Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Endoscopy ; 45(3): 214-7, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23446668

RESUMEN

The sixth EURO-NOTES workshop (4 - 6 October 2012, Prague, Czech Republic) focused on enabling intensive scientific dialogue and interaction between surgeons, gastroenterologists, and engineers/industry representatives and discussion of the state of the practice and development of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) in Europe. In accordance with previous meetings, five working groups were formed. In 2012, emphasis was put on specific indications for NOTES and interventional endoscopy. Each group was assigned an important indication related to ongoing research in NOTES and interventional endoscopy: cholecystectomy and appendectomy, therapy of colorectal diseases, therapy of adenocarcinoma and neoplasia in the upper gastrointestinal tract, treating obesity, and new therapeutic approaches for achalasia. This review summarizes consensus statements of the working groups.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Cirugía Endoscópica por Orificios Naturales , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Apendicectomía , Colecistectomía , Enfermedades del Colon/cirugía , Acalasia del Esófago/cirugía , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Obesidad/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía
2.
Surg Endosc ; 24(9): 2120-7, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20177940

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Mediastinal surgery most often is performed via a transthoracic or transabdominal approach; however, the pre- and paratracheal mediastinum can be readily accessed with a transcervical approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and success rate of using a transcervical approach and flexible endoscopes to perform mediastinal surgery also in the retro- and paraesophageal mediastinum. METHODS: Mediastinal operations on four live pigs and one human cadaver were performed using standard endoscopes through a small cervical incision. The procedure involved marking of four mediastinal lymph nodes using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). The esophagus was dissected to the phrenoesophageal junction by creating connective tissue tunnels with balloon dilatation and low-pressure CO(2) insufflation. Heller myotomy was performed followed by sequential identification and removal of the marked nodes. Success rate of esophageal dissection to the diaphragm, Heller myotomy, directed mediastinal lymph node harvest, and complication rates were evaluated. RESULTS: Dissection of the esophagus to the diaphragm was achieved in 100% of attempts. Distal esophageal myotomy was performed in all cases. Harvest of marked lymph nodes (ln) was successful in 100% of animals (16/16 ln) and cadavers (2/2 ln). One major complication was recorded in the pig group (tension pneumomediastinum). CONCLUSIONS: The entire visceral mediastinum can be successfully accessed through a transcervical incision using flexible endoscopes. Directed lymph node harvest and esophageal myotomy is feasible with a high success rate. Connective tissue tunnels are safe, atraumatic, and a promising concept for targeted mediastinal exploration. With refinement in technology, this approach may be useful for a variety of mediastinal surgeries.


Asunto(s)
Tejido Conectivo , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Mediastinoscopía/métodos , Mediastino/cirugía , Animales , Cadáver , Cateterismo , Endosonografía , Esófago/cirugía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Mediastinoscopios , Mediastinoscopía/instrumentación , Porcinos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Minerva Chir ; 63(5): 385-8, 2008 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18923349

RESUMEN

Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) represents a burgeoning but still largely experimental field. Most NOTES researchers have favored transgastric and transvaginal approaches to abdominal access. For surgeries involving the upper abdominal organs, transvaginal and transanal approach promise to provide a more direct route in contrast to the often cumbersome retroflexion typically required with the transgastric approach. The potential disadvantages of the transanal route are also significant and include issues of sterility, the risk of inadvertent trauma to adjacent organs during transmural puncture, and the risk of colonic wall shearing. This article reviews early development of NOTES, the evolution of transanal access to the peritoneal cavity, highlights the various techniques that have been used for transanal access, and discusses the relative advantages and disadvantages of this approach.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal/métodos , Endoscopios , Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/tendencias , Colectomía , Humanos , Laparoscopía , Cavidad Peritoneal/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Factores de Riesgo
4.
Hernia ; 19(6): 975-82, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26129921

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Mesh repair of large hiatal hernias has increasingly gained popularity to reduce recurrence rates. Integration of iron particles into the polyvinylidene fluoride mesh-based material allows for magnetic resonance visualisation (MR). METHODS: In a pilot prospective case series eight patients underwent surgical repair of hiatal hernias repair with pre-shaped meshes, which were fixated with fibrin glue. An MR investigation with a qualified protocol was performed on postoperative day four and 3 months postoperatively to evaluate the correct position of the mesh by assessing mesh appearance and demarcation. The total MR-visible mesh surface area of each implant was calculated and compared with the original physical mesh size to evaluate potential reduction of the functional mesh surfaces. RESULTS: We documented no mesh migrations or dislocations but we found a significant decrease of MR-visualised total mesh surface area after release of the pneumoperitoneum compared to the original mesh size (mean 78.9 vs 84 cm(2); mean reduction of mesh area = 5.1 cm(2), p < 0.001). At 3 months postoperatively, a further reduction of the mesh surface area could be observed (mean 78.5 vs 78.9 cm(2); mean reduction of mesh area = 0.4 cm(2), p < 0.037). CONCLUSION: Detailed mesh depiction and accurate assessment of the surrounding anatomy could be successfully achieved in all cases. Fibrin glue seems to provide effective mesh fixation. In addition to a significant early postoperative decrease in effective mesh surface area a further reduction in size occurred within 3 months after implantation.


Asunto(s)
Hernia Hiatal/diagnóstico , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Herniorrafia , Prótesis e Implantes , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Adhesivo de Tejido de Fibrina , Humanos , Compuestos de Hierro , Laparoscopía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Falla de Prótesis
5.
Chirurg ; 86(10): 949-54, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25616745

RESUMEN

For patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) who suffer from severe symptoms despite adequate medical therapy, interventional procedures are the only option for improving symptoms and thus the quality of life. In the clinical practice it is decisive if a hiatal hernia (HH) is present or not and whether it is larger or smaller than 2-3 cm. Patients who have a HH > 2-3 cm should undergo laparoscopic fundoplication with hiatal hernia repair. Patients with a larger HH are no longer eligible for endoscopic therapy as closure of the HH is not endoscopically possible. With the new laparoscopic methods (e.g. LINX and electrical stimulation) HH closure is theoretically possible but sufficient data is lacking. Furthermore, if a hiatal closure is additionally carried out the actual advantages of these methods are partly lost. Currently, outside of clinical trials only laparoscopic fundoplication can be recommended for patients with GERD and HH, because convincing long-term data are only available for this method. It seems that in clinical practice it is not so important what type of fundoplication is performed, more important seems to be the experience of the surgeon with the technique.


Asunto(s)
Fundoplicación/métodos , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Competencia Clínica , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Hernia Hiatal/diagnóstico , Humanos , Selección de Paciente , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Hernia ; 18(6): 883-8, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23292367

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Closure of the esophageal hiatus is an important step during laparoscopic antireflux surgery and hiatal hernia surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between the preoperatively determined hiatal hernia size and the intraoperative size of the esophageal hiatus. METHODS: One hundred patients with documented chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease underwent laparoscopic fundoplication. All patients had been subjected to barium studies before surgery, specifically to measure the presence and size of hiatal hernia. The size of the esophageal hiatus was measured during surgery by calculating the hiatal surface area (HSA). HSA size >5 cm(2) was defined as large hiatal defect. Patients were grouped according to radiologic criteria: no visible hernia (n = 42), hernia size between 2 and 5 cm (n = 52), and >5 cm (n = 6). A retrospective correlation analysis between hiatal hernia size and intraoperative HSA size was undertaken. RESULTS: The mean radiologically predicted size of hiatal hernias was 1.81 cm (range 0-6.20 cm), while the interoperative measurement was 3.86 cm(2) (range 1.51-12.38 cm(2)). No correlation (p < 0.05) was found between HSA and hiatal hernia size for all patients, and in the single radiologic groups, 11.9 % (5/42) of the patients who had no hernia on preoperative X-ray study had a large hiatal defect, and 66.6 % (4/6) patients with giant hiatal hernia had a HSA size <5 cm(2). CONCLUSIONS: The study clearly demonstrates that a surgeon cannot rely on preoperative findings from the barium swallow examination, because the sensitivity of a preoperative swallow is very poor.


Asunto(s)
Diafragma/cirugía , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/cirugía , Hernia Hiatal/cirugía , Adulto , Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Fundoplicación , Reflujo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico por imagen , Hernia Hiatal/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Preoperatorio , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA