Belantamab Mafodotin, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Belantamab mafodotin had single-agent activity in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, a finding that supports further evaluation of the agent in combination with standard-care therapies. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label, randomized trial, we evaluated belantamab mafodotin, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (BVd), as compared with daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd), in patients who had progression of multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were overall survival, response duration, and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status. RESULTS: In total, 494 patients were randomly assigned to receive BVd (243 patients) or DVd (251 patients). At a median follow-up of 28.2 months (range, 0.1 to 40.0), median progression-free survival was 36.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.4 to not reached) in the BVd group and 13.4 months (95% CI, 11.1 to 17.5) in the DVd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.31 to 0.53; P<0.001). Overall survival at 18 months was 84% in the BVd group and 73% in the DVd group. An analysis of the restricted mean response duration favored BVd over DVd (P<0.001). A complete response or better plus MRD-negative status occurred in 25% of the patients in the BVd group and 10% of those in the DVd group. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 95% of the patients in the BVd group and 78% of those in the DVd group. Ocular events were more common in the BVd group than in the DVd group (79% vs. 29%); such events were managed with dose modifications, and events of worsening visual acuity mostly resolved. CONCLUSIONS: As compared with DVd therapy, BVd therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among patients who had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma after at least one line of therapy. Most patients had grade 3 or higher adverse events. (Funded by GSK; DREAMM-7 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04246047; EudraCT number, 2018-003993-29.).

Evaluation of a bone morphogenetic protein 6 variant as a cause of iron loading.

BACKGROUND: Atypical iron overload without variation in the five clinically associated hereditary hemochromatosis genes is now recognized; however, their etiology remains unknown. Since the identification of iron overload in the bone morphogenetic protein 6 (Bmp6) knockout mouse, the search has been on for clinically pathogenic variants in the BMP6 gene. A recent report proposes that variants in the pro-peptide region of BMP6 are the underlying cause of several cases of iron overload. We performed targeted next-generation sequencing on three cases of atypical iron overload with Asian ethnicity and identified a p.Q118dup (aka p.E112indelEQ, p.Q115dup, p.Q118_L119insQ) variant in BMP6. The purpose of this study was to characterize the molecular function of the identified BMP6 variant. Molecular characterization by immunofluorescence microscopy and Western blotting of transfected cells, bioinformatics, and population analyses was performed. RESULTS: In contrast to reports for other BMP6 pro-peptide variants in this region, our data indicates that this variant does not affect the function of the mature BMP6 protein. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that assignment of disease causation in clinical cases of iron overload to pro-peptide variants in BMP6 should thus be treated with caution and requires biological characterization.

Ibrutinib plus rituximab and mini-CHOP in older patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL: a phase 2 ALLG study.

ABSTRACT: The multicenter, prospective phase 2 Australasian Leukaemia & Lymphoma Group NHL29 trial was conducted to assess the addition of ibrutinib to R-mini-CHOP (dose attenuated R-CHOP; rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in patients aged ≥75 years with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Treatment consisted of six 21-day cycles of ibrutinib-R-mini-CHOP followed by two 21-day cycles of R-ibrutinib. Coprimary end points were deliverability and 2-year overall survival (OS). The median average relative total dose and average relative dose intensity for the entire regimen were both 97% (interquartile range, 82-100 and 88-100, respectively). With a median follow-up of 35.5 months, the 2-year OS was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.6-77.4) with a 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 60.0% (95% CI, 47.7-70.3). Median OS and PFS were 72 months (95% CI, 35 to not reached) and 40 months (95% CI, 20.4 to not reached), respectively. The overall response rate was 76% (61/79) of patients, with a complete response rate of 71% (56/79). Deaths occurred in 34 of 79 patients (43%), including 17 from progressive disease and 5 treatment related. Overall, 67% patients experienced at least 1 serious adverse event. Most common adverse events were infections and diarrhea (the majority grade 1-2). In both health-related quality of life measures, there was an improvement in functional and symptom scales, median health state classification score, and median visual analogue scale in responders over time. In conclusion, this study showed that the addition of ibrutinib to R-mini-CHOP was both deliverable and efficacious in elderly DLBCL patients.

Depth of response and response kinetics of isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma.

The IKEMA study (Randomized, Open Label, Multicenter Study Assessing the Clinical Benefit of Isatuximab Combined With Carfilzomib [Kyprolis®] and Dexamethasone Versus Carfilzomib With Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapse and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With 1 to 3 Prior Lines; #NCT03275285) was a randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 3 study investigating isatuximab plus carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Isa-Kd) vs Kd in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. This subanalysis analyzed the depth of response of Isa-Kd vs Kd. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included overall response rate, very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) rate, complete response (CR) rate, and minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate (assessed in patients with ≥VGPR by next-generation sequencing at a 10-5 sensitivity level). At a median follow-up of 20.7 months, deeper responses were observed in the Isa-Kd arm vs the Kd arm, with ≥VGPR 72.6% vs 56.1% and CR of 39.7% vs 27.6%, respectively. MRD negativity occurred in 53 (29.6%) of 179 patients in the Isa-Kd arm vs 16 (13.0%) of 123 patients in the Kd arm, with 20.1% (Isa-Kd, 36 of 179 patients) vs 10.6% (Kd, 13 of 123 patients) reaching MRD-negative CR status. Achieving MRD negativity resulted in better PFS in both arms. A positive PFS treatment effect was seen with Isa-Kd in both MRD-negative patients (hazard ratio, 0.578; 95% CI, 0.052-6.405) and MRD-positive patients (hazard ratio, 0.670; 95% CI, 0.452-0.993). Exploratory analysis indicates that both current CR and MRD-negative CR rates are underestimated due to M-protein interference (potential adjusted CR rate, 45.8%; potential adjusted MRD-negative CR rate, 24.0%). In conclusion, there was a clinically meaningful improvement in depth of response with Isa-Kd. The CR rate in Isa-Kd was 39.7%. Mass spectrometry suggests that the potential adjusted CR rate could reach an unprecedented 45.8% of patients treated with Isa-Kd.