Economic Consequences of the Overuse of Short-Acting ß-Adrenergic Agonists in the Treatment of Asthma in Spain.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between short-acting ß-adrenergic agonist (SABA) overuse and health care resource use and costs in asthma patients in routine clinical practice. METHODS: A longitudinal retrospective study was conducted in Spanish primary and specialized care centers using the BIG-PAC medical records database. The study population comprised asthma patients ≥12 years of age who attended ≥2 consultations during 2017 and had 1-year follow-up data available. The main outcomes were demographics, comorbidities, medication, and clinical and health care resource use and costs. The relationship between SABA overuse and health care costs and between asthma severity and health care costs was determined. RESULTS: The SABA use IN Asthma (SABINA) study included 39 555 patients, with a mean (SD) age of 49.8 (20.7) years (64.2% female). The Charlson comorbidity index was 0.7 (1.0). SABA overuse (≥3 canisters/y) was 28.7% (95%CI, 27.7-29.7), with a mean of 3.3 (3.6) canisters/y. Overall, 5.1% of patients were prescribed ≥12 canisters/y. SABA overuse was correlated with health care costs (ρ=0.621; P<.001). The adjusted mean annual cost/patient according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA 2019) classification of asthma severity was €2231, €2345, €2735, €3473, and €4243 for steps 1-5, respectively (P<.001). Regardless of asthma severity, SABA overuse yielded a significant increase in health care costs per patient and year (€5702 vs €1917, P<.001) compared with recommended use (<2 canisters/y). CONCLUSION: SABA overuse yields high costs for the Spanish National Health System. Costs increased with severity of asthma.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Resource Use and Costs in Adult Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Receiving Systemic Treatment: Derma-Atopic Study in Spain.

BACKGROUND: Moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has a significant impact on patients' lives, with many requiring systemic treatment to manage symptoms (e.g., pruritus). Several drugs are used off-label to treat AD. This study describes sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, health resource use (HRU) and costs in adults with AD who initiated systemic treatment or phototherapy in routine practice. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of electronic medical records in the BIG-PAC database identified adults with prior diagnosis of AD (ICD-9: 691.8 or 692.9) starting oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologics or phototherapy between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. Patients were followed for 3 years from treatment initiation, up to 31/12/2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRU and costs were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Patients (N=1995) had a mean age of 60 years, 64% were female, with a mean time of 23 years since diagnosis (84% were ≥18 years at AD onset). Main comorbidities were anxiety (38%), arterial hypertension (36%) and dyslipidemia (35%). Most patients used oral corticosteroids as first systemic (84%; median duration 29 days) and immunosuppressants in 13% of patients (median duration 117 days, 5% cyclosporine and 4% methotrexate). Half of patients required a second line systemic and 12% a third line. The use of immunosuppressants and biologics increased with treatment lines. About 13% of patients received systemic treatments continuously over the 3-year follow-up. The average 3-year per patient cost was 3835 euros, with an average annual cost of 1278 euros. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a high comorbidity and economic burden in this real-world adult population with AD, and the need for systemic treatments indicated for use in AD.

Real-World Treatment Patterns, Resource Use and Costs in Adult Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Receiving Systemic Treatment: Derma-Atopic Study in Spain. / [Artículo traducido] Características de los pacientes, patrones de tratamiento, uso de recursos y costes en adultos con dermatitis atópica moderada-grave en la práctica habitual en España: Estudio Derma-Atopic.

BACKGROUND: Moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has a significant impact on patients' lives, with many requiring systemic treatment to manage symptoms (e.g., pruritus). Several drugs are used off-label to treat AD. This study describes sociodemographic/clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, health resource use (HRU) and costs in adults with AD who initiated systemic treatment or phototherapy in routine practice. METHODS: This retrospective observational study of electronic medical records in the BIG-PAC database identified adults with prior diagnosis of AD (ICD-9: 691.8 or 692.9) starting oral corticosteroids, immunosuppressants, biologics or phototherapy between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2016. Patients were followed for 3 years from treatment initiation, up to 31/12/2019. Data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, HRU and costs were analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: Patients (N = 1995) had a mean age of 60 years, 64% were female, with a mean time of 23 years since diagnosis (84% were ≥18 years at AD onset). Main comorbidities were anxiety (38%), arterial hypertension (36%) and dyslipidemia (35%). Most patients used oral corticosteroids as first systemic (84%; median duration 29 days) and immunosuppressants in 13% of patients (median duration 117 days, 5% cyclosporine and 4% methotrexate). Half of patients required a second line systemic and 12% a third line. The use of immunosuppressants and biologics increased with treatment lines. About 13% of patients received systemic treatments continuously over the 3-year follow-up. The average 3-year per patient cost was 3835 euros, with an average annual cost of 1278 euros. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a high comorbidity and economic burden in this real-world adult population with AD, and the need for systemic treatments indicated for use in AD.

Prevalence, T2-biomarkers and cost of severe asthma in the era of biologics: The BRAVO-1 study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The last decade has seen a new era of classifications of asthma pathophysiology which have changed the treatment options available. To update the figures of prevalence of T2 asthma, comorbidities, biomarker characterization and costs of severe asthma in patients≥12-years-old adapted to this new situation. METHODS: Retroprospective, observational, nationwide study using a top-down approach. Data were obtained from the BIG-PAC®, an electronic medical record database of 1.7 million patients in Spain. Patients≥12-years-old who had received medical care during the period 2016-2017 and diagnosed with asthma at least one year prior to the index date were included and followed for one year. RESULTS: Prevalence of asthma was 5.5%. Of these patients, asthma was severe in 3.031 (7.7%), 81.2% of whom presented T2 asthma. Among severe asthma patients, 64·1% were uncontrolled, 31.2% were Oral corticosteroids-dependent (37% in the uncontrolled severe asthma group) and only 3.8% were on biologics. The most common T2 comorbidities were allergic rhinitis (66·1%), atopic dermatitis (29·1%) and chronic rhinositis with nasal polyps (14.6%). Mortality rates in the total and the uncontrolled severe asthma groups were 4.2% and 5.5% respectively. The total annual costs per patient with severe asthma were 5.890€ (uncontrolled) and 2.841€ (controlled). CONCLUSIONS: In the era of biologics, most severe asthma patients present T2 asthma. Despite the availability of new treatments, the rates of uncontrolled and oral corticosteroids-dependent patients with severe asthma remain high, but biologics still underused. The costs of uncontrolled severe asthma are twice as high as those of controlled severe asthma.

Treatment persistence and adherence and their consequences on patient outcomes of generic versus brand-name statins routinely used to treat high cholesterol levels in Spain: a retrospective cost-consequences analysis.

BACKGROUND: High blood lipoprotein concentrations are one of the major risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. Drug therapy is the base of treatment; statins in particular. Both brand-name and generic presentations are available for statin therapy of high cholesterol levels. Factors that may influence their use in routine medical practice include, among others, patient persistence and adherence to treatment as prescribed by physicians. The aim of this retrospective analysis was to provide real-world evidence of treatment persistence and adherence and their consequences on economic and patient outcomes of generic versus brand-name statins routinely used to treat high cholesterol levels in Spain. METHODS: Existing real-world electronic medical records abstracted from a database of two regions in Spain were analyzed. The analysis compared generic versus brand-name statins data from subjects' who started treatment between July 1, 2010 and June 30, 2012. Treatment persistence, adherence expressed as medication possession ratio (MPR), healthcare resource utilization and their costs were analyzed together with patient's at-goal rates of low-density-lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-c), incidence of any major cardiovascular event (CVE) and all-cause mortality during a 5-year follow-up period. Multivariate analyses were applied. RESULTS: A total of 13,244 records were included. Persistence was lower with generics; adjusted hazard ratio -HR- [95% confidence interval]: 0.86 [0.82-0.91], p < 0.001) and MPR was also lower: 61.5% vs. 65.1% (p < 0.001). Less patients with generics reached their LDL-c goal: 39.2% [38.3-40.2%] vs. 42.0% [40.2-43.7%]; adjusted odds ratio; 0.87 [0.80-0.95], p = 0.003. Compared to brand-name statins, the observed probability of occurrence of a CVE; HR: 1.31 [1.15-1.50], p < 0.001, and also all-cause deaths; HR: 1.36 [1.15-1.62], was significantly higher with generics; p < 0.001 in both cases. Adjusted mean total healthcare cost per patient was also higher with generic than with brand-name statins: €9118 (9059-9176) vs. €7980 (7853-8808) [adjusted difference: €1137 (997-1277), p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: This retrospective cost-consequences analysis found poorer treatment persistence and adherence in patients who first started therapy with generic instead of brand-name statins in routine medical practice in Spain. Also, patients receiving generics were more unlikely to reach LDL-c goals, showed increased probability of having CVE and all-cause mortality at a higher cost to payers.

Statins after recent stroke reduces recurrence and improves survival in an aging Mediterranean population without known coronary heart disease.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The effect of a statin-based medical intervention on prevention of fatal and non-fatal stroke recurrence and the incidence of all-causes mortality have been explored previously in aging populations within the scope of clinical trials research. However, such evidence needs to be explored under conditions of routine clinical practice. The objective of this study was to determine whether statin therapy in patients with a first stroke episode reduces the incidence of 6-year recurrent fatal or non-fatal stroke and all-cause mortality in an aging Mediterranean population without known coronary heart disease followed in routine medical practice. METHODS: A retrospective study was carried out using records on death, hospitalizations owing to stroke and history of statin therapy included in the Badalona Serveis Assistencials (BSA) database. The cohort studied consisted of consecutive patients covered by the BSA health provider plan with a first-ever acute stroke episode during January 2003 until December 2008, for whom there was available information covering the 6-year follow-up period. Recurrence rate (RR) and incidence rate (IR) of fatal/non-fatal stroke and all-causes mortality were computed. Association with statin therapy was assessed by means of calculation of relative risk (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) using multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models controlling for confounding covariates. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The cohort comprised a series of 601 consecutive patients [57% men, 75·9 (12·4) years old (88% >60 years)]. Of these, 32% received statins, which were associated with lower fatal/non-fatal recurrent stroke RR; 7% vs. 18% [adjusted RR=0·32 (CI: 0·16-0·61), P=0·001] and lower IR; 16·78 vs. 45·22 events/year-1000 subjects [adjusted HR=0·35 (0·19-0·64), P=0·001]. Similarly, observed all-causes mortality was lower in the cohort receiving statins; 11% vs. 16% [adjusted RR=0·29 (CI: 0·08-1·12), P=0·072], and also mortality rate; 26·09 vs. 36·25 deaths/year-1000 subjects [adjusted HR=0·23 (0·08-0·67), P=0·007]. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Statin therapy in patients with first-ever acute stroke lowers the risk of 6-year stroke recurrence and improves survival in an aging Mediterranean cohort. These results add additional evidence in routine clinical practice to the observed effects of statins in clinical trials.

Clinical characteristics, management, and one-year risk of complications among patients with heart failure with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: This work aims to describe the clinical characteristics and therapeutic management and to determine cardiovascular outcomes after one year of follow-up in a contemporaneous population with heart failure (HF) with and without type 2 diabetes in Spain. These factors were also analyzed in the DAPA-HF-like population (patients who met most inclusion criteria of the DAPA-HF trial) and in patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors at baseline. METHODS: This work is an observational, retrospective, population-based study using the BIG-PAC database. The index date was January 1, 2019. People aged ≥ 18 years who received care for HF in 2019 were selected. Events that occurred in 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 21,851 patients with HF (age 78.0 ± 11.3 years, 53.0% men, 50.9% with HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, 44.5% in NYHA functional class II). HF prevalence was 1.88% and incidence was 2.83 per 1,000 person-years. Regarding HF treatments, 66.1% were taking renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 69.4% beta blockers, 31.2% aldosterone antagonists, and 7.5% sacubitril/valsartan. During the year of follow-up, 29.8% had HF decompensation which led to hospitalization (mean time to first event of 120.9 ± 72.5 days), 12.3% died, and 8.1% died during hospitalization. Events were more common among patients with type 2 diabetes. Hospitalizations for HF were more common in the DAPA-HF-like population. CONCLUSIONS: In Spain, the population with HF is elderly and has many comorbidities. Approximately half of patients have HF with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. There is room for improvement in HF management, particularly through the use of drugs that reduce both HF hospitalization and mortality, in order to reduce the burden of HF.

[Morbi-mortality and use of recourses after acute coronary syndrome in a Spanish population]. / Morbimortalidad y consumo de recursos asociados tras síndrome coronario agudo en una población española.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the management of patients suffering acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and to determine its clinical and economic consequences in a Spanish population. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective claim database study including patient medical records from 6 primary care centers, two hospitals and two years of follow-up was carried out. Patients ≥30 years, suffering a first acute coronary syndrome (ACS), between 2003 and 2007, were included. Groups: acute coronary syndrome with and without ST segment elevation. VARIABLES: socio-demographic, co-morbidities, metabolic syndrome (MS), biochemical parameters, drugs, cumulative incidence (total mortality and cardiovascular events (CVE: including myocardial infarction, stroke and peripheral artery disease) and total costs. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier curves and ANCOVA; (P<.05). RESULTS: A total of 1020 patients were included. Mean age: 69 years; males: 65%. Groups: ST segment elevation ACS (N=632; 62%). Co-morbidities: hypertension (56%), dyslipidemia (46%) and diabetes (38%). Prevalence of MS: 59% (CI 95%: 56-62%). All biochemical parameters had improved after two years of follow-up. The average total cost per patient was €14,069 (87% direct costs; 13% productivity loss costs). Direct costs: primary care (20%), specialty care (67%); hospitalization costs represented 63% of total costs. The average total cost for patients presenting more than one CVE was 22,750€ vs 12,380€ for those patients who suffered only one (P<.001). Cumulative incidence: total mortality 14%; CVE: 16%. CONCLUSIONS: In the current clinical practice, and despite the clinical efforts carried out, patients with an ACS are still at a high risk of suffering further CVE, representing a high cost burden to the health care system.

[Treatment persistence with brand-name vs. generic metformin in monotherapy for type 2 diabetes: real-life retrospective study using the propensity matching score]. / Persistencia al tratamiento con metformina de marca vs. genérica en monoterapia para la diabetes tipo 2: estudio retrospectivo de vida real mediante propensity score matching.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment persistence in patients with polymedicated type 2 diabetes (DM2) receiving new treatment with brand-name vs. generic metformin 850mg in usual clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective study based on the medical records of patients aged ≥50 years who initiated metformin treatment (brand-name vs. generic) between 01/01/2016 and 31/12/2017. The follow up was two years. MAIN MEASURES: treatment persistence and clinical consequences (metabolic control [HbA1c] and hospital admissions). Each patient in the brand-name group (reference) was paired with a patient from the generic group using propensity score matching. A Cox proportional risk model was constructed (p<0.05). RESULTS: 863 patients receiving brand-name metformin were matched (ratio 1:1) with patients receiving generic metformin. The median age was 60.8 years (SD: 8.8) years and 52.6% were female. Persistence at 24 months was 8.6% higher for brand-name vs. generic metformin (63.2% vs. 58.2%; p=0.034). The hazard ratio for brand-name metformin was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.71-0.96, p=0.013). During the follow-up there was a greater percentage reduction of HbA1c in the brand-name vs. generic group (-6.8% vs. -4.1%; p=0.013). There was a non-significant 19.1% reduction in hospital admissions in the brand-name vs. generic group (8.9% vs. 11.0%; p=0.148). CONCLUSIONS: Polymedicated patients who initiated new brand-name metformin treatment for DM2 had greater treatment persistence than those who initiated it with generic metformin and had better metabolic control (percentage reduction in HbA1c).

