International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology CXIII: Nuclear Receptor Superfamily-Update 2023.

The NR superfamily comprises 48 transcription factors in humans that control a plethora of gene network programs involved in a wide range of physiologic processes. This review will summarize and discuss recent progress in NR biology and drug development derived from integrating various approaches, including biophysical techniques, structural studies, and translational investigation. We also highlight how defective NR signaling results in various diseases and disorders and how NRs can be targeted for therapeutic intervention via modulation via binding to synthetic lipophilic ligands. Furthermore, we also review recent studies that improved our understanding of NR structure and signaling. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-regulated transcription factors that are critical regulators of myriad physiological processes. NRs serve as receptors for an array of drugs, and in this review, we provide an update on recent research into the roles of these drug targets.

Patients with telomere biology disorders show context specific somatic mosaic states with high frequency of U2AF1 variants.

Somatic mosaic states in telomere biology disorders are characterized by somatic variants in the spliceosome and DNA damage response and repair pathways. A likely maladaptive response to short telomeres that may lead to increased hematological cancer.

The transcriptional corepressor CBFA2T3 inhibits all-trans-retinoic acid-induced myeloid gene expression and differentiation in acute myeloid leukemia.

CBFA2/RUNX1 partner transcriptional co-repressor 3 (CBFA2T3, also known as MTG16 or ETO2) is a myeloid translocation gene family protein that functions as a master transcriptional corepressor in hematopoiesis. Recently, it has been shown that CBFA2T3 maintains leukemia stem cell gene expression and promotes relapse in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). However, a role for CBFA2T3 in myeloid differentiation of AML has not been reported. Here, we show that CBFA2T3 represses retinoic acid receptor (RAR) target gene expression and inhibits all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA)-induced myeloid differentiation of AML cells. ChIP-Seq revealed that CBFA2T3 targets the RARα/RXRα cistrome in U937 AML cells, predominantly at myeloid-specific enhancers associated with terminal differentiation. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated abrogation of CBFA2T3 resulted in spontaneous and ATRA-induced activation of myeloid-specific genes in a manner correlated with myeloid differentiation. Importantly, these effects were reversed by CBFA2T3 re-expression. Mechanistic studies showed that CBFA2T3 inhibits RAR target gene transcription by acting at an early step to regulate histone acetyltransferase recruitment, histone acetylation, and chromatin accessibility at RARα target sites, independently of the downstream, RAR-mediated steps of transcription. Finally, we validated the inhibitory effect of CBFA2T3 on RAR in multiple AML subtypes and patient samples. To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that CBFA2T3 down-regulation is both necessary and sufficient for enhancing ATRA-induced myeloid gene expression and differentiation of AML cells. Our findings suggest that CBFA2T3 can serve as a potential target for enhancing AML responsiveness to ATRA differentiation therapies.

Histone deacetylase 3 preferentially binds and collaborates with the transcription factor RUNX1 to repress AML1-ETO-dependent transcription in t(8;21) AML.

In up to 15% of acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs), a recurring chromosomal translocation, termed t(8;21), generates the AML1-eight-twenty-one (ETO) leukemia fusion protein, which contains the DNA-binding domain of Runt-related transcription factor 1 (RUNX1) and almost all of ETO. RUNX1 and the AML1-ETO fusion protein are coexpressed in t(8;21) AML cells and antagonize each other's gene-regulatory functions. AML1-ETO represses transcription of RUNX1 target genes by competitively displacing RUNX1 and recruiting corepressors such as histone deacetylase 3 (HDAC3). Recent studies have shown that AML1-ETO and RUNX1 co-occupy the binding sites of AML1-ETO-activated genes. How this joined binding allows RUNX1 to antagonize AML1-ETO-mediated transcriptional activation is unclear. Here we show that RUNX1 functions as a bona fide repressor of transcription activated by AML1-ETO. Mechanistically, we show that RUNX1 is a component of the HDAC3 corepressor complex and that HDAC3 preferentially binds to RUNX1 rather than to AML1-ETO in t(8;21) AML cells. Studying the regulation of interleukin-8 (IL8), a newly identified AML1-ETO-activated gene, we demonstrate that RUNX1 and HDAC3 collaboratively repress AML1-ETO-dependent transcription, a finding further supported by results of genome-wide analyses of AML1-ETO-activated genes. These and other results from the genome-wide studies also have important implications for the mechanistic understanding of gene-specific coactivator and corepressor functions across the AML1-ETO/RUNX1 cistrome.

Computational Modeling of Gene-Specific Transcriptional Repression, Activation and Chromatin Interactions in Leukemogenesis by LASSO-Regularized Logistic Regression.

Many physiological and pathological pathways are dependent on gene-specific on/off regulation of transcription. Some genes are repressed, while others are activated. Although many previous studies have analyzed the mechanisms of gene-specific repression and activation, these studies are mainly based on the use of candidate genes, which are either repressed or activated, without simultaneously comparing and contrasting both groups of genes. There is also insufficient consideration of gene locations. Here we describe an integrated machine learning approach, using LASSO-regularized logistic regression, to model gene-specific repression and activation and the underlying contribution of chromatin interactions. LASSO-regularized logistic regression accurately predicted gene-specific transcriptional events and robustly detected the rate-limiting factors that underlie the differences of gene activation and repression. An example was provided by the leukemogenic transcription factor AML1-ETO, which is responsible for 10-15 percent of all acute myeloid leukemia cases. The analysis of AML1-ETO has also revealed novel networks of chromatin interactions and uncovered an unexpected role for E-proteins in AML1-ETO-p300 interactions and a role for the pre-existing gene state in governing the transcriptional response. Our results show that logistic regression-based probabilistic modeling is a promising tool to decipher mechanisms that integrate gene regulation and chromatin interactions in regulated transcription.

Myeloid translocation gene CBFA2T3 directs a relapse gene program and determines patient-specific outcomes in AML.

CBFA2T3 is a master transcriptional coregulator in hematopoiesis. In this study, we report novel functions of CBFA2T3 in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) relapse. CBFA2T3 regulates cell-fate genes to establish gene expression signatures associated with leukemia stem cell (LSC) transformation and relapse. Gene set enrichment analysis showed that CBFA2T3 expression marks LSC signatures in primary AML samples. Analysis of paired primary and relapsed samples showed that acquisition of LSC gene signatures involves cell type-specific activation of CBFA2T3 transcription via the NM_005187 promoter by GCN5. Short hairpin RNA-mediated downregulation of CBFA2T3 arrests G1/S cell cycle progression, diminishes LSC gene signatures, and attenuates in vitro and in vivo proliferation of AML cells. We also found that the RUNX1-RUNX1T1 fusion protein transcriptionally represses NM_005187 to confer t(8;21) AML patients a natural resistance to relapse, whereas lacking a similar repression mechanism renders non-core-binding factor AML patients highly susceptible to relapse. These studies show that 2 related primary AML-associated factors, the expression level of CBFA2T3 and the ability of leukemia cells to repress cell type-specific CBFA2T3 gene transcription, play important roles in patient prognosis, providing a paradigm that differential abilities to repress hematopoietic coregulator gene transcription are correlated with patient-specific outcomes in AML.

Emerging Roles of MTG16 in Cell-Fate Control of Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Cancer.

MTG16 (myeloid translocation gene on chromosome 16) and its related proteins, MTG8 and MTGR1, define a small family of transcriptional corepressors. These corepressors share highly conserved domain structures yet have distinct biological functions and tissue specificity. In vivo studies have shown that, of the three MTG corepressors, MTG16 is uniquely important for the regulation of hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell (HSPC) proliferation and differentiation. Apart from this physiological function, MTG16 is also involved in carcinomas and leukemias, acting as the genetic target of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) aberrations in breast cancer and recurrent translocations in leukemia. The frequent involvement of MTG16 in these disease etiologies implies an important developmental role for this transcriptional corepressor. Furthermore, mounting evidence suggests that MTG16 indirectly alters the disease course of several leukemias via its regulatory interactions with a variety of pathologic fusion proteins. For example, a recent study has shown that MTG16 can repress not only wild-type E2A-mediated transcription, but also leukemia fusion protein E2A-Pbx1-mediated transcription, suggesting that MTG16 may serve as a potential therapeutic target in acute lymphoblastic leukemia expressing the E2A-Pbx1 fusion protein. Given that leukemia stem cells share similar regulatory pathways with normal HSPCs, studies to further understand how MTG16 regulates cell proliferation and differentiation could lead to novel therapeutic approaches for leukemia treatment.

New insights into transcriptional and leukemogenic mechanisms of AML1-ETO and E2A fusion proteins.

BACKGROUND: Nearly 15% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases are caused by aberrant expression of AML1-ETO, a fusion protein generated by the t(8;21) chromosomal translocation. Since its discovery, AML1-ETO has served as a prototype to understand how leukemia fusion proteins deregulate transcription to promote leukemogenesis. Another leukemia fusion protein, E2A-Pbx1, generated by the t(1;19) translocation, is involved in acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALLs). While AML1-ETO and E2A-Pbx1 are structurally unrelated fusion proteins, we have recently shown that a common axis, the ETO/E-protein interaction, is involved in the regulation of both fusion proteins, underscoring the importance of studying protein-protein interactions in elucidating the mechanisms of leukemia fusion proteins. OBJECTIVE: In this review, we aim to summarize these new developments while also providing a historic overview of the related early studies. METHODS: A total of 218 publications were reviewed in this article, a majority of which were published after 2004.We also downloaded 3D structures of AML1-ETO domains from Protein Data Bank and provided a systematic summary of their structures. RESULTS: By reviewing the literature, we summarized early and recent findings on AML1-ETO, including its protein-protein interactions, transcriptional and leukemogenic mechanisms, as well as the recently reported involvement of ETO family corepressors in regulating the function of E2A-Pbx1. CONCLUSION: While the recent development in genomic and structural studies has clearly demonstrated that the fusion proteins function by directly regulating transcription, a further understanding of the underlying mechanisms, including crosstalk with other transcription factors and cofactors, and the protein-protein interactions in the context of native proteins, may be necessary for the development of highly targeted drugs for leukemia therapy.