Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Nurs Adm ; 51(1): 9-11, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33278195

RESUMEN

This article describes a survey exploring the use of professional introductions by nurses.For this project, a survey inquiring about introduction practices was administered to nurses attending a regional research conference.


Asunto(s)
Práctica Profesional/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
2.
J Emerg Nurs ; 40(4): 317-22, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23684130

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Patient satisfaction, an important measurable outcome, allows nurses to assess what can be improved in nursing practice. The purpose of this study is to compare expectations of patients and nurses using 3 nursing care attributes: 1) friendliness, courtesy, and respectfulness; 2) comfort measures; and 3) degree of information sharing. METHODS: This is an Institutional Review Board-exempt survey of paired patients' and nurses' perceptions of nursing care in a 50-bed emergency department of a level 1 trauma center. The survey consists of questions that addressed 3 performance attributes of nursing care. The respondent circled their responses in a Likert scale of 5 choices from 1: "way below expectation" to 5: "way above expectation." An open-ended comment section followed each question; the last survey item asked for recommendations on how to make nursing care extraordinary. RESULTS: Nineteen males and 30 female patients, ages 18-89 participated. Of the nurse participants, 20% had <5 years ED experience, 22% had 5-10 years, and 52% had >10 years. The patients rated the care they received consistently higher than nurses. The difference in the average patient ratings vs. the average nurse's rating was significant. (P = < 0.002, paired T test and Sign test). Patient ratings were also consistently higher when patients either knew their nurse's name or were able to identify them by sight. The higher average rating was significant in all 3 attributes (P = 0.02, Wilcoxon Rank-sum test). DISCUSSION: The unexpected highly positive patient rating did not identify specific areas for practice improvement; it did provide positive feedback for excellent care, reinforcing good nursing practice.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermería de Urgencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Rol de la Enfermera/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Satisfacción del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA