Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 97(3): E346-E351, 2021 Feb 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32320138

RESUMEN

World Health Organization has designated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) as a pandemic. During the past several weeks, a considerable burden has been imposed on the Iranian's healthcare system. The present document reviewed the latest evidence and expert opinion regarding the management of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction during the outbreak of COVID-19 and outlines a practical algorithm for it.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Algoritmos , COVID-19/transmisión , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología
2.
Health Sci Rep ; 7(2): e1867, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357486

RESUMEN

Background and Aims: Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the treatment of choice in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. This study aims to evaluate predictors of in-hospital and long-term mortality among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. Methods: In this registry-based study, we retrospectively analyzed patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI enrolled in the primary angioplasty registry of Sina Hospital. Independent predictors of in-hospital and long-term mortality were determined using multivariate logistic regression and Cox regression analyses, respectively. Results: A total of 1123 consecutive patients with STEMI were entered into the study. The mean age was 59.37 ± 12.15 years old, and women constituted 17.1% of the study population. The in-hospital mortality rate was 5.0%. Multivariate analyses revealed that older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.10), lower ejection fraction (OR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99), lower mean arterial pressure (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.98), and higher white blood cells (OR: 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06-1.29) as independent risk predictors for in-hospital mortality. Also, 875 patients were followed for a median time of 21.8 months. Multivariate Cox regression demonstrated older age (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06), lower mean arterial pressure (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.97-1.00), and higher blood urea (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02) as independent predictors of long-term mortality. Conclusion: We found that older age and lower mean arterial pressure were significantly associated with the increased risk of in-hospital and long-term mortality in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Our results indicate a necessity for more precise care and monitoring during hospitalization for such high-risk patients.

3.
Urologia ; 90(1): 192-194, 2023 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34965807

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Glans necrosis in association with priapism is very rare and its appropriate treatment is not known. There is a secondary cause in most cases. CASE DESCRIPTION: We treated a 65-year-old man with priapism and glans necrosis using a closed shunt (Winter), continuous penile irrigation with normal saline, and heparin for 48 h and waited for the necrotic area to resolve spontaneously. The treatment outcome was much better compared to previous cases in whom open surgery, irrigation with pure normal saline, and/or resection of the necrotic area were performed. CONCLUSION: In cases with priapism and glans ischemia, we recommend treating the condition with continuous covernose irrigation with heparinized saline and avoiding open surgery.


Asunto(s)
Priapismo , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Priapismo/terapia , Priapismo/cirugía , Solución Salina , Pene/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
ARYA Atheroscler ; 19(3): 1-9, 2023 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38881586

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the clinical and angiographic characteristics of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who experienced primary percutaneous coronary intervention failure. METHOD: This retrospective observational study was derived from the Primary Angioplasty Registry of Sina Hospital (PARS). A total of 548 consecutive patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention between November 2016 and January 2019 were evaluated. Percutaneous coronary intervention failure was defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) flow ≤ 2 or corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC) ≥ 28. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 458 (83.6%) males and 90 (16.4%) females with a mean age of 59.2 ± 12.49 years. TIMI flow 3 was achieved in 499 (91.1%) patients after the procedure, while 49 (8.9%) patients developed TIMI ≤ 2. The findings showed that cTFC ≥ 28 was present in 50 (9.1%) patients, while 489 (89.2%) patients had cTFC < 28. Multiple regression analysis shows that age 1.04 (1.01, 1.07), duration of pain onset to first medical contact time 1.04 (1.00, 1.18), and left anterior descending artery involvement 3.15 (1.21, 8.11) were independent predictors of TIMI ≤ 2. CONCLUSION: Even though TIMI ≤ 2 was uncommon among the study population, it was associated with adverse in-hospital outcomes. The results indicate that earlier emergency medical service arrival and shorter transfer time to the referral center can dramatically reduce the primary percutaneous coronary intervention failure rate.

5.
J Cardiovasc Thorac Res ; 14(4): 253-257, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36699557

RESUMEN

Introduction: Since the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, the use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in hypertensive patients with COVID-19 has been controversial. Following our previous study, after one year, we intended to extend our sample size and results to investigate the effects of ARBs with both in-hospital outcomes and 7-month follow-up results in patients with COVID-19. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 who were admitted to Sina Hospital, Tehran, Iran, from February to October 2020 participated in this follow-up cohort study. The COVID-19 diagnosis was based on a positive polymerase chain reaction test or chest computed tomography scan according to guidelines. Patients were followed for disease severity, incurring in-hospital mortality, complications, and 7-month all-cause mortality. Results: We evaluated 1413 patients with COVID-19 in this study. After excluding 124 patients, 1289 including 561(43.5%) hypertensive patients, entered the analysis. During the study, 875(67.9%) severe disease, 227(17.6%) in-hospital mortality, and 307(23.8%) 7-month all-cause mortality were observed. After adjusting for possible confounders, ARB was not associated with severity, in-hospital and 7-month all-cause mortality, and in-hospital complications except for acute kidney injury. Discontinuation of ARBs was significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality and 7-month all-cause mortality (both P values<0.006). We observed a better 7-month outcome in those who continued their ARBs after discharge. Conclusion: The results of this study, along with the previous studies, provide reassurance that taking ARBs is not associated with the risk of mortality, complications, and poorer outcomes in hypertensive COVID-19 patients after adjustment for possible confounders.

6.
Clin Case Rep ; 10(12): e6808, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36590658

RESUMEN

Consider amiodarone pneumonitis as an important differential diagnosis of ARDS, especially in clinically ill patients who recently received Intravenous amiodarone.

7.
Korean J Transplant ; 36(2): 136-142, 2022 Jun 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35919203

RESUMEN

Background: Heart transplantation has been considered the gold-standard treatment for patients with end-stage heart failure. This study assessed the survival outcomes of marginal donor hearts compared with ideal donor hearts in Iran. Methods: This retrospective study is based on the follow-up data of heart donors and recipients in the Sina Hospital Organ Procurement Unit. Among the 93 participants, 75 were categorized as ideal donors (group A) and 18 as marginal donors (group B). Group C included heart recipients who received a standard organ, and group D included heart recipients who received a marginal one. To analyze differences in patient characteristics among the groups, posttransplant heart survival was assessed in all groups. All data were obtained from the hospital records. Results: The mean age of the donors was 26.27±11.44 years (median age, 28 years). The marginal age showed a significant association with donor age. The age of recipients had a significant effect on survival days in the ideal group. Most patients survived for at least 1 year, with a median of 645 days in recipients from marginal donors and 689 days in recipients from ideal donors. Conclusions: Considering the lack of organ availability in Iran, it may be possible to use marginal donors for marginal recipients, therefore reducing the number of people on the waitlist. We also recommend establishing a national marginal donor system specifically for Iranian patients to extend the donor pool.

8.
J Tehran Heart Cent ; 17(3): 103-111, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37252079

RESUMEN

Background: Limited data exist on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: This multicenter study, conducted in 6 centers in Iran, aimed to compare baseline clinical and procedural data between a case group, comprising STEMI patients with COVID-19, and a control group, comprising STEMI patients before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to determine in-hospital infarct-related artery thrombus grades and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of deaths from any cause (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular), nonfatal strokes, and stent thrombosis. Results: No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding baseline characteristics. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was performed in 72.9% of the cases and 98.5% of the controls (P=0.043), and primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 6.2% of the cases and 1.4% of the controls (P=0.048). Successful PPCI procedures (final TIMI flow grade III) were significantly fewer in the case group (66.5% vs 93.5%; P=0.001). The baseline thrombus grade before wire crossing was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The summation of thrombus grades IV and V was 75% in the case group and 82% in the control group (P=0.432). The rate of MACCEs was 14.5% and 2.1% in the case and control groups, respectively (P=0.002). Conclusion: In our study, the thrombus grade had no significant differences between the case and control groups; however, the in-hospital rates of the no-reflow phenomenon, periprocedural MI, mechanical complications, and MACCEs were statistically significantly higher in the case group.

9.
Am J Hypertens ; 34(11): 1217-1226, 2021 11 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34265044

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The role of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) has been addressed in some studies related to the current coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with possible higher severity and mortality in patients with hypertension. A triple-blind randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the effects of these medications on the COVID-19 progression. METHODS: Patients were enrolled in this trial between April and September 2020. They were randomized in 2 groups. The former dosage of ACEis/ARBs was continued in one group while in another group, the ACEis/ARBs were replaced by amlodipine ± carvedilol according to the dose equivalents. The primary outcomes were length of stay in hospitals and intensive care units (ICUs). Other outcomes include mechanical ventilation, noninvasive ventilation, readmission, and COVID-19 symptoms after discharge. RESULTS: We randomized 64 patients with COVID-19 into 2 groups. Most patients were aged 66-80 and 46-65 years-old, 33 (51.6%) and 27 (42.2%), respectively. The study groups were nearly similar in baseline vital signs and characteristics. In addition, there was no significant difference in terms of recorded systolic and diastolic blood pressure measurements between groups. Furthermore, we did not find a significant difference between the days of ICU or ward admission, the discharge rate, or readmission rates between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This randomized triple-blind multicentric clinical trial did not show any deleterious effects of ACEi/ARB medications in hypertensive COVID-19 patients. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: The trial acquired the ethical code, IR.TUMS.VCR.REC.1399.028 and was registered in the Iranian randomized controlled trial system (registration no. IRCT20151113025025N3), https://en.irct.ir/trial/46531.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hipertensión , Aldosterona , Amlodipino/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Angiotensinas , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Carvedilol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Irán , Antagonistas de Receptores de Mineralocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Renina
10.
Crit Pathw Cardiol ; 20(2): 81-87, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32910085

