The effect of L-thyroxine substitution on lipid profile, glucose homeostasis, inflammation and coagulation in patients with subclinical hypothyroidism.

AIMS: Subclinical hypothyroidism (SH) is associated with increased risk for atherosclerosis, mainly attributable to dyslipidaemia and hypercoagulability. However, conflicting data exist regarding the effect of L-thyroxine substitution on these parameters. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of L-thyroxine therapy on lipidaemic profile, coagulation markers, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and glucose homoeostasis in SH patients. METHODS: It was a prospective open-label study. The following parameters were measured before and 6 months after intervention: anthropometric data, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG), apolipoproteins B (apoB) and A1 (apoA1), lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)], fasting plasma glucose and insulin, homoeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), hsCRP, antithrombin III (AT-III), protein C (PC), protein S (PS), fibrinogen and homocysteine. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (30 women) aged 52.1 ± 13.9 years with SH completed the study. Baseline mean TSH levels were 6.79 ± 2.58 mIU/ml. Achievement of euthyroidism significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (BP) in patients with SH (from 135.2 ± 18.5 to 129.7 ± 15.8 mmHg, p = 0.03) and diastolic BP only in those with baseline TSH levels > 7 mIU/ml (from 79.5 ± 9.8 to 72.1 ± 7.3 mmHg, p = 0.03). No significant changes in body weight, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, apoB, glucose, insulin, HOMA-IR, hsCRP, AT-III, PC, PS, fibrinogen or homocysteine levels were noticed after restoration of euthyroidism, except for a decrease in apoA1 (p = 0.04) and an increase in Lp(a) levels (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Except for a reduction in systolic and diastolic BP, thyroid substitution therapy does not affect lipidaemic profile, systematic inflammation, glucose homoeostasis or coagulation in patients with SH.

Acromegaly: presentation, morbidity and treatment outcomes at a single centre.

OBJECTIVE: Analysis of patients with acromegaly followed-up at a single centre, focusing on baseline characteristics, morbidity and efficacy of treatment. DESIGN AND METHODS: Retrospective review of electronic medical records of acromegalics from 1987 to 2009. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen patients (45 men), aged 47 ± 14 years, with a mean follow-up of 8.8 ± 0.8 years were studied. Twenty-five per cent had micro- and 75% macroadenomas. Forty-three per cent presented with visual field defects, 49% had hypertension, 25% diabetes mellitus and 35% dyslipidaemia. At follow-up, 50% had myocardial hypertrophy, 55% colon polypodiasis, 74% nodular thyroid disease and 18% adrenal masses. Surgery was performed in 79% (8% twice), followed by conventional radiotherapy in 27%. Fifty-two per cent of the patients achieved remission. Disease control was reported in 65% of microadenomas and 41% of macroadenomas. Remission rates with surgery alone were 41%. Improvement of remission rates was achieved with subsequent treatment with somatostatin analogues (SSA) (53%), or conventional radiotherapy (63%). Nevertheless, pituitary reserve was compromised with the latter. SSA significantly improved outcomes in microadenomas, even as a monotherapy (remission in 89%), in contrast to macroadenomas (0%), although these agents were associated with impaired glucose metabolism and cholelithiasis in half of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Acromegaly is associated with an increased morbidity. About half of the treated patients achieved remission (2/3 of microadenomas). The best outcomes were reported for the combination of surgery with radiotherapy, in spite of a higher risk of hypopituitarism. SSA led to remission in a significant percentage of microadenomas, but was associated with increased rates of cholelithiasis and impaired glucose homeostasis.

Comparative effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on glucose metabolism and adipokine levels in non-diabetic patients with dyslipidaemia: a prospective randomised open-label study.

AIMS: The impact of statins on glucose metabolism and adipokines remains controversial. We compared the effects of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin on glucose homeostasis, insulin sensitivity (IS), adiponectin and leptin levels as well as systemic inflammation in non-diabetic patients with dyslipidaemia. METHODS: Thirty-six patients were randomly assigned to 10 mg/day of rosuvastatin (n = 18) or 20 mg/day of atorvastatin (n = 18) for 12 weeks. Total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-HDL-C, triglycerides (TG), fasting plasma glucose, insulin, homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), quantitative IS check index (QUICKI), adiponectin, leptin and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks. RESULTS: Both statins significantly lowered TC, LDL-C, non-HDL-C and TG compared with baseline. Only rosuvastatin caused a significant reduction in insulin and HOMA-IR levels (-35%, p = 0.005 and -33%, p = 0.011 respectively) and a significant increase in QUICKI (+11%, p = 0.003) at 12 weeks. In terms of adipokines and hsCRP, no difference was observed after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment with either statin. CONCLUSIONS: Rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin resulted in significant improvements in IS indices. No significant changes in adiponectin, leptin or hsCRP levels were observed at 4 and 12 weeks of treatment with either statin.