Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 405(1): 117-123, 2020 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31915920

RESUMEN

Approximately 10% of patients with ascites associated with cirrhosis fail to respond to dietary rules and diuretic treatment and therefore present with refractory ascites. In order to avoid iterative large-volume paracentesis in patients with contraindication to TIPS, the automated low flow ascites pump system (Alfapump) was developed to pump ascites from the peritoneal cavity into the urinary bladder, where it is eliminated spontaneously by normal micturition. This manuscript reports the surgical technique for placement of the Alfapump.


Asunto(s)
Ascitis/cirugía , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Paracentesis/instrumentación , Paracentesis/métodos , Cavidad Peritoneal/cirugía , Vejiga Urinaria/cirugía , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/instrumentación , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Ascitis/etiología , Ascitis/terapia , Humanos
2.
Br J Surg ; 101(2): 8-16, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24276950

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) are commonly used in patients with cancer. Although several methods of implantation have been described, there is not enough evidence to support the use of a specific technique on a daily basis. The objective of this study was systematically to assess the literature comparing percutaneous subclavian vein puncture with surgical venous cutdown. METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched by two independent authors. No time limits were applied. A systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out according to the recommendations of the Cochrane Collaboration, including randomized clinical trials comparing primary percutaneous subclavian vein puncture with surgical venous cutdown. RESULTS: Six trials were included, with 772 patients overall. The primary implantation failure rate was significantly lower for the percutaneous approach compared with surgical cutdown (odds ratio (OR) 0.26, 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 0.07 to 0.94; P = 0.039). There was no evidence supporting a significant difference in terms of risk of pneumothorax, haematoma, venous thrombosis, infectious events or catheter migration. After taking between-study heterogeneity into account by using a random-effects model, procedure duration was not significantly longer for surgical cutdown: weighted mean difference +4 (95 per cent c.i. -12 to 20) min (P = 0.625). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous subclavian vein puncture is associated with a higher TIVAD implantation success rate and a procedure duration similar to that of surgical cutdown. Pneumothorax develops exclusively after percutaneous puncture and requires special attention from clinicians dealing with TIVAD insertion.


Asunto(s)
Catéteres de Permanencia , Incisión Venosa/métodos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Vena Subclavia/cirugía , Resultado del Tratamiento , Incisión Venosa/efectos adversos
3.
J Visc Surg ; 158(1): 27-37, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32553558

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The treatment of symptomatic hernia in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites is critical but challenging. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of the implantation of alfapump® combined with concomitant hernia repair in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. METHODS: Using data from six European centres, we retrospectively compared patients treated with alfapump® system implantation and concomitant hernia repair [the combined treatment group (CT group, n=12)] or with intermittent paracentesis hernia repair [the standard treatment group (ST group, n=26)]. Some patients of the ST group had hernia repair in an elective setting (STel group) and others in emergency (STem group). The endpoints were requirement of peritoneal drainage, the rate of infectious complications, the in-hospital mortality, the length of stay, paracentesis-free survival. RESULTS: Postoperatively, none of the patients in the CT group and 21 patients (80%) in the ST group underwent peritoneal drainage for the evacuation of ascites fluid (P<0.0001). The overall incidence of infectious complications was not different between groups but there were fewer infections in the CT group than in the STem group (33% vs. 81%; P=0.01). There was no difference for in-hospital mortality. The length of stay was shorter in the CT group (P=0.03). Paracentesis-free survival was significantly better (P=0.0003) in the CT group than in the ST group. CONCLUSION: Implantation of alfapump combined with concomitant hernia repair seems feasible and safe in cirrhotic patients; however, larger and randomized study are required.


Asunto(s)
Ascitis , Herniorrafia , Ascitis/etiología , Ascitis/terapia , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
J Visc Surg ; 158(3): 191-197, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33184018

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Based on the Competency Assessment Tool, herein we developed an assessment instrument suitable to evaluate the implantation of central intravenous devices. BACKGROUND: Surgical assessment is based mainly on the subjective impressions of the teacher. Based on the "Competency Assessment Tool" (CAT) developed for the evaluation of technical surgical skills in minimally invasive colorectal resection, we designed an assessment tool suitable to evaluate the implantation of central venous access devices performed by junior surgical trainees. METHODS: Four major assessments during the different steps of the intervention were used in this evaluation. Each of these tasks was divided into four sub-domains according to surgical skill. In addition to the CAT score, the apprentices' skills were evaluated using a visual assessment that was quantified using an analogue scale (value from 1 to 10). The candidates were classified into junior and senior trainees depending on the number of procedures they had already performed and on their surgical experience. RESULTS: 71 procedures were evaluated during the study period. Seven senior trainees conducted 43 procedures and five junior trainees performed 28 interventions. The senior trainees had significantly higher CAT scores than junior candidates, and the scores fluctuated according to surgical experience, usually reaching their peak after 10 procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The CAT model is well suited for the assessment of surgical trainees during central venous access device implantation. It enables a close assessment of the learning process and the technical skills of trainees, which helps them improving in a safe, standardized manner.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos
5.
J Hosp Infect ; 88(1): 40-7, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25063012

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surveillance is an essential element of surgical site infection (SSI) prevention. Few studies have evaluated the long-term effect of these programmes. AIM: To present data from a 13-year multicentre SSI surveillance programme from western and southern Switzerland. METHODS: Surveillance with post-discharge follow-up was performed according to the US National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system methods. SSI rates were calculated for each surveyed type of surgery, overall and by year of participation in the programme. Risk factors for SSI and the effect of surveillance time on SSI rates were analysed by multiple logistic regression. FINDINGS: Overall SSI rates were 18.2% after 7411 colectomies, 6.4% after 6383 appendicectomies, 2.3% after 7411 cholecystectomies, 1.7% after 9933 herniorrhaphies, 1.6% after 6341 hip arthroplasties, and 1.3% after 3667 knee arthroplasties. The frequency of SSI detected after discharge varied between 21% for colectomy and 94% for knee arthroplasty. Independent risk factors for SSI differed between operations. The NNIS risk index was predictive of SSI in gastrointestinal surgery only. Laparoscopic technique was protective overall, but associated with higher rates of organ-space infections after appendicectomy. The duration of participation in the surveillance programme was not associated with a decreased SSI rate for any of the included procedure. CONCLUSION: These data confirm the effect of post-discharge surveillance on SSI rates and the protective effect of laparoscopy. There is a need to establish alternative case-mix adjustment methods. In contrast to other European programmes, no positive impact of surveillance duration on SSI rates was observed.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Epidemiológico , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hospitales , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Suiza/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA