RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes are best treated with rapid endovascular therapy (EVT). There are two routes that LVO stroke patients can take to EVT therapy when transported by EMS: primary transport (ambulance transports directly to an endovascular stroke center (ESC) or secondary transport (EMS transports to a non-ESC then transfers for EVT). There is no clear evidence which path to care results in better functional outcomes for LVO stroke patients. To find this answer, an analysis of a large, real-world population of LVO stroke patients must be performed. METHODS: A pragmatic registry of LVO stroke patients from nine health systems across the United States. The nine health systems span urban and rural populations as well as the spectrum of socioeconomic statuses. We will use univariate and multivariate analysis to explore the relationships between type of EMS transport, socioeconomic factors, and LVO stroke outcomes. We will use geographic information systems and spatial analysis to examine the complex movements of patients in time and space. To detect an 8% difference between groups, with a 3:1 patient ratio of primary to secondary transports, 95% confidence and 80% power, we will need approximately 1600 patients. The primary outcome is the patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤ 2 at 90 days. Subgroup analyses include patients who receive intravenous thrombolysis and duration of stroke systems. Secondary analyses include socioeconomic factors associated with poor outcomes after LVO stroke. DISCUSSION: Using the data obtained from the OPUS-REACH registry, we will develop evidence based algorithms for prehospital transport of LVO stroke patients. Unlike prior research, the OPUS-REACH registry contains patient-level data spanning from EMS dispatch to ninety day functional outcomes. We expect that we will find modifiable factors and socioeconomic disparities associated with poor outcomes in LVO stroke. OPUS-REACH with its breadth of locations, detailed patient records, and multidisciplinary researchers will design the optimal prehospital stroke system of care for LVO stroke patients.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Isquemia Encefálica , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/terapia , Isquemia Encefálica/diagnóstico , Humanos , Sistema de Registros , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infections in an emergency department (ED) with an established screening program. METHODS: Evaluation of the prevalence and risk factors for HIV from an 8-week (June 24, 2007-August 18, 2007) identity-unlinked HIV serosurvey, conducted at the same time as an ongoing opt-in rapid oral-fluid HIV screening program. Testing facilitators offering 24/7 bedside rapid testing to patients aged 18 to 64 years, with concordant collection of excess sera collected as part of routine clinical procedures. Known HIV positivity was determined by (1) medical record review or self-report from the screening program and/or (2) presence of antiretrovirals in serum specimens. RESULTS: Among 3207 patients, 1165 (36.3%) patients were offered an HIV test. Among those offered, 567 (48.7%) consented to testing. Concordance identity-unlinked study revealed that the prevalence of undiagnosed infections was as follows: 2.3% in all patients, 1.0% in those offered testing vs 3.0% in those not offered testing (P < .001); and 1.3% in those who declined testing compared with 0.4% in those who were tested (P = .077). Higher median viral loads were observed in those not offered testing (14255 copies/mL; interquartile range, 1147-64354) vs those offered testing (1865 copies/mL; interquartile range, undetectable-21786), but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: High undiagnosed HIV prevalence was observed in ED patients who were not offered HIV testing and those who declined testing, compared with those who were tested. This indicates that even with an intensive facilitator-based rapid HIV screening model, significant missed opportunities remain with regard to identifying undiagnosed infections in the ED.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Western Blotting , Cromatografía Liquida , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Espectrometría de Masas en TándemRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of data on the effect(s) of suboptimal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care on subsequent health care utilization among emergency department (ED) patients with HIV. Findings on their ED and inpatient care utilization patterns will provide information on service provision for those who have suboptimal access to HIV-related care. METHODS: A pilot prospective study was conducted on HIV-positive patients in an ED. At enrollment, participants were interviewed regarding health care utilization. Participants were followed up for 1 year, during which time data on ED visits and hospitalizations were obtained from their patient records. Inadequate HIV care (IHC) was defined according to Infectious Diseases Society of America recommendations as less than 3 scheduled clinic visits for HIV care in the year before enrollment. Cox regression models were used to evaluate whether IHC was associated with increased hazard of health care utilization. RESULTS: Of 107 subjects, 36% were found to have IHC. Inadequate HIV care did not predict more frequent ED visits but was significantly associated with fewer hospitalizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.61 [95% CI: 0.43-0.86]). Inadequate HIV care did not significantly increase the hazard for earlier ED visit or hospitalization. However, further stratification analysis found that IHC increased the hazard of hospitalization for subjects without comorbid diseases (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.50 [95% CI: 1.10-5.68]). CONCLUSIONS: In our setting, IHC does not appear to be associated with earlier or more frequent ED visits but may lead to earlier hospitalization, particularly among those without other chronic diseases.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Seropositividad para VIH/terapia , Hospitales/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Adulto , Baltimore/epidemiología , Recuento de Linfocito CD4/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Seropositividad para VIH/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We seek to identify and analyze, from a group of participants experienced with HIV screening, the perceived challenges and solutions to the ethical, financial, and legal considerations of emergency department (ED)-based HIV screening. METHODS: We performed a qualitative analysis of the focus group discussions from the ethical, financial, and legal considerations portion of the inaugural National Emergency Department HIV Testing Consortium conference. Four groups composed of 20 to 25 consortium participants engaged in semistructured, facilitated focus group discussions. The focus group discussions were audiotaped and transcribed. A primary reader identified major themes and subthemes and representative quotes from the transcripts and summarized the discussions. Secondary and tertiary readers reviewed the themes, subthemes, and summaries for accuracy. RESULTS: The focus group discussions centered on the following themes. Ethical considerations included appropriateness of HIV screening in the ED and ethics of key elements of the 2006 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV testing recommendations. Financial considerations included models of payment and support, role of health care insurance, financial ethics and downstream financial burdens, and advocacy approaches. Legal considerations included the adequacy of obtaining consent, partner notification, disclosure of HIV results, difficulties in addressing special populations, failure of not performing universal screening, failure to notify a person of being tested, failure to notify someone of their test results, liability of inaccurate tests, and failure to link to care. CONCLUSION: This qualitative analysis provides a broadly useful foundation to the ethical, financial, and legal considerations of implementing HIV screening programs in EDs throughout the United States.
Asunto(s)
Serodiagnóstico del SIDA , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Serodiagnóstico del SIDA/economía , Serodiagnóstico del SIDA/ética , Serodiagnóstico del SIDA/legislación & jurisprudencia , Trazado de Contacto/ética , Trazado de Contacto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/ética , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/legislación & jurisprudencia , Grupos Focales , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Costos de Hospital , Humanos , Consentimiento Informado/ética , Consentimiento Informado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Cobertura del Seguro , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/ética , Tamizaje Masivo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We compare the outcomes and costs of alternative staffing models for an emergency department (ED) rapid HIV testing program. METHODS: A rapid oral-fluid HIV testing program was instituted in an inner-city ED in 2005. Three staffing models were compared during 24.5 months: indigenous medical staff only, exogenous staff only, or exogenous staff plus medical staff (hybrid). Personnel obtained written consent and provided brief pretest counseling, obtained kits, collected specimens, returned specimens to the ED satellite laboratory, and performed posttest counseling and referral to care. Cost analysis was performed to estimate cost per patient tested and cost per patient linked to care. RESULTS: Overall, 44 of 2,958 (1.5%) patients tested received confirmed positive results and 30 (68%) were linked to care. The exogenous staff only model yielded the highest number tested per month (587), and indigenous medical staff only yielded the lowest (57). Significantly higher positivity rates were found in both indigenous medical staff only (2.2%) and hybrid (2.0%) models versus the exogenous staff only model (0.6%) (prevalence rate ratio: 3.7 [95% confidence interval {CI}1.5 to 9.3] versus 3.4 [95% CI 1.5 to 7.8], respectively). All patients with confirmed positive results were linked to care in the indigenous medical staff only model but only approximately 60% were linked to care in the 2 other models (linked to care rate ratio versus exogenous staff only: 1.8 [95% CI 1.1 to 4.4]; versus hybrid: 1.7 [95% CI 1.2 to 2.5]). The indigenous medical staff only model had the highest cost ($109) per patient tested, followed by the hybrid ($87) and the exogenous staff only ($39). However, the indigenous medical staff only model had the lowest cost ($4,937) per patient linked to care, followed by the hybrid ($7,213) and exogenous staff only ($11,454). CONCLUSION: The exogenous staff only model tested the most patients at the least cost per patient tested. The indigenous medical staff only model identified the fewest patients with unrecognized HIV infection and had the highest cost per patient tested but the lowest cost per patient linked to care.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Centros Médicos Académicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Baltimore/epidemiología , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/economía , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Costos de Hospital , Hospitales Urbanos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Organizacionales , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Sistemas de Atención de Punto/economía , Prevalencia , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ability to provide medical care during sudden increases in patient volume during a disaster or other high-consequence event is a serious concern for health-care systems. Identification of inpatients for safe early discharge (ie, reverse triage) could create additional hospital surge capacity. We sought to develop a disposition classification system that categorises inpatients according to suitability for immediate discharge on the basis of risk tolerance for a subsequent consequential medical event. METHODS: We did a warfare analysis laboratory exercise using evidence-based techniques, combined with a consensus process of 39 expert panellists. These panellists were asked to define the categories of a disposition classification system, assign risk tolerance of a consequential medical event to each category, identify critical interventions, and rank each (using a scale of 1-10) according to the likelihood of a resultant consequential medical event if a critical intervention is withdrawn or withheld because of discharge. FINDINGS: The panellists unanimously agreed on a five-category disposition classification system. The upper limit of risk tolerance for a consequential medical event in the lowest risk group if discharged early was less than 4%. The next categories had upper limits of risk tolerance of about 12% (IQR 8-15%), 33% (25-50%), 60% (45-80%) and 100% (95-100%), respectively. The expert panellists identified 28 critical interventions with a likelihood of association with a consequential medical event if withdrawn, ranging from 3 to 10 on the 10-point scale. INTERPRETATION: The disposition classification system allows conceptual classification of patients for suitable disposition, including those deemed safe for early discharge home during surges in demand. Clinical criteria allowing real-time categorisation of patients are awaited.
Asunto(s)
Ocupación de Camas , Planificación en Desastres , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Pacientes Internos/clasificación , Alta del Paciente , Comité de Profesionales/organización & administración , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Triaje/métodos , Toma de Decisiones Asistida por Computador , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo/organización & administración , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Triaje/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
This article explores the tenets of the responsible conduct of research. The proper treatment of human and animal subjects, recognition and avoidance of conflicts of interest, management of data to ensure privacy and confidentiality, authorship, academic freedom, and scientific misconduct are discussed. Historically significant events that have influenced the ethical climate, along with a review of guiding principles and regulations that define the conduct of ethical research are presented. Circumstances more specific to emergency medicine are examined in detail to provide meaningful guidance to practicing emergency medicine researchers.
Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/ética , Confidencialidad/ética , Conflicto de Intereses , Privacidad , Edición/ética , Animales , Autoria , Experimentación Humana/ética , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is a common sexually transmitted disease, but there is limited data on its epidemiology among urban populations. The urban Emergency Department (ED) is a potential venue for surveillance as it predominantly serves an inner city minority population. We evaluate the seroprevalence and factors associated with HSV-2 infection among patients attending the Johns Hopkins Hospital Adult Emergency Department (JHH ED). METHODS: An identity unlinked-serosurvey was conducted between 6/2007 and 9/2007 in the JHH ED; sera were tested by the Focus HerpeSelect ELISA. Prevalence risk ratios (PRR) were used to determine factors associated with HSV-2 infection. RESULTS: Of 3,408 serum samples, 1,853 (54.4%) were seropositive for HSV-2. Females (adjPRR â=â1.47, 95% CI 1.38-1.56), non-Hispanic blacks (adjPRR â=â2.03, 95% CI 1.82-2.27), single (adjPRR â=â1.15, 95% CI 1.07-1.25), divorced (adjPRR â=â1.28, 95% CI 1.15-1.41), and unemployed patients (adjPRR â=â1.13, 95% CI 1.05-1.21) had significantly higher rates of HSV-2 infection. Though certain zip codes had significantly higher seroprevalence of HSV-2, this effect was completely attenuated when controlling for age and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Seroprevalence of HSV-2 in the JHH ED was higher than U.S. national estimates; however, factors associated with HSV-2 infection were similar. The high seroprevalence of HSV-2 in this urban ED highlights the need for targeted testing and treatment. Cross-sectional serosurveys in the urban ED may help to examine the epidemiology of HSV-2.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Herpes Simple/epidemiología , Herpesvirus Humano 2/aislamiento & purificación , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Urbanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Baltimore/epidemiología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Herpes Simple/virología , Humanos , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Distribución por Sexo , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estados Unidos , Población Urbana , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to describe the proportions of successful linkage to care (LTC) and identify factors associated with LTC among newly diagnosed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients, from two urban emergency department (ED) rapid HIV screening programs. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of programmatic data from two established urban ED rapid HIV screening programs between November 2005 and October 2009. Trained HIV program assistants interviewed all patients tested to gather risk behavior data using a structured data collection instrument. Reactive results were confirmed by Western blot testing. Patients were provided with scheduled appointments at HIV specialty clinics at the institutions where they tested positive within 30 days of their ED visit. "Successful" LTC was defined as attendance at the HIV outpatient clinic within 30 days after HIV diagnosis, in accordance with the ED National HIV Testing Consortium metric. "Any" LTC was defined as attendance at the outpatient HIV clinic within 1 year of initial HIV diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with any LTC or successful LTC. RESULTS: Of the 15,640 tests administered, 108 (0.7%) were newly identified HIV-positive cases. Nearly half (47.2%) of the patients had been previously tested for HIV. Successful LTC occurred in 54% of cases; any LTC occurred in 83% of cases. In multivariate analysis, having public medical insurance and being self-pay were negatively associated with successful LTC (odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.12 to 0.96; OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.13 to 0.89, respectively); being female and having previously tested for HIV was negatively associated with any LTC (OR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.10 to 0.93; OR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.07 to 0.77, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In spite of dedicated resources for arranging LTC in the ED HIV testing programs, nearly 50% of patients did not have successful LTC (i.e., LTC occurred at >30 days), although >80% of patients were LTC within 1 year of initial diagnosis. Further evaluation of the barriers associated with successful LTC for those with public insurance and self-pay is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/diagnóstico , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/terapia , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/organización & administración , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Síndrome de Inmunodeficiencia Adquirida/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/organización & administración , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Maryland , Pacientes no Asegurados , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to determine attitudes and perceptions (A&P) of emergency medicine (EM) residents toward emergency department (ED) routine provider-driven rapid HIV testing services and the impact of both a focused training program (FTP) and implementation of HIV testing on A&P. METHODS: A three-phase, consecutive, anonymous, identity-unlinked survey was conducted pre-FTP, post-FTP, and 6 months postimplementation. The survey was designed to assess residents' A&P using a five-point Likert scale. A preimplementation FTP provided both the rationale for the HIV testing program and the planned operational details of the intervention. The HIV testing program used only indigenous ED staff to deliver HIV testing as part of standard-of-care in an academic ED. The impact of the FTP and implementation on A&P were analyzed by multivariate regression analysis using generalized estimating equations to control for repeated measurements in the same individuals. A "favorable" A&P was operationally defined as a mean score of >3.5, "neutral" as mean score of 2.5 to 3.5, and "unfavorable" as mean score of <2.5. RESULTS: Thirty of 36 residents (83.3%) participated in all three phases. Areas of favorable A&P found in phase I and sustained through phases II and III included "ED serving as a testing venue" (score range = 3.7-4.1) and "emergency medicine physicians offering the test" (score range = 3.9-4.1). Areas of unfavorable and neutral A&P identified in phase I were all operational barriers and included required paperwork (score = 3.2), inadequate staff support (score = 2.2), counseling and referral requirements (score range = 2.2-3.1), and time requirements (score = 2.9). Following the FTP, significant increases in favorable A&P were observed with regard to impact of the intervention on modification of patient risk behaviors, decrease in rates of HIV transmission, availability of support staff, and self-confidence in counseling and referral (p < 0.05). At 6 months postimplementation, all A&P except for time requirements and lack of support staff scored favorably or neutral. During the study period, 388 patients were consented for and received HIV testing; six (1.5%) were newly confirmed HIV positive. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency medicine residents conceptually supported HIV testing services. Most A&P were favorably influenced by both the FTP and the implementation. All areas of negative A&P involved operational requirements, which may have influenced the low overall uptake of HIV testing during the study period.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Infecciones por VIH/diagnóstico , Internado y Residencia , Adulto , Consejo/organización & administración , Educación Médica Continua , Femenino , Hospitales Urbanos/organización & administración , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Derivación y Consulta/organización & administración , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: US hospitals are expected to function without external aid for up to 96 hours during a disaster; however, concern exists that there is insufficient capacity in hospitals to absorb large numbers of acute casualties. The aim of the study was to determine the potential for creation of inpatient bed surge capacity from the early discharge (reverse triage) of hospital inpatients at low risk of untoward events for up to 96 hours. METHODS: In a health system with 3 capacity-constrained hospitals that are representative of US facilities (academic, teaching affiliate, community), a variety (N = 50) of inpatient units were prospectively canvassed in rotation using a blocked randomized design for 19 weeks ending in February 2006. Intensive care units (ICUs), nurseries, and pediatric units were excluded. Assuming a disaster occurred on the day of enrollment, patients who did not require any (previously defined) critical intervention for 4 days were deemed suitable for early discharge. RESULTS: Of 3491 patients, 44% did not require any critical intervention and were suitable for early discharge. Accounting for additional routine patient discharges, full use of staffed and unstaffed licensed beds, gross surge capacity was estimated at 77%, 95%, and 103% for the 3 hospitals. Factoring likely continuance of nonvictim emergency admissions, net surge capacity available for disaster victims was estimated at 66%, 71%, and 81%, respectively. Reverse triage made up the majority (50%, 55%, 59%) of surge beds. Most realized capacity was available within 24 to 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital surge capacity for standard inpatient beds may be greater than previously believed. Reverse triage, if appropriately harnessed, can be a major contributor to surge capacity.
Asunto(s)
Planificación en Desastres/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidentes con Víctimas en Masa , Alta del Paciente/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Maryland , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistemas Multiinstitucionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We present a four-year, cross-sectional epidemiologic description of injuries and illnesses among Baltimore Marathon participants and the evaluation, treatment, and disposition of those conditions by an on-site event medical team led by physicians and staff from an urban, academic emergency department. METHODS: We analyzed data from injuries encountered during the marathon. Subjects presenting to a medical aid station along the course route or at the finish line were defined as "injured or ill" and were prospectively divided into two groups: 1) a brief-encounter group and 2) an extended-encounter group. Data collected included gender, presenting complaint(s), assessment, treatment(s), and disposition. RESULTS: Three percent (N=1,144) of approximately 33,700 total participants over four years presented to medical aid stations during the Baltimore Marathon between 2002 and 2005. Most participants (66%) did not require a full clinical evaluation. Common complaints encountered were dehydration (32%), musculoskeletal injuries (25%), and cutaneous wounds (20%). Transport to the hospital was required for 4% of all injured participants, and 61% returned to the race. CONCLUSIONS: Most injuries/illnesses encountered at the Baltimore Marathon in 2002-2005 were minor, although some were serious enough to require transport to a hospital. The year with the highest average race-day temperature had the highest observed injury rates and the highest number of hospital transports. These results help to improve understanding of the types, severity, and distribution of injuries commonly sustained by marathon participants and may guide decisions regarding the appropriate distribution of emergency medical resources at such events.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos en Atletas/epidemiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Carrera/lesiones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Aniversarios y Eventos Especiales , Baltimore/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Deshidratación/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Transporte de PacientesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE(S): : To determine the effect of viral suppression on cross-sectional incidence testing. METHODS: : In 2001 and 2003, patients entering the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) Emergency Department (ED) were enrolled into an interview-based identity-unlinked serosurvey. All HIV-positive samples were tested by the Vironostika-less sensitive (LS) enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Organon-Teknika, Charteston, SC) and an avidity assay to determine recent HIV infection. Additionally 16 samples from 8 previously characterized elite suppressors (ES) were tested by cross-sectional incidence assays. RESULTS: : HIV prevalence was 12% for the 2001 survey and 11% for the 2003 survey. Of the HIV-infected subjects, 18% did not know they were infected. The Vironostika-LS EIA determined that 6% (11 of 183) and 7% (17 of 243) of HIV-positive individuals in 2001and 2003, respectively, were recently infected. Avidity testing confirmed that 6 of 11 in 2001 and 5 of 17 in 2003 were newly infected, leaving 17 discrepant samples. All 17 discrepant samples were Western blot-positive and viral load undetectable, and 7 of 17 had antiretroviral drugs (ARVs) in their serum. Ten individuals were virally suppressed without ARVs and seemed incident by the Vironostika-LS EIA but chronic by avidity testing. These 10 subjects had similar testing profiles to the known 16 ES samples, because 9 of 16 were incident by the Vironostika-LS EIA and 0 of 16 were incident by avidity testing. CONCLUSIONS: : By removing the viral load-negative individuals and confirming the initial Vironostika-LS EIA results by avidity testing, the incidence estimate was lowered from 1.73% to 0.94% per year in 2001 and from 1.90% to 0.56% per year in 2003. Viral suppression affects the performance of the cross-sectional incidence tests, which rely on antibody titer. In addition, 2% (10 of 426) of all HIV-infected individuals who use the JHH ED for medical care seem to suppress HIV to undetectable levels without ARVs.