RESUMEN

Due to the importance of early treatment in the final prognosis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, full-time provision of revascularization services should be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week (24/7) in conjunction with a fully-coordinated pre-hospital emergency system and equipped centers with experienced medical teams. We reviewed the 24/7 primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) management registry and evaluated the quality of care and patient management as well as the temporal trend of provided health care services. In the present cross-sectional study, we retrieved the data on 11,563 STEMI patients having undergone primary PCI at the thirty-one 24/7 PCI-capable hospitals through the national 24/7 STEMI management program between September 2015 and August 2017 in Iran. The median (25th-75th) age of the patients was 59 (51-68) years. The median (25th-75th) time of door-to-device was 64 (41-100) min and 68% of patients achieved door to device time of ≤90 min. There was no significant difference in the median door-to-device time between the general and heart hospitals. This is the first Iranian National attempt to provide a uniform guideline-driven standard management in patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI in a 24/7 program. We demonstrated an acceptable door-to-device time consistent with the recommendations of the current guidelines. We observed higher door-to-device time in older patients, female patients, and those where the culprit lesion was other than the left anterior descending coronary artery. Efforts should be made to improve door-to-device time in all patients or groups.


Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
11.
J Nephrol ; 23(2): 216-23, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20175053

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Sodium bicarbonate has been recently proposed as a prophylactic measure for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). We aimed to compare the efficacy of the combination of sodium bicarbonate with half saline, and half saline alone in preventing CIN in patients having uncontrolled hypertension, compensated severe heart failure or a history of pulmonary edema. METHODS: Seventy-two patients undergoing elective coronary angiography with a serum creatinine level > or =1.5 mg/dL who had uncontrolled hypertension, compensated severe heart failure or a history of pulmonary edema were prospectively enrolled in a single-center, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial from August 2007 to July 2008 and were assigned to either an infusion of sodium bicarbonate plus half saline (n=36) or half saline alone (n=36). The primary end point was an absolute (> or =0.5 mg/dL) or relative (> or =25%) increase in serum creatinine 48 hours after the procedure (CIN). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups regarding their baseline demographic and biochemical characteristics, as well as the underlying disease. A total of 6.1% of the patients receiving sodium bicarbonate plus half saline developed CIN as opposed to 6.3% of the patients in the half saline group, which was not statistically different (odds ratio = 0.97; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-7.3; p=1.0). CONCLUSION: The combination therapy of sodium bicarbonate plus half saline does not offer additional benefits over hydration with half saline alone in the prevention of CIN.


Asunto(s)
Volumen Sanguíneo , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Enfermedades Renales/prevención & control , Bicarbonato de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Creatinina/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Soluciones Hipotónicas , Infusiones Intravenosas , Enfermedades Renales/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Renales/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Edema Pulmonar/complicaciones , Cloruro de Sodio/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Am J Hypertens ; 33(12): 1102-1111, 2020 12 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32920644

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is an ongoing controversy about harms and benefits of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in hypertensive patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given the unresolved debate, we investigated the association of ARBs with in-hospital outcomes of these patients. METHODS: In this retrospective observational study, we studied patients with COVID-19 who referred to Sina Hospital in Tehran, Iran, from 20 February to 29 May 2020. Patients with either positive real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction test of swab specimens, or high clinical suspicion according to the World Health Organization's interim guidance were included. We followed-up patients for incurring death, severe COVID-19, and in-hospital complications. RESULTS: We evaluated 681 patients with COVID-19 of whom 37 patients were excluded due to incomplete medical records and 8 patients who used ACEIs which left 636 patients in the analysis. In this cohort, 108 (17.0%) patients expired and 407 (64.0%) patients incurred severe COVID-19. Of 254 (39.9%) patients with hypertension, 122 (48.0%) patients were receiving an ARB. After adjustment for possible confounders, we found no independent association between taking ARBs and in-hospital outcomes except for acute kidney injury (AKI), in patients with confirmed or clinically suspected COVID-19, either hypertensive or not-hypertensive. We found that discontinuation of ARBs during hospitalization was associated with a greater risk of mortality, invasive ventilation, and AKI (all P ˂ 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: We found that taking ARBs by patients with hypertension and confirmed or clinically suspected COVID-19 is not associated with poorer in-hospital outcomes after adjustment for possible confounders.


Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/uso terapéutico , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/terapia , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesión Renal Aguda/mortalidad , Anciano , Antagonistas de Receptores de Angiotensina/efectos adversos , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitalización , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/mortalidad , Irán , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Intern Emerg Med ; 15(8): 1415-1424, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32772283

RESUMEN

In this study, we aimed to assess the association between development of cardiac injury and short-term mortality as well as poor in-hospital outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. In this prospective, single-center study, we enrolled hospitalized patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and highly suspicious patients with compatible chest computed tomography features. Cardiac injury was defined as a rise of serum high sensitivity cardiac Troponin-I level above 99th percentile (men: > 26 ng/mL, women: > 11 ng/mL). A total of 386 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were included. Cardiac injury was present among 115 (29.8%) of the study population. The development of cardiac injury was significantly associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate compared to those with normal troponin levels (40.9% vs 11.1%, p value < 0.001). It was shown that patients with cardiac injury had a significantly lower survival rate after a median follow-up of 18 days from symptom onset (p log-rank < 0.001). It was further demonstrated in the multivariable analysis that cardiac injury could possibly increase the risk of short-term mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (HR = 1.811, p-value = 0.023). Additionally, preexisting cardiovascular disease, malignancy, blood oxygen saturation < 90%, leukocytosis, and lymphopenia at presentation were independently associated with a greater risk of developing cardiac injury. Development of cardiac injury in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 was significantly associated with higher rates of in-hospital mortality and poor in-hospital outcomes. Additionally, it was shown that development of cardiac injury was associated with a lower short-term survival rate compared to patients without myocardial damage and could independently increase the risk of short-term mortality by nearly two-fold.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/complicaciones , Lesiones Cardíacas/complicaciones , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/tendencias , Neumonía Viral/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Femenino , Lesiones Cardíacas/epidemiología , Lesiones Cardíacas/mortalidad , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias
14.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 72(2): 71-6, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19947188

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study was designed to evaluate the demographic and clinical findings and in-hospital management and outcome in patients with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: By review of the Cardiovascular Tehran Heart Center Registry (CVDTHCR), 2028 patients were found to have the acute STEMI. We compared the patients' characteristics in 109 (5.4%) subjects < or = 40 and 1919 subjects > 40-years-old. RESULTS: The young patients had less diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia and history of MI or prior revascularization, and were more likely to be male (92.7% vs. 74%), smoker (58.7% vs. 31.7%) and have family history of CVD (50.5% vs. 23.4%). The young patients had higher prevalence of angiographically normal coronary artery (13.7% vs. 0.9%; p<0.001). The young patients were more likely to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (38.5% vs. 18.6%), whereas coronary artery bypass grafting was more common in the old ones (p<0.001). In-hospital death was markedly different among young and old patients (0.9% and 6.1%, respectively; p<0.01). CONCLUSION: In STEMI population, the risk profile, clinical findings and severity of coronary disease of the young differ substantially from the elderly counterparts. Young patients with STEMI have a favorable outcome compared with that in older patients.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Demografía , Electrocardiografía , Femenino , Hospitales Universitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
15.
Kardiol Pol ; 67(2): 140-6; discussion 147-8, 2009 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés, Polaco | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19288376

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programmes play an important role in the management of patients with coronary artery disease. However, a significant proportion of patients do not participate or do not complete CR. AIM: To asses the prevalence and predictors of discontinuation of a hospital-based CR programme and to investigate whether or not the completers and dropouts differed in relation to their baseline characteristics. METHODS: Data used for analysis were from a hospital-based CR programme involving 1986 discharged patients at Tehran Heart Centre between July 2004 and January 2006. The patients who completed all 24 sessions of the CR programme were compared with the dropouts. RESULTS: The CR completion rate was 18.1% (average of 11.4+/-8.1, ranging from 1 to 78 sessions) including patients who completed 24 (n=284) or more sessions (n=77) of the CR programme. Factors predicting dropout were male gender (OR 1.441, p=0.0094), younger age (OR 0.979, p=0.005), and lower levels of education (OR 0.412, p <0.0001). CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated a relatively high rate of CR programme dropout. Only less than a fifth of the patients completed this hospital-based programme. Patients who were male and younger and had lower education levels were better likely to drop out of the CR programme. Social support and educational programmes may be helpful in achieving better compliance.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones Cardiológicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Cardiopatías/rehabilitación , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Alta del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Desistentes del Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Edad , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Polonia , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales
16.
Endokrynol Pol ; 60(6): 430-6, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20041359

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to clarify whether type 2 diabetic patients with coronary disease are subject to similar benefits in heart rate recovery (HRR) as non-diabetic counterpatrs after cardiac rehabilitation, assessing men and women subjects separately. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data used for this analysis were from an eight-week, phase-II cardiac rehabilitation including 284 patients with ischaemic heart disease who were managed at Tehran Heart Centre between July 2004 and January 2006. The heart rate parameters were compared between diabetic and non-diabetic patients before and after cardiac rehabilitation. Diabetic and non-diabetic patients had similar age and left ventricular ejection fraction. RESULTS: Among men, the non-diabetic patients achieved a greater improvement in peak heart rate and heart rate recovery (HRR). Additionally, lower resting heart rate was found in nondiabetic men after rehabilitation. In the women >or= 50 years old, there was no significant difference between diabetic and non-diabetic. The non-diabetic women < 50 years old showed significantly higher peak heart rate and HRR compared with diabetic women. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the benefit of cardiac rehabilitation in HRR is significantly lower in type 2 diabetic men. Improvement of HRR is not associated with diabetic status in women >/= 50 years old. The response to cardiac rehabilitation in women may appear to be influenced more by age at menopause rather than diabetes mellitus.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/epidemiología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/rehabilitación , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Frecuencia Cardíaca , Factores de Edad , Comorbilidad , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Irán/epidemiología , Masculino , Menopausia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales
18.
J Card Surg ; 23(6): 762-4, 2008.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18793219

RESUMEN

Few cases of a floating thrombus in a normal aorta have been reported without other underlying reasons for the thrombus formation and its systemic embolic complications. We report a case in which a floating thrombus in the proximal aortic arch was detected after echocardiography and computed tomography angiography as an origin of upper extremities and ophthalmic embolism.


Asunto(s)
Aorta Torácica/cirugía , Trombosis Coronaria/cirugía , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/cirugía , Tromboembolia/cirugía , Aorta Torácica/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta Torácica/patología , Trombosis Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Trombosis Coronaria/patología , Ecocardiografía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/etiología , Tromboembolia/diagnóstico por imagen , Tromboembolia/etiología
19.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 25: 26-28, 2018 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30025371

RESUMEN

Natalizumab is among the most effective drugs for controlling multiple sclerosis (MS). The most important side effect of this drug is progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, although some other complications are increasingly reported in literature such as meningitis and encephalitis. Here, a patient with MS who has suffered from myocardial infarction (MI) after the injection of natalizumab is introduced.


Asunto(s)
Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto del Miocardio/inducido químicamente , Natalizumab/efectos adversos , Angiografía Coronaria , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico por imagen
20.
J Tehran Heart Cent ; 9(1): 27-32, 2014 Jan 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25561967

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Whether coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is a unique clinical finding or results from other clinical entities is still unknown. We aimed to determine the CAE prevalence, investigate the relationship between CAE and patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, and assess the prognosis at follow-up in a sample of Iranian population. METHODS: Totally, 10057 patients who underwent coronary angiography were divided into three categories: normal coronary arteries without co-existing coronary artery disease; CAE without co-existing coronary artery narrowing < 50%; and coronary artery stenosis with > 50% luminal narrowing (CAS). RESULTS: The prevalence of CAE was 1.5%. Compared to the normal individuals, the CAE patients were older, were more frequently male, and had higher rates of myocardial infarction (MI). The CAE patients had a lower frequency of diabetes and MI than the CAS group. The CAE patients were largely focused between 40 to 60 years of age. The right coronary and left anterior descending arteries were the most involved arteries, and ectasia was located more frequently in the proximal part of these arteries. Patients with ectasia in the three main vessels had higher rates of MI. After a mean follow-up of 54.23 ± 18.41 months, chest pain and dyspnea on exertion remained the main complaint in more than 97% of the patients, leading to hospital admission in more than 14%. CONCLUSION: There was no relationship between the presence of ectasia and conventional risk factors. According to our study, pure CAE may be deemed a benign feature of atherosclerosis; however, it can lead to frequent hospital admissions because of the persistence of cardiovascular symptoms.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA