Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United Kingdom: temporal trends, predictors of outcome, and 6-year follow-up: a report from the UK Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Registry, 2007 to 2012.

BACKGROUND: We assessed trends in the performance of transcatheter aortic valve implantation in the United Kingdom from the first case in 2007 to the end of 2012. We analyzed changes in case mix, complications, outcomes to 6 years, and predictors of mortality. METHODS AND RESULTS: Annual cohorts were examined. Mortality outcomes were analyzed in the 92% of patients from England and Wales for whom independent mortality tracking was available. A total of 3980 transcatheter aortic valve implantation procedures were performed. In successive years, there was an increase in frequency of impaired left ventricular function, but there was no change in Logistic EuroSCORE. Overall 30-day mortality was 6.3%; it was highest in the first cohort (2007-2008), after which there were no further significant changes. One-year survival was 81.7%, falling to 37.3% at 6 years. Discharge by day 5 rose from 16.7% in 2007 and 2008 to 28% in 2012. The only multivariate preprocedural predictor of 30-day mortality was Logistic EuroSCORE ≥40. During long-term follow-up, multivariate predictors of mortality were preprocedural atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, creatinine >200 µmol/L, diabetes mellitus, and coronary artery disease. The strongest independent procedural predictor of long-term mortality was periprocedural stroke (hazard ratio=3.00; P<0.0001). Nonfemoral access and postprocedural aortic regurgitation were also significant predictors of adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: We analyzed transcatheter aortic valve implantation in an entire country, with follow-up over 6 years. Although clinical profiles of enrolled patients remained unchanged, longer-term outcomes improved, and patients were discharged earlier. Periprocedural stroke, nonfemoral access, and postprocedural aortic regurgitation are predictors of adverse outcome, along with intrinsic patient risk factors.

Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis.

AIMS: Prosthesis-patient mismatch (P-PM) is an important determinant of morbidity and mortality following open aortic valve replacement. The aims of this study were to report its incidence and determinants following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with the Corevalve bioprosthesis, which have-thus far-not been described. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis received TAVI with the Corevalve bioprosthesis via transfemoral route. Following TAVI, moderate P-PM was defined as indexed aortic valve effective orifice area (AVAi) < or =0.85 cm(2)/m(2) and severe P-PM as AVAi < or =0.65 cm(2)/m(2). Clinical, echocardiographic, and procedural factors relating to P-PM were studied. Optimal device position was defined on fluoroscopy as final position of the proximal aspect of the Corevalve stent frame 5-10 mm below the native aortic annulus. Between January 2007 and January 2009, 50 consecutive patients underwent TAVI in a single centre with the Corevalve bioprosthesis. Mean age was 82.8 years (SD 5.9; 70-93) and 48% were male. P-PM occurred in 16 of 50 cases (32%). Optimal position was achieved in 50% of cases. P-PM was unrelated to age, annulus size, LVOT size, Corevalve size, aortic angulation, ejection fraction, and sex. It was inversely correlated to optimal position (Spearman rho r = -0.34, P = 0.015). Those with optimal positioning had a 16% incidence of P-PM relative to 48% of those with suboptimal positioning (Pearson chi(2) P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: The incidence of P-PM following TAVI with the Corevalve bioprosthesis is compared favourably with that seen after AVR with conventional open stented bioprostheses and its occurrence is influenced by device positioning.

Predictors for permanent pacemaker requirement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the CoreValve bioprosthesis.

