[New antibiotics for severe infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens : Definitive treatment and escalation]. / Neue Antibiotika bei schweren Infektionen durch multiresistente Erreger : Definitive Therapie und Eskalation.

Multidrug-resistant pathogens often lead to treatment failure of antimicrobial regimens. After a period of imbalance between the occurrence/spread of resistance mechanisms and the development of new substances, some new substances have meanwhile been approved and many more are currently undergoing clinical testing. They are particularly effective against specific resistance mechanisms/pathogens and should be preserved for definitive treatment of an isolated pathogen. In the absence of alternatives reserve antibiotics, such as aztreonam and colistin have experienced a renaissance. They are again used in special infection scenarios and clinically tested in combination with new substances. Despite the introduction and development of new substances the building of resistance will at some time also render these (at least partially) ineffective. Therefore, their implementation must be carried out according to the antibiotic or infectious diseases stewardship.

[Infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens : Pathogens, resistance mechanisms and established treatment options]. / Infektionen durch multiresistente Erreger : Erreger, Resistenzmechanismen und etablierte Therapieoptionen.

The increase in resistant pathogens has long been a global problem. Complicated life-threatening infections due to multidrug-resistant pathogens (MRD) meanwhile occur regularly in intensive care medicine. An important and also potentially modifiable factor of the rapid spread of resistance is the irrational use of broad spectrum antibiotics in human medicine. In addition to many other resistance mechanisms, beta-lactamases play an important role in Gram-negative pathogens. They are not uncommonly the leading reason of difficult to treat infections and the failure of known routinely used broad spectrum antibiotics, such as cephalosporins, (acylamino)penicillins and carbapenems. Strategies for containment of MRDs primaríly target the rational use of antibiotics. In this respect interdisciplinary treatment teams, e.g. antibiotic stewardship (ABS) and infectious diseases stewardship (IDS) play a major role.

Bacterial sepsis : Diagnostics and calculated antibiotic therapy.

The mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock is still unacceptably high. An effective calculated antibiotic treatment within 1 h of recognition of sepsis is an important target of sepsis treatment. Delays lead to an increase in mortality; therefore, structured treatment concepts form a rational foundation, taking relevant diagnostic and treatment steps into consideration. In addition to the assumed infection and individual risks of each patient, local resistance patterns and specific problem pathogens must be taken into account during the selection of anti-infective treatment. Many pathophysiologic alterations influence the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antibiotics during sepsis. The principle of standard dosing should be abandoned and replaced by an individual treatment approach with stronger weighting of the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) index of the substance groups. Although this is not yet the clinical standard, prolonged (or continuous) infusion of ß­lactam antibiotics and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can help to achieve defined PK targets. Prolonged infusion is sufficient without TDM, but for continuous infusion, TDM is generally necessary. A further argument for individual PK/PD-oriented antibiotic approaches is the increasing number of infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in the intensive care unit. For effective treatment, antibiotic stewardship teams (ABS teams) are becoming more established. Interdisciplinary cooperation of the ABS team with infectious disease (ID) specialists, microbiologists, and clinical pharmacists leads not only to rational administration of antibiotics, but also has a positive influence on treatment outcome. The gold standards for pathogen identification are still culture-based detection and microbiologic resistance testing for the various antibiotic groups. Despite the rapid investigation time, novel polymerase chain reaction(PCR)-based procedures for pathogen identification and resistance determination are currently only an adjunct to routine sepsis diagnostics, due to the limited number of studies, high costs, and limited availability. In complicated septic courses with multiple anti-infective therapies or recurrent sepsis, PCR-based procedures can be used in addition to treatment monitoring and diagnostics. Novel antibiotics represent potent alternatives in the treatment of MDR infections. Due to the often defined spectrum of pathogens and the practically (still) absent resistance, they are suitable for targeted treatment of severe MDR infections (therapy escalation). (Contribution available free of charge by "Free Access" [ https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00101-017-0396-z ].).

[Bacterial sepsis : Diagnostics and calculated antibiotic therapy]. / Bakterielle Sepsis : Diagnostik und kalkulierte Antibiotikatherapie.

The mortality of patients with sepsis and septic shock is still unacceptably high. An effective antibiotic treatment within 1 h of recognition of sepsis is an important target of sepsis treatment. Delays lead to an increase in mortality; therefore, structured treatment concepts form a rational foundation, taking relevant diagnostic and treatment steps into consideration. In addition to the assumed focus and individual risks of each patient, local resistance patterns and specific problem pathogens must be taken into account for selection of anti-infection treatment. Many pathophysiological alterations influence the pharmacokinetics of antibiotics during sepsis. The principle of standard dosing should be abandoned and replaced by an individual treatment approach with stronger weighting of the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) index of the substance groups. Although this is not yet the clinical standard, prolonged (or continuous) infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) can help to achieve defined PK targets. Prolonged infusion is sufficient without TDM but for continuous infusion TDM is basically necessary. A further argument for individual PK/PD-oriented antibiotic approaches is the increasing number of infections due to multidrug resistant pathogens (MDR) in the intensive care unit. For effective treatment antibiotic stewardship teams (ABS team) are becoming more established. Interdisciplinary cooperation of the ABS team with infectiologists, microbiologists and clinical pharmacists leads not only to a rational administration of antibiotics but also has a positive influence on the outcome. The gold standards for pathogen detection are still culture-based detection and microbiological resistance testing for the various antibiotic groups. Despite the rapid investigation time, novel polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based procedures for pathogen identification and resistance determination, are currently only an adjunct to routine sepsis diagnostics due to the limited number of studies, high costs and limited availability. In complicated septic courses with multiple anti-infective treatment or recurrent sepsis, PCR-based procedures can be used in addition to therapy monitoring and diagnostics. Novel antibiotics represent potent alternatives in the treatment of MDR infections. Due to the often defined spectrum of pathogens and the practically absent resistance, they are suitable for targeted treatment of severe MDR infections (therapy escalation).

More than just crushing: a prospective pre-post intervention study to reduce drug preparation errors in patients with feeding tubes.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES: Incorrect drug preparation for patients with feeding tubes can result in harm for the patient and the preparing person. Combined intervention programs are effective tools to reduce such preparation errors. However, to date, intervention programs have been mostly tested in hospitals with computerized physician order entry (CPOE), unit-dose systems, or ward-based clinical pharmacists. Hence, the primary objective of this study was to develop and evaluate an intervention program tailored to hospitals without such preconditions. METHODS: We conducted a prospective pre-/post-intervention study on a gastroenterological intensive care unit (ICU) and a surgical ward for oral, dental and maxillofacial diseases (surgical ward). During the study periods, observers documented and evaluated drug preparation processes of all peroral drugs for patients with feeding tubes. The primary endpoint was the rate of inappropriately crushed and/or suspended solid peroral drugs in regards to all solid peroral drugs. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Altogether, we evaluated 775 drug preparation processes of solid peroral drugs on the ICU and 975 on the surgical ward. The intervention program significantly reduced incorrect crushing and/or suspending of solid peroral drugs for administration to patients with feeding tubes from 9·8% to 4·2% (P < 0·01) on the ICU and from 5·7% to 1·4% (P < 0·01) on the surgical ward. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The implementation of the newly developed intervention program significantly reduced the rate of inappropriately prepared solid peroral drugs, suggesting that it is an effective measure to enable safe drug administration for inpatients with feeding tubes.

[Strategies for antifungal treatment failure in intensive care units]. / Strategien bei Versagen einer antimykotischen Therapie auf Intensivstation.

Recent epidemiologic studies reveal both an increasing incidence and an escalation in resistance of invasive fungal infections in intensive care units. Primary therapy fails in 70 % of cases, depending on the underlying pathogens and diseases. The purpose of this review is to raise awareness for the topic of antifungal therapy failure, describe the clinical conditions in which it occurs, and suggest a possible algorithm for handling the situation of suspected primary therapy failure.

[Antibiotic treatment of nosocomial pneumonia]. / Antibiotikatherapie der nosokomialen Pneumonie.

Nosocomial pneumonia is one of the most common infectious diseases acquired in hospital and is often caused by resistant pathogens. For treatment of nosocomial pneumonia an appropriate initial antibiotic therapy is essential and exact knowledge of the specific pathogen spectrum is essential for the correct choice of the empirically calculated antibiotics. In line with a critical reevaluation of the primary treatment, pathogen-specific de-escalation therapy, a diagnosis of possible pulmonary complications (e. g. pleural empyema) and the identification and appropriate rehabilitation measures of non-pulmonary infections are necessary. To attain the best possible outcome the respective therapy concept needs to be adjusted to the individual risk characteristics. Appropriate initial antibiotic therapy, duration of mechanical ventilation and comorbidities are the key factors for patient outcome. This approach helps to avoid the development of resistant pathogens and saves economic resources.