Efficacy and Safety of PrabotulinumtoxinA in Subjects With Benign Masseteric Hypertrophy: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Trial and Open-Label Extension Study.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread use of botulinum toxin (BTX) injection for the treatment of masseter muscle hypertrophy (MMH), there is no standard treatment option. OBJECTIVE: We report the efficacy and safety for BTX in MMH over a period of 48 weeks. METHODS: In double-blinded, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials, 180 patients (randomized 1:1) received treatment with placebo (normal saline) or prabotulinumtoxinA (48 units). Masseter muscle thickness (at maximal clenching and resting positions), 3D imaging analysis, and masseter muscle hypertrophy scale grades were analyzed at each time point. After the 24-week CORE study, all patients who met the same criteria of the CORE study at week 24 ( n = 114) received only prabotulinumtoxinA, regardless of previous treatment, for an additional 24 weeks (48 weeks in total) for the open-label extension study. RESULTS: The largest differences in mean and percent changes from baseline in masseter muscle thickness were observed at 12 weeks, and there were significant differences between the 2 groups at all time points (all p < .001). The effect was independent of the number of injections. No serious adverse event was observed. CONCLUSION: PrabotulinumtoxinA could effectively ameliorate MMH without major complications.

A randomized, double-blind, multi-center, placebo-controlled, Phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DWJ211 in the treatment of moderate to severe submental fat.

Excessive accumulation of submental fat (SMF) causes a lower face cosmetic problem. A lipolytic injectable has recently been developed as a solution. The objective of this study is to investigate the effects and safety of DWJ211 (a newly developed lipolytic injectable) in the reduction of SMF and to identify the optimum dose. In this multi-center, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, subjects with moderate to severe SMF were randomized to injections of DWJ211 0.5%, DWJ211 1%, DWJ211 2% or placebo in the submental area, every 4 weeks, up to Week 12. Efficacy was determined by improvements in physician-assisted SMF rating scales (PA-SMFRS) and subject-assisted SMF rating scales (SA-SMFRS) 4 weeks after the last treatment (Week 16). Safety was assessed by inquiries, subject diary entries of adverse events, laboratory tests, and vital sign checks. Of 140 enrolled subjects, 136 were included in the analysis. The proportions of subjects, who achieved ≥1-grade improvement on the PA-SMFRS were 41.7%, 65.7%, 84.4%, and 72.7%, and the proportions of subjects, who achieved ≥1-grade improvement on the SA-SMFRS were 50.0%, 71.4%, 93.8%, and 81.8% for the placebo, DWJ211 0.5%, DWJ211 1%, and DWJ211 2% group, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were more common in each of the treatment groups compared with placebo, with the most common ADR being injection site pain. No subjects experienced any serious adverse events. In conclusion, the 1% DWJ211 dose was beneficial for SMF reduction and had a tolerable safety profile. Thus, we selected 1% as the dose to be tested in a Phase 3 clinical trial.

A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial to compare the effectiveness and safety of two botulinum toxin type A formulations for improving moderate to severe glabellar wrinkles in Asians.

Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) was first isolated in 1946, and since then, several formulations have been developed and widely used to treat wrinkles by inducing muscle paralysis. This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled phase 3 clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a newly developed BoNT-A formulation, BMI2006, in improving moderate to severe glabellar wrinkles and to compare with existing onabotulinumtoxin A (OBoNT) injections. A total of 276 subjects were enrolled and received 20 units of the randomized material, which was intramuscularly injected into five different locations on the forehead. The primary endpoint, assessed at 4 weeks, showed no statistically significant difference in the improvement rate of glabellar wrinkles between the two groups, with BMI2006 demonstrating non-inferiority to comparator BoNT-A. Secondary endpoints, evaluated by both treating investigators and independent investigators, also exhibited similar improvement rates throughout the study period. Both groups reported high levels of satisfaction with no statistical difference between the two groups. Safety evaluations indicated mild and transient adverse events, with no serious reactions observed. In conclusion, BMI2006 is an effective and safe BoNT-A for treating glabellar wrinkles with an expected duration of action between 8 and 12 weeks.

A Multi-center Phase II Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Botulax® in Asian Patients with Benign Masseteric Hypertrophy.

BACKGROUND: Benign masseteric hypertrophy (BMH) is a condition in which the thickness of the masseter muscle is increased, resulting in jawline prominence with undesirable aesthetic appearance. Botulinum toxin type A (BTA) injection is a promising treatment option, but its effective dose remains debated. METHODS: Adults over 19 diagnosed with BMH through visual examination and palpation related to a masseter muscle prominence were selected; 80 patients were randomly assigned into five groups (placebo group and 4 groups with different doses of BTA - 24U, 48U, 72U, 96U on both sides of the jaw) and treated with placebo or BTA once at their baseline visit. During each follow-up, the treatment efficacy was evaluated via ultrasound examination of the masseter muscle, 3D facial contour analysis, visual evaluation by the investigator, and patient satisfaction evaluation. RESULTS: The mean age of the 80 patients was 42.7±9.98 years; 68.75% were women. The mean change of the MMT during the maximum clenching state after 12 weeks of drug administration compared to the baseline in the 24U, 48U, 72U, and 96U groups were -2.33±0.41 mm, -3.35±0.42 mm, -2.86±0.42 mm, and -3.79±0.42 mm. All treatment groups showed a statistically significant decrease compared to placebo. Regarding subjective satisfaction, all treatment groups, except the 24U group at 4 weeks, showed higher satisfaction than the placebo group during all visits. No significant adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: BTA administration of at least 48U for BMH is more cost-effective than high-dose units and has a low possibility of side effects.

Assessment of Effects of Low-Level Light Therapy on Scalp Condition and Hair Growth.

Background: The appearance of the scalp and hair is very important aesthetically regardless of age or sex. Although there are many drugs and treatment methods for scalp problems and hair loss, the treatment response is still insufficient. Aims and Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of low-level light therapy in a helmet-like device. Materials and Methods: This study was designed as a 24-week trial with 50 participants. All participants used a helmet-shaped device emitting 630-690, 820-880, and 910-970 nm light wavelengths, for 20 minutes, daily for 24 weeks. A phototrichogram for hair density and thickness, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale score, erythema index, and sebum secretions of the scalp were evaluated at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks. Results: After 24 weeks of treatment, hair density and hair thickness were found to have significantly increased (P <.01 and P =0.013, respectively) and sebum secretion of vertex area had decreased significantly (P <.01). Of 49 participants, 73.47% of the participants showed improvement in the overall appearance of the scalp (n = 36). Conclusion: A helmet-like low-level light therapy device can improve the appearance of the hair, with thickening and increase in the density of the hair, and can improve scalp condition by decreasing sebum secretion.

Analysis of the Microbiome of the Ear Canal in Normal Individuals and Patients with Chronic Otitis Externa.

BACKGROUND: Recently, microbiome research has been actively conducted for various skin areas. However, no study has yet compared the microbiome of bacteria and fungi in the ear canal of healthy individuals and patients with chronic otitis externa in Korea. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the difference in the distribution of fungal and bacterial microbial communities in ear canal samples of healthy individuals and patients with chronic otitis externa. METHODS: In 24 patients with bilateral chronic otitis externa and 24 healthy controls, cotton swabs were used to obtain samples from the bilateral ear canal. To characterize the fungal and bacterial communities, we sequenced and analyzed the 16S rRNA V4-V5 and ITS1 regions using Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology 2, respectively. RESULTS: The alpha diversity analysis for bacteria and fungi confirmed that both richness and evenness decreased in the patient group. The beta diversity analysis for bacteria confirmed that these parameters differed between the control and patient groups. The beta diversity analysis for fungi showed no difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: We observed different skin microbiomes in the patients with chronic otitis externa compared with those in the healthy individuals.