INTRODUCTION: Changes in atrioventricular (AV) conduction and need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) are a recognized complication after open aortic valve replacement. We hypothesized that the need for PPM after CoreValve (Corevalve Inc, Irvine, CA) can be predicted with a combination of baseline variables. METHODS: In patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation, potential clinical, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic predictors of permanent pacing requirement were studied. RESULTS: Between January 2007 and March 2008, 34 patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis were recruited in a single center. Mean age was 84.4 years (SD 5.4, range 71-93). Of 34 cases paced at baseline, 3 (8.8%) were excluded from this analysis, as was the single periprocedural mortality. Of the remaining 30, 10 underwent permanent pacemaker implantation during the same admission (33.3%). PPM was for prolonged high-grade AV block in 4 cases, episodic high-grade AV block in 5, and sinus node disease in 1. Need for pacemaker was correlated to left axis deviation at baseline (P = .004, r = 0.508) and left bundle-branch block with left axis deviation (P = .002, r = 0.548). It was related to diastolic interventricular septal dimension on transthoracic echocardiography >17 mm (P = .045, r = 0.39) and the baseline thickness of the native noncoronary cusp (P = .002, r = 0.655). A susceptibility model was generated, and if at least one of (1) left bundle-branch block with left axis deviation, (2) interventricular septal dimension >17 mm, or (3) noncoronary cusp thickness >8 mm was present, the likelihood of PPM could be predicted with 75% sensitivity and 100% specificity and a receiver operating characteristic curve area of 0.93 +/- 0.055 (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: After transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve, permanent pacing was performed in around a third of patients and we present preliminary concepts towards a predictive model for this phenomenon.

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement in patients with challenging aortoiliofemoral access.

Percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR) offers considerable promise in treating high risk patients with aortic valve disease. Two devices are currently clinically available for transfemoral delivery: the Edwards-Sapien balloon-expandable bioprosthesis and the Corevalve self-expanding bioprosthesis, both of which require careful sizing of the peripheral vasculature. Through a case based discussion, we illustrate that these limits of PAVR technology can be stretched in cases of extraordinary clinical need. We demonstrate that, following a learning curve of "optimal cases," successful PAVR is also possible in diffusely diseased peripheries of borderline small size or with focal aortoiliofemoral disease amenable to a separate intervention beforehand.

Amaze: a randomized controlled trial of adjunct surgery for atrial fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: Atrial fibrillation (AF) reduces survival and quality of life (QoL). It can be treated at the time of major cardiac surgery using ablation procedures ranging from simple pulmonary vein isolation to a full maze procedure. The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of adjunct AF surgery as currently performed on sinus rhythm (SR) restoration, survival, QoL and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: In a multicentre, Phase III, pragmatic, double-blinded, parallel-armed randomized controlled trial, 352 cardiac surgery patients with >3 months of documented AF were randomized to surgery with or without adjunct maze or similar AF ablation between 2009 and 2014. Primary outcomes were SR restoration at 1 year and quality-adjusted life years at 2 years. Secondary outcomes included SR at 2 years, overall and stroke-free survival, medication, QoL, cost-effectiveness and safety. RESULTS: More ablation patients were in SR at 1 year [odds ratio (OR) 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.20-3.54; P = 0.009]. At 2 years, the OR increased to 3.24 (95% CI 1.76-5.96). Quality-adjusted life years were similar at 2 years (ablation - control -0.025, P = 0.6319). Significantly fewer ablation patients were anticoagulated from 6 months postoperatively. Stroke rates were 5.7% (ablation) and 9.1% (control) (P = 0.3083). There was no significant difference in stroke-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.99, 95% CI 0.64-1.53; P = 0.949] nor in serious adverse events, operative or overall survival, cardioversion, pacemaker implantation, New York Heart Association, EQ-5D-3L and SF-36. The mean additional ablation cost per patient was £3533 (95% CI £1321-£5746). Cost-effectiveness was not demonstrated at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunct AF surgery is safe and increases SR restoration and costs but not survival or QoL up to 2 years. A continued follow-up will provide information on these outcomes in the longer term. Study registration: ISRCTN82731440 (project number 07/01/34).

The effect of preoperative atrial fibrillation on survival following mitral valve repair for degenerative mitral regurgitation.

OBJECTIVE: There is conflicting evidence with regard to the impact of preoperative atrial fibrillation (AF) on the post mitral valve (MV) repair on the early and late outcome. METHODS: A total of 349 patients undergoing various MV repair procedures for degenerative mitral regurgitation (MR) between 1997 and 2003 were studied. Preoperatively, 152 (44%) of these patients were in AF and 197 (56%) patients were in sinus rhythm (SR). The clinical features and the outcome in these two cohorts of patients were compared. RESULTS: The patients in the AF group were older than their counterparts in the SR group (66+/-7 vs 62+/-9 years) (p=0.01), had a higher mean NYHA class score (2.4+/-0.6 vs 2.2+/-0.7) (p=0.04) and were more likely to have impaired left ventricular function (60% vs 36%) (p<0.0001). A similar proportion of patients in the AF (38%) and SR (30%) groups had additional cardiac surgical procedures (p=0.12). Operative mortality was 3.9% in AF group versus 0.5% in SR group (p=0.04), and operative morbidity was 27% versus 17%, respectively (p=0.03). At latest follow up, 4% of patients that were in SR preoperatively developed AF; conversely, 2% of the patients in the AF group converted to SR. The rates of recurrent grade II or III MR (4% vs 5%) (p=0.8) and MV re-operation (2.6% vs 2.5%) (p=1.0) were similar in the AF and SR groups. Kaplan-Meier survival at 7 years was 75+/-6% versus 90+/-3% (p=0.005). On Cox proportional hazards regression model, impaired LV function [(p=0.02), hazard ratio 0.25 (95% confidence intervals (C.I.) 0.078-0.84)] and AF [(p=0.03), hazard ratio 2.70 (95% C.I. 1.09-6.68)] were significant adverse predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that in patients undergoing MV repair for degenerative MR, preoperative AF has a major negative impact on the early and late survival.

Skeletonization of internal thoracic artery affects its innervation and reactivity.

OBJECTIVE: The studies showing the superior characteristics of ITA graft and its impact on the clinical results of coronary artery surgery were performed with ITA harvested almost exclusively as a pedicle. This study assesses the impact of ITA skeletonization on its innervation and reactivity. METHODS: Segments of skeletonized and non-skeletonized ITA were stained with antibodies against protein S-100 to look for the presence of sympathetic nerve fibers. The functional studies were performed on segments of discarded human pedicled ITA that were divided into two 3mm rings, one skeletonized and another non-skeletonized. We compared concentration-effect relationships for the contraction to norepinephrine and endothelium-dependent relaxation to acetylcholine and bradykinin, as well as endothelium-independent relaxation to sodium nitroprusside in skeletonized and non-skeletonized segments of the same ITA. RESULTS: Skeletonized ITA was devoid of protein S-100 positive nerve fibers. It contracted stronger (maximal response 37.0+/-2.04 vs. 25.4+/-1.83mN (P<0.001)) and was twice as sensitive to norepinephrine: pD(2) 6.03+/-0.10 vs. 5.70+/-0.12 (P=0.035). The endothelium-dependent relaxation responses did not differ between skeletonized and non-skeletonized ITA rings. The skeletonized ITA rings appeared over 10 times more sensitive to sodium nitroprusside: pD(2) 6.66+/-0.20 vs. 5.59+/-0.37 (P=0.012)-potency ratio 11.61. The maximal responses did not differ significantly: 112.0+/-6.71 vs. 129.4+/-16.4% (P=0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Skeletonization results in sympathectomy of ITA. It has no effect on endothelium-dependent relaxation but increases reactivity of ITA to norepinephrine. This augmented response to alpha-agonist is small, in comparison with over a ten-fold increase in sensitivity to sodium nitroprusside. Pedicled and skeletonized ITA are functionally significantly different vessels when studied in vitro.

Left atrial radiofrequency ablation during mitral valve surgery for continuous atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Although left atrial radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is increasingly used for the treatment of chronic atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery, its efficacy to restore sinus rhythm and any resulting benefits have not been examined in the context of an adequately powered randomized trial. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether intraoperative RFA of the left atrium increases the long-term restoration of sinus rhythm and improves exercise capacity. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, double-blind trial performed in a single UK tertiary referral center with enrollment between December 2001 and November 2003. A total of 101 patients referred for mitral valve surgery with at least 6 months' history of uninterrupted atrial fibrillation were assessed for eligibility; 97 were enrolled. Patients were followed up for 12 months. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to undergo mitral valve surgery and RFA of the left atrium (n = 49) or mitral valve surgery alone (controls; n = 48). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was presence of sinus rhythm at 12 months; secondary measures were patient functional status and exercise capacity (assessed by shuttle-walk test), left atrial contractility, and left atrial and left ventricular dimension and function and plasma levels of B-type natriuretic peptide. RESULTS: At 12 months, sinus rhythm was present in 20 (44.4%) of 45 RFA patients and in 2 (4.5%) of 44 controls (rate ratio, 9.8; 95% CI, 2.4-86.3; P<.001). Restoration of sinus rhythm in the RFA group was accompanied by a greater improvement in mean (SD) shuttle-walk distance compared with controls (+94 [102] m vs +48 [82] m; P = .003) and a greater reduction in the plasma level of B-type natriuretic peptide (-104 [87] fmol/mL vs -51 [82] fmol/mL; P = .03). Patients randomized to receive RFA had similar rates of postoperative complications and deaths as control patients. CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation of the left atrium during mitral valve surgery for continuous atrial fibrillation significantly increases the rate of sinus rhythm restoration 1 year postoperatively, improving patient exercise capacity. On the basis of its efficacy and safety, routine use of RFA of the left atrium during mitral valve surgery may be justified. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00238706.

Early hemofiltration improves survival in post-cardiotomy patients with acute renal failure.

OBJECTIVE: The application and timing of hemofiltration (continuous veno-venous hemofiltration, CVVH) in patients with acute renal failure (ARF) post cardiac surgery has been called into question because of uncertain short-term outcome. The aim of the present study was to identify how the timing of introduction of hemofiltration affects the morbidity and mortality in patients with ARF after cardiac surgery. METHODS: 1264 consecutive patients who underwent adult cardiac surgical procedures performed between January 2002 and January 2003 were audited. Out of these, case notes of 64 patients who required renal supportive intervention were reviewed. Statistical significance was accepted at a level of P<0.05. RESULTS: Of the 64 (5%) patients, who developed ARF and required CVVH, there were 48 males and 16 females. Mean age was 70+/-6.8 years. The hospital mortality was 43% (12 patients) in Group-I and 22% (8) in Group-II (P<0.05), giving an overall 1.5% mortality associated with ARF. The mean time between the operation and the initiation of CVVH was 2.55+/-2.2 days in Group-I and 0.78+/-0.2 days in Group-II (P<0.001). The mean duration of CVVH was 4.57+/-11.4 days in Group-I and 4.61+/-2.0 days in Group-II (P=NS). Older age (P=0.013), elevated preoperative creatinine (P=0.002), postoperative pulmonary oedema (P=0.01), sepsis (P=0.001), multiple organ failure (P=0.031), hypotension (P=0.031) and preoperative renal failure (P<0.05) were the independent factors influencing the poor postoperative outcome and cardiac instability. CONCLUSION: Early and aggressive use of CVVH is associated with better than expected survival in severe ARF after cardiac operations.

Device-dependent association between paravalvar aortic regurgitation and outcome after TAVI.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to identify predictors of paraprosthetic aortic regurgitation (AR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and examine its influence on short/medium-term mortality using the UK TAVI Registry. TAVI is an effective treatment for high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS), but paraprosthetic AR has been associated with increased in-hospital and mid-term mortality. METHODS: Between January 2007 and December 2011, 2584 TAVI procedures were performed in the UK. Patients undergoing 'valve-in-valve' procedures, patients with aortic regurgitation as the primary pathology and with no recorded severity of AR were excluded from this analysis (n=144). In total, therefore, 2440 patients were included. Balloon-expandable and self-expanding devices were implanted in 52.7 and 47.2%, respectively, using either transfemoral (67.7%) or non-transfemoral, surgical access (32.3%). RESULTS: Postprocedural AR was observed in 68%, mild AR in 57% and moderate-severe in 10%. A large aortic annulus, high preprocedural transaortic gradient, and use of self-expanding valve were independent predictors of moderate-severe AR. Moderate-severe (but not mild) AR was associated with increased mortality, and this relationship appeared significant for the balloon-expandable but not the self-expanding device. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that a large aortic annulus, high preprocedural transaortic gradient, and use of the self-expanding valve predict moderate-severe AR after TAVI. Such a degree of AR is associated with a significantly worse outcome with the balloon-expandable, but not with the self-expanding valve. Further studies are needed to verify this and explore potential mechanisms.

Decrease of pulmonary hypertension impacts on prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

AIMS: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is established as a treatment strategy for patients with end-stage aortic stenosis, many of whom are suffering from severe pulmonary hypertension (PH). In cardiac surgery patients, PH is associated with less symptomatic improvement and increased late mortality. This study elucidates the impact of PH on outcome after TAVR. METHODS AND RESULTS: Pre and 90 days post-TAVR, pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) was determined non-invasively by echocardiography in 353 patients undergoing TAVR. PH was classified as absent (<30 mmHg), mild-to-moderate (30-60 mmHg), and severe (>60 mmHg). Three hundred and fifty-three patients at high surgical risk, indicated by a logistic EuroSCORE of 26.6±16.5%, underwent TAVR. The severity of PH before TAVR was related to outcome with two-year mortality rates of 13.9%, 27.3%, and 48.4% for PASP <30 mmHg, 30-60 mmHg, and >60 mmHg, respectively (p=0.001). In patients with baseline PASP >60 mmHg, PASP decreased from 65.6±7.6 mmHg to 49.5±14.0 mmHg (p<0.001) at 90 days after TAVR. Patients with persistent severe PH had a worse prognosis than patients with a decrease of PASP below 60 mmHg (two-year mortality rate: 50.0% vs. 18.6%; p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Severe pulmonary hypertension predicts adverse outcome after TAVR. Reduction of PASP after the procedure is associated with favourable prognosis.

Impact of paravalvular leakage on outcome in patients after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the aortic regurgitation (AR) index as a new hemodynamic parameter in an independent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) cohort and validate its application. BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence associates more-than-mild periprosthetic aortic regurgitation (periAR) with increased mortality and morbidity; therefore precise evaluation of periAR after TAVI is essential. The AR index has been proposed recently as a simple and reproducible indicator for the severity of periAR and predictor of associated mortality. METHODS: The severity of periAR was evaluated by echocardiography, angiography, and periprocedural measurement of the dimensionless AR index = ([diastolic blood pressure - left ventricular end-diastolic pressure]/systolic blood pressure) × 100. A cutoff value of 25 was used to identify patients at risk. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients underwent TAVI by use of either the Medtronic CoreValve (Medtronic, Minneapolis, Minnesota) (79.5%) or the Edwards-SAPIEN bioprosthesis (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) (20.5%). The AR index decreased stepwise from 29.4 ± 6.3 in patients without periAR (n = 26) to 28.0 ± 8.5 with mild periAR (n = 76), 19.6 ± 7.6 with moderate periAR (n = 18), and 7.6 ± 2.6 with severe periAR (n = 2) (p < 0.001). Patients with AR index <25 had a significantly increased 1-year mortality rate compared with patients with AR index ≥ 25 (42.3% vs. 14.3%; p < 0.001). Even in patients with none/mild periAR, the 1-year mortality risk could be further stratified by an AR index <25 (31.3% vs. 14.3%; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: The validity of the AR index could be confirmed in this independent TAVI cohort and provided prognostic information that was complementary to the severity of AR.

Comparison of complete versus incomplete stent frame expansion after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with Medtronic CoreValve bioprosthesis.

We sought to determine the significance of incomplete stent frame expansion after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-CoreValve device. Incomplete coronary stent expansion is a well-described phenomenon. Transcatheter valves are mounted on stents; however, the incidence of incomplete stent expansion after transcatheter aortic valve implantation, its sequelae and predictors are poorly elucidated. The 18Fr CoreValve revalving system was used to treat anatomically and clinically suitable patients with severe calcific aortic stenosis. The postdeployment stent dimensions were measured on fluoroscopic images at multiple levels of the stent frame. Incomplete expansion at each was defined as <100% expected and complete expansion as ≥100%. These parameters were correlated to the hemodynamic and clinical end points. A total of 50 consecutive patients underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-CoreValve at a single center from January 2007 to December 2008. For the inflow portion, incomplete expansion was seen in 54% of patients and was unrelated to the aortic valve area, peak or mean aortic valve gradients, or measures of aortic regurgitation, although it was paradoxically associated with a lower incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch. Incomplete expansion of the constrained portion was seen in 62% of the patients and displayed a trend toward a greater incidence of aortic regurgitation grade 2 or greater, although this was rare. Incomplete expansion of the Medtronic CoreValve stent frame is common. For the most part, valvular hemodynamic function was satisfactory, regardless of the degree of expansion of the stent frame that carries it and a strategy of reluctant postdilation in the context of incomplete stent frame expansion was supported.

Short- and medium-term survival following coronary artery bypass surgery in British Indo-Asian and white Caucasian individuals: impact of diabetes mellitus.

Previous studies have suggested that South Asian (SA) ethnicity is a predictor of poorer outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Our aim was to identify potential reasons for the higher postoperative mortality in SA patients and investigate all these reasons. All individuals undergoing isolated CABG in a tertiary cardiac centre from April 2002 to September 2007. In total, there were 2897 subjects (2623 white subjects; 274 SA subjects) who were included in an observational study showing the effect of ethnicity on the medium-term survival following CABG. Survival at 30 days and survival up to five years (median 2.7 years) were measured. SA subjects undergoing CABG were younger (62+/-9 vs. 66+/-9 years, P<0.001), less obese [body mass index (BMI) 26+/-4 vs. 28+/-4 kg/m(2), P<0.001] and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (58% vs. 33%, P<0.001) compared with white subjects. Thirty-day mortality was higher in SA subjects (2.6% vs. 1.0%, P=0.02). Non-diabetic SA had similar 30-day mortality, five-year survival and life expectancy compared to non-diabetic white subjects. In contrast, diabetic SA had a higher 30-day mortality (3.8% vs. 1.4%, P=0.01) and worse life expectancy compared to diabetic white subjects. The higher early postoperative mortality observed in SA patients is related to higher incidence of diabetes among them. SA diabetics have a significantly higher postoperative mortality and worse overall life expectancy. Ethnicity per se is not an independent predictor of short- or medium-term survival after CABG.

Anatomic suitability for present and next generation transcatheter aortic valve prostheses: evidence for a complementary multidevice approach to treatment.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the proportion of patients anatomically suitable for transcatheter aortic valve implantation by multiple access approaches. BACKGROUND: The devices currently in mainstream use for transcatheter treatment of severe aortic stenosis are those of Edwards (Edwards Lifesciences, Nyon, Switzerland) and Medtronic CoreValve (M-C) (Luxembourg City, Luxembourg). The range of patients that these can presently treat requires elucidation to guide the necessary evolution of these technologies and increase their scope of therapy. METHODS: A consecutive series of patients were assessed with transthoracic or transesophageal echocardiography and invasive angiography to assess anatomical suitability by different approaches. The transfemoral access requirements for Edwards and M-C (Edwards currently 22- and 24-F, soon to be 18- and 19-F; M-C 18-F) as well as the aortic valve annular criteria (18 to 25 mm and 20 to 27 mm, respectively) were incorporated in this assessment. Patients unsuitable for the transfemoral approach were considered for Edwards transapical and M-C transaxillary and direct ascending aortic access. Patients suitable for these devices and access approaches were identified. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 100 consecutive patients. Edwards suitability was 28% for Edwards-Sapien transfemoral, 78% for Edwards Novaflex transfemoral, and 88% for Edwards-Sapien transapical. Medtronic CoreValve suitability was 84% for transfemoral and 89% using additional transaxillary and direct aortic approaches. Of the 12 patients unsuitable for Edwards-based procedures, 8 were suitable for M-C. Of the 11 patients unsuitable for M-C-based techniques, 8 were suitable for Edwards. Only 3% were anatomically unsuitable for all approaches. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, 97% of patients were anatomically suitable for a complementary approach to treatment.

Early regression of left ventricular wall thickness following percutaneous aortic valve replacement with the CoreValve bioprosthesis.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with hypertrophy of the left ventricle (LVH), which is linked to adverse clinical outcomes. To date, the effects of the novel technology of percutaneous aortic valve replacement (PAVR) on LVH in severe AS have not been described. We sought to test the hypothesis that PAVR would result in regression of LVH associated with severe AS. METHODS: Patients were recruited as part of a single-arm, prospective, safety, feasibility and clinical outcome study of the third-generation CoreValve percutaneous aortic bioprosthesis. To assess hypertrophy at baseline and at 1 month, the parasternal long-axis view in end-diastole was used to assess interventricular septal dimension and left ventricular posterior wall dimension. RESULTS: 15 patients were studied. There were significant periprocedural reductions in peak (76.6 +/- 28.1 mmHg to 16.3 +/- 7.5 mmHg; p < 0.001) and mean (45.3 +/- 18.4 mmHg to 8.2 +/- 3.7 mmHg; p = 0.001) transvalvular gradients and increases in calculated aortic valve areas (0.73 +/- 0.19 cm2 to 1.5 +/- 0.3 cm2). Septal wall thickness regressed by 13% from 1.54 +/- 0.30 cm at baseline to 1.35 +/- 0.27 cm at 1 month (for difference; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: We demonstrate an early regression of septal hypertrophy after PAVR for severe AS which is comparable to that seen at 1 year after conventional surgical aortic valve replacement.

Management of superior vena cava obstruction syndrome due to thrombosis of a Contegra conduit used to re-establish the innominate vein-to-right atrium continuity.

Following intraoperative superior vena cava injury, venous drainage of the head, neck and upper extremities can be re-established with bovine jugular vein (Contegra) conduits. Inadequate anticoagulation, however, may lead to conduit thrombosis and superior vena cava obstruction syndrome. This can be successfully treated with percutaneous dilatation and stenting of the failed conduit.

Effect of training in mitral valve repair surgery on the early and late outcome.

BACKGROUND: Preservation of the native mitral valve provides important advantages over valve replacement. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of training for mitral valve repair on the outcome. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2004, 471 patients underwent mitral valve repair procedures in a single firm. Of these procedures, 300 (64%) were performed by a consultant (TJS) (consultant group) and 171 (36%) by trainees supervised by the same consultant (trainees group). RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation was more prevalent in the consultant group (p = 0.02) but there were no significant differences in the demographics, etiology of mitral regurgitation, and other comorbidity between the groups. Posterior leaflet prolapse was more prevalent in the trainees group (p < 0.0001) and anterior leaflet prolapse (p < 0.0001), bileaflet prolapse (p = 0.003), and Barlow's syndrome (p = 0.0003) in the consultant group. The consultant performed a higher proportion of concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting (p = 0.04), aortic valve replacement (p = 0.02), procedures, and nonelective cases (p = 0.03) with shorter bypass (p = 0.01) and ischemic times (p = 0.0004) than trainees. The complication rate was similar in the two groups (26% vs 22%), but the consultant had a higher operative mortality than the trainees (5% vs 0.6%) (p = 0.01). A similar proportion in the two groups exhibited recurrent mitral regurgitation (8% vs 9%). Kaplan-Meier five-year freedom from reoperation (95.6 +/- 1.6 vs 95.7 +/- 2.2%) (p = 0.7) and survival (82 +/- 4% vs 88 +/- 4%) (p = 0.09) were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: With appropriate patient selection, cardiothoracic trainees can be taught mitral valve repair surgery without a negative effect on the early or late outcome.