Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Levels in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Infants Exposed In Utero.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Vedolizumab and ustekinumab pharmacokinetics in pregnancy and the infant after in utero exposure remain incompletely defined. We aim to define the antenatal stability of ustekinumab and vedolizumab levels and the time at which infant drug levels become undetectable. METHODS: This multicenter prospective observational cohort study recruited pregnant or preconception women with inflammatory bowel disease receiving vedolizumab or ustekinumab. Trough drug levels, clinical data, and biochemical data were documented preconception, during each trimester of pregnancy, and postpartum. Maternal and cord blood drug levels were measured at delivery and in infants until undetectable. Infant outcomes were assessed until 2 years of age. RESULTS: A total of 102 participants (vedolizumab, n = 58) were included. The majority of mothers were, and remained, in clinical and biochemical remission. Maternal vedolizumab levels decreased over the course of pregnancy in association with increasing weight, rather than increasing gestation. Maternal ustekinumab levels remained stable. The median time to drug becoming undetectable in the infant was shorter for vedolizumab (11 wk; range, 5-19 wk; n = 32) than ustekinumab (14 wk; range, 9-36 wk; n = 17) and correlated positively with infant delivery level. Thirty-two of 41 (88%) and 17 of 30 (67%) vedolizumab- and ustekinumab-exposed infants had undetectable drug levels by 15 weeks of age, respectively. Pregnancy and infant outcomes were favorable. Twenty infants with undetectable drug levels received the rotavirus vaccine, with no adverse reactions reported. CONCLUSIONS: Maternal vedolizumab levels decreased, whereas ustekinumab levels remained stable over the course of pregnancy. Most vedolizumab- and approximately half of ustekinumab-exposed infants had undetectable drug levels by 15 weeks of age. No concerning maternal or infant safety signals were identified.

Infections in inflammatory bowel disease patients on immunomodulator and biologic therapy are not associated with high serum drug levels.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) therapies now utilise higher doses of immunomodulatory and biologic therapies, predisposing patients to an increased risk of infections. AIMS: We aimed to determine whether infections were associated with high anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) drug levels in IBD and to quantify the risk and consequences of infections. METHODS: Two retrospective studies were performed, a descriptive cohort study and a matched case-control study. For the matched case-control study, cases of infection occurring on anti-TNF agents were matched in a 1:2 ratio to controls of anti-TNF treated patients without infections. RESULTS: In the descriptive study, 76 infections occurred in 60 patients, including 49 bacterial, 24 viral, four fungal and four parasitic. Of these, 61 (80.3%) were on biologics, 49 (64.5%) on immunomodulators and 11 (14.5%) on corticosteroids. Thirty-four (44.7%) were on combination therapy, 27 (35.5%) on biologic monotherapy and 15 (19.7%) on immunomodulator monotherapy. Median anti-TNF drug levels in infection cases were 3.9 µg/mL for infliximab and 6.0 µg/mL for adalimumab. In the case-control study, 32 cases of infection in 27 anti-TNF treated patients were matched with 64 anti-TNF treated controls without infections. Among infection cases, 59.5% were on combination therapy versus 40.6% on biologic monotherapy (P = 0.59). Median drug levels for cases and controls respectively were 3.9 µg/mL versus 5.5 µg/mL for infliximab (P = 0.72) and 6.0 µg/mL versus 9.9 µg/mL for adalimumab (P = 0.34). CONCLUSION: Infections in patients with IBD were common, and the risk was highest with combination therapy. Infections were not associated with high serum anti-TNF levels.

Pharmacist-Driven Therapeutic Infliximab Monitoring at the Point of Care Using Rapidly Assessed Drug Levels in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic monitoring of infliximab is limited by the time lag between drug-level measurement and dose adjustment, along with the cost of dose escalation. Strategies for dose reduction in stable patients on maintenance infliximab at supratherapeutic levels are uncertain. This study determined the feasibility of a pharmacist-driven strategy for immediate dose adjustment using a sliding scale at the point of care in stable patients with inflammatory bowel disease on maintenance therapy. METHODS: Adult patients with stable disease undergoing maintenance therapy with infliximab infusions, 5 mg/kg every 8 weeks, were prospectively studied. Trough drug levels were assessed by a rapid assay (and later by ELISA) at all infusions for up to 12 months with immediate but quantitatively small dose adjustment according to a sliding scale targeting a therapeutic range of 3-7 mcg/mL. Disease activity was assessed both clinically and biochemically. RESULTS: The rapid assay and ELISA detected similar infliximab levels, and the strategy added approximately 30 minutes to the duration of infusion events. Only 20% of 48 patients (77% with Crohn disease) had baseline trough infliximab concentrations within the therapeutic range. This value increased 3-fold after 24 and 48 weeks of interventions. One in 2 patients had baseline supratherapeutic levels, and most were brought into the therapeutic range without a discernible impact on disease activity by 1 dose adjustment, but 2 or 3 adjustments were generally needed for 29% of patients with subtherapeutic levels. Overall, drug costs were reduced by 4%. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate dose adjustment after infliximab rapid assay performed by a pharmacist using a sliding scale is a feasible strategy. Supratherapeutic infliximab levels can be safely and quickly brought into the therapeutic range using small dose adjustments without affecting disease activity, offsetting (at least partly) costs associated with dose escalation.

Higher Anti-tumor Necrosis Factor-α Levels Correlate With Improved Radiologic Outcomes in Crohn's Perianal Fistulas.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Higher anti-tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF) drug levels are associated with improved clinical healing of Crohn's perianal fistulas. It is unclear whether this leads to improved healing on radiologic assessment. We aimed to evaluate the association between anti-TNF drug levels and radiologic outcomes in perianal fistulising Crohn's disease. METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective multicenter study was undertaken. Patients with perianal fistulising Crohn's disease on maintenance infliximab or adalimumab, with drug levels within 6 months of perianal magnetic resonance imaging were included. Patients receiving dose changes or fistula surgery between drug level and imaging were excluded. Radiologic disease activity was scored using the Van Assche Index, with an inflammatory subscore calculated using indices: T2-weighted imaging hyperintensity, collections >3 mm diameter, rectal wall involvement. Primary endpoint was radiologic healing (inflammatory subscore ≤6). Secondary endpoint was radiologic remission (inflammatory subscore = 0). RESULTS: Of 193 patients (infliximab, n = 117; adalimumab, n = 76), patients with radiologic healing had higher median drug levels compared with those with active disease (infliximab 6.0 vs 3.9 µg/mL; adalimumab 9.1 vs 6.2 µg/mL; both P < .05). Patients with radiologic remission also had higher median drug levels compared with those with active disease (infliximab 7.4 vs 3.9 µg/mL; P < .05; adalimumab 9.8 vs 6.2 µg/mL; P = .07). There was a significant incremental reduction in median inflammatory subscores with higher anti-TNF drug level tertiles. CONCLUSIONS: Higher anti-TNF drug levels were associated with improved radiologic outcomes on magnetic resonance imaging in perianal fistulising Crohn's disease, with an incremental improvement at higher drug level tertiles for both infliximab and adalimumab.

Low-Dose Azathioprine in Combination with Allopurinol: The Past, Present and Future of This Useful Duo.

The inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are complex immune-mediated inflammatory diseases that are associated with significant morbidity around the world. As our understanding of IBD, and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, advances the number of therapeutic targets has increased which has rapidly driven the development and introduction of new therapies. While these new therapies have shown promise they come with the significant drawback of high costs. For many IBD patients around the world the cost of newer therapies is prohibitive which means treating clinicians often need to turn to optimising simpler, older, and inexpensive medications. The concept of optimising well established cheaper medications is not unique to the management of IBD as health systems all over the world look to reduce costs while simultaneously improving patient outcomes. Despite thiopurines being used in the management IBD for over 60 years, many clinicians are still hesitant to use them due to perceptions around limited efficacy and poor tolerance. One method identified to potentially increase utilisation of thiopurines involves the coadministration of allopurinol. In this review we will explore the history, pharmacology, recent studies and give recommendations for the utilisation of the usual duo of azathioprine combined with allopurinol.

De-escalation from Dose-Intensified Anti-TNF Therapy Is Successful in the Majority of IBD Patients at 12 Months.

BACKGROUND: Data on outcomes following de-escalation of intensified anti-TNF therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are limited and concerns about relapse limit willingness to de-escalate. AIMS: To evaluate rates of successful de-escalation at 12 months and to determine factors that may predict success. METHODS: Single-centre experience of IBD patients that were de-escalated following deep remission on dose-intensified infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA) for secondary loss of response. Patients were classified as 'successes' if remaining on reduced anti-TNF or 'failures' if requiring re-escalation, steroids, surgery or enrolment into a clinical trial at 12 months. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, biomarkers (faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, albumin) and anti-TNF drug levels were collected 6-monthly. RESULTS: Of 25 patients (20 CD, 5 UC), 16 (64%) were successes 12 months post-de-escalation. Median time to failure was 6 months. Six of the nine failures required anti-TNF re-escalation and three entered a clinical trial. Re-escalation recaptured response in all six patients. There was no significant difference in baseline biomarker activity between the two groups. There was no difference in infliximab levels between successes and failures at the time of de-escalation (5.5 vs. 5.3, p = 0.63) as well as 6 months (3.1 vs. 4.6, p = 0.95) and 12 months (3.2 vs. 4.5, p = 0.58) post-de-escalation. CONCLUSION: Nearly two-thirds of patients remained on reduced anti-TNF dosing 12 months after de-escalation. All patients who failed de-escalation were recaptured after dose re-escalation. De-escalation with close monitoring may be considered in patients on intensified anti-TNF therapy in sustained remission.

Appropriateness of Medical and Surgical Treatments for Chronic Pouchitis Using RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Methodology.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The treatment of chronic pouchitis remains a challenge due to the paucity of high-quality studies. We aimed to provide guidance for clinicians on the appropriateness of medical and surgical treatments in chronic pouchitis. METHODS: Appropriateness of medical and surgical treatments in patients with chronic pouchitis was considered in 16 scenarios incorporating presence/absence of four variables: pouchitis symptoms, response to antibiotics, significant prepouch ileitis, and Crohn's disease (CD)-like complications (i.e., stricture or fistula). Appropriateness of permanent ileostomy in patients refractory to medical treatments was considered in eight additional scenarios. Using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method, international IBD expert panelists rated appropriateness of treatments in each scenario on a 1-9 scale. RESULTS: Chronic antibiotic therapy was rated appropriate only in asymptomatic antibiotic-dependent patients with no CD-like complications and inappropriate in all other scenarios. Ileal-release budesonide was rated appropriate in 6/16 scenarios including patients with significant prepouch ileitis but no CD-like complications. Probiotics were considered either inappropriate (14/16) or uncertain (2/16). Biologic therapy was considered appropriate in most scenarios (14/16) and uncertain in situations where significant prepouch ileitis or CD-like complications were absent (2/16). In patients who are refractory to all medications, permanent ileostomy was considered appropriate in all scenarios (7/8) except in asymptomatic patients with no CD-like complications. CONCLUSIONS: In the presence of significant prepouch ileitis or CD-like complications, chronic antibiotics and probiotics are inappropriate. Biologics are appropriate in all patients except in asymptomatic patients with no evidence of complications. Permanent ileostomy is appropriate in most medically refractory patients.

Thiopurines and their optimization during infliximab induction and maintenance: A retrospective study in Crohn's disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Combining therapy with a thiopurine is favored when commencing infliximab in Crohn's disease; however, the optimal 6-thioguanine nucleotide (TGN) level and how long to continue thiopurines after induction are uncertain. We aimed to compare outcomes after induction and during maintenance in combination therapy versus infliximab monotherapy in Crohn's and to examine whether TGN levels were associated with outcomes. METHODS: Crohn's patients induced with infliximab with or without concomitant thiopurines were retrospectively identified. Response to induction and clinical outcomes in subsequent 6-month maintenance semesters were analyzed. A TGN level ≥235 pmol/8 × 108 red blood cells was considered therapeutic. RESULTS: In 89 patients, response to induction was higher in combination therapy than monotherapy (74 vs 47%, P = 0.04). This benefit was only seen in patients with a therapeutic TGN (odds ratio 3.72, confidence interval 1.07-13.0, P = 0.04). Combination therapy during induction yielded a three times longer time to subsequent need for treatment escalation or treatment failure compared with monotherapy (29 vs 9 months, P = 0.01), with both therapeutic and subtherapeutic TGNs independent predictors on multivariate analysis. Among 370 semesters, there was no difference in outcomes between combination therapy and monotherapy (P = 0.42), nor when combination semesters were stratified by therapeutic versus subtherapeutic TGN (P = 0.56). In semester 1 only, a significantly higher remission rate was observed with therapeutic compared with subtherapeutic TGN (76% vs 33%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy dosed with an optimized thiopurine was superior to infliximab monotherapy for induction of response, durability of response, and clinical outcomes in the first 6 months following induction. Thereafter, combination therapy yielded no clinical advantage, supporting consideration of thiopurine withdrawal on a case-by-case basis.

Evolving Role of Thiopurines in Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Biologics and New Small Molecules.

In recent years, with the increasing availability of biologic therapies and due to safety concerns, the role of thiopurines in the management of inflammatory bowel disease has been questioned. While acknowledging that the benefit/risk ratio of biologic therapies is very high, they are expensive and are not required by a majority of patients. Therefore, thiopurines do retain an important role as steroid-sparing and maintenance agents when used as monotherapy, and in combination therapy with biologics due to their clinical and pharmacokinetic optimization of anti-tumor necrosis factor agents in particular. Safety concerns with thiopurines are real but also relatively rare, and with careful pre-treatment screening and ongoing monitoring thiopurine benefits outweigh risks in the majority of appropriately selected patients. Measurement of newer pharmacogenomic markers such as nudix hydrolase 15 (NUDT15), when combined with knowledge of existing known mutations (e.g., thiopurine S-methyltransferase-TPMT), will hopefully minimize the risk of potentially life-threatening leukopenia by allowing for pre-treatment dosing stratification. Further optimization of thiopurine dosing via measurement of thiopurine metabolites should be performed routinely and is superior to weight-based dosing. The association of thiopurines with malignancies including lymphoproliferative disorders needs to be recognized in all patients and individualized in each patient. The decrease in lymphoma risk after thiopurine cessation provides an incentive for thiopurine de-escalation in appropriate patients after a period of prolonged deep remission. This review will summarize the current role of thiopurines in inflammatory bowel disease management and provide recommendations for commencing and monitoring therapy, and when to consider de-escalation.

E-Health and remote management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease: lessons from Denmark in a time of need.

In Denmark, remote monitoring and management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) started two decades ago with the web application Constant Care. The disease monitoring in Constant Care consists of simple disease activity questionnaires and home measurement of faecal calprotectin, a stool biomarker for inflammation. It has now been implemented in clinical practice at North Zealand University Hospital in Denmark. Digital health care solutions facilitate remote contact between patients and healthcare providers and have been shown to reduce time to remission, outpatient visits and hospital admissions, and increase adherence to medical therapy, quality of life and disease and treatment knowledge. In Australia, E-Health is an area of increasing interest, particularly given the significant distances travelled by rural patients to access specialist care. There are several foreseeable benefits to incorporating E-Health/remote monitoring into Australian IBD management, including reduced burdens of time and cost on rural patients, and more efficient management of well outpatients, thereby increasing clinic availability for acutely unwell patients. The significant portion of IBD patients managed in private practice in Australia, and the infrastructure within private practice that is well suited to implementation of E-Health makes Australia a viable setting for an E-Health IBD management model like Denmark's Constant Care model. One pilot study is currently underway investigating the feasibility of rapid and remote IBD monitoring and E-Health in an Australian IBD population. The current COVID-19 pandemic has further illustrated the importance of telehealth as a means of maintaining health services to patients in geographic, or social, isolation.

Appropriate Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologic Agents for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is widely available for biologic therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We reviewed current data and provided expert opinion regarding the clinical utility of TDM for biologic therapies in IBD. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi method to establish consensus. A comprehensive literature review was performed regarding the use of TDM of biologic therapy in IBD and presented to international IBD specialists. Subsequently, 28 statements on the application of TDM in clinical practice were rated on a scale of 1 to 10 (1 = strongly disagree and 10 = strongly agree) by each of the panellists. Statements were accepted if 80% or more of the participants agreed with a score ≥7. The remaining statements were discussed and revised based on the available evidence followed by a second round of voting. RESULTS: The panel agreed on 24 (86%) statements. For anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies, proactive TDM was found to be appropriate after induction and at least once during maintenance therapy, but this was not the case for the other biologics. Reactive TDM was appropriate for all agents both for primary non-response and secondary loss of response. The panellists also agreed on several statements regarding TDM and appropriate drug and anti-drug antibody (ADA) concentration thresholds for biologics in specific clinical scenarios. CONCLUSION: Consensus was achieved towards the utility of TDM of biologics in IBD, particularly anti-TNF therapies. More data are needed especially on non-anti-TNF biologics to further define optimal drug concentration and ADA thresholds as these can vary depending on the therapeutic outcomes assessed.

Higher Mucosal Healing with Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors in Combination with Thiopurines Compared to Methotrexate in Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The differential impact of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapy with methotrexate versus thiopurine co-therapy on endoscopic remission remains uncertain. AIMS: To compare rates of endoscopic remission based on methotrexate or thiopurine co-therapy used with anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease. METHODS: A retrospective observational study at two tertiary centers between 2010 and 2016 compared endoscopic remission rates and persistence on anti-TNF therapy in combination with methotrexate versus thiopurines for at least 3 months. RESULTS: Of 412 patients on anti-TNF therapy, 278 (67%) received immunomodulator co-therapy for ≥ 3 months and 269 (65%) had complete data for analysis. Methotrexate was used in 77 (29%) and thiopurines in 192 (71%) patients plus either infliximab (156, 58%) or adalimumab (113, 42%), with median follow-up of 2.8 years. The methotrexate group had greater prior immunomodulator intolerance (62% vs 20%, p < 0.01). Endoscopic remission rates were higher in those treated with thiopurine compared to methotrexate co-therapy at 12 m (58% vs 17%, p < 0.01) and at last review (59% vs 40%, p = 0.03). Endoscopic remission rates were higher with thiopurines than methotrexate when combined with adalimumab (49% vs 6%, p < 0.01) but not with infliximab (65% vs 54%, p = 0.09). In multivariate analysis, thiopurine co-therapy, elevated baseline CRP, and therapeutic anti-TNF drug levels were each associated with longer persistence of co-therapy (each p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in adverse events, malignancy or infection rates. CONCLUSION: In this cohort, anti-TNF and thiopurine co-therapy resulted in higher rates of mucosal healing than methotrexate, the difference is most pronounced with adalimumab and conversely with low-dose methotrexate.

Anti-MAdCAM antibody (PF-00547659) for ulcerative colitis (TURANDOT): a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: PF-00547659 is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds to human mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 (MAdCAM-1) to selectively reduce lymphocyte homing to the intestinal tract. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of PF-00547659 in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. METHODS: This phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial recruited patients aged 18-65 years from 105 centres in 21 countries, with a history (≥3 months) of active ulcerative colitis extending more than 15 cm beyond the anal verge (with a total Mayo score ≥6 and a Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥2) who had failed or were intolerant to at least one conventional therapy. Patients were stratified by previous anti-TNFα treatment, and randomly assigned by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to receive a subcutaneous injection of 7·5 mg, 22·5 mg, 75 mg, or 225 mg PF-00547659 or placebo at baseline, then every 4 weeks. Patients, investigators, and sponsors were blinded to the treatment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving remission (total Mayo score ≤2 with no individual subscore >1 and rectal bleeding subscore ≤1) at week 12. The efficacy analysis included all patients who received at least one dose of the randomised treatment; the safety analysis was done according to treatment received. All p values were one-sided and multiplicity-adjusted. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01620255. FINDINGS: Between Nov 2, 2012, and Feb 4, 2016, we screened 587 patients; 357 were eligible and randomly assigned to receive placebo (n=73) or PF-00547659 at doses of 7·5 mg (n=71), 22·5 mg (n=72), 75 mg (n=71), or 225 mg (n=70). Remission rates at week 12 were significantly greater in three of four active-treatment groups than in the placebo group (2·7% [two of 73]): 7·5 mg (11·3% [eight of 71]), 22·5 mg (16·7% [12 of 72]), 75 mg (15·5% [11 of 71]), and 225 mg (5·7% [four of 70]). These rates corresponded to a stratum-adjusted (anti-TNFα-naive and anti-TNFα-experienced) risk difference versus placebo of 8·0% for 7·5 mg (90% CI 1·9 to 14, p=0·0425), 12·8% for 22·5 mg (5·6 to 19·9, p=0·0099), 11·8% for 75 mg (4·8 to 18·8, p=0·0119), and 2·6% for 225 mg (-1·2 to 6·4, p=0·1803). Four of 73 (5·5%) patients had a serious adverse event in the placebo group, ten of 71 (14·1%) in the 7·5 mg group, one of 70 (1·4%) in the 22·5 mg group, three of 73 (4·1%) in the 75 mg group, and three of 70 (4·3%) in the 225 mg group. No safety signal was observed for the study drug. INTERPRETATION: PF-00547659 was safe and well tolerated in this patient population, and better than placebo for induction of remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. The greatest clinical effects were observed with the 22·5 mg and 75 mg doses. FUNDING: Pfizer.

Appropriateness of Combination Therapy for Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: One Size Still Does Not Fit All.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that therapies targeting tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and α4ß7 integrin are effective when given as monotherapy in inducing and/or maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn's disease (CD), but data from RCTs are less clear on whether concomitant immunomodulator (IM) therapy confers additional benefit. In CD, RCT data are mixed,1,2 as are results of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, showing no benefit overall,3 minimal benefit with individual agents,4 and comparative benefit over some monotherapies but not others.5 For example, concomitant azathioprine with infliximab is more effective than either drug alone in patients with CD naive to both drugs,2 but whether combination therapy is more effective than monotherapy with infliximab in nonnaive patients, or with other approved biologic drugs in any population, remains unknown. In UC, RCTs have shown that the benefit may be limited to specific populations,6 whereas systematic reviews suggest no benefit at all.7.

Examining maintenance care following infliximab salvage therapy for acute severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Data supporting the optimal maintenance drug therapy and strategy to monitor ongoing response following successful infliximab (IFX) induction, for acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), are limited. We aimed to evaluate maintenance and monitoring strategies employed in patients post-IFX induction therapy. METHODS: Patients in six Australian tertiary centers treated with IFX for steroid-refractory ASUC between April 2014 and May 2015 were identified via hospital IBD and pharmacy databases. Patients were followed up for 1 year with clinical data over 12 months recorded. Analysis was limited to patient outcomes beyond 3 months. RESULTS: Forty one patients were identified. Five of the 41 (12%) patients underwent colectomy within 3 months, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Six of 35 (17%) of the remaining patients progressed to colectomy by 12 months. Maintenance therapy: Patients maintained on thiopurine monotherapy (14/35) versus IFX/thiopurine therapy (15/35) were followed up. Two of 15 (13%) patients who received combination maintenance therapy underwent a colectomy at 12 months, compared with 1/14 (7%) patients receiving thiopurine monotherapy (P = 0.610). Monitoring during maintenance: Post-discharge, thiopurine metabolites were monitored in 15/27 (56%); fecal calprotectin in 11/32 (34%); and serum IFX levels in 4/20 (20%). Twenty of 32 (63%) patients had an endoscopic evaluation after IFX salvage with median time to first endoscopy of 109 days (interquartile range 113-230). CONCLUSION: Following IFX induction therapy for ASUC, the uptake of maintenance therapy in this cohort and strategies to monitor ongoing response were variable. These data suggest that the optimal maintenance and monitoring strategy post-IFX salvage therapy remains to be defined.

Predicting response after infliximab salvage in acute severe ulcerative colitis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC) is a medical emergency requiring prompt therapeutic intervention. Although infliximab has been used as salvage therapy for over 15 years, clinical predictors of treatment success are lacking. We performed a retrospective analysis to identify factors that predict colectomy and may guide dose intensification. METHODS: Fifty-four hospitalized patients received infliximab for ASUC at seven Australian centers (April 2014-May 2015). Follow-up was over 12 months. The data were primarily analyzed for predictors of colectomy. Accelerated (AI) versus standard (SI) infliximab induction strategies were also compared. RESULTS: Of 54 patients identified, the overall colectomy rate was 15.38% (8/52) at 3 months and 26.92% (14/52) at 12 months. Two patients were lost to follow-up. There was a numerically higher colectomy rate in those treated with AI compared with SI (P = 0.3); however, those treated with AI had more severe biochemical disease. A C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin ratio cut-off of 0.37 post-commencement of infliximab and before discharge was a significant predictor of colectomy with an area under receiver operating curve of 0.73. Pretreatment CRP and albumin levels were not predictive of colectomy. A Mayo Endoscopic Score of 2 had a 94% PPV for avoidance of colectomy following infliximab salvage. CONCLUSIONS: The baseline Mayo Endoscopic Score and the CRP/albumin ratio following infliximab salvage are significant predictors of treatment response for ASUC and identify patients at high risk of colectomy. Whether this risk can be mitigated using infliximab dose intensification requires prospective evaluation before the CRP/albumin ratio can be integrated into ASUC management algorithms.

Concentrations of Adalimumab and Infliximab in Mothers and Newborns, and Effects on Infection.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Little is known about in utero exposure to and postnatal clearance of anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in neonates. We investigated the concentrations of adalimumab and infliximab in umbilical cord blood of newborns and rates of clearance after birth, and how these correlated with drug concentrations in mothers at birth and risk of infection during the first year of life. METHODS: We performed a prospective study of 80 pregnant women with inflammatory bowel diseases at tertiary hospitals in Denmark, Australia, and New Zealand from March 2012 through November 2014: 36 received adalimumab and 44 received infliximab; 39 received concomitant thiopurines during pregnancy. Data were collected from medical records on disease activity and treatment before, during, and after pregnancy. Concentrations of anti-TNF agents were measured in blood samples from women at delivery and in umbilical cords, and in infants for every 3 months until the drug was no longer detected. RESULTS: The time from last exposure to anti-TNF agent during pregnancy correlated inversely with the concentration of the drugs in the umbilical cord (adalimumab: r = -0.64, P = .0003; infliximab: r = -0.77, P < .0001) and in mothers at time of birth (adalimumab, r = -0.80; infliximab, r = -0.80; P < .0001 for both). The median ratio of infant:mother drug concentration at birth was 1.21 for adalimumab (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94-1.49) and 1.97 for infliximab (95% CI, 1.50-2.43). The mean time to drug clearance in infants was 4.0 months for adalimumab (95% CI, 2.9-5.0) and 7.3 months for infliximab (95% CI, 6.2-8.3; P < .0001). Drugs were not detected in infants after 12 months of age. Bacterial infections developed in 4 infants (5%) and viral infections developed in 16 (20%), all with benign courses. The relative risk for infection was 2.7 in infants whose mothers received the combination of an anti-TNF agent and thiopurine, compared with anti-TNF monotherapy (95% CI, 1.09-6.78; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective study of infants born to mothers who received anti-TNF agents during pregnancy, we detected the drugs until 12 months of age. There was an inverse correlation between the time from last exposure during pregnancy and drug concentration in the umbilical cord. Infliximab was cleared more slowly than adalimumab from the infants. The combination of an anti-TNF agent and thiopurine therapy during pregnancy increased the relative risk for infant infections almost 3-fold compared with anti-TNF monotherapy. Live vaccines therefore should be avoided for up to 1 year unless drug clearance is documented, and pregnant women should be educated on the risks of anti-TNF use.