Definitive treatment of leptomeningeal spinal metastases in children.

BACKGROUND: Uniquely in children, the existence of leptomeningeal spinal metastases does not confer a uniformly grave prognosis. Although the radiation tolerance of the spinal cord is of significant concern in these cases, the chemo- and radiosensitivity of these lesions argues for an aggressive approach where possible. METHODS: The records of the Indiana University Health Proton Therapy Center were reviewed for patients undergoing proton beam therapy with curative intent for LSM between January 1, 2004 and July 7, 2012. Patients with microscopic disease only on LP were not included. Particulars of therapy, including dose, field sizes, toxicities, and outcomes were collated. RESULTS: Twenty-two children received therapy as described, of median age 5 years (range 1.1-17.1). Patients had medulloblastoma (n = 9), ATRT (n = 4), ependymoma, and PNET (n = 3 each). Five lesions (23%) were chemo-recurrent, though no patient had prior radiation to the spine. Median follow-up was 14 months (range 4-33) for all living patients. Fifteen (68%) children continued to have local control at last follow-up visit. Median dose was 37.8 Gy (range 21.6-54 Gy). Eight patients with chemo-recurrent disease or diffuse cord seeding did poorly, with local control and overall survival achieved in four. The 12-month overall survival was 68% with grade 1 skin erythema as the most frequent toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a cohort of LSM patients treated with RT with definitive intent, and the only available data from the proton environment. Durable response is possible for these children in over two-thirds of cases. Significant toxicity was infrequent using proton radiotherapy and these fractionation schemes.

Radiation therapy at end of life in children.

OBJECTIVE: Few data exist on evaluating utilization patterns of radiotherapy (RT) at the end of life (EOL) in children. Metastatic disease in pediatric patients is not pathognomonic for palliative treatment intent; further complicating the issue are complexities surrounding the very select population of children receiving proton therapy (PrT). We compared data for RT and PrT in terms of death rate within 30 days. METHODS: We performed chart reviews for patients receiving radiation therapy at age ≤21 years treated at Indiana University Health Proton Therapy Center (IUHPTC) between June 2008 and June 2013 and University of Miami Radiation Oncology Department (UM) between June 2000 and June 2013. Included were patients not completing prescribed courses of RT, and those dying within 30 days of therapy. Comparison was made of differences between practice data for PrT and conventional RT. RESULTS: At IUHPTC, 2 children of 272 did not complete their courses and died within 30 days (0.7%). At UM, data are available for 425 children; 9 did not complete their courses and 7 died within 30 days (1.6%). Neither the number of patients who did not complete treatment nor the 30-day death rates (P=.21) for PrT and RT were significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Delivery of RT for children at EOL is complex. Frequency of RT at EOL in children occurs in is <2% of cases, and is not significantly less frequent in the proton milieu. This appears to be about an order of magnitude less than in adults.

Repetitive pediatric anesthesia in a non-hospital setting.

PURPOSE: Repetitive sedation/anesthesia (S/A) for children receiving fractionated radiation therapy requires induction and recovery daily for several weeks. In the vast majority of cases, this is accomplished in an academic center with direct access to pediatric faculty and facilities in case of an emergency. Proton radiation therapy centers are more frequently free-standing facilities at some distance from specialized pediatric care. This poses a potential dilemma in the case of children requiring anesthesia. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The records of the Indiana University Health Proton Therapy Center were reviewed for patients requiring anesthesia during proton beam therapy (PBT) between June 1, 2008, and April 12, 2012. RESULTS: A total of 138 children received daily anesthesia during this period. A median of 30 fractions (range, 1-49) was delivered over a median of 43 days (range, 1-74) for a total of 4045 sedation/anesthesia procedures. Three events (0.0074%) occurred, 1 fall from a gurney during anesthesia recovery and 2 aspiration events requiring emergency department evaluation. All 3 children did well. One aspiration patient needed admission to the hospital and mechanical ventilation support. The other patient returned the next day for treatment without issue. The patient who fell was not injured. No patient required cessation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest reported series of repetitive pediatric anesthesia in radiation therapy, and the only available data from the proton environment. Strict adherence to rigorous protocols and a well-trained team can safely deliver daily sedation/anesthesia in free-standing proton centers.