The 2021 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Fee Schedule's Impact on Adult Reconstruction Surgeon Productivity and Reimbursement.

BACKGROUND: On December 20, 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) finalized its proposed rule: CMS-1734-P. This 2021 Final Rule significantly changed Medicare total joint arthroplasty (TJA) reimbursement. The precise impact on surgeon productivity and reimbursement is unknown. In the present study, we sought to model the potential impact of these changes for multiple unique practice configurations. METHODS: A mathematical model was applied to CMS data to determine the impact of CMS-1734-F on multiple, theoretical TJA practice configurations. Variables tested were the annual percentage of revision vs primary arthroplasty cases performed and the annual percentage of operative vs office-based productivity. The model defined baseline annual surgeon productivity as the 2018 Medical Group Management Association hip and knee arthroplasty surgeon median productivity of 10,568 work relative value units (wRVUs). RESULTS: All modeled simulations demonstrated a year-to-year increase in wRVUs independent of practice configuration. However, simulations that demonstrated less than a 3.35% increase in wRVUs from year-to-year saw a decrease in reimbursement. Those simulations with higher wRVU increases tended to have a higher percentage of revision vs primary arthroplasty cases and/or had annual productivity that was derived to a greater extent from office encounters than surgical cases. CONCLUSION: The impact of CMS-1734-F will vary based on 3 factors: (1) the relative contribution of a surgeon's operative TJA practice compared with their office-based practice to their annual wRVUs; (2) the relative percentage of revision TJAs vs the percentage of primary TJAs performed; and (3) the relative percentage of primary TJA compared to non-arthroplasty surgeries as a component of overall operative practice. The decreased reimbursement will be disproportionately felt by arthroplasty surgeons who perform relatively fewer revision TJA procedures and whose office-based productivity makes up a smaller overall percentage of their annual workload.

An Orthopaedic Surgeon's Guide to Billing and Coding.

Understanding the nuances of musculoskeletal documentation, coding, and billing is an integral part of any orthopaedic practice, but these nuances are not actively taught in most orthopaedic residency programs. The paucity of medical billing education overwhelms many young orthopaedic surgeons as they begin their first job. In addition, not understanding how their value as a surgeon is calculated poses a significant disadvantage when negotiating employment contracts. The purpose of this review article is to educate orthopaedic residents, fellows, and new attendings on how to effectively document during clinical and surgical encounters to maximize value, understand basic orthopaedic coding, and introduce important billing concepts.

Nonbattle injury among deployed troops: an epidemiologic study.

(n = 150) Nonbattle injury (NBI) continues to be a leading cause of morbidity among troops currently deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan. To assess NBI incidence, impact, and risk factors, a survey was given to soldiers during mid- or postdeployment from Iraq, Afghanistan, and surrounding region, from January 2005 through May 2006. Among 3,367 troops completing a survey, 19.5% reported at least one NBI, and 85% sought care at least once for their symptoms. Service component, rank, and unit type were among factors associated with differential NBI risk. Twenty percent stated that NBI resulted in back-up personnel being called or shift change to cover impacted duties, and among those reported having been grounded from flight status, a third were the result of NBI. NBI continues to be a problem in recent deployments, and given the findings on individual and potential operational impact indicators, NBI should be viewed as a primary force health protection problem.

Enlarging nodule under the toenail · no history of trauma · unremarkable medical history · Dx?

A 28-year-old woman with an unremarkable medical history presented with an enlarging nodule that had been growing under her left great toenail for 6 months. The patient monitored the nodule, hoping that it would resolve on its own, but found that it steadily increased in size and began to displace the nail, causing pain. At the time of presentation, the nodule measured approximately 10 mm in diameter, and there was significant (~80°) superior displacement of the nail.