Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
N Engl J Med ; 364(20): 1920-31, 2011 May 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21591944

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oxygen free radicals and cytokines play a pathogenic role in Graves' orbitopathy. METHODS: We carried out a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of selenium (an antioxidant agent) or pentoxifylline (an antiinflammatory agent) in 159 patients with mild Graves' orbitopathy. The patients were given selenium (100 µg twice daily), pentoxifylline (600 mg twice daily), or placebo (twice daily) orally for 6 months and were then followed for 6 months after treatment was withdrawn. Primary outcomes at 6 months were evaluated by means of an overall ophthalmic assessment, conducted by an ophthalmologist who was unaware of the treatment assignments, and a Graves' orbitopathy-specific quality-of-life questionnaire, completed by the patient. Secondary outcomes were evaluated with the use of a Clinical Activity Score and a diplopia score. RESULTS: At the 6-month evaluation, treatment with selenium, but not with pentoxifylline, was associated with an improved quality of life (P<0.001) and less eye involvement (P=0.01) and slowed the progression of Graves' orbitopathy (P=0.01), as compared with placebo. The Clinical Activity Score decreased in all groups, but the change was significantly greater in the selenium-treated patients. Exploratory evaluations at 12 months confirmed the results seen at 6 months. Two patients assigned to placebo and one assigned to pentoxifylline required immunosuppressive therapy for deterioration in their condition. No adverse events were evident with selenium, whereas pentoxifylline was associated with frequent gastrointestinal problems. CONCLUSIONS: Selenium administration significantly improved quality of life, reduced ocular involvement, and slowed progression of the disease in patients with mild Graves' orbitopathy. (Funded by the University of Pisa and the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research; EUGOGO Netherlands Trial Register number, NTR524.).


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/uso terapéutico , Antioxidantes/uso terapéutico , Oftalmopatía de Graves/tratamiento farmacológico , Pentoxifilina/uso terapéutico , Calidad de Vida , Selenio/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Antiinflamatorios/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Pentoxifilina/efectos adversos
3.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 95(3): 1333-7, 2010 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20061414

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Radioiodine (RAI) therapy may cause progression of mild or absent Graves' orbitopathy (GO), preventable by oral prednisone. Optimal doses of prednisone are undefined. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of reported doses [starting dose, >0.3 mg/kg body weight (bw)], and lower (<0.3 mg/kg bw)] doses of prednisone. DESIGN AND SETTING: We conducted a retrospective matched cohort study at a University Center. PATIENTS: Of 111 RAI-treated Graves' patients with mild or no GO, 35 received no steroid prophylaxis (absence of GO and/or risk factors for RAI-associated GO progression); 28 received low-dose prednisone (starting dose, 0.16-0.27 mg/kg bw; mean +/- sd, 0.22 +/- 0.03 mg/kg bw; group 1); and 48 received higher doses (group 2). Among the latter, 28 (starting dose, 0.32-0.56 mg/kg bw; mean +/- sd, 0.36 +/- 0.05 mg/kg bw) were matched with group 1 according to several relevant variables. Prednisone was started 1 d after RAI and withdrawn after 6 wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed ocular changes (1, 3, and 6 months after RAI) and side effects of prednisone. RESULTS: Two of 35 patients not receiving steroid prophylaxis (6%) developed mild-to-moderate GO (clinical activity score, 2/7 and 3/7) after RAI. No patients in group 1 or group 2 had GO progression. Side effects were very mild and inconstant, although more frequent in group 2. Both groups showed an increase in bw, an increase that was significantly higher in group 2. CONCLUSION: Lower doses of oral prednisone (about 0.2 mg/kg bw) are as effective as previously reported doses (0.3-0.5 mg/kg bw). A shorter treatment period (6 wk) is probably sufficient. The increase in bw is less using lower doses of prednisone.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Graves/radioterapia , Oftalmopatía de Graves/tratamiento farmacológico , Oftalmopatía de Graves/prevención & control , Radioisótopos de Yodo/efectos adversos , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Graves/patología , Oftalmopatía de Graves/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prednisona/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/inducido químicamente , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Glándula Tiroides/efectos de los fármacos , Glándula Tiroides/patología , Tirotropina/sangre , Tiroxina/sangre , Triyodotironina/sangre , Aumento de Peso/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA