RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Renal colic is common and CT (computerized tomography) is frequently utilized when the diagnosis of kidney stone is suspected. CT is accurate, but exposes patients to ionizing radiation and has not been shown to alter either interventional approaches or hospital admission rates. This multi-organizational transdisciplinary collaboration sought evidence-based, multispecialty consensus on optimal imaging across different clinical scenarios in patients with suspected renal colic in the acute setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In conjunction with the ACEP (American College of Emergency Physicians®) E-QUAL (Emergency Quality Network) we formed a nine-member panel with three physician representatives each from the ACEP, the ACR® (American College of Radiology) and the AUA (American Urological Association). A systematic literature review was used as the basis for a 3-step modified Delphi process to seek consensus on optimal imaging in 29 specific clinical scenarios. RESULTS: From an initial search yielding 6,337 records there were 232 relevant articles of acceptable evidence quality to guide the literature summary. At the completion of the Delphi process consensus, agreement was rated as perfect in 15 (52%), excellent in 8 (28%), good in 3 (10%) and moderate in 3 (10%) of the 29 scenarios. There were no scenarios where at least moderate consensus was not reached. CT was recommended in 7 scenarios (24%) with ultrasound in 9 (31%) and no further imaging needed in 13 (45%). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence and multispecialty consensus support ultrasound or no further imaging in specific clinical scenarios, with reduced-radiation dose CT to be employed when CT is needed in patients with suspected renal colic.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Cólico Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/normas , Ultrasonografía/normas , Técnica Delphi , Medicina de Emergencia/normas , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Radiología/normas , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos , Urología/normasRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVE: Renal colic is common and computed tomography (CT) is frequently used when the diagnosis of kidney stone is suspected. CT is accurate but exposes patients to ionizing radiation and has not been shown to alter either interventional approaches or hospital admission rates. This multiorganizational transdisciplinary collaboration seeks evidence-based, multispecialty consensus on optimal imaging across different clinical scenarios in patients with suspected renal colic in the acute setting. METHODS: In conjunction with the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) Emergency Quality Network, we formed a 9-member panel with 3 physician representatives each from ACEP, the American College of Radiology, and the American Urology Association. A systematic literature review was used as the basis for a 3-step modified Delphi process to seek consensus on optimal imaging in 29 specific clinical scenarios. RESULTS: From an initial search yielding 6,337 records, there were 232 relevant articles of acceptable evidence quality to guide the literature summary. At the completion of the Delphi process consensus, out of the 29 scenarios agreement was rated as perfect in 15 (52%), excellent in 8 (28%), good in 3 (10%), and moderate in 3 (10%). There were no scenarios in which at least moderate consensus was not reached. CT was recommended in 7 scenarios (24%), with ultrasonography in 9 (31%) and no further imaging needed in 12 (45%). CONCLUSION: Evidence and multispecialty consensus support ultrasonography or no further imaging in specific clinical scenarios, with reduced-radiation-dose CT to be used when CT is needed for patients with suspected renal colic.
Asunto(s)
Cólico Renal/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Ultrasonografía , Adulto , Anciano , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistemas de Atención de Punto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Posterior acoustic shadow width has been proposed as a more accurate measure of kidney stone size compared to direct measurement of stone width on ultrasound (US). Published data in humans to date have been based on a research using US system. Herein, we compared these two measurements in clinical US images. METHODS: Thirty patient image sets where computed tomography (CT) and US images were captured less than 1 day apart were retrospectively reviewed. Five blinded reviewers independently assessed the largest stone in each image set for shadow presence and size. Shadow size was compared to US and CT stone sizes. RESULTS: Eighty percent of included stones demonstrated an acoustic shadow; 83% of stones without a shadow were ≤ 5 mm on CT. Average stone size was 6.5 ± 4.0 mm on CT, 10.3 ± 4.1 mm on US, and 7.5 ± 4.2 mm by shadow width. On average, US overestimated stone size by 3.8 ± 2.4 mm based on stone width (p < 0.001) and 1.0 ± 1.4 mm based on shadow width (p < 0.0098). Shadow measurements decreased misclassification of stones by 25% among three clinically relevant size categories (≤ 5, 5.1-10, > 10 mm), and by 50% for stones ≤ 5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: US overestimates stone size compared to CT. Retrospective measurement of the acoustic shadow from the same clinical US images is a more accurate reflection of true stone size than direct stone measurement. Most stones without a posterior shadow are ≤ 5 mm.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Adulto , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Precisión de la Medición Dimensional , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Renal colic is commonly seen in the emergency department (ED), where the focus is on diagnosis and symptom control. Educational materials are sometimes provided upon discharge, however, no standard content has been established. We characterized the educational materials given to patients reporting to EDs in different regions across the U.S. for symptomatic kidney stones, specifically evaluating disease-specific information, symptom management, prevention strategies including dietary recommendations (DRs), and patient follow up plans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Generic discharge instructions for patients presenting to EDs with renal colic were obtained from community hospitals and academic medical centers between October 2016 and November 2017. Hospitals were called directly. If the same discharge instructions were used by more than one hospital, each was included in our analysis. We assessed the different types of information provided with a focus on stone prevention and DRs by characterizing them into specific nutritional categories. RESULTS: Of 266 hospitals contacted, 79 provided discharge instructions. Of these, 51 (65%) provided some information on diet. While most recommended higher fluid intake, almost 40% endorsed unnecessary fluid restrictions. Recommendations to reduce protein and oxalate intake were common, but erroneous information for both was given. Nearly 1 in 5 EDs recommended lower calcium intake. Less than 30% of EDs mentioned that stones can have different composition or causes. Less than 30% referenced consultation with a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) or that dietary approaches to stone prevention are optimally individualized. Only 9 summaries recommended urologic follow up. CONCLUSIONS: Many ED discharge materials contain DRs for stone prevention. These recommendations can be inaccurate and/or inappropriate. Advice on diet and stone prevention is more appropriately addressed in the outpatient setting when more data (stone composition, serum and urine parameters) and expert consultants are available.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Cálculos Renales/prevención & control , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/normas , Calcio/administración & dosificación , Dieta , Proteínas en la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Dietética , Ingestión de Líquidos , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/terapia , Oxalatos/administración & dosificación , Alta del Paciente , Derivación y ConsultaRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to assess the prostate cancer screening practices of Vermont primary care physicians and compare them with a prior study in 2001. An electronic survey was created and emailed to all currently practicing primary care physicians in Vermont. Data was stratified by practice length, practice location, university affiliation, and internal medicine versus family practice. Surveys were received from 123 (27.2%) primary care physicians. 27.7% of physicians in practice <10 years recommended prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing, compared with 55.9% of those practicing ≥10 years (p = 0.006). Of those who modified their recommendations in the past 5 years, 96.1% reported that the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2012 statement influenced them. Respondents who continued to use PSA testing were less likely to stop screening after age 80 compared with those surveyed in 2001 (51% in 2014 vs. 74% in 2001; p <0.001). Primary care physicians in practice for 10 or more years were more likely to recommend PSA-based screening than those in practice for less time. The USPSTF statement discouraging PSA-based screening for prostate cancer has had significant penetrance among Vermont primary care physicians.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Masculino , Salud del Hombre , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , VermontRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Recent reports support renal ultrasound as the initial imaging study to evaluate patients with suspected renal colic. However, urologists often advocate for computerized tomography to better define stone size and location, especially before proceeding with endourological intervention. One concern with using ultrasound as initial imaging is that computerized tomography may be required later, obviating the reduction in costs and radiation gained by using ultrasound. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the electronic health records of 10,680 episodes of stone disease in a total of 7,659 patients who presented to the emergency department or walk-in clinic with a chief complaint or visit diagnosis of urolithiasis from 2009 to 2015 at a single institution. Images obtained during the index encounter and in the following 90 days were recorded. RESULTS: The index encounter included computerized tomography in 47% of episodes, ultrasound in 20%, plain x-ray of the kidneys, ureters and bladder in 12% and no imaging in 29%. Of the index visits 49% included multiple testing. If no computerized tomography was obtained during the index visit, 10% of patients underwent computerized tomography later in the episode. Total imaging costs and radiation exposure during 90 days were significantly higher when computerized tomography was done at the index visit. If the initial image obtained during an episode was ultrasound, computerized tomography was performed in 20% of cases within 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Of patients who underwent an initial ultrasound 80% avoided computerized tomography imaging. Avoiding computerized tomography at the index visit was associated with substantial reductions in radiation exposure and imaging costs.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Exposición a la Radiación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/economía , Ultrasonografía/economíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: To identify factors associated with stone composition in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent PCNL at two academic institutions between 2002 and 2014. Stone composition, stone characteristics based on non-contrast computer tomography (NCCT), patient demographics, and the S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry scores were compared. Stones were characterized as either infection or metabolic. Metabolic stones were classified as calcium phosphate-containing and all others. RESULTS: A total of 192 renal units underwent PCNL. Retrieved stones were found to be 75% (144) metabolic and 25% (48) infection by stone analysis. Of the metabolic stones, 51% (73) were phosphate-containing calculi. Overall, infection stones were found to have a significantly higher S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry score than metabolic stones (9.2 versus 8.1, p < 0.001). Average Hounsfield units (HU) were significantly lower in infection stones (765 versus 899, p < 0.05). Sixty-three percent of patients with infection stones were female as compared to 46% of patients with metabolic stones. Patients with phosphate-containing stones in the metabolic group were significantly more likely to be female (56% versus 35%, p < 0.01), younger (mean 49 versus 60 years of age, p < 0.02), and have lower BMI's (30 versus 32, p < 0.02) compared with other metabolic stones. CONCLUSIONS: Patient demographics including age, sex and BMI differ between patients with phosphate and non-phosphate containing metabolic stones. Higher S.T.O.N.E nephrolithometry scores were found in infection stones. These findings may serve as useful tools in the identification of stone compositions that are being seen more frequently in large and complicated stones undergoing PCNL.
Asunto(s)
Fosfatos de Calcio/análisis , Cálculos Renales/química , Cálculos Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Infecciones/complicaciones , Cálculos Renales/clasificación , Cálculos Renales/etiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrostomía Percutánea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores SexualesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Renal ultrasound accurately identifies hydronephrosis but it is less sensitive than computerized tomography for the detection of ureterolithiasis. We investigated whether the presence of hydronephrosis on ultrasound was associated with a ureteral stone in patients who underwent both ultrasound and computerized tomography during the evaluation of acute renal colic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients from 3 institutions who were evaluated for acute renal colic by both ultrasound and computerized tomography between 2012 and 2015. Patients were included in analysis if ultrasound and computerized tomography were performed on the same day. The presence of ureterolithiasis, stone location and hydronephrosis was reviewed and compared between imaging modalities. RESULTS: Ureteral stones were present in 85 of 144 patients. Ultrasound identified hydronephrosis in 89.8% of patients and a ureteral stone in 25.9%. Computerized tomography identified hydronephrosis in 91.8% of patients and a ureteral stone in 98.8%. In 75.0% of cases the presence or absence of hydronephrosis on ultrasound correctly predicted the presence or absence of a ureteral stone on computerized tomography. Hydronephrosis on ultrasound had a positive predictive value of 0.77 for the presence of a ureteral stone and a negative predictive value of 0.71 for the absence of a ureteral stone. CONCLUSIONS: Hydronephrosis on ultrasound did not accurately predict the presence or absence of a ureteral stone on computerized tomography in 25.0% of the patients in this study. Ultrasound is an important tool for evaluating hydronephrosis associated with renal colic but patients may benefit from other studies to confirm the presence or absence of ureteral stones.
Asunto(s)
Hidronefrosis/diagnóstico , Cólico Renal/diagnóstico , Ultrasonografía/métodos , Urolitiasis/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Humanos , Hidronefrosis/complicaciones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Cólico Renal/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Urolitiasis/complicacionesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We compared infection rates after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a group of patients without a history of infection or struvite calculi who received 24 hours or less of antibiotics postoperatively (ie compliance with AUA guidelines) vs a group that received 5 to 7 days of antibiotics postoperatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutive percutaneous nephrolithotomy procedures in patients without a history of urinary tract infection. Group 1 received 24 hours or less of antibiotics postoperatively and group 2 received a mean of 6 days of antibiotics postoperatively. RESULTS: A total of 52 patients in group 1 (24 hours or less of antibiotics) and 30 in group 2 (mean 6 days of antibiotics) met study inclusion criteria. In 5 group 1 patients (9.6%) fever developed within 72 hours of percutaneous nephrolithotomy but none demonstrated bacteriuria or bacteremia on cultures. No patient in group 1 was treated for urinary tract infection on postoperative days 3 to 14. In 4 group 2 patients (13.3%) fever developed within 72 hours of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A single patient showed bacteriuria (less than 10,000 cfu mixed gram-positive bacteria) on culture while no patient demonstrated bacteremia. No patient in group 2 was treated for urinary tract infection on postoperative days 3 to 14. There was no difference in stone-free rates or the need for additional procedures between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot series compliance with AUA guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis did not result in higher rates of infection than in a comparable group of 30 patients who received approximately 6 days of antibiotics postoperatively.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz , Nefrostomía Percutánea , Cuidados Posoperatorios/normas , Infecciones Urinarias/epidemiología , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos , UrologíaRESUMEN
Over the past decade, computed tomographic (CT) urography has emerged as the primary imaging modality for evaluating the urinary tract in various clinical settings, including the initial workup of hematuria. With the widespread implementation of CT urography, it is critical for radiologists to understand normal ureteral anatomy and the varied appearance of pathologic ureteral conditions at CT urography. Pathologic findings at CT urography include congenital abnormalities, filling defects, dilatation, narrowing, and deviations in course. These abnormalities are reviewed, along with the indications for CT urography, current imaging protocols with specific techniques for optimal evaluation of the ureter, and dose reduction strategies.
Asunto(s)
Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Uréter/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Ureterales/diagnóstico por imagen , Urografía/métodos , Medios de Contraste , Humanos , Dosis de RadiaciónRESUMEN
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard treatment for patients with large stone burdens, but can be associated with significant complications. Flexible ureteroscopy is an alternative approach that is less invasive, but often requires multiple procedures. Typically, many factors play a role in the decision to perform PCNL or ureteroscopy. The challenge is that it is difficult to predict which stone burdens will be able to be cleared ureteroscopically. We describe our approach using initial prone ureteroscopy with the transition to standard prone PCNL if required.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales/patología , Cálculos Renales/terapia , Ureteroscopía/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Litotripsia por Láser , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrostomía Percutánea , Posicionamiento del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the duration of antibiotic treatment and timing between urgent renal decompression and stone intervention impacts the risk of developing urosepsis following definitive stone treatment. MATERIALS & METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who were diagnosed with obstructive urolithiasis and underwent urgent decompression with a ureteral double J stent or percutaneous nephrostomy at our institution between 2012 and 2018 was performed. We narrowed our analysis to the subset of patients who had suspected infection and received definitive stone treatment at our institution. Demographic, infection and antimicrobial data, and initial admission to stone treatment characteristics were collected. Factors associated with developing urosepsis were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 872 patients who were treated with urgent renal decompression, of which 215 were analyzed that had suspected infection and also received definitive stone removal at our institution. Thirty-three had fevers, 64.2% had a positive urine culture, and 45.6% had urosepsis at the initial presentation. The median antibiotics duration post decompression was 13 days (IQR 8-18). The median duration from decompression to stone treatment was 17 days (IQR 12-27). Of all, 4.6% of the patients developed urosepsis post ureteroscopy and 5% post percutaneous nephrolithotomy. No factors were associated with developing urosepsis post stone treatment on logistic regression analyses. CONCLUSION: In patients requiring urgent decompression for obstructing urolithiasis and suspected infection, the time between decompression and stone treatment and the length of antibiotic exposure did not impact rates of postoperative urosepsis. This highlights the importance of maintaining high clinical suspicion for prolonged use of antibiotics, to prevent overtreatment and possible exacerbation of antibiotic resistance.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Nefrolitotomía Percutánea , Sepsis , Cálculos Ureterales , Infecciones Urinarias , Urolitiasis , Humanos , Cálculos Ureterales/complicaciones , Cálculos Ureterales/cirugía , Cálculos Ureterales/tratamiento farmacológico , Urolitiasis/complicaciones , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Urinarias/complicaciones , Infecciones Urinarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Ureteroscopía , Sepsis/etiología , Descompresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cálculos Renales/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient reported measures in patients undergoing endourologic procedures and robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) to demonstrate the efficacy of non-opioid postoperative pain management strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective cohort study performed at an academic medical center included a patient telephone questionnaire and chart review. Opioid prescriptions, opioid use, and patient reported outcomes were recorded. Bivariate analyses were used to compare patients who did and did not use opioids in the RARP cohort while overall trends were reported for the endourologic procedures. RESULTS: Of the 68 patients undergoing endoscopic intervention, 14 (21%) were prescribed an opioid and 6 (9%) reported any opioid use. 58 (85%) reported their pain was very well or well controlled while 9 reported their pain was poorly controlled. 59 (87%) were satisfied or very satisfied with their pain control. Fifty-three (93%) of the 57 patients undergoing RARP received an opioid prescription and only 23 reported any opioid use. All but 1 patient reported that their pain was well or very well controlled and almost all (54) of the patients were satisfied with their level of pain control. 36 (63%) reported their pain was less than expected while only 7 (12%) reported it was more than expected. CONCLUSION: Most patients undergoing endourologic procedures do not use postoperative opioids and report favorable outcomes regarding their pain control. Similarly, after RARP, most patients do not use opioids even when they are prescribed and are satisfied with their pain control.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Masculino , Humanos , Satisfacción del Paciente , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/etiología , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: While urological complaints increase in aging populations and conditions commonly require management by multiple physician specialty types, exposure to formal urological education in United States medical schools is limited and has been decreasing over time. We aim to update the current status of urological education in the United States curriculum and delve further into the subject matter being taught and the type and timing of this education. METHODS: An 11-question survey was developed to describe the current status of urological education. The survey was distributed using Survey Monkey to the American Urological Association's medical student listserv in November 2021. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize survey findings. RESULTS: Of 879 invitations sent, 173 responded (20%). Most (112/173, 65%) of respondents were in their fourth year. Only 4 (2%) reported that their school had a required clinical urology rotation. Kidney stones (98%) and urinary tract infections (100%) were the most frequent topics taught. The least exposure included infertility (20%), urological emergencies (19%), bladder drainage (17%), and erectile dysfunction (13%). Videos and case vignettes were the preferred learning modalities and the majority (84%) of respondents were familiar with the American Urological Association's medical student curriculum material. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of United States medical schools do not have a required clinical urology rotation and some core urological topics are not taught at all. Future incorporation of urological educational material through video and case vignette learning may be the best opportunity to provide exposure to clinical topics that will commonly be encountered regardless of chosen medical discipline.
RESUMEN
Background: The odds of nephrolithiasis increase with more metabolic syndrome (MetS) traits. We evaluated associations of metabolic and dietary factors from urine studies and stone composition with MetS traits in a large cohort of stone-forming patients. Methods: Patients >18 years old who were evaluated for stones with 24-hour urine collections between July 2009 and December 2018 had their records reviewed retrospectively. Patient factors, laboratory values, and diagnoses were identified within 6 months of urine collection and stone composition within 1 year. Four groups with none, one, two, and three or four MetS traits (hypertension, obesity, dyslipidemia, and diabetes) were evaluated. Trends across groups were tested using linear contrasts in analysis of variance and analysis of covariance. Results: A total of 1473 patients met the inclusion criteria (835 with stone composition). MetS groups were 684 with no traits, 425 with one trait, 211 with two traits, and 153 with three or four traits. There were no differences among groups for urine volume, calcium, or ammonium excretion. There was a significant trend (P<0.001) for more MetS traits being associated with decreasing urine pH, increasing age, calculated dietary protein, urine uric acid (UA), oxalate, citrate, titratable acid phosphate, net acid excretion, and UA supersaturation. The ratio of ammonium to net acid excretion did not differ among the groups. After adjustment for protein intake, the fall in urine pH remained strong, while the upward trend in acid excretion was lost. Calcium oxalate stones were most common, but there was a trend for more UA (P<0.001) and fewer calcium phosphate (P=0.09) and calcium oxalate stones (P=0.01) with more MetS traits. Conclusions: Stone-forming patients with MetS have a defined pattern of metabolic and dietary risk factors that contribute to an increased risk of stone formation, including higher acid excretion, largely the result of greater protein intake, and lower urine pH.
Asunto(s)
Cálculos Renales , Síndrome Metabólico , Adolescente , Citratos/orina , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/epidemiología , Síndrome Metabólico/epidemiología , Oxalatos/orina , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
In recent years, the use of opioids in medical practice has come under significant scrutiny. This, in part, is owing to evidence of overprescription and overuse of opioid medications, as well as the unintended consequences and side effects for patients who take these medications. Here, we review the role of opioids and the responsible use of these medications with respect to kidney stone disease and surgical interventions for kidney stones.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Cálculos Renales , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Humanos , Cálculos Renales/inducido químicamente , Resultado del Tratamiento , UreteroscopíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To explore how laboratories in the United States (U.S.) report red blood cell per high powered field (RBC/HPF) counts on urinalysis and to evaluate whether this methodology permits effective risk stratification in accordance with the 2020 AUA/SUFU microhematuria guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reporting methods for RBC/HPF counts (ranges, or actual counts) were collected by querying urologists in U.S. academic medical institutions or commercial laboratories. We explore whether (1) the reporting schemes were concordant with the risk strata in the new microhematuria guideline (3-10 [low risk], 11-25 [intermediate risk], and more than 25 [high risk]), and (2) evaluate the potential for risk group misclassification based on reporting methodology. RESULTS: Data were available for 141 laboratories. Seventy-two (51%) use RBC/HPF ranges, while the remainder use actual counts (or counts to a threshold). Sixty (42%) report range cutoffs which are not concordant with the microhematuria guidelines risk groups. Furthermore, fifty-six (40%) do not include the cutoff of 25 RBC/HPF which could potentially misclassify intermediate and high risk groups. Finally, sixteen (11%) do not include the cut-off of 3 RBC/HPF that defines the presence of microhematuria. CONCLUSION: A significant number of laboratories report RBC/HPF counts in ranges that differ from thresholds in the 2020 AUA/SUFU guideline. The implication is potential misclassification of microhematuria both at minimum threshold diagnosis (3 RBC/HPF), and additionally between intermediate and high risk groups. Standardization of reporting schemes to actual RBC/HPF counts may allow improved adherence to guidelines while providing data for future guideline development.
Asunto(s)
Hematuria/orina , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Urinálisis/normas , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/normas , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Sociedades Médicas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , UrologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Concern regarding radiation exposure has led to increased interest in the use of ultrasound for the initial imaging of suspected renal colic in the emergency department. It is unknown whether such an approach simply defers computerized tomography to outpatient followup. We analyzed national imaging patterns to explore this relationship. METHODS: Using the MarketScan® insurance claims database we reviewed adult patients newly diagnosed with nephrolithiasis in U.S. emergency departments between 2007 and 2015. Patients were excluded if they had been diagnosed with or undergone treatment for nephrolithiasis in the preceding 180 days. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2015, 830,785 emergency department nephrolithiasis encounters met inclusion criteria. The ultrasound-only rate increased from 2.7% to 6.9%, while the computerized tomography-only rate remained stable at 85.8%. A history of computerized tomography in the 30 days before emergency department presentation increased the rate of ultrasound-only imaging from 4.6% to 8.9%. The mean cumulative computerized tomography scans from the emergency department visit to 90 days after was significantly lower in those imaged with emergency department ultrasound (0.82±0.77) compared to those imaged with emergency department computerized tomography (1.2±0.51, p <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo ultrasonography in the emergency department for evaluation of renal colic undergo fewer cumulative computerized tomography scans in the 90 days following their visit than do patients initially imaged with computerized tomography. Ultrasound use for the evaluation of renal colic has increased while computerized tomography rates have remained stable.