0.83) and days invasively ventilated (27.9 ± 18.1 days vs. 32.6 ± 25.1 days, p = 0.16) were similar. Overall mortality did not differ between transported patients and controls (57/94 [61%] vs. 51/83 [61%], p = 0.43). COVID-19 patients cannulated and retrieved by mobile ECMO-teams have no excess risk compared with patients receiving vvECMO at experienced ECMO centers. Patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS, limited comorbidities, and no contraindication for ECMO should be referred early to local ECMO centers.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Neumonía , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/terapia , Ambulancias , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/etiología , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapiaRESUMEN
Background: There is ongoing debate whether lung physiology of COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) differs from ARDS of other origin. Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze and compare how critically ill patients with COVID-19 and Influenza A or B were ventilated in our tertiary care center with or without extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). We ask if acute lung failure due to COVID-19 requires different intensive care management compared to conventional ARDS. Methods: 25 patients with COVID-19-associated ARDS were matched to a cohort of 25 Influenza patients treated in our center from 2011 to 2021. Subgroup analysis addressed whether patients on ECMO received different mechanical ventilation than patients without extracorporeal support. Results: Compared to Influenza-associated ARDS, COVID-19 patients had higher ventilatory system compliance (40.7 mL/mbar [31.8-46.7 mL/mbar] vs. 31.4 mL/mbar [13.7-42.8 mL/mbar], p = 0.198), higher ventilatory ratio (1.57 [1.31-1.84] vs. 0.91 [0.44-1.38], p = 0.006) and higher minute ventilation at the time of intubation (mean minute ventilation 10.7 L/min [7.2-12.2 L/min] for COVID-19 vs. 6.0 L/min [2.5-10.1 L/min] for Influenza, p = 0.013). There were no measurable differences in P/F ratio, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and driving pressures (ΔP). Respiratory system compliance deteriorated considerably in COVID-19 patients on ECMO during 2 weeks of mechanical ventilation (Crs, mean decrease over 2 weeks -23.87 mL/mbar ± 32.94 mL/mbar, p = 0.037) but not in ventilated Influenza patients on ECMO and less so in ventilated COVID-19 patients without ECMO. For COVID-19 patients, low driving pressures on ECMO were strongly correlated to a decline in compliance after 2 weeks (Pearson's R 0.80, p = 0.058). Overall mortality was insignificantly lower for COVID-19 patients compared to Influenza patients (40% vs. 48%, p = 0.31). Outcome was insignificantly worse for patients requiring veno-venous ECMO in both groups (50% mortality for COVID-19 on ECMO vs. 27% without ECMO, p = 0.30/56% vs. 34% mortality for Influenza A/B with and without ECMO, p = 0.31). Conclusion: The pathophysiology of early COVID-19-associated ARDS differs from Influenza-associated acute lung failure by sustained respiratory mechanics during the early phase of ventilation. We question whether intubated COVID-19 patients on ECMO benefit from extremely low driving pressures, as this appears to accelerate derecruitment and consecutive loss of ventilatory system compliance.
RESUMEN
Low flow extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R) is a promising approach to correct hypercapnic lung failure, facilitate lung protective ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome and to possibly prevent the application of invasive ventilation. However, the predominant availability of adult membrane lungs (MLs) at most intensive care units are burdens for low flow ECCO2R that intends to reduce cannula size and promote the mobility of the patients. Herein, in a mock setup, we combine the idea of a low flow ECCO2R and the use of adult MLs by installing a recirculation channel into the circuit and comparing the new setup to an already clinically established setup, "the Homburg lung." Furthermore, to make stronger reference to hypercapnic respiratory failure, we investigate the influence of CO2 partial pressure in blood on CO2 removal of both setups. A linear association between CO2 partial pressure in blood and CO2 removal of the ML in the physiologically relevant range was observed. To understand this linear dependence, a simplified mathematical model was proposed. Our new ECCO2R mock setup combines the idea of a low flow ECCO2R and an adult size ML. It shows a reasonable alternative to the current available low flow setups based on pediatric MLs.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Adulto , Dióxido de Carbono , Niño , Circulación Extracorporea , Humanos , Hipercapnia , Respiración Artificial , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapiaRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has drastically increased the number of patients requiring extracorporeal life support. We investigate the efficacy and safety of low-dose recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rtPA) injection into exhausted oxygenators to delay exchange in critically ill COVID-19 patients on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-V ECMO). Small doses of rtPA were injected directly into the draining section of a V-V ECMO circuit. We compared transmembrane pressure gradient, pump head efficiency, membrane arterial partial oxygen pressure, and membrane arterial partial carbon dioxide pressure before and after the procedure. Bleeding was compared with a matched control group of 20 COVID-19 patients on V-V ECMO receiving standard anticoagulation. Four patients received 16 oxygenator instillations with rtPA at 5, 10, or 20 mg per dose. Administration of rtPA significantly reduced transmembrane pressure gradient (Δ pm = 54.8 ± 18.1 mmHg before vs . 38.3 ± 13.3 mmHg after, p < 0.001) in a dose-dependent manner (Pearson's R -0.63, p = 0.023), allowing to delay oxygenator exchange, thus reducing the overall number of consumed oxygenators. rtPA increased blood flow efficiency η (1.20 ± 0.28 ml/revolution before vs . 1.24 ± 0.27 ml/r, p = 0.002). Lysis did not affect membrane blood gases or systemic coagulation. Minor bleeding occurred in 2 of 4 patients (50%) receiving oxygenator lysis as well as 19 of 20 control patients (95%). Lysis of ECMO oxygenators effectively delays oxygenator exchange, if exchange is indicated by an increase in transmembrane pressure gradient. Application of lysis did not result in higher bleeding incidences compared with anticoagulated patients on V-V ECMO for COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Oxigenadores de Membrana , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno , Análisis de los Gases de la Sangre , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/instrumentación , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Humanos , Activador de Tejido Plasminógeno/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has become an important therapeutic approach in the COVID-19 pandemic. The development and research in this field strongly relies on animal models; however, efforts are being made to find alternatives. In this work, we present a new mock circuit for ECMO that allows measurements of the oxygen transfer rate of a membrane lung at full ECMO blood flow. The mock utilizes a large reservoir of heparinized porcine blood to measure the oxygen transfer rate of the membrane lung in a single passage. The oxygen transfer rate is calculated from blood flow, hemoglobin value, venous saturation, and post-membrane arterial oxygen pressure. Before the next measuring sequence, the blood is regenerated to a venous condition with a sweep gas of nitrogen and carbon dioxide. The presented mock was applied to investigate the effect of a recirculation loop on the oxygen transfer rate of an ECMO setup. The recirculation loop caused a significant increase in post-membrane arterial oxygen pressure (paO2). The effect was strongest for the highest recirculation flow. This was attributed to a smaller boundary layer on gas fibers due to the increased blood velocity. However, the increase in paO2 did not translate to significant increases in the oxygen transfer rate because of the minor significance of physically dissolved oxygen for gas transfer. In conclusion, our results regarding a new ECMO mock setup demonstrate that recirculation loops can improve ECMO performance, but not enough to be clinically relevant.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Early prognostication of COVID-19 severity will potentially improve patient care. Biomarkers, such as TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL), interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10), and C-reactive protein (CRP), might represent possible tools for point-of-care testing and severity prediction. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we analyzed serum levels of TRAIL, IP-10, and CRP in patients with COVID-19, compared them with control subjects, and investigated the association with disease severity. RESULTS: A total of 899 measurements were performed in 132 patients (mean age 64 years, 40.2% females). Among patients with COVID-19, TRAIL levels were lower (49.5 vs 87 pg/ml, P = 0.0142), whereas IP-10 and CRP showed higher levels (667.5 vs 127 pg/ml, P <0.001; 75.3 vs 1.6 mg/l, P <0.001) than healthy controls. TRAIL yielded an inverse correlation with length of hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) stay, Simplified Acute Physiology Score II, and National Early Warning Score, and IP-10 showed a positive correlation with disease severity. Multivariable regression revealed that obesity (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 5.434, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.005-29.38), CRP (aOR 1.014, 95% CI 1.002-1.027), and peak IP-10 (aOR 1.001, 95% CI 1.00-1.002) were independent predictors of in-ICU mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated a correlation between COVID-19 severity and TRAIL, IP-10, and CRP. Multivariable regression showed a role for IP-10 in predicting unfavourable outcomes, such as in-ICU mortality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04655521.