Digital Preoperative Huddle Platform Use Leads to Decreased Surgical Cost.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Communication has a well-established effect on improving outcomes. The current study evaluated the effect of multidisciplinary preoperative team communication using a digital huddle software platform on operating room costs. METHODS: A digital huddle software platform was implemented in March 2022 for neurosurgical procedures performed at a single tertiary care center. Surgeons were encouraged, but not required, to participate. General linear models were used to test the association between participation and the difference in supply-related cost and case length, using intergroup comparison and historical controls. RESULTS: A total of 29626 cases (performed by 97 surgeons), conducted between March 2021 and June 2023, were included in our analysis. Cases from participating neurosurgeons (12 surgeons, 4064 cases) were compared with cases from nonparticipating neurosurgeons (6 surgeons, 2452 cases), non-neurosurgery cases carried out by the same operating room staff (20 orthopedic spine surgeons, 6073 cases), and non-neurosurgery cases performed in a different operating room unit (59 surgeons, 21 996 cases). In aggregate, operating room (OR) costs increased by 7.3% (95% CI: 0.9-14.1, P = .025) in the postintervention period. In the same period, participation in the digital huddle platform was associated with an OR utilization and supply-related cost decrease of 16.3% (95% CI: 8.3%-23.6%, P < .001). Among neurosurgeons specifically, participation was associated with a supply-related cost decrease of 17.5% (95% CI: 6.0%-27.5%, P = .0037). There was no change in case length (median case length 171 minutes, change: +2.7% increase, 95% CI:-2.2%-7.9%, P = .28). CONCLUSION: The implementation of a digital huddle software platform resulted in an OR utilization and supply cost decrease among participants during a period when the overall nonparticipating control cohort experienced an increase in cost.

Skull Base Aerosol Generating Cases Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Experience from the Epicenter.

Soon after the World Health Organization declared the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 a global health emergency on January 30, 2020, New York City was plagued by the virus and its health system and economy pushed to their limits. The majority of the limited neurosurgical data in relation to COVID-19 is anecdotal and the higher theoretical risk of transmission of the virus among skull base aerosol generating (SBAG) cases has not been investigated or discussed in a neurosurgical population. We discuss a series of 13 patients who underwent 15 SBAG surgical procedures during the peak of COVID-19 in our hospital system and the protocols use perioperatively for their procedures. Our data support that with proper preoperative testing, a well-delineated surgical algorithm, and appropriate personal protective equipment, emergent/urgent cases can be done safely in hospitals that are currently experiencing high volumes of COVID-19 cases as we did in March to May of 2020.

Perioperative Nursing Management of Donor and Recipient Patients Undergoing Face Transplantation.

Individuals with debilitating facial injuries and deformities have achieved significant improvement of aesthetic form and function after undergoing a face transplantation. The involvement of surgical technologists and perioperative nurses in the care of the recipient and donor plays a critical role in the success of these procedures. There are unique challenges that staff members may be presented with when caring for a donor and recipient undergoing a face transplantation, including less comfort with and knowledge of the surgical procedure and instrumentation, an increased amount of equipment and personnel in the OR, donor and recipient admission and discharge care, and increased shift length. At New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, we have developed a comprehensive process to prepare staff members to care for patients undergoing face transplantation.

Reduced-dose influenza vaccine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine in adults. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search was conducted (1966-May 2006) using the key search terms inactivated, trivalent, influenza vaccine, dose, and intradermal. DATA SYNTHESIS: Four recent studies evaluated the safety and effectiveness of reduced-dose, inactivated, trivalent influenza vaccine. Reduced doses had immunogenicity similar to that of standard dose vaccination in healthy individuals less than 60 years old. Intramuscular administration caused fewer local adverse effects compared with the other routes of administration. The differences in vaccine administration and dosing used in these studies limit the comparison of their results. CONCLUSIONS: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention does not recommend vaccinating with reduced-dose influenza vaccine. If reduced-dose vaccination is to be employed during times of vaccine shortage, it should be administered only to healthy adults under the age of 60, and the intramuscular route is preferred.