RESUMEN
BACKGROUND & AIMS: We previously reported that colon epithelial cell silencing of Smad4 increased epithelial expression of inflammatory genes, including the chemokine c-c motif chemokine ligand 20 (CCL20), and increased susceptibility to colitis-associated cancer. Here, we examine the role of the chemokine/receptor pair CCL20/c-c motif chemokine receptor 6 (CCR6) in mediating colitis-associated colon carcinogenesis induced by SMAD4 loss. METHODS: In silico analysis of SMAD4, CCL20, and CCR6 messenger RNA expression was performed on published transcriptomic data from human ulcerative colitis (UC), and colon and rectal cancer samples. Immunohistochemistry for CCL20 and CCR6 was performed on human tissue microarrays comprising human UC-associated cancer specimens, Mice with conditional, epithelial-specific Smad4 loss with and without germline deletion of the Ccr6 gene were subjected to colitis and followed for up to 3 months. Tumors were quantified histologically, and immune cell populations were analyzed by flow cytometry and immunostaining. RESULTS: In human UC-associated cancers, loss of epithelial SMAD4 was associated with increased CCL20 expression and CCR6+ cells. SMAD4 loss in mouse colon epithelium led to enlarged gut-associated lymphoid tissues and recruitment of immune cells to the mouse colon epithelium and stroma, particularly T regulatory, Th17, and dendritic cells. Loss of CCR6 abrogated these immune responses and significantly reduced the incidence of colitis-associated tumors observed with loss of SMAD4 alone. CONCLUSIONS: Regulation of mucosal inflammation is central to SMAD4 tumor suppressor function in the colon. A key downstream node in this regulation is suppression of epithelial CCL20 signaling to CCR6 in immune cells. Loss of SMAD4 in the colon epithelium increases CCL20 expression and chemoattraction of CCR6+ immune cells, contributing to greater susceptibility to colon cancer.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma , Neoplasias Asociadas a Colitis , Colitis , Humanos , Ratones , Animales , Receptores CCR6/genética , Quimiocina CCL20/metabolismo , Ligandos , Inflamación , Colitis/complicaciones , ARN Mensajero , Proteína Smad4/genética , Proteína Smad4/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Radiographic calcifications and cystic morphology are associated with higher and lower tumor grade, respectively, in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Whether calcifications and/or cystic morphology could be used preoperatively to predict post-resection survival in patients with PNETs remains elusive. METHODS: Patients undergoing curative-intent resection of well-differentiated PNETs from 2000 to 2017 at eight academic institutions participating in the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group were identified. Preoperative cross-sectional imaging reports were reviewed to identify the presence of calcifications and of a cystic component occupying >50% of the total tumor area. Clinicopathologic characteristics and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared. RESULTS: Of 981 patients studied, 18% had calcifications and 17% had cystic tumors. Tumors with calcifications were more commonly associated with Ki-67 ≥3% (47% vs. 33%; p = 0.029), lymph node metastasis (36% vs. 24%; p = 0.011), and distant metastasis (13% vs. 4%; p < 0.001). In contrast, cystic tumors were less commonly associated with lymph node metastasis (12% vs. 30%; p < 0.001). Five-year RFS after resection was most favorable for cystic tumors without calcifications (91%), intermediate for solid tumors without calcifications (77%), and least favorable for any calcified PNET (solid 69%, cystic 67%; p = 0.043). Calcifications remained an independent predictor of RFS on multivariable analysis (p = 0.043) controlling for nodal (p < 0.001) and distant metastasis (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Easily detectable radiographic features, such as calcifications and cystic morphology, can be used preoperatively to stratify prognosis in patients with PNETs and possibly inform the decision to operate or not, as well as guide the extent of resection and potential use of neoadjuvant therapy.
Asunto(s)
Calcinosis , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico por imagen , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Metástasis Linfática , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pancreatectomía , Calcinosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Calcinosis/cirugía , Tumores Neuroectodérmicos Primitivos/cirugíaRESUMEN
A 27-year-old female presented at 13 weeks' gestation with epigastric pain and anemia requiring blood and iron transfusions but no family history of gastrointestinal malignancy. Upper endoscopy revealed a giant circumferential polyp and associated hyperplastic-appearing polyps in the proximal stomach. Biopsies revealed hyperplasia with lamina propria eosinophils. She was supported with intermittent transfusions until labor was induced at 34 weeks' gestation. Total gastrectomy was performed at seven weeks post-partum. Final pathology revealed multiple hamartomatous polyps without malignancy. Her anemia resolved postoperatively. Genetic testing revealed mutation of the SMAD4 gene and Juvenile Polyposis Syndrome. JPS is caused by germline mutations in the SMAD4 or BMPR1A genes and is characterized by hamartomatous polyps in the gastrointestinal tract. While most polyps are benign, malignant transformation can occur. One should have low threshold to send patients for genetic screening when multiple polyps are found in a young patient, even without family history.
Asunto(s)
Poliposis Intestinal , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Poliposis Intestinal/complicaciones , Poliposis Intestinal/diagnóstico , Poliposis Intestinal/genética , Mutación , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Pólipos Intestinales , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Proteína Smad4/genéticaRESUMEN
Background: Idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) is a rare fibrotic disease of the proximal airway affecting adult Caucasian women nearly exclusively. Life-threatening ventilatory obstruction occurs secondary to pernicious subglottic mucosal scar. Disease rarity and wide geographic patient distribution has previously limited substantive mechanistic investigation into iSGS pathogenesis. Result: By harnessing pathogenic mucosa from an international iSGS patient cohort and single-cell RNA sequencing, we unbiasedly characterize the cell subsets in the proximal airway scar and detail their molecular phenotypes. Results show that the airway epithelium in iSGS patients is depleted of basal progenitor cells, and the residual epithelial cells acquire a mesenchymal phenotype. Observed displacement of bacteria beneath the lamina propria provides functional support for the molecular evidence of epithelial dysfunction. Matched tissue microbiomes support displacement of the native microbiome into the lamina propria of iSGS patients rather than disrupted bacterial community structure. However, animal models confirm that bacteria are necessary for pathologic proximal airway fibrosis and suggest an equally essential role for host adaptive immunity. Human samples from iSGS airway scar demonstrate adaptive immune activation in response to the proximal airway microbiome of both matched iSGS patients and healthy controls. Clinical outcome data from iSGS patients suggests surgical extirpation of airway scar and reconstitution with unaffected tracheal mucosa halts the progressive fibrosis. Conclusion: Our data support an iSGS disease model where epithelial alterations facilitate microbiome displacement, dysregulated immune activation, and localized fibrosis. These results refine our understanding of iSGS and implicate shared pathogenic mechanisms with distal airway fibrotic diseases.
RESUMEN
In the United States, uninsurance remains a major barrier in accessing health care for many citizens and residents. Studies have shown that uninsured patients with many cancers and chronic diseases have worse survival than insured patients. A recent study similarly showed that uninsured patients with gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have significantly shortened survival. While GEP-NETs are indolent tumors with generally favorable prognosis, comprehensive care involves years of surveillance, imaging, and treatment following resection, all of which carry a large financial burden. In this commentary, we expand on these findings as they relate to insurance-based disparities as well as management and policy implications.
Asunto(s)
Seguro , Neoplasias Intestinales , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/epidemiología , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Appendiceal neuroendocrine tumors (A-NETs) are rare neoplasms of the GI tract. They are typically managed according to tumor size; however, the impact of surgical strategy on the short- and long-term outcomes is unknown. METHODS: All patients who underwent resection of A-NET at 8 institutions from 2000 to 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Patient clinicopathologic features and outcomes were stratified according to resection type. RESULTS: Of 61 patients identified with A-NET, mean age of presentation was 44.7 ± 16.0 years and patients were predominantly Caucasian (77%) and female (56%). Mean tumor size was 1.2 ± 1.3 cm with a median of 0.8 cm. Thirty-one patients (51%) underwent appendectomy and 30 (49%) underwent colonic resection. The appendectomy group had more T1 tumors (87% vs 42%, p < 0.01) than the colon resection group. Of patients in the colon resection group, 27% had positive lymph nodes and 3% had M1 disease. R0 resections were achieved in 90% of appendectomy patients and 97% of colon resection patients. Complications occurred with a higher frequency in the colon resection group (30%) compared with those in the appendectomy group (6%, p = 0.02). The colon resection group also had a longer length of stay, higher average blood loss, and longer average OR time. Median RFS and OS were similar between groups. CONCLUSION: A-NET RFS and OS are equivalent regardless of surgical strategy. Formal colon resection is associated with increased length of stay, OR time, higher blood loss, and more complications. Further study is warranted to identify patients that are likely to benefit from more aggressive surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Apéndice , Tumores Neuroendocrinos , Adulto , Neoplasias del Apéndice/cirugía , Colectomía , Colon , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Adrenocortical carcinoma is a rare, aggressive cancer. We compared features of patients who underwent synchronous versus metachronous metastasectomy. METHODS: Adult patients who underwent resection for metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma from 1993 to 2014 at 13 institutions of the US adrenocortical carcinoma group were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized as synchronous if they underwent metastasectomy at the index adrenalectomy or metachronous if they underwent resection after recurrence of the disease. Factors associated with overall survival were assessed by univariate analysis. RESULTS: In the study, 84 patients with adrenocortical carcinoma underwent metastasectomy; 26 (31%) were synchronous and 58 (69%) were metachronous. Demographics were similar between groups. The synchronous group had more T4 tumors at the index resection (42 vs 3%, P < .001). The metachronous group had prolonged median survival after the index resection (86.3 vs 17.3 months, P < .001) and metastasectomy (36.9 vs 17.3 months, P = .007). Synchronous patients with R0 resections had improved survival compared to patients with R1/2 resections (P = .008). Margin status at metachronous metastasectomy was not associated with survival (P = .452). CONCLUSION: Select patients with metastatic adrenocortical carcinoma may benefit from metastasectomy. Patients with metachronous metastasectomy have a more durable survival benefit than those undergoing synchronous metastasectomy. This study highlights need for future studies examining differences in tumor biology that could explain outcome disparities in these distinct patient populations.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/cirugía , Carcinoma Corticosuprarrenal/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Corteza Suprarrenal/patología , Carcinoma Corticosuprarrenal/mortalidad , Carcinoma Corticosuprarrenal/secundario , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
TGF-ß superfamily signaling is responsible for many critical cellular functions including control of cell growth, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and apoptosis. TGF-ß appears to be critical in gastrulation, embryonic development, and morphogenesis, and it retains pleiotropic roles in many adult tissues and cell types in a highly context-dependent manner. While TGF-ß signaling within leukocytes is known to have an immunosuppressive role, its immunomodulatory effects within epithelial cells and epithelial cancers is less well understood. Recent data has emerged that suggests TGF-ß pathway signaling within epithelial cells may directly modulate pro-inflammatory chemokine/cytokine production and resultant leukocyte recruitment. This immunomodulation by epithelial TGF-ß pathway signaling may directly impact tumorigenesis and tumor progression through modulation of the epithelial microenvironment, although causal pathways responsible for such an observation remain incompletely investigated. This review presents the published literature as it relates to the immunomodulatory effects of TGF-ß family signaling within intestinal epithelial cells and carcinomas.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In a changing health care environment where patient outcomes will be more closely scrutinized, the ability to predict surgical complications is becoming increasingly important. The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) online risk calculator is a popular tool to predict surgical risk. This paper aims to assess the applicability of the ACS NSQIP calculator to patients undergoing surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). METHODS: Using the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group (USNET-SG), 890 patients who underwent pancreatic procedures between 1/1/2000-12/31/2016 were evaluated. Predicted and actual outcomes were compared using C-statistics and Brier scores. RESULTS: The most commonly performed procedure was distal pancreatectomy, followed by standard and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy. For the entire group of patients studied, C-statistics were highest for discharge destination (0.79) and cardiac complications (0.71), and less than 0.7 for all other complications. The Brier scores for surgical site infection (0.1441) and discharge to nursing/rehabilitation facility (0.0279) were below the Brier score cut-off, while the rest were equal to or above and therefore not useful for interpretation. CONCLUSION: This work indicates that the ACS NSQIP risk calculator is a valuable tool that should be used with caution and in coordination with clinical assessment for PNET clinical decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastric carcinoids are rare neuroendocrine tumors of the gastrointestinal tract. They are typically managed according to their etiology. However, there is little known about the impact of surgical strategy on the long-term outcomes of these patients. METHODS: All patients who underwent resection of gastric carcinoids at 8 institutions from 2000 to 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Tumors were stratified according to subtype (I, II, III, IV) and resection type (local resection, LR or formal gastrectomy, FG). Clinicopathological parameters, recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 79 patients identified with gastric carcinoids, 34 had type I lesions associated with atrophic gastritis, 4 had type II lesions associated with a gastrinoma, 37 had type III sporadic lesions, and 4 had type IV poorly-differentiated lesions. The mean age of presentation was 56 years in predominantly Caucasian (77%) and female (63%) patients. Mean tumor size was 2.4â¯cm and multifocal tumors were found in 24 (30%) of patients with the majority occurring in those with type I tumors. Lymph node positive tumors were seen in 15 (19%) patients and 7 (8%) had M1 disease; both most often in type IV followed by type III tumors. R0 resection was achieved in 56 (71%) patients while 15 (19%) had R1 resections and 6 (8%) R2 resections. Patients with type I and III tumors were equally likely to have a LR (50% and 43% respectively) compared to FG while those with type II and IV all had FG with one exception. Type IV tumors had the poorest RFS and OS while Type II tumors had the most favorable RFS and OS (pâ¯<â¯0.04 and pâ¯<â¯0.0004, respectively). While there was no difference in RFS in those patients undergoing FG versus LR, OS was worse in the FG group (pâ¯<â¯0.017). This trend persisted when type II and type IV groups were excluded (pâ¯<â¯0.045). CONCLUSION: Gastric carcinoid treatment should be tailored to tumor type, as biologic behavior rather than resection technique is the more important factor contributing to long-term outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Tumor Carcinoide/mortalidad , Tumor Carcinoide/cirugía , Gastrectomía , Gastroscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Tumor Carcinoide/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
The ACS established an online risk calculator to help surgeons make patient-specific estimates of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Our objective was to assess the accuracy of the ACS-NSQIP calculator for estimating risk after curative intent resection for primary GI neuroendocrine tumors (GI-NETs). Adult patients with GI-NET who underwent complete resection from 2000 to 2017 were identified using a multi-institutional database, including data from eight academic medical centers. The ability of the NSQIP calculator to accurately predict a particular outcome was assessed using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC). Seven hundred three patients were identified who met inclusion criteria. The most commonly performed procedures were resection of the small intestine with anastomosis (N = 193, 26%) and partial colectomy with anastomosis (N = 136, 18%). The majority of patients were younger than 65 years (N = 482, 37%) and ASA Class III (N = 337, 48%). The most common comorbidities were diabetes (N = 128, 18%) and hypertension (N = 395, 56%). Complications among these patients based on ACS NSQIP definitions included any complication (N = 132, 19%), serious complication (N = 118, 17%), pneumonia (N = 7, 1.0%), cardiac complication (N = 1, 0.01%), SSI (N = 80, 11.4%), UTI (N = 17, 2.4%), venous thromboembolism (N = 18, 2.5%), renal failure (N = 16, 2.3%), return to the operating room (N = 27, 3.8%), discharge to nursing/rehabilitation (N = 22, 3.1%), and 30-day mortality (N = 9, 1.3%). The calculator provided reasonable estimates of risk for pneumonia (AUC = 0.721), cardiac complication (AUC = 0.773), UTI (AUC = 0.716), and discharge to nursing/rehabilitation (AUC = 0.779) and performed poorly (AUC < 0.7) for all other complications Fig. 1). The ACS-NSQIP risk calculator estimates a similar proportion of risk to actual events in patients with GI-NET but has low specificity for identifying the correct patients for many types of complications. The risk calculator may require modification for some patient populations.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/diagnóstico , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/complicaciones , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/mortalidad , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Curva ROC , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRO: Chromogranin A (CgA) may be prognostic for patients with neuroendocrine tumors; however, the clinical utility of this test is unclear. METHODS: Patients undergoing resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNET) were selected from the eight institutions of the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group database. Cox regression was used to identify pre-operative variables that predicted recurrence-free survival (RFS), and those with p < 0.1 were included in a risk score. The risk score was tested in a unique subset of the overall cohort. RESULTS: In the entire cohort of 287 patients, median follow-up time was 37 months, and 5-year RFS was 73%. Cox regression analysis identified four variables for inclusion in the risk score: CgA > 5x ULN (HR 4.3, p = 0.01), tumor grade 2/3 (HR 3.7, p = 0.01), resection for recurrent disease (HR 6.2, p < 0.01), and tumor size > 4 cm (HR 4.5, p = 0.1). Each variable was assigned 1 point. Risk-score testing in the unique validation cohort of 63 patients revealed a 95% negative predictive value for recurrence in patients with zero points. DISCUSSION: This simple pre-operative risk scoring system resulted in a high degree of specificity for identifying patients at low-risk for tumor recurrence. This test can be utilized pre-operatively to aid informed decision-making.