Chorioamniotic membrane separation (CMS) after fetal spina bifida repair: Impact of CMS size and patient management.

INTRODUCTION: Chorioamniotic membrane separation (CMS) is a known complication after fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair. This study's goal was to analyze women's outcomes with open fSB repair and CMS (group A) compared to the ones without (group B) and to assess the influence of CMS size and patient management. METHODS: 194 women with open fSB repair at our center were included in this retrospective study. Outcomes of group A were compared to the ones of group B. Regression analysis was performed to assess risk factors for CMS. Two subgroup analyses assessed the impact of CMS size (local (A-local) vs. global (A-global)) as well as patient management (A1 = hospitalization vs. A2= no hospitalization) on pregnancy outcomes. RESULTS: Of 194 women, 23 (11.9%) were in group A, and 171 (88.1%) in group B. Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) (69.6% vs. 24.1%, p = <0.001), amniotic infection syndrome (AIS) (22.7% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.03), histologically confirmed chorioamnionitis (hCA) (40.0% vs. 14.7%, p = 0.03), length of hospital stay (LOS) after fSB repair (35 (19-65) vs. 17 (14-27) days), and overall LOS (43 (33-71) vs. 35 (27-46) days, p = 0.004) were significantly more often/longer in group A. Gestational age (GA) at delivery was significantly lower in group A compared to group B (35.3 (32.3-36.3) vs. 36.7 (34.9-37.0) weeks, p = 0.006). Regression analysis did not identify risk factors for CMS. Subgroup analysis comparing CMS sized in group A-local vs. A global showed: higher AIS rate (42% vs. 0%, p = 0.04), lower LOS (22.0 (15.5-42.5) vs. 59.6 ± 24.1, p = 0.003). Comparison of group A1 vs. A2 showed: longer LOS (49.3 ± 22.8 vs. 15 (15-17.5) days, p <0.001), lower planned readmission rate (5.6% vs. 80%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: CMS significantly increased the risk of PPROM, AIS, hCA, caused longer LOS, and lower GA at delivery. Women with local CMS had higher AIS rates but shorter LOS compared to women with global CMS, while apart from LOS pregnancy outcomes did not differ regarding patient management (hospitalization after CMS yes vs. no).

Fetal Spina Bifida Repair in Obese Mothers: Is Maternal and Fetal Safety Compromised?

INTRODUCTION: The Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) eligibility criteria preclude in utero surgery for fetal spina bifida (fSB) when the maternal body mass index (BMI) is ≥35 kg/m2. Some centers still respect this criterion, while others, like ours, do not. This study aimed to assess whether maternal and fetal safety is compromised with higher maternal BMIs. METHODS: Data of 192 patients with open fSB repair at our center were retrospectively analyzed. According to their BMI, patients were divided into three groups: group 1 (BMI <30 kg/m2), group 2 (BMI 30-35 kg/m2), and group 3 (BMI >35 kg/m2). Subgroup analysis was performed to assess differences in maternal and fetal outcomes. Additionally, complications were divided into grades 1 to 5 according to their severity and outcome consequences and compared among groups. RESULTS: Out of 192 patients, 146 (76.0%) had a BMI <30 kg/m2, 28 (14.6%) had a BMI 30-35 kg/m2, and 18 (9.4%) had a BMI >35 kg/m2. Significant differences occurring more often in either group 2 or 3 compared to group 1 were maternal wound seroma (50% or 56% vs. 32%, p = 0.04), amniotic fluid leakage (14% or 6% vs. 2%, p = 0.01) as well as vaginal bleeding (11% or 35% vs. 9%, p = 0.01). On the contrary, duration of tocolysis with atosiban was shorter in patients with BMI >30 kg/m2 (4 or 5 vs. 6 days, p = 0.01). When comparing severity of maternal or fetal complications, grade 1 intervention-related complications occurred significantly more often in group 3 compared to group 1 or 2 (78% vs. 45% or 57%, p = 0.02). Gestational age at delivery was around 36 weeks in all groups without significant differences. CONCLUSION: This investigation did not identify clinically relevant maternal and/or fetal outcome problems related to BMIs >35 kg/m2. Additional studies are however needed to confirm our results.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair.

INTRODUCTION: For open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair, a maternal laparotomy is required. Hence, enhanced maternal recovery after surgery (ERAS) is paramount. A revision of our ERAS protocol was made, including changes in operative techniques and postoperative pain management. This study investigates eventual benefits. METHODS: Our study included 111 women with open fSB repair at our center. The old protocol group (group 1) either received a transverse incision of the fascia with transection of the rectus abdominis muscle (RAM) or a longitudinal incision of the fascia without RAM transection, depending on placental location. The new protocol required longitudinal incisions in all patients (group 2). Postoperative pain management was changed from tramadol to oxycodone/naloxone. Outcomes of the two different protocol groups were analyzed and compared regarding the primary endpoint, the length of hospital stay (LOS) after fetal surgery, as well as regarding the following secondary endpoints: postoperative pain scores, day of first mobilization, removal of urinary catheter, bowel movement, and the occurrence of maternal and fetal complications. RESULTS: Out of 111 women, 82 (73.9%) were in group 1 and 29 (26.1%) were in group 2. Women in group 2 showed a significantly shorter LOS (18 [14-23] days vs. 27 [18-39] days, p = 0.002), duration until mobilization (3 [2-3] days vs. 3 [3-4] days, p = 0.03), and removal of urinary catheter (day 3 [3-3] vs. day 4 [3-4], p = 0.004). Group 2 less often received morphine subcutaneously (0% vs. 35.4%, p < 0.001) or intravenously (0% vs. 17.1%, p = 0.02) but more often oxycodone (69.0% vs. 18.3%, p < 0.001). No significant differences were seen regarding pain scores, bowel movement, and maternal and/or fetal complications. CONCLUSION: The new ERAS protocol that combined changes in surgical technique and pain medication led to better outcomes while reducing LOS. Continuous revisions of current ERAS protocols are essential to improve patient care continuously.

Middle Cerebral Artery Doppler before and after Fetal Spina Bifida Repair: An Indirect Sign of Hindbrain Compression and Decompression?

INTRODUCTION: Reduced middle cerebral artery resistance indices (MCA-RI) in fetuses with spina bifida (fSB) are commonly observed. Compression of neuronal pathways in the brainstem due to hindbrain herniation (HH) and disturbed cerebrospinal fluid circulation likely cause an imbalance of the autonomic nervous system. This may increase systemic vasoconstriction and compensatory increase cerebral vasodilation (like brain sparing). The aim of this study was to systematically analyze all fetal MCA-RI before and after fSB repair and to compare their correlation with the presence and postsurgical resolution of HH. METHODS: 173 patients were included. Standardized ultrasound examinations including MCA and umbilical artery (UA) Doppler as well as assessment of HH presence and regression were performed. Fetuses with MCA-RI <5th percentile (P) before fetal surgery were compared to the group with normal MCA-RI and correlated to the presence of HH before and its regression after fSB repair. RESULTS: 30% (49/161) fetuses showed RI's <5th P before fSB repair. All fetuses had normal UA-RI. 99.4% of fetuses (160/161) showed normal of MCA-RI before delivery. Normalization occurred within a mean of 1.3 ± 1.2 weeks. HH regression was observed in 97% in the group with normal MCA-RI and in 96% in the group with MCA-RI <5th P before surgery (p = 0.59). Time lapse to HH regression after fSB repair was 1.8 ± 1.7 and 1.9 ± 1.6 weeks, respectively. CONCLUSION: In fetuses with MCA-RIs <5 P before fSB repair, a parallel timely course of MCA-RI normalization and HH regression was noted. To suggest common pathogenic factor(s), more studies are needed. However, normalization of the fetal cerebral circulation could be a further benefit of fSB repair.

Pain Scores after Open Fetal Spina Bifida Repair and Caesarean Section: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

INTRODUCTION: In fetal surgery, successful pain management is crucial for postoperative mobilization, prophylaxis of contractions, and fast recovery. This study analyzed patient's pain experience after open fetal spina bifida (fSB) repair in comparison to pain scores after the subsequent Caesarean section (C-section). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected with a questionnaire given to 91 women, who had fSB repair and then C-section at our center between 2019 and 2022. It comprised 12 questions covering different aspects of pain experience and satisfaction with pain therapy and was answered by 67 women after fSB repair and 53 after C-section. Postoperative pain was rated on a Likert scale from 0 (slight/rarely) to 100 (strongest/always). Outcomes after fSB repair were compared to those after C-section. Additionally, subgroup analysis compared outcomes of women with different pain levels (group 1-5) after fSB repair. RESULTS: Compared to women after C-section women after fSB repair reported significantly higher maximum pain scores (MPS) (p = 0.03), higher sleep disturbance due to pain (p = 0.03), and sedation rates (p = 0.001) as side effect from pain therapy. No differences were found regarding feelings of insecurity (p = 0.20) or helplessness (p = 0.40), as well as involvement in (p = 0.3) and satisfaction with pain therapy (p = 0.5). Subgroup analysis revealed that women with higher MPS after fSB repair were significantly more often non-Caucasians (p = 0.003) and more often affected by pain while lying in bed (p = 0.007) and during mobilization (p = 0.005). Additionally, they reported higher rates of dizziness (p = 0.02) and lower satisfaction rates with pain therapy (p = 0.03). Postoperative complication rate did not differ among groups. CONCLUSION: Although women after fSB repair reported higher MPS compared to after C-section, the current pain management was generally perceived as satisfactory.