Subcellular localization and nucleocytoplasmic transport of the chromosomal passenger proteins before nuclear envelope breakdown.

As mitosis progresses, the chromosomal passenger proteins (CPPs) Survivin, Aurora B, INCENP and Borealin dynamically colocalize to mitotic structures. Chromosomal passenger proteins are already expressed during G2, whereas the nuclear envelope is only disassembled at the end of prophase. However, the mechanisms that modulate their nucleocytoplasmic localization before nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB) are poorly characterized. Using epitope-tagged proteins, we show that Aurora B, like Survivin, undergoes CRM1-mediated nucleocytoplasmic shuttling, although both proteins lack identifiable 'classical' nuclear transport signals. On the other hand, INCENP resides more stably in the nucleus and contains multiple nuclear localization signals. Finally, Borealin was detected in the nucleolus and the cytoplasm, but its cytoplasmic localization is not directly regulated by CRM1. Coexpression experiments indicate that the nuclear localization of Aurora B, but not of Survivin, is modulated by INCENP and that Survivin prevents the nucleolar accumulation of Borealin. Our data reveal that, in contrast to their closely related localization during mitosis, the nucleocytoplasmic localization of the CPPs before NEB is largely unrelated. Furthermore, the specific effect of INCENP and Survivin on the localization of Aurora B and Borealin, respectively, suggests that different complexes of CPPs may exist not only during mitosis, as recently reported, but also before NEB.

Chemotherapy triggers apoptosis in a caspase-8-dependent and mitochondria-controlled manner in the non-small cell lung cancer cell line NCI-H460.

Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis is generally thought to be dependent on a pathway headed by caspase-9. This model is primarily based on studies performed in leukemia cells; however, little is known about caspase cascades in relatively resistant solid tumor cells, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cells. Using the NSCLC cell line NCI-H460 (H460), here, we studied the effect of stable expression of various caspase inhibitors on apoptosis induced by the anticancer drugs cisplatin, topotecan, and gemcitabine. Interestingly, overexpression of caspase-9S and X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP), both able to inhibit caspase-9 activity, failed to block apoptosis. In contrast, stable expression of caspase-8 inhibitors, such as cytokine response modifier A (CrmA) and dominant-negative caspase-8, almost completely abrogated apoptosis and also enhanced clonogenic survival. Caspase-8 activation in H460 cells was not mediated by death receptors, inasmuch as overexpression of dominant-negative Fas-associated death domain (FADD-DN) did not prevent procaspase-8 cleavage and subsequent apoptosis. However, stable expression of Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL did suppress these apoptotic events, including the release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which was observed in drug-treated H460 cells. In the NSCLC cell line H460, we, thus, provide evidence for the existence of a novel drug-inducible apoptotic pathway in which activation of caspase-8, and not of caspase-9, forms the apical and mitochondria-dependent step that subsequently activates the downstream caspases.

Expression of X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis as a novel prognostic marker in radically resected non-small cell lung cancer patients.

PURPOSE: To assess the pattern of expression and the prognostic value of the inhibitor of apoptosis family member X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP; MIHA/ILP-a) in radically resected non-small cell lung cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The expression of XIAP and its relationship with overall survival was analyzed by immunohistochemistry on tumors from 144 patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. In addition, the apoptotic and mitotic index, Ki-67, p53, and bcl-2 levels were also assessed. RESULTS: XIAP expression was specific for tumor cells, and the pattern was cytoplasmic. The median expression of XIAP was 20%, and when this value was used as a cutoff point for statistical analyses, 63 of the samples were considered high XIAP-expressing and 81 low XIAP-expressing. Surprisingly, high XIAP-expressing patients had a longer overall survival than the group expressing lower levels (60 versus 24 months of median survival; log rank, P = 0.01). The positive impact of XIAP expression on survival was confirmed by multivariate analysis (P = 0.026). Although no correlation was observed between XIAP expression and the apoptotic index, a significant inverse correlation was observed between XIAP, Ki-67 (P = 0.006), and mitotic index (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The unexpected inverse correlation of XIAP with proliferation markers and the absence of correlation with apoptotic index, coupled with its role as an independent positive prognostic factor for survival in radically resected NSCLC patients imply a more complex role for XIAP in tumor biology than anticipated by in vitro data.

Drug-induced apoptosis in lung cnacer cells is not mediated by the Fas/FasL (CD95/APO1) signaling pathway.

Anticancer drugs exert at least part of their cytotoxic effect by triggering apoptosis. We previously identified chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in lung cancer cells and suggested a role for p53 alternative or complementary pathways in this process. Recently, a role for the Fas/FasL (CD95/Apo1) signaling system in chemotherapy-induced apoptosis was proposed in some cell types. In the present work, the involvement of the Fas/FasL system in drug-induced apoptosis in lung cancer cells was investigated upon exposure to four cytotoxic drugs (cisplatin, gemcitabine, topotecan, and paclitaxel). We assessed the expression of Fas and FasL and the function of the Fas pathway in six lung cancer cell lines (H460, H322, GLC4, GLC4/ADR, H187, and N417). All lung cancer cell lines expressed Fas and FasL at RNA and protein levels, and apoptosis could be induced in four of six cell lines upon exposure to the Fas agonistic monoclonal antibody (mAb) CLB-CD95/15. Nevertheless, after drug exposure, no significant FasL up-regulation was observed, whereas the Fas expression was increased in the wild-type p53 cell line H460, but not in the other lines, proved to be mutant p53 by direct gene sequencing. Moreover, no correlation was observed in lung cancer cell lines between sensitivity to drugs and to a Fas agonistic mAb, and preincubation of cells with either the Fas-antagonistic mAb CLB-CD95/2 or a FasL-neutralizing mAb did not protect from drug-induced apoptosis. Taken together, these observations strongly argue against a role of the Fas/FasL signaling pathway in drug-induced apoptosis in lung cancer cells. Interestingly, caspase-8 activation was observed upon drug exposure, independently from Fas/FasL signaling.

Nuclear localization of survivin is a positive prognostic factor for survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Expression of survivin, a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis protein family, is commonly detected in cancers but not in normal differentiated tissues. Survivin is usually localized in the cytoplasm of cancer cells, but nuclear localization has also been described, and we recently reported that survivin is a nuclear-cytoplasmic shuttling protein. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three tumor specimens from patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (55% stage IIIA, 17% stage IIIB and 28% stage IV) who underwent chemotherapy treatment were evaluated with immunohistochemistry for survivin expression and localization. These two sets of data were processed and tested for correlation with major patient characteristics, response to chemotherapy, and overall and relapse-free survival. RESULTS: Survivin was present only in malignant tissues, and 47/53 (89%) of the specimens were positive. The overall median expression of tumor cells was 40%, and this value was used as a cut-off point for statistical analysis. By dichotomizing the specimens as expressing low or high levels of survivin, a significant association was seen between the expression of survivin and the histology of the tumors (P=0.020), squamous cell carcinoma being the histotype with lower levels of survivin expression. Three patterns of localization were observed: 42% of cases (22/53) showed reactivity confined to the nucleus, 17% (nine of 53) only in the cytoplasm and 30% (16/53) in both the nucleus and the cytoplasm. Interestingly, nuclear survivin levels predicted longer overall and relapse-free survival, in univariate and multivariate analyses. Expression and localization of survivin did not correlate with response to chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that differential localization of survivin may be a prognostic factor for NSCLC. Further studies are warranted.

Assessment of IAP (inhibitor of apoptosis) proteins as predictors of response to chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Expression of inhibitor of apoptosis family proteins (IAPs) has been shown in vitro to decrease chemosensitivity through caspase inhibition. However, the role of IAPs as predictors of response to chemotherapy in cancer patients remains to be determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using immunohistochemistry, we assessed the expression of the IAP proteins c-IAP1, c-IAP2, and XIAP on tumors from 55 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with chemotherapy, and correlated that with the observed response to chemotherapy, time to progression and overall survival. RESULTS: Differences were observed in the pattern of staining among the IAP proteins. The expression of c-IAP2 and XIAP was exclusively cytoplasmic. whereas c-IAP1 also displayed nuclear staining. The median expression of tumor cells for c-IAP1, c-IAP2, and XIAP was 70%, 45%, and 25%, respectively, and a correlation was observed between c-IAP1 and c-IAP2 (P = 0.004), and c-IAP1 and XIAP expression (P = 0.013). However, no association was seen between the expression of these proteins and sex, age, tumor size, stage, histology and grade of differentiation. Interestingly, expression of c-IAP1, c-IAP2, and XIAP did not predict response to chemotherapy. In addition, the expression of IAPs had no impact on the time to progression or overall survival of this group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that: 1) there are differences in the level of expression and in the subcellular distribution of c-IAP1, c-IAP2, and XIAP in tumors derived from NSCLC patients. 2) The expression of c-IAP1, c-IAP2 and XIAP does not predict the response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC. 3) The relation between expression of IAPs and chemosensitivity in cancer patients may be more complex than anticipated by in vitro data.