Regorafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world study.

BACKGROUND: The benefits and tolerability of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with regorafenib as a second-line therapy has not been reported for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to explore the benefits and tolerability of TACE combined with second-line regorafenib in patients with unresectable advanced HCC and failure to first-line treatment. METHODS: This was a multicenter retrospective study of patients with progression after first-line sorafenib and/or lenvatinib between 01/2019 and 04/2020 at four tertiary hospitals in China. The patients were treated with TACE. Then, 5-7 days after the first TACE, the patients started taking regorafenib for 3 weeks every 4-week cycle. The overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were observed. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5.6 (range 0.7, 17.0) months. The median age was 60 (range 35, 79) years. There were 32 (84.2%) males. The patients underwent a median of three TACE sessions (range 1-13). The initial doses of regorafenib were 20 mg/d (n = 1, 2.6%), 80 mg/d (n = 10, 26.3%), 120 mg/d (n = 15, 39.5%), and 160 mg/d (n = 11, 28.9%). The incidence of grade 3/4 AEs was 15.8%. Two patients stopped regorafenib due to AEs. The median OS was 14.3 months. The median PFS and TTP were 9.1 (95% CI 4.0, 14.2) and 9.1 (95% CI 5.5, 12.8) months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study provides real-world evidence indicating that regorafenib combined with TACE was beneficial and tolerable in patients with unresectable HCC. Additional prospective large-scale studies are required for confirmation.

A prognostic nomogram for colorectal cancer liver metastases after percutaneous thermal ablation.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of percutaneous thermal ablation in treating colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRCLM), and to propose a prognostic nomogram for overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-one patients with CRCLM undergoing thermal ablation at our institute from 2009 to 2013 were identified and analysed to formulate a prognostic nomogram. The concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve were calculated to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the nomogram. The nomogram was compared with two current prognostic nomograms for patients with CRCLM who had undergone hepatectomy (Kattan) and selective internal radiation therapy (Fendler). Predictive validity was assessed in the validation cohort of 25 patients who had undergone thermal ablation from 2014 to 2016. RESULTS: The median OS in the primary cohort was 26.4 months, whereas the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 72.2%, 37.2% and 17%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 4.2 months. After univariate and multivariate analysis, a prognostic nomogram was formulated based on four predictors, including the number of tumours, maximum diameter of the tumour, CA19-9 level and ablation margin. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.815. Based on the patients of this study, the C-index was significantly higher than that of the Fendler nomogram (C-index, 0.698) and Kattan nomogram (C-index, 0.514, p < 0.001). Predictive accuracy of the proposed nomogram was also satisfactory in the validation cohort, with a C-index of 0.884. CONCLUSIONS: Thermal ablation was an effective therapy for CRCLM. Moreover, the nomogram was effective and simple for CRCLM patients undergoing thermal ablation.