[Comorbidity and health resources use in smokers. An analysis from a primary care setting]. / Comorbilidades y consumo de recursos sanitarios en población fumadora. Un análisis desde Atención Primaria.

BACKGROUND: To ascertain the morbidity profile, achievement of the clinical control objectives, resources use and the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVE) in smoking subjects in Primary Care settings (PC). METHODS: Retrospective multicentric study. All smoker subjects older than thirty years attended in any of five PC settings were included. A comparative cohort was established with non-smokers. Primary measures were: presence of CVE, age, gender, Charlson index, history/co-morbidity and clinics parameters and direct costs (fixed and variable; visits, drugs, diagnostic test and referrals). Multiple logistic regression analysis and ANCOVA models were applied for models correction, P<0.05. RESULTS: 55,653 patients were included. 20.8% (95% confidence intervals [CI]:20.5-21.1%) were smokers. Non-smokers were younger (48.2 versus 55.9 years), with more men (60.8%), P<0.01; and a similar Charlson index (0.3 versus 0.3; P=NS). The proportion of smokers in hypertensive population was 18.8% and in diabetics 9.6%. CVE presence in smokers were 4.9% versus 4.2% and the accumulated incidence/annual of 14.2 per thousand versus 12.5 per thousand, P<0.028. Smokers showed higher levels of serum triglycerides (136.3 mg/dl) and LDL-cholesterol (128.0 mg/dl, P<0.001). Smoking habit was independent related to the alcoholism (Odds ratio, OR=5.3) and the EPOC (OR=2.5), in presence of CVE (OR=1.2, P<0.001). Adjusted direct costs non differences showed: euro660.10 versus euro654.11, P=NS (in all components). CONCLUSIONS: CVE annual incidence in smoking subjects was greater, with a minor average of age. Smokers presented a similar number of co-morbidities and total/patient costs. Clinical control objectives should be better in Primary prevention of the cardiovascular risk factors. To give up smoking should be the best strategy to diminish CVE incidence.

[Clinical and economic consequences in patients initiating therapy with clopidogrel brand-name vs. generic: A real-life retrospective study]. / Consecuencias clínicas y económicas en pacientes que inician tratamiento con clopidogrel de marca vs. genérico: estudio retrospectivo de vida real.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the adherence to treatment, resource use, and costs in subjects initiating treatment with brand-name versus generic clopidogrel for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, retrospective study based on the medical records of patients aged ≥18 years who initiated treatment with clopidogrel (brand-name vs. generic) between 4 April 2015 and 31 March 2017. Four study groups were compared, and the follow-up was one year. The main measurements were: comorbidity, treatment adherence, medication possession ratio (MPR), resource use, and costs. The results were analysed using multivariate analysis. The level of statistical significance was P<.05. RESULTS: Four groups were compared: a) ACS: brand-name clopidogrel (N=1,067) vs. generic (N=3,504), and b) PAD: brand-name clopidogrel (N=425) vs. generic (N=994). In the ACS comparison (mean age: 69.7 years, 61.4% male), adherence (65.3% vs. 61.0%, P<.001), adjusted hazard ratio 0.85 and MPR (89.8% vs. 86.7%, P=.045) were more superior with brand-name clopidogrel than with the generic and with a lower mean cost per unit (€2,890 vs. €3,865, P=.001). In the PAD comparison, similar results were observed: persistence (64.7% vs. 58.9%, P=.039); adjusted hazard-ratio 0.86 and MPR (88.6% vs. 81.7%; P=.013) were more superior with brand-name clopidogrel than for the generic, with a lower mean cost per unit (€2,880 vs. €3,532, P=.044). CONCLUSIONS: There was better treatment adherence in patients initiating treatment with brand-name compared with generic clopidogrel for ACS and PAD, resulting in lower health costs for the Spanish National Health System.