Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 30(3): 371-9, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22339813

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammation of the spine and the sacroiliac joints. Current markers of inflammation, such as C-reactive protein (CRP), are reflecting the production of an acute phase reactant rather than tissue specific inflammation, but the use of CRP as a diagnostic and prognostic marker for AS has not provided the sought accuracy and specificity. We hypothesized that local enzymatic activity in the disease-affected tissue, which is associated with extensive tissue turnover may, by cleavage, modify the CRP produced in the liver. These cleavage products may provide additional information on systemic inflammation as compared to that of full-length CRP. We investigated whether these CRP degradation products would provide additional diagnostic value in AS patients compared to full-length CRP. METHODS: CRP fragments were identified by mass-spectrometry. Two fragments were selected for ELISA development. One assay exclusively identified a matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) generated fragment, CRP-MMP, whereas the other assay identified a cathepsin generated fragment, CRP-CAT. Full-length CRP, CRP-MMP and CRP-CAT were measured in serum samples from 40 AS patients and 40 sex- and age-matched controls. RESULTS: Full-length CRP was not elevated in AS patients compared to controls, whereas CRP-MMP was elevated by 25% (p<0.001) and CRP-CAT by 50% (p<0.0001). The Area Under Curve of the Receiver-Operator Characteristic curve of CRP-CAT was the highest with 77%. CONCLUSIONS: MMP and cathepsin degraded CRP provided more discriminative diagnostic potential compared to that of full-length CRP in this current study. These data suggest that different pools of CRP may provide insight into the inflammation processes in AS.


Asunto(s)
Proteína C-Reactiva/inmunología , Catepsinas/inmunología , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/métodos , Inflamación , Metaloproteinasas de la Matriz/inmunología , Espondilitis Anquilosante , Anciano , Secuencia de Aminoácidos , Animales , Biomarcadores/sangre , Proteína C-Reactiva/química , Proteína C-Reactiva/metabolismo , Catepsinas/sangre , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática/normas , Epítopos/sangre , Epítopos/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/sangre , Inflamación/diagnóstico , Inflamación/inmunología , Masculino , Metaloproteinasas de la Matriz/sangre , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos BALB C , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fragmentos de Péptidos/química , Fragmentos de Péptidos/inmunología , Fragmentos de Péptidos/metabolismo , Curva ROC , Espondilitis Anquilosante/sangre , Espondilitis Anquilosante/diagnóstico , Espondilitis Anquilosante/inmunología
2.
J Hosp Infect ; 104(1): 27-32, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31494129

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Multi-resistant bacteria (MRB) are an emerging problem. Early identification of patients colonized with MRB is mandatory to avoid in-hospital transmission and to target antibiotic treatment. Since most patients pass through specialized emergency departments (EDs), these departments are crucial in early identification. The Danish National Board of Health (DNBH) has developed exposure-based targeted screening tools to identify and isolate carriers of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE). AIM: To assess the national screening tools for detection of MRSA and CPE carriage in a cohort of acute patients. The objectives were to investigate: (i) if the colonized patients were detected; and (ii) if the colonized patients were isolated. METHODS: This was a multi-centre cross-sectional survey of adults visiting EDs. The patients answered the DNBH questions, and swabs were taken from the nose, throat and rectum. The collected samples were examined for MRSA and CPE. Screening performances were calculated. FINDINGS: Of the 5117 included patients, 16 were colonized with MRSA and four were colonized with CPE. The MRSA screening tool had sensitivity of 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) 25-75%] for carrier detection and 25% (95% CI 7-52%) for carrier isolation. The CPE screening tool had sensitivity of 25% (95% CI 1-81%) and none of the CPE carriers were isolated. CONCLUSION: The national screening tools were of limited use as the majority of MRSA and CPE carriers passed unidentified through the EDs, and many patients were isolated unnecessarily.


Asunto(s)
Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/aislamiento & purificación , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/aislamiento & purificación , Aislamiento de Pacientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Enterobacteriaceae Resistentes a los Carbapenémicos/efectos de los fármacos , Portador Sano/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple/efectos de los fármacos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/epidemiología , Infecciones por Enterobacteriaceae/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recto/microbiología , Factores de Riesgo , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/epidemiología , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA