Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 94
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Ig ; 36(5): 581-587, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38567705

RESUMEN

Background: Regular physical activity is crucial in preventing chronic diseases. International health authorities recommend that children and adolescents engage in at least 60 minutes of moderate to vigorous physical activity per day to achieve health benefits. Offering regular exercise opportunities to young people can promote the development of healthy lifestyles. In 2021, a new regu-lation introduced up to two compulsory hours of Physical Education per week in Italy and established that Physical Education should be entrusted to adequately trained teachers. The present study aimed to assess, from the perspective of the new teachers, the resources available for Physical Education in Italian primary schools. Methods: A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study was conducted among primary school Physical Education teachers during the year 2022-2023. Their opinion about the school resources were analyzed in light of their demographic characteristics and work experience. Results: Out of the 118 participating teachers, 96 (81.3%) reported the presence of a gym in their school. Participants expressed satisfaction with the size and windows of the gym, particularly for the schools of the North, as well as the adequacy of outdoor spaces. However, lower levels of satisfaction for locker rooms and gym small equipment emerged, especially among those teachers with less work experience. Conclusions: The introduction of the Physical Education teacher figure in Italian primary schools was an important step for health promotion in our country. However, some aspects related to the structural resources should be considered in future policies.


Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud , Educación y Entrenamiento Físico , Maestros , Instituciones Académicas , Italia , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Niño , Ejercicio Físico , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad
2.
Br J Haematol ; 201(6): 1072-1080, 2023 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36942786

RESUMEN

Splenectomy/asplenia is a condition associated with immune-compromission and specific vaccines are recommended for these patients, including the anti-COVID-19 vaccine. Among the high-risk group for which vaccination was prioritized in Italy, the immunocompromised patients after therapies or treatments were included. The Apulian regional archive of hospital discharge forms was used to define the list of splenectomized Apulian inhabitants, considering data from 2015 through 2020. The overall vaccination status of asplenic patients was assessed via data collected from the Regional Immunization Database. The history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and the infectious disease outcomes were extracted from the Italian Institute of Health platform "Integrated surveillance of COVID-19 cases in Italy". 1219 Apulian splenectomized inhabitants were included; the incidence rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection was 15.0 per 100 persons-year with a proportion of re-infection equal to 6.4%; the proportion of hospitalization was 2.9%, with a case-fatality rate of 2.6%. The vaccine coverage (VC) for the anti-COVID-19 vaccine basal routine was 64.2%, for the first booster dose was 15.4%, and for the second booster dose was 0.6%. A multifactorial approach is needed to increase the vaccination uptake in this sub-group population and to increase the awareness of the asplenia-related risks to patients and health personnel.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Vacunación
3.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 41(1): 166-169, 2023 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36441661

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Scanty data on the anti- SARS-CoV-2 IgG level decay after two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination have been published in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) on TNF inhibitors (TNFi). Similarly, no reports on the immunogenicity of a booster dose in such patients have been provided yet.We aimed to investigate the IgG level decay after two-dose BNT162b2 vaccination and the immunogenicity and safety of the booster dose in PsA patients on TNFi. METHODS: Forty patients with classified PsA on TNFi undergoing booster dose with the BNT162b2 mRNA SARS- CoV-2 vaccine (BioNTech/Pfizer) were enrolled. Fifteen days after the third shot, serum IgG levels against SARS-CoV-2 (Abbott®ARCHITECT i2000SR, positivity cut-off 50 AU/mL) were assayed in all patients. Clinimetrics and treatment data were gathered. TNFi treatment was not discontinued. Sera from healthcare professionals were considered as healthy controls for 1:1 propensity score-matching. Student's t-test and logistic regression were used for investigating differences in immunogenicity between groups and predictors of antibody response. RESULTS: Even though the decay of IgG levels showed similar magnitude between groups, PsA patients had a lower IgG level than matched controls at 4 months after two-dose vaccination (2009.22±4050.22 vs. 6206.59±4968.33 AU/mL, respectively p=0.0006). Booster dose restored IgG levels to a similar extent in both groups (15846.47±12876.48 vs. 20374.46±12797.08 AU/ml p=0.20, respectively). Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) did not change before and after vaccination (6.68±4.38 vs. 4.95±4.20, p=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: A BNT162b2 booster dose should be recommended in PsA patients on TNFi as its administration restores anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels similar to healthy individuals.


Asunto(s)
Artritis Psoriásica , COVID-19 , Humanos , Vacuna BNT162 , SARS-CoV-2 , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Vacunación , Vacunas de ARNm
4.
Int J Mol Sci ; 24(8)2023 Apr 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37108130

RESUMEN

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients on JAK inhibitors (JAKi) have an increased HZ risk compared to those on biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs). Recently, the Adjuvanted Recombinant Zoster Vaccine (RZV) became available worldwide, showing good effectiveness in patients with inflammatory arthritis. Nevertheless, direct evidence of the immunogenicity of such a vaccine in those on JAKi or anti-cellular bDMARDs is still lacking. This prospective study aimed to assess RZV immunogenicity and safety in RA patients receiving JAKi or anti-cellular bDMARDs that are known to lead to impaired immune response. Patients with classified RA according to ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria on different JAKi or anti-cellular biologics (namely, abatacept and rituximab) followed at the RA clinic of our tertiary center were prospectively observed. Patients received two shots of the RZV. Treatments were not discontinued. At the first and second shots, and one month after the second shot, from all patients with RA, a sample was collected and RZV immunogenicity was assessed and compared between the treatment groups and healthy controls (HCs) receiving RZV for routine vaccination. We also kept track of disease activity at different follow-up times. Fifty-two consecutive RA patients, 44 females (84.61%), with an average age (±SD) of 57.46 ± 11.64 years and mean disease duration of 80.80 ± 73.06 months, underwent complete RZV vaccination between February and June 2022 at our center. At the time of the second shot (1-month follow-up from baseline), anti-VZV IgG titer increased significantly in both groups with similar magnitude (bDMARDs: 2258.76 ± 897.07 mIU/mL; JAKi: 2059.19 ± 876.62 mIU/mL, p < 0.001 for both from baseline). At one-month follow-up from the second shot, anti-VZV IgG titers remained stable in the bDMARDs group (2347.46 ± 975.47) and increased significantly in the JAKi group (2582.65 ± 821.59 mIU/mL, p = 0.03); still, no difference was observed between groups comparing IgG levels at this follow-up time. No RA flare was recorded. No significant difference was shown among treatment groups and HCs. RZV immunogenicity is not impaired in RA patients on JAKi or anti-cellular bDMARDs. A single shot of RZV can lead to an anti-VZV immune response similar to HCs without discontinuing DMARDs.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Artritis Reumatoide , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Biológicos/uso terapéutico , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal
5.
J Med Virol ; 94(5): 2230-2236, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35106771

RESUMEN

In March, people living with HIV infection (PLWH) were included in the risk category of fragile people for severe COVID-19 receiving priority access to vaccination with BNT162b2 vaccine. The aim of the study was to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of the two doses regimen. The antibodies titer for severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) was evaluated after 21 days since the first administration (Time 1), 1 (Time 2), and 3 (Time 3) months post-vaccination. Information regarding virological and immunological conditions at baseline, previous SARS-CoV-2 state of infection, other immunodeficiencies, current antiretroviral therapy (ART), comorbidities, and severe adverse events (SAE) to vaccination was collected. Six hundred and ninety-seven patients were tested for quantitative anti-spike antibodies at Time 1, 577 patients had a second detection at Time 2, and 491 patients had the third detection. Baseline characteristics of the study population are reported in Table 1. At the time of vaccine administration, all patients were on ART (except one long-term nonprogressor); 632 (90.7%) patients had undetectable HIV-RNA; 12 (1.7%) patients were immunosuppressed due to chemotherapy or other immunosuppressive drugs; 345 (49.5%) patients had at least one COVID-19 related comorbidity and 155 (22.2%) had two or more comorbidities. No SAEs were reported. Final serological results are available for 694 patients after the first dose, 577 and 491 after the second and third ones, respectively; positive titer (values ≥ 50 AU/ml) was demonstrated in 653 (94.1%), 576 (99.8%), 484 (98.6%) patients, respectively. Only one patient was a nonresponder after completing vaccination, who was a newly diagnosed one for HIV infection. All vaccinations were well tolerated, with no SAEs. BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine was immunogenic and safe in PLWH.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por VIH , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Vacuna BNT162 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , ARN Mensajero , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacunas Sintéticas , Vacunas de ARNm
6.
J Adv Nurs ; 78(9): 2894-2903, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35301774

RESUMEN

AIMS: To determine coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination hesitancy in healthcare professionals and healthcare students in Italy across four generations (baby boomers, generations X, Y and Z). DESIGN: A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed through an online survey conducted from May to June 2021. The STROBE guidelines were adopted for reporting. METHODS: Data were collected by initially sending a survey link to a convenience sample of healthcare professionals and students, which was followed by snowball sampling. The VAX scale was validated and adopted. An ANOVA was performed to detect differences in vaccine-hesitancy beliefs between the four generational groups. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1226 healthcare professionals and students. Worries about unforeseen future effects accounted for the higher vaccination hesitancy factor across generations. More positive attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination were expressed by members of generation Z than by members of generation Y and baby boomers. Members of generation X had the highest vaccination hesitancy scores in the overall scale. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that public health campaigns should take into account the generational differences in COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy to achieve higher levels of vaccine acceptance, including amongst healthcare professionals and students. IMPACT: Vaccination is the most effective strategy to tackle the COVID-19 pandemic. The advice of health professionals strongly influences vaccination willingness in the general population. A consideration of the generational patterns in the COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy of healthcare workers and students may increase vaccination uptake in these populations, which in turn may lead to greater public acceptance of the vaccine.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Estudiantes , Vacunación
7.
Int J Mol Sci ; 23(15)2022 Jul 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35955621

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The recent COVID-19 pandemic produced a significant increase in cases and an emergency state was induced worldwide. The current knowledge about the COVID-19 disease concerning diagnoses, patient tracking, the treatment protocol, and vaccines provides a consistent contribution for the primary prevention of the viral infection and decreasing the severity of the SARS-CoV-2 disease. The aim of the present investigation was to produce a general overview about the current findings for the COVID-19 disease, SARS-CoV-2 interaction mechanisms with the host, therapies and vaccines' immunization findings. METHODS: A literature overview was produced in order to evaluate the state-of-art in SARS-CoV-2 diagnoses, prognoses, therapies, and prevention. RESULTS: Concerning to the interaction mechanisms with the host, the virus binds to target with its Spike proteins on its surface and uses it as an anchor. The Spike protein targets the ACE2 cell receptor and enters into the cells by using a special enzyme (TMPRSS2). Once the virion is quietly accommodated, it releases its RNA. Proteins and RNA are used in the Golgi apparatus to produce more viruses that are released. Concerning the therapies, different protocols have been developed in observance of the disease severity and comorbidity with a consistent reduction in the mortality rate. Currently, different vaccines are currently in phase IV but a remarkable difference in efficiency has been detected concerning the more recent SARS-CoV-2 variants. CONCLUSIONS: Among the many questions in this pandemic state, the one that recurs most is knowing why some people become more seriously ill than others who instead contract the infection as if it was a trivial flu. More studies are necessary to investigate the efficiency of the treatment protocols and vaccines for the more recent detected SARS-CoV-2 variant.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas Virales , Enzima Convertidora de Angiotensina 2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Peptidil-Dipeptidasa A/metabolismo , ARN , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína de la Espiga del Coronavirus/metabolismo
8.
J Infect Dis ; 224(3): 431-434, 2021 08 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34007998

RESUMEN

In the preregistration trial, data on efficacy of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infection were not collected. This study aimed to evaluate vaccine effectiveness (VE) against documented infection. Bari Policlinico University Hospital health care workers (HCWs) who completed the vaccination schedule were matched with HCWs who had refused vaccination. VE for documented infection was 61.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19.2%-82.0%) 14-20 days after first dose, 87.9% (95% CI, 51.7%-97.0%) 21-27 days after first dose, and 96.0% (95% CI, 82.2%-99.1%) 7 or more days after second dose. Unvaccinated HCWs remain a concern in the context of the pandemic emergency.


Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Adulto , Anciano , Vacuna BNT162 , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
9.
BMC Infect Dis ; 21(1): 475, 2021 May 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34034659

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Chickenpox is a highly contagious disease caused by the varicella zoster virus (VZV), and in infants, adolescents, adults, pregnant women, and the immunocompromised it can be serious. The best way to prevent chickenpox is immunization with the varicella vaccine. Protective levels of antibodies induced by the varicella vaccine decline over time, but there is currently no formal recommendation for testing anti-varicella zoster virus (VZV) IgG levels in immunized healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS: The aims of this study were to evaluate the seroprevalence of circulating anti-VZV IgG in a sample a sample of students and residents of the medical school of the University of Bari, the long-term immunogenicity of the varicella vaccine, and the effectiveness of a strategy consisting of a third vaccine booster dose. The study population was screened as part of a biological risk assessment conducted between April 2014 and October 2020. A strategy for the management of non-responders was also examined. RESULTS: The 182 students and residents included in the study had a documented history of immunization (two doses of varicella vaccine). The absence of anti-VZV IgG was determined in 34% (62/182; 95%CI = 27.2-41.4%), with serosusceptibility more common among males than females (p < 0.05). After a third varicella dose, seroconversion was achieved in 100% of this previously seronegative group. No serious adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: One-third of the study population immunized against VZV lacked a protective antibody titer, but a third dose of vaccine restored protection. Since it is highly unlikely that VZV will be eliminated in the immediate future, the loss of immunity in a substantial portion of the population implies a risk of varicella outbreaks in the coming years. Screening for varicella immunity in routine assessments of the biological risk of medical students and HCWs may help to prevent nosocomial VZV infections.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Vacuna contra la Varicela/inmunología , Varicela/epidemiología , Varicela/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades/prevención & control , Personal de Salud , Herpesvirus Humano 3/inmunología , Inmunización Secundaria/métodos , Vacunación/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Varicela/sangre , Varicela/virología , Vacuna contra la Varicela/administración & dosificación , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Seroepidemiológicos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
10.
Environ Res ; 195: 110793, 2021 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33508260

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are highly exposed to SARS-CoV-2 infection given their specific tasks. The IgG-IgM serological assay has demonstrated good accuracy in early detection in symptomatic patients, but its role in the diagnosis of asymptomatic patients is uncertain. The aim of our study was to assess IgM and IgG prevalence in sera in a large cohort of HCWs previously subjected to Nasopharyngeal swab test (NST) after accurate risk assessment due to positive COVID-19 patient exposure during an observation period of 90 days. METHODS: 2407 asymptomatic HCWs that had close contact with COVID-19 patients in the period between April 8th and June 7th were screened with NST based on the RT-PCR method. In parallel, they underwent large-scale chemiluminescence immunoassays involving IgM-IgG serological screening to determine actual viral spread in the same cohort. RESULTS: During the 90-day observation period, 18 workers (0.75%) resulted positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection at the NST, whereas the positivity rates for IgM and IgG were 11.51% and 2.37%, respectively (277 workers). Despite high specificity, serological tests were inadequate for detecting SARS-CoV-2 infection in patients with previous positive NST results (IgM and IgG sensitivities of 27.78% and 50.00%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate a widespread low viral load of SARS-CoV-2 among hospital workers. However, serological screening showed very low sensitivity with respect to NST in identifying infected workers, and negative IgG and IgM results should not exclude the diagnosis of COVID-19. IgG-IgM chemiluminescence immunoassays could increase the diagnosis of COVID-19 only in association with NST, and this association is considered helpful for decision-making regarding returning to work.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , Personal de Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G , Inmunoglobulina M , Italia/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Salud Pública , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
11.
J Infect Dis ; 221(5): 721-728, 2020 02 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31580436

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Levels of antibodies induced by the measles virus-containing vaccine have been shown to decline over time, but there is no formal recommendation about testing immunized subjects (in particular, healthcare workers [HCWs]) to investigate the persistence of measles immunoglobulin G (IgG). METHODS: This study aims to evaluate the long-term immunogenicity of measles vaccine in a sample of medical students and residents of the University of Bari who attended the Hygiene Department for a biological risk assessment (April 2014-June 2018). RESULTS: Two thousand immunized (2 doses of measles-mumps-rubella [MMR] vaccine) students and residents were tested; 305 of these (15%) did not show protective anti-measles IgG. This proportion was higher among subjects who received vaccination at ≤15 months (20%) than in those who received vaccination at 16-23 months (17%) and at ≥24 months (10%) (P < .0001). After an MMR vaccine booster dose, we noted a seroconversion of 74% of seronegative HCWs. The overall seroconversion rate after a second dose (booster) was 93%. No serious adverse events were noted after the booster doses. CONCLUSIONS: An important proportion of subjects immunized for measles do not show a protective IgG titer in the 10 years after vaccination. Our management strategy seems consistent with the purpose of evidencing immunological memory.


Asunto(s)
Inmunogenicidad Vacunal , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Sarampión/prevención & control , Morbillivirus/inmunología , Virus de la Parotiditis/inmunología , Paperas/prevención & control , Virus de la Rubéola/inmunología , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Vacunación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Femenino , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Italia , Masculino , Sarampión/virología , Paperas/virología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/virología , Adulto Joven
12.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 1490, 2019 Nov 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31703651

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend that healthcare workers (HCWs) have presumptive evidence of immunity to rubella and that susceptible HCWs and doubt cases receive two doses of the MMR vaccine. However, a small percentage of the fully immunized will remain unprotected against wild viruses. Moreover, protective levels of antibodies induced by the vaccine have been shown to decline over time, but a formal recommendation regarding the testing of immunized HCWs for the persistence of IgG against rubella is lacking. METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term immunogenicity conferred by rubella vaccination and the effectiveness of a strategy for the management of immunized individuals in whom IgG against rubella could not be demonstrated (non-responders). The study enrolled students and medical residents who attended the Hygiene Department of Bari Policlinico University Hospital for biological risk assessment (April 2014 to June 2018). RESULTS: Two thousand students and residents with documented immunization (≥2 doses of rubella or MMR vaccine) were tested. In 181 (9%), IgG against rubella was not detectable. The seronegative rate was higher among participants vaccinated at age < 2 years (89.6%) and lower among those immunized at age ≥ 2 years (93.6%; p < 0.0001). The administration of a single MMR booster dose resulted in a seroconversion rate of 98% in the seronegative group. The seroconversion rate after a second booster dose was 100%. No serious adverse events in the re-immunized were recorded. CONCLUSIONS: An important proportion of individuals immunized for rubella or MMR do not have a protective titer for the disease(s). Our management strategy (booster followed by re-test and, for those who are still negative, a second booster and re-test) is consistent with the goal of achieving immunological memory.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , Inmunogenicidad Vacunal/inmunología , Vacuna contra el Sarampión-Parotiditis-Rubéola/inmunología , Virus de la Rubéola/inmunología , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/prevención & control , Adulto , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Preescolar , Femenino , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Inmunización Secundaria , Lactante , Italia , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Rubéola (Sarampión Alemán)/inmunología , Vacunación , Adulto Joven
14.
Int J Infect Dis ; 141: 106960, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38365084

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: In 2021, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported increased cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in the United States after mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. Our study aims to estimate the incidence of myocarditis in Apulia (Southern Italy) and the cause-effect relationship between COVID-19 mRNA vaccines and the risk of myocarditis. METHODS: The Apulian regional archive of hospital discharge forms was used to define the cases of myocarditis in Apulia, considering data from 2017 to 2022. The overall vaccination status of patients was assessed via data collected from the Regional Immunization Database. The history of SARS-CoV-2 infection was extracted from the Italian Institute of Health platform. RESULTS: Since 2017, 5687 cases of myocarditis have been recorded in Apulian subjects; the overall incidence described a decreasing trend, with a slight increase in 0-40 years-old subjects. From 2021 to 2022, 2,930,276 doses of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were administered; a diagnosis of myocarditis after the second dose of the mRNA vaccine was reported for 894 (0.03%) of Apulian inhabitants, with an incidence rate of 17.9 × 1,000,000 persons-month. The multivariate analysis, adjusted for age, sex, underlying medical conditions, and diagnosis of COVID-19, showed that mRNA vaccination is a protective factor for myocarditis even in younger subjects (aOR = 0.4; 95% CI = 0.3-0.5). CONCLUSION: A temporal association between an exposure and an outcome is not equivalent to a causal association. Our study underlines how an approach that considers the other potential causes of myocarditis (primarily COVID-19) and a causality assessment must be prioritized in the study of the topic.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Miocarditis , Pericarditis , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Preescolar , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Miocarditis/epidemiología , Miocarditis/etiología , SARS-CoV-2/genética , Vacunas de ARNm , Vacunación/efectos adversos
15.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2314383, 2024 Dec 31.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38356279

RESUMEN

Vaccination is the principal strategy for primary prevention of infection by Human Papilloma Virus (HPV), which causes different pathological conditions, up to cancer, in both males and females. However, to date, knowledge among adolescents and their parents about the HPV vaccine is still low. The aim of this quasi-experimental, multicenter study is to assess the effectiveness of a digital educational intervention, conducted by a multidisciplinary health-care team including a Community Nurse, to increase adolescents' HPV vaccination uptake, their knowledge, self-efficacy, feelings and involvement in HPV vaccine decision-making, and parents' vaccination hesitancy. The study will be carried out among a population of students (and their parents), aged between 11 and 13, at secondary schools in Italy. Validated questionnaires will be administered to both students and parents at baseline (T0) and 3 months after a digital educational intervention (T1). The findings may be useful in evaluating and deepening a methodology for designing and implementing educational interventions, embedded in the school setting, that could promote the achievement of outcomes within the broader process of youth's health promotion.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Humanos , Niño , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/epidemiología , Rol de la Enfermera , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Vacunación , Papillomaviridae , Estudiantes , Padres , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
16.
Vaccine ; 42(12): 2966-2974, 2024 Apr 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582693

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since 2021 a recombinant adjuvanted anti-Herpes Zoster vaccine(Recombinant Zoster Vaccine, RZV) is offered in Italy to high-risk patients. Few real-life data about RZV safety are available in target populations. OBJECTIVES: This study investigates Adverse Events Following Immunization(AEFIs), baseline disease flare-ups, and Herpes Zoster (HZ) episodes occurring after RZV administration in a heterogeneous population of fragile patients to design its safety profile. METHODS: This is a retrospective population-based study. RZV-vaccinated patients at Bari Policlinico General Hospital vaccination clinic from October 1st, 2021, to March 31st, 2023, were enrolled. Subjects were screened for reason of RZV eligibility and baseline chronic pathologies. AEFIs occurred in the first 7-days post-vaccination period were collected, and baseline disease flare-ups and post-vaccination HZ episodes were assessed via a 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Five-hundred-thirty-eight patients were included and total of 1,031 doses were administered. Most patients were vaccinated due to ongoing immunosuppressive therapy(54.65 %); onco-hematological and cardiovascular conditions were the most common chronic baseline pathologies. Out of 1,031 follow-ups, 441 AEFI cases were reported(42.7/100). The most common symptoms were injection site pain/itching(35.60/100), asthenia/malaise(11.44/100), and fever (10.09/100). Four serious AEFIs occurred(0.38/100). Older age, male sex, and history of cardiovascular diseases(OR:0.71; 95CI:0.52-0.98; p-value <0.05) were found to decrease AEFIs risk, while endocrine-metabolic illnesses(OR:1.61; 95CI:1.15-2.26; p-value <0.05) increased it. Twelve patients(2.23 %) reported a flare-up/worsening of their baseline chronic condition within the first three months after vaccination(mean interval 31.75 days, range 0-68 days). Patients with rheumatological illnesses had a higher risk of relapse(OR:16.56; 95CI:3.58-76.56; p-value <0.001), while male sex behaved as a protective factor. Twelve patients who completed the vaccination cycle(2.43%) had at least one HZ episode by the long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates RZV safety in a significant number of high-risk patients. Hence, RZV should be actively offered as part of tailored vaccination programs to decrease the burden of HZ in fragile populations.


Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster , Herpes Zóster , Humanos , Masculino , Adyuvantes Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Herpes Zóster/epidemiología , Herpes Zóster/prevención & control , Vacuna contra el Herpes Zóster/efectos adversos , Herpesvirus Humano 3 , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Brote de los Síntomas , Vacunas Sintéticas/efectos adversos , Espera Vigilante , Femenino , Anciano
17.
J Infect Public Health ; 17(6): 967-974, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38631066

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Candidemia is the most common healthcare associated invasive fungal infection. Over the last few decades, candidemia caused by Candida species other than Candida albicans, particularly the Candida parapsilosis complex, has emerged worldwide. The aims of this study were: to analyze the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of C. parapsilosis strains isolated from blood cultures and the environment in a hospital in southern Italy, to study the possible source of infection and to correlate the isolated strains. METHODS: From April to October 2022, cases of candidemia due to C. parapsilosis in patients admitted to a hospital in the Apulia region were investigated. However, 119 environmental samples from the intensive care unit were collected for identification of the likely environmental reservoir of infection. Routine antifungal (amphotericin B, anidulafungin, fluconazole) susceptibility was performed on all isolates. Whole genome sequencing was performed to study the genotypic correlation of the isolates. Biofilm biomass and metabolic activity were also quantified for all isolates. RESULTS: A total of 43 C. parapsilosis isolates were cultured from the bloodstream of each patient in different departments, and seven surface samples were positive for C. parapsilosis. Most of the isolated yeasts (41/50; 85 %) were resistant to fluconazole and were genetically related to each other, suggesting an ongoing clonal outbreak of this pathogen. The fluconazole-susceptible isolates produced significantly more biofilm than did the resistant isolates. Metabolic activity was also higher for fluconazole-susceptible than resistant isolates. CONCLUSION: Cross-transmission of the microorganisms is suggested by the phenotypic similarity and genetic correlation between clinical and environmental strains observed in our study.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos , Biopelículas , Candida parapsilosis , Candidemia , Infección Hospitalaria , Genotipo , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Fenotipo , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Candidemia/microbiología , Candidemia/epidemiología , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Candida parapsilosis/efectos de los fármacos , Candida parapsilosis/genética , Candida parapsilosis/aislamiento & purificación , Candida parapsilosis/clasificación , Infección Hospitalaria/microbiología , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Biopelículas/crecimiento & desarrollo , Farmacorresistencia Fúngica , Secuenciación Completa del Genoma , Femenino , Fluconazol/farmacología , Masculino
18.
Front Public Health ; 11: 1323394, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38249411

RESUMEN

Vaccine hesitancy is a multi-faceted phenomenon, deeply rooted in cultural, socioeconomic and personal background. Communication is deemed fundamental in fighting vaccine hesitancy. Medical communication should be accessible, relying both on an emotional approach and accurate information. Trained professionals should curate communication with the public.


Asunto(s)
Comunicación , Vacilación a la Vacunación , Emociones
19.
Vaccine ; 41(7): 1303-1309, 2023 02 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690559

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: People affected by diabetes are at higher risk for complications from certain vaccine-preventable diseases. Suboptimal vaccination coverages are reported in this population sub-group. The purpose of this study is to estimate the proportion of diabetic patients who express hesitation to the COVID-19 vaccine worldwide. METHODS: Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis and systematic review, selected from scientific articles available in the MEDLINE/PubMed, Google Scholar and Scopus databases from 2020 to 2022. The following terms were used for the search strategy: (adherence OR hesitancy OR compliance OR attitude) AND (covid* OR SARS*) AND (vaccin* OR immun*) AND (diabet*). RESULTS: The vaccine hesitation rate among persons with diabetes was 27.8 % (95 %CI = 15.6-41.9 %). In the comparison of vaccine hesitancy between sexes and educational status, the RRs were 0.90 (95 %CI = 0.71-1.15) and 0.88 (95 %CI = 0.76-1.02), respectively. The main reasons of unwillingness were lack of information, opinion that the vaccine was unsafe or not efficient, and fear of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In order to achieve a high vaccination coverage, multifactorial approach is needed, which requires major social, scientific and health efforts. The success of the vaccination campaign in this population depends on the capillarity and consistency of the interventions implemented.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Diabetes Mellitus , Vacunas , Humanos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Vacilación a la Vacunación , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunación
20.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 11(4)2023 Mar 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37112629

RESUMEN

Despite its effectiveness in the prevention of seasonal flu, influenza vaccination uptake remains low, even among healthcare workers (HCWs), despite their occupational risk. The aim of this study was to explore the association between main reasons for accepting or refusing influenza vaccination and the decision to receive the vaccination during both previous and following year among health sciences students. A multi-center, cross-sectional study was performed using a validated online questionnaire. Data were analyzed by performing univariable and multivariable logistic analysis. Data from over 3000 participants showed that avoiding the spread of infection to family members and the general population (aOR: 43.55), as well as to patients (aOR: 16.56) were the main reasons associated with the highest probability of taking the influenza vaccination the following year. On the contrary, not considering influenza as a severe disease was the reason associated with the lowest probability for past (aOR: 0.17) and future vaccination (aOR: 0.01). Therefore, the importance of vaccination to protect others should always be the core of vaccination campaigns for health sciences students, together with tools to increase their awareness of the severity of this disease.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA