A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Effect of Standardized Video Education on Prenatal Genetic Testing Choices: Uptake of Genetic Testing.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the use of a standardized prenatal genetic testing educational video and its effects on patient uptake of prenatal testing, patient knowledge, decisional conflict, and decisional regret. STUDY DESIGN: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved randomized controlled trial. Patients were randomized to intervention (standardized video education) or control (no video education). The video education group viewed a 5-minute educational video on genetic testing options, and the control group did not review the video. Both groups answered validated questionnaires to assess maternal knowledge (Maternal Serum Screening Knowledge Questionnaire [MSSK]), conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale [DCS]), and regret (Decisional Regret Scale [DRS]). The primary outcome was genetic testing uptake; secondary outcomes were knowledge-based test score, and level of decisional conflict and regret. RESULTS: We enrolled 210 patients between 2016 and 2020, with 208 patients randomized, 103 patients in the video education group and 105 patients in the control group. Four patients were excluded from the video education group for missing data. Video education was associated with a 39% lower chance of prenatal testing compared with patients who did not receive video education, (odds ratio 0.39, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.92). Patients in the video education group had higher mean MSSKQ scores by 2.9 points (8.5 vs. 5.7, p < 0.001), lower Decisional Conflict Scores by 7.3 points (31.5 vs. 38.8, p < 0.001), lower Decisional Regret Scores by 5.4 points (23.8 vs. 29.2, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: We found that video education on prenatal genetic testing improved patients' knowledge, decreased testing and decisional conflict and regret regarding testing. This may indicate improved understanding of testing options and more informed decisions that align with their personal values and beliefs. This standardized video can be easily implemented in clinical practice to increase patient understanding and support decisions that align with patient's values. KEY POINTS: · A standardized educational video improves patient knowledge about prenatal testing options in pregnancy.. · Video education decreases testing and decisional conflict and decisional regret in pregnancy.. · A standardized educational video may be used in the clinical setting to educate patients on testing options and help them make informed decisions about testing..

Pregnancy outcomes after implementation of an induction of labor care pathway.

BACKGROUND: Induction of labor is common; however, the optimum clinical strategy for induction of labor is less clear. Variations in clinical practices related to induction of labor may lead to increased complications and longer induction of labor times. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to analyze whether the implementation of an evidence-based standardized care pathway improves the clinical outcomes associated with induction of labor. STUDY DESIGN: This was an approved quality improvement project implementing a clinical care pathway for induction of labor. Moreover, this was a retrospective cohort study of inductions of labor for 5 months before (January 2018 to May 2018) and 14 months after (August 2018 to September 2019) the implementation of the care pathway. The primary outcome was time from admission to delivery. Time from admission to delivery was stratified by mode of delivery. The secondary outcomes included chorioamnionitis, endometritis, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and a composite of unanticipated outcomes (chorioamnionitis, endometritis, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, cesarean delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage). In addition, pathway adherence was analyzed. The outcomes were analyzed using 2-tailed t tests for continuous data and the Fisher exact test and chi-square tests for categorical data. Propensity score matching was used to assess for confounding by potential covariates. RESULTS: A total of 1471 inductions of labor were reviewed, with 392 inductions of labor before the implementation of the care pathway and 1079 inductions of labor after the implementation of the care pathway. The pathway was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the time from admission to delivery by 1.2 hours (from 23.4 to 22.2 hours; P=.08). There was a nonsignificant increase in the time to cesarean delivery before (28.2 hours) and after (28.8 hours) protocol implementation (P=.71). There was a significant decrease in the time to delivery by 1.7 hours for vaginal deliveries (from 22.2 to 20.5 hours) after protocol implementation (P=.02). There was a significant decrease in chorioamnionitis (from 12.5% to 6.0%; odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.67), a significant decrease in endometritis (from 6.9% to 2.6%; odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.20-0.65), and a significant decrease in composite unanticipated outcomes (from 56.9% to 36.6%; odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-0.56) after the implementation of the care pathway. There was no significant difference in postpartum hemorrhage (from 7.9% to 6.1%; odds ratio, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-1.22), neonatal intensive care unit admissions (from 18.1% to 14.0%; odds ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.02), or cesarean deliveries (from 19.6% to 20.1%; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.76-1.40) after the implementation of the care pathway. Pathway adherence varied, ranging from 50% to 89%. CONCLUSION: The introduction of a standardized induction of labor pathway was associated with a nonsignificant reduction in the time from admission to delivery by 1.2 hours and improved pregnancy outcomes, including decreased infections and unanticipated outcomes. Further opportunities for improvements in clinical outcomes may be realized with increased compliance with the care pathway.

Obstetrical health care inequities in a universally insured health care system.

BACKGROUND: Racial and ethnic disparities in health care exist and are rooted in long-standing systemic inequities. These disparities result in significant excess health care expenditures and are due to complex interactions between patients, health care providers and systems, and social and environmental factors. In perinatal care, these inequities also exist, with Black patients being 3 to 4 times more likely to die of childbirth compared with White patients. Similar health care inequities may also exist in the Military Health System despite universal health care coverage, stable employment, and social programs that benefit military families. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes in the Military Health System. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of deliveries from 2019 to 2021 in the Military Health System, which provides obstetrical care for approximately 35,000 annual deliveries. The study was conducted using National Perinatal Information Center data on cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and severe maternal morbidity by race and ethnicity from direct-care military hospitals representing tertiary care medical centers and community hospitals in the United States and abroad. Chi-square analyses and binary logistic regression were used to compare groups. RESULTS: The cohort included 68,918 deliveries. Of these, 32,358 (47%) were White, 9594 (13.9%) Black, 3120 (4.5%) Asian Pacific Islander, 456 (0.7%) American Indian/Alaska Native, 19,543 (28.4%) other, 3976 (5.8%) unknown, 7096 (10.3%) Hispanic, 58,009 (84.2%) non-Hispanic, and 4399 (6.4%) other ethnicity. Rates of cesarean delivery were significantly higher for Black (30%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.52), Asian Pacific Islander (27%; odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.35), and other (26%; odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.25) compared with White race (23%) (P<.001). Postpartum hemorrhage rates were higher for Black (5.9%; odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.24) and Asian Pacific Islander (7.7%; odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.72) compared with White race (5.3%) (P<.001). Severe maternal morbidity was higher for Black (2.9%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.67), Asian Pacific Islander (2.9%; odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.82), and other (2.8%; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.54) compared with White race (2.1%) (P<.001). For severe maternal morbidity excluding blood transfusions, rates were also significantly higher for Black (1%; odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.17) than for White race (0.6%) (P<.002). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a lower rate of severe maternal morbidity excluding transfusions (0.5%; odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.98) compared with non-Hispanic ethnicity (0.7%) (P=.04). CONCLUSION: Racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes exist in the Military Health System despite universal health care coverage, with significantly higher rates of cesarean delivery and severe maternal morbidity in Black, Asian Pacific Islander, and other races compared with White race. These findings suggest that these disparities are likely related to other factors or social determinants of health rather than availability of health care and insurance coverage. Further work should include investigation into such social determinants of health to address their causes, including systemic and structural barriers.

Reports to the Navy's Family Advocacy Program: impact of removal of mandatory reporting for domestic violence.

The impact of mandatory reporting laws on domestic violence reports is unclear. In 2006, the Department of Defense removed its requirement for mandatory reporting of domestic violence against adults. Our objective was to determine if there was a change in the incidence of domestic violence reports to the Navy's Family Advocacy Program after the shift from mandatory reporting to a policy allowing restricted reporting. Reports of domestic violence to the Navy Central Registry between fiscal year (FY) 2000 and 2010 were studied. Frequencies and rates of domestic violence reports, type of abuse, and victim and offender gender were studied. Over the past 11 years, the total number of unrestricted domestic violence reports to the Navy Central Registry has decreased by just over a third. In addition, the number of substantiated reports has decreased by approximately 50%. Since the collection of data on restricted reports in 2008, the aggregated reporting rate of substantiated reports is significantly smaller, 0.87% for FYs 2008 to 2010 compared to 1.34% for FYs 2000 to 2005, p < 0.01. Domestic violence reports to the Navy Central Registry have declined over the past 11 years, even with the removal of the requirement for mandatory reporting of domestic violence.

Prevalence and Predictors of Intimate Partner Violence in a Military Urogynecology Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Intimate partner violence (IPV) is common, with prevalence in women of 15 to 71% over the lifespan, 4 to 54% currently. Violence is associated with poor health, and may be more common in military populations. A history of abuse is also common in patients with pain, urinary/bowel symptoms, and dyspareunia. Our purpose was to determine the prevalence and predictors of abuse in a military urogynecology clinic. METHODS: Patients presenting to a military urogynecology clinic were screened for IPV with the 4-item Hurt-Insult-Threaten-Scream (HITS) screen. Patients' abuse history, reason for visit, and risk factors for IPV were assessed. χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables. FINDINGS: Out of 142 surveys, only 4 (2.8%) indicated a positive HITS screen (score of 10 or greater on a scale of 4-20), and 39 (27.5%) responded positively to at least one item. These individuals were significantly more likely to have a history of physical abuse or abuse in their families, with at least one positive response in 45.4% of patients with a history of family abuse compared to 20.8% of patients without this history (p = 0.007). The lifetime prevalence of physical abuse by an intimate partner was reported by 10 women (7%). A total of 29 women (20%) reported a history of forced sex and 33 (23%) reported a history of abuse in their family. Participants with a family history of abuse were more likely to have a positive HITS score, relative risk (RR) 2.19 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-3.71), p = 0.004, as were those with history of physical abuse RR 2.44 (95% CI 1.35-4.39), p = 0.003 and a history of forced sexual contact, RR 1.73 (95% CI 1.00-3.00), p = 0.049. Race, education, marital status, and employment showed no association with a positive HITS response. DISCUSSION/IMPACT/RECOMMENDATIONS: The self-reported rate of IPV in a sample of women presenting to a urogynecology clinic in a military setting was 2.8%, below the rate reported in the civilian literature of 4 to 54%. We found that lifetime prevalence of IPV (7%) was also lower than the civilian rate of 15 to 71%. Routine screening for IPV is recommended by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, U.S. Preventative Services Task Force, and the Joint Commission. Even though IPV rates in the military are below civilian rates, IPV affects 3 to 7% of our population and remains a significant and preventable problem affecting women. CONCLUSIONS: IPV in military urogynecology patients was lower than the civilian setting; however, women with a history of abuse may be at increased risk of experiencing current IPV, and continued screening is important.