An economic evaluation of the randomized controlled trial of topical corticosteroid and home-based narrowband ultraviolet B for active and limited vitiligo (the HI-Light Vitiligo Trial).

BACKGROUND: Economic evidence for vitiligo treatments is absent. OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of (i) handheld narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and (ii) a combination of topical corticosteroid (TCS) and NB-UVB compared with TCS alone for localized vitiligo. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a pragmatic, three-arm, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial with 9 months' treatment. In total 517 adults and children (aged ≥ 5 years) with active vitiligo affecting < 10% of skin were recruited from secondary care and the community and were randomized 1: 1: 1 to receive TCS, NB-UVB or both. Cost per successful treatment (measured on the Vitiligo Noticeability Scale) was estimated. Secondary cost-utility analyses measured quality-adjusted life-years using the EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels for those aged ≥ 11 years and the Child Health Utility 9D for those aged 5 to < 18 years. The trial was registered with number ISRCTN17160087 on 8 January 2015. RESULTS: The mean ± SD cost per participant was £775 ± 83·7 for NB-UVB, £813 ± 111.4 for combination treatment and £600 ± 96·2 for TCS. In analyses adjusted for age and target patch location, the incremental difference in cost for combination treatment compared with TCS was £211 (95% confidence interval 188-235), corresponding to a risk difference of 10·9% (number needed to treat = 9). The incremental cost was £1932 per successful treatment. The incremental difference in cost for NB-UVB compared with TCS was £173 (95% confidence interval 151-196), with a risk difference of 5·2% (number needed to treat = 19). The incremental cost was £3336 per successful treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment, compared with TCS alone, has a lower incremental cost per additional successful treatment than NB-UVB only. Combination treatment would be considered cost-effective if decision makers are willing to pay £1932 per additional treatment success.

Randomized controlled trial of topical corticosteroid and home-based narrowband ultraviolet B for active and limited vitiligo: results of the HI-Light Vitiligo Trial.

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the effectiveness of vitiligo treatments is limited. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness of (i) handheld narrowband UVB (NB-UVB) and (ii) a combination of potent topical corticosteroid (TCS) and NB-UVB, compared with TCS alone, for localized vitiligo. METHODS: A pragmatic, three-arm, placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial (9-month treatment, 12-month follow-up). Adults and children, recruited from secondary care and the community, aged ≥ 5 years and with active vitiligo affecting < 10% of skin, were randomized 1 : 1 : 1 to receive TCS (mometasone furoate 0·1% ointment + dummy NB-UVB), NB-UVB (NB-UVB + placebo TCS) or a combination (TCS + NB-UVB). TCS was applied once daily on alternating weeks; NB-UVB was administered on alternate days in escalating doses, adjusted for erythema. The primary outcome was treatment success at 9 months at a target patch assessed using the participant-reported Vitiligo Noticeability Scale, with multiple imputation for missing data. The trial was registered with number ISRCTN17160087 on 8 January 2015. RESULTS: In total 517 participants were randomized to TCS (n = 173), NB-UVB (n = 169) and combination (n = 175). Primary outcome data were available for 370 (72%) participants. The proportions with target patch treatment success were 17% (TCS), 22% (NB-UVB) and 27% (combination). Combination treatment was superior to TCS: adjusted between-group difference 10·9% (95% confidence interval 1·0%-20·9%; P = 0·032; number needed to treat = 10). NB-UVB alone was not superior to TCS: adjusted between-group difference 5·2% (95% CI - 4·4% to 14·9%; P = 0·29; number needed to treat = 19). Participants using interventions with ≥ 75% expected adherence were more likely to achieve treatment success, but the effects were lost once treatment stopped. Localized grade 3 or 4 erythema was reported in 62 (12%) participants (including three with dummy light). Skin thinning was reported in 13 (2·5%) participants (including one with placebo ointment). CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment with home-based handheld NB-UVB plus TCS is likely to be superior to TCS alone for treatment of localized vitiligo. Combination treatment was relatively safe and well tolerated but was successful in only around one-quarter of participants.

Unilateral naevoid trichoepitheliomas on the face of a child.

Trichoepitheliomas are benign epidermal appendage tumours that present most commonly as solitary lesions, and less often as multiple, symmetrically distributed lesions on the face, scalp, neck and trunk. Only a few patients have been reported in whom trichoepitheliomas were found as unusually configured linear or plaque-like confluent lesions, all of which occurred in patients with skin types V or VI. We describe a white girl with a hemifacial plaque of confluent naevoid trichoepitheliomas, the first report of such lesions in a white patient.

Multiple dermatofibromata developing during pregnancy.

Dermatofibromata are common benign dermal tumours of unknown aetiology. They usually present as a single lesion on the limbs of young adults. Multiple dermatofibromata have been reported occurring in patients with autoimmune disease, who were receiving immunosuppressive treatment. A 25-year-old female is reported who developed multiple dermatofibromata during her first pregnancy, a state of altered immunity.

Pregnancy-induced chilblain lupus erythematosus.

A case of chilblain lupus erythematosus during pregnancy is described in a 28-year-old woman. Symptoms and signs were present by 8 weeks of her first pregnancy and had resolved by 10 days after delivery. The condition is discussed with particular emphasis on the relationship with pregnancy.

Dosage and delivery of nebulised beta agonists in hospital.

A questionnaire was sent to physicians with an interest in chest disease to determine the dose and method of delivery of nebulised beta agonists in hospital. All of the 67 physicians replying gave beta agonists by nebuliser, and all reported either salbutamol (72%) or terbutaline (10%) as the drug they prescribed most commonly (18% gave either drug). There was a fivefold difference in the dose of salbutamol they prescribed most commonly (range 2.5-12.5 mg, mode 5 mg), a 20 fold difference in the volume of diluent solution used (range 0.5-10 ml, mode 2 ml), and a 10 fold variation in the flow rates of gas driving the nebuliser (range 1-10 1/min, mode 4 1/min). There are therefore very large variations in the dose and method of delivery of beta agonists nebulised in hospital. Studies attempting to determine the optimum dose of beta agonist for use in a nebuliser need to take the type of nebuliser, diluent volume, and gas flow rate into account.

Clinical aspects of the use of gamma linolenic acid in systemic sclerosis.

Systemic sclerosis is a multi system disorder, for which there is no satisfactory treatment. Theoretically, dietary supplementation with essential fatty acids may lead to an increase in their derivatives, the vasoactive prostaglandins, which benefit the acute and chronic ischaemic lesions of this disease. We assessed the value of concentrated essential fatty acids in patients with systemic sclerosis, concentrating particularly on vascular symptoms and objective tests of vascular reactivity. Twenty-five patients with systemic sclerosis were randomised to receive concentrated essential fatty acids or placebo, for 6 months in a double-blind parallel group study. There was no significant difference between the active and placebo groups in terms of maximum blood flow after warming, minimum blood flow after cooling or the recovery time after cooling. There were no significant differences between the groups in the other parameters measured. Dietary essential fatty acids have no role in the treatment of vascular symptoms in established systemic sclerosis.

Isotretinoin for the treatment of acne vulgaris: which factors may predict the need for more than one course?

We investigated 299 patients treated 5-10 years ago with isotretinoin, and followed them for 5 years post-treatment. Of the 299 patients 22.7% required repeat courses of treatment; 17% had two courses, 5% had three courses and 1% had 4-5 courses. Response to further treatment was predictably successful, was not associated with any additional adverse reactions, and produced no persistent side-effects. Factors contributing to the need for further courses of treatment included lower dose regimens (0.1 and 0.5 mg/kg), the presence of severe acne, being a female over the age of 25 at the onset of therapy, and having a prolonged history of acne.