Smoking cessation after surgery. A randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking is the greatest cause of preventable mortality in the United States. Because most smokers would like to quit and most hospitals are smoke free, surgical admissions represent a window of opportunity for tobacco cessation interventions. METHODS: A total of 324 patients (98% men), aged 25 to 82 years, who were current smokers and who underwent noncardiac surgery were enrolled in a randomized controlled trial at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, Calif. One hundred sixty-eight participants (52%) received a multicomponent intervention designed to increase self-efficacy and coping skills that included face-to-face in-hospital counseling, viewing a smoking cessation videotape, self-help literature, nicotine replacement therapy, and 3 months of telephone follow-up. One hundred fifty-six participants (48%) received self-help literature and brief counseling lasting 10 minutes. Serum or saliva cotinine levels were measured to confirm self-reported smoking cessation. RESULTS: At 12 months of follow-up, the self-reported quit rate was 27% among the intervention group and 13% among the comparison group (relative risk, 2.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.5; P < .01). Based on biochemical confirmation, 15% of the intervention group, compared with 8% of the comparison group, quit smoking at 12 months (relative risk, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-3.9; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: A smoking cessation intervention targeted at smokers hospitalized for noncardiac surgery can increase long-term quit rates. Surgical hospitalizations provide an opportunity to reach smokers who want to quit smoking.

Case management of persons with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in San Francisco.

The acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) epidemic represents a growing challenge for the health care system and for case management models applied to persons with AIDS. The experience of San Francisco highlights some of the issues involved in developing a case management system appropriate to the needs of persons with AIDS, as well as providers, and payers. Dramatic growth in the size and complexity of the AIDS caseload and the involvement of public, health maintenance organization, and community providers has required the increasing formalization and centralization of case management roles. Persistent questions about the definition and goals of case management complicate development of these services.

Performance of cancer screening in a university general internal medicine practice: comparison with the 1980 American Cancer Society Guidelines.

The authors evaluated use of seven cancer screening tests by 52 providers in a university general internal medicine practice, using 1980 American Cancer Society (ACS) recommendations as standards for comparison. Performance rates were determined by retrospective medical record reviews of a stratified random sample of 525 patients. In addition, the 48 physicians and four nurse-practitioners in the practice were interviewed to determine their opinions, knowledge and perceived use of the tests. Performance rates were low, significantly below the ACS guidelines for all tests except Pap smear. Providers used the tests significantly more often to evaluate patients with cancer risk factors or for new patients. They significantly overestimated their own performances of six tests. More than a fourth of the providers disagreed with the use of mammography, sigmoidoscopy, pelvic or rectal examinations for screening asymptomatic adults. Their knowledge about cancer screening and the ACS recommendations was highly variable, and frequently quite limited. Providers offered four major reasons for not performing the screening tests: provider forgetfulness, lack of time, inconvenience and logistical difficulties, and patient discomfort or refusal.