RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: GLP-1 RA (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists), including semaglutide, may reduce stroke risk in people with type 2 diabetes. This post hoc analysis examined the subcutaneous and oral semaglutide effects, versus placebo, on stroke and its subtypes in people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. METHODS: SUSTAIN 6 (Trial to Evaluate Cardiovascular and Other Long-Term Outcomes With Semaglutide in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes) and PIONEER 6 (Peptide Innovation for Early Diabetes Treatment) were randomized cardiovascular outcome trials of subcutaneous and oral semaglutide in people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, respectively. Time to first stroke and stroke subtypes were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model stratified by trial with pooled treatment as a factor. The impact of prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction or stroke, age, sex, systolic blood pressure, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and prior atrial fibrillation on treatment effects was assessed using interaction P values. Risk of major adverse cardiovascular event was analyzed according to prior stroke. RESULTS: A total of 106/6480 participants had a stroke (1.0 event/100 patient-years of observation [PYO]). Semaglutide reduced incidence of any stroke versus placebo (0.8 versus 1.1 events/100 PYO; hazard ratio, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.46-1.00]; P=0.048), driven by significant reductions in risk of small-vessel occlusion (0.3 versus 0.7 events/100 PYO; hazard ratio, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.29-0.89]; P=0.017). Hazard ratios for risk of any stroke with semaglutide versus placebo were 0.60 (95% CI, 0.37-0.99; 0.5 versus 0.9 events/100 PYO) and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.47-1.69; 2.7 versus 3.0 events/100 PYO) in those without and with prior stroke, respectively. Except for prior atrial fibrillation (Pinteraction=0.025), no significant interactions were observed between treatment effects on risk of any stroke and subgroups investigated, or between treatment effects on risk of major adverse cardiovascular event and prior stroke (Pinteraction >0.05 for all). CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide reduced incidence of any first stroke during the trials versus placebo in people with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk, primarily driven by small-vessel occlusion prevention. Semaglutide treatment, versus placebo, lowered the risk of stroke irrespective of prior stroke at baseline. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov; Unique identifier: NCT01720446 and NCT02692716.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/efectos adversos , Péptidos Similares al Glucagón/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Timely reperfusion with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains the gold standard in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), limiting infarct size, preserving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and improving clinical outcomes. Despite this, a significant proportion of STEMI patients develop post-infarct heart failure. We review the current understanding and up-to-date evidence base for therapeutic intervention of ischaemia-reperfusion injury (IRI), a combination of myocardial ischaemia secondary to acute coronary occlusion and reperfusion injury leading to further myocardial injury and cell death. Multiple treatment modalities have been shown to be cardioprotective and reduce IRI in experimental animal models. Recent phase II/III randomised controlled trials (RCT) have assessed multiple cardioprotective strategies ranging from ischaemic conditioning, therapeutic hypothermia and hyperoxaemia to pharmacological therapies. While several therapies have been shown to reduce infarct size in animal models or proof-of-concept studies, many larger scale trial results have proven inconsistent and disappointing. Hard clinical outcomes remain elusive. We discuss potential reasons for the difficulties in translation to clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Oclusión Coronaria , Infarto del Miocardio , Daño por Reperfusión Miocárdica , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST , Animales , Humanos , Daño por Reperfusión Miocárdica/etiología , Daño por Reperfusión Miocárdica/prevención & control , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio con Elevación del ST/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Although cardiovascular disease is the biggest cause of death in people with diabetes, microvascular complications have a significant impact on quality of life and financial burden of the disease. Little is known about the progression of microvascular dysfunction in the early stages of type 2 diabetes before the occurrence of clinically apparent complications. We aimed to explore the determinants of endothelial-dependent and -independent microvascular function progression over a 3 year period, in people with and without both diabetes and few clinical microvascular complications. METHODS: Demographics were collected in 154 participants with type 2 diabetes and in a further 99 participants without type 2 diabetes. Skin microvascular endothelium-dependent response to iontophoresis of acetylcholine and endothelium-independent responses to sodium nitroprusside were measured using laser Doppler fluximetry. All assessments were repeated 3 years later. RESULTS: People with type 2 diabetes had impaired endothelial-dependent microvascular response compared with those without (AUC 93.9 [95% CI 88.1, 99.4] vs 111.9 [102.3, 121.4] arbitrary units [AU] × min, p < 0.001, for those with vs without diabetes, respectively). Similarly, endothelial-independent responses were attenuated in those with diabetes (63.2 [59.2, 67.2] vs 75.1 [67.8, 82.4] AU × min, respectively, p = 0.002). Mean microvascular function declined over 3 years in both groups to a similar degree (pinteraction 0.74 for response to acetylcholine and 0.69 for response to sodium nitroprusside). In those with diabetes, use of sulfonylurea was associated with greater decline (p = 0.022 after adjustment for co-prescriptions, change in HbA1c and weight), whereas improving glycaemic control was associated with less decline of endothelial-dependent microvascular function (p = 0.03). Otherwise, the determinants of microvascular decline were similar in those with and without diabetes. The principal determinant of change in microvascular function in the whole population was weight change over 3 years, such that those that lost ≥5% weight had very little decline in either endothelial-dependent or -independent function compared with those that were weight stable, whereas those who gained weight had a greater decline in function (change in endothelial-dependent function was 1.2 [95% CI -13.2, 15.7] AU × min in those who lost weight; -15.8 [-10.5, -21.0] AU × min in those with stable weight; and -37.8 [-19.4, -56.2] AU × min in those with weight gain; ptrend < 0.001). This association of weight change with change in endothelial function was driven by people with diabetes; in people without diabetes, the relationship was nonsignificant. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Over 3 years, physiological change in weight was the greatest predictor of change in microvascular function.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/uso terapéutico , Acetilcolina/farmacología , Anciano , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Endotelio Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirculación/efectos de los fármacos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitroprusiato , Calidad de Vida , Vasodilatación/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: in chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension is associated with poor outcomes at ages <70 years. At older ages, this association is unclear. We tested 10-year mortality and cardiovascular outcomes by clinical systolic blood pressure (SBP) in older CKD Stages 3 and 4 patients without diabetes or proteinuria. METHODS: retrospective cohort in population representative primary care electronic medical records linked to hospital data from the UK. CKD staged by CKD-EPI equation (≥2 creatinine measurements ≥90 days apart). SBPs were 3-year medians before baseline, with mean follow-up 5.7 years. Cox competing models accounted for mortality. RESULTS: about 158,713 subjects with CKD3 and 6,611 with CKD4 met inclusion criteria. Mortality increased with increasing CKD stage in all subjects aged >60. In the 70 plus group with SBPs 140-169 mmHg, there was no increase in mortality, versus SBP 130-139. Similarly, SBPs 140-169 mmHg were not associated with increased incident heart failure, stroke or myocardial infarctions. SBPs <120 mmHg were associated with increased mortality and cardiovascular risk. At ages 60-69, there was increased mortality at SBP <120 and SBP >150 mmHg.Results were little altered after excluding those with declining SBPs during 5 years before baseline, or for longer-term outcomes (5-10 years after baseline). CONCLUSIONS: in older primary care patients, CKD3 or 4 was the dominant outcome predictor. SBP 140-169 mmHg having little additional predictive value, <120 mmHg was associated with increased mortality. Prospective studies of representative older adults with CKD are required to establish optimum BP targets.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Presión Sanguínea , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/mortalidad , Masculino , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to determine whether random non-fasting C-peptide (rCP) measurement can be used to assess hypoglycaemia risk in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We compared continuous glucose monitoring-assessed SD of blood glucose and hypoglycaemia duration in 17 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and severe insulin deficiency (rCP < 200 pmol/l) and 17 matched insulin-treated control patients with type 2 diabetes but who had preserved endogenous insulin (rCP > 600 pmol/l). We then assessed the relationship between rCP and questionnaire-based measures of hypoglycaemia in 256 patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and a comparison group of 209 individuals with type 1 diabetes. RESULTS: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM)-assessed glucose variability and hypoglycaemia was greater in individuals with rCP < 200 pmol/l despite similar mean glucose. In those with low vs high C-peptide, SD of glucose was 4.2 (95% CI 3.7, 4.6) vs 3.0 (2.6, 3.4) mmol/l (p < 0.001). In the low-C-peptide vs high-C-peptide group, the proportion of individuals experiencing sustained hypoglycaemia ≤ 4 mmol/l was 94% vs 41% (p < 0.001), the mean rate of hypoglycaemia was 5.5 (4.4, 6.7) vs 2.1 (1.4, 2.9) episodes per person per week (p = 0.004) and the mean duration was 630 (619, 643) vs 223 (216, 230) min per person per week (p = 0.01). Hypoglycaemia ≤ 3 mmol/l was infrequent in individuals with preserved C-peptide (1.8 [1.2, 2.6] episodes per person per week vs 0.4 [0.1, 0.8] episodes per person per week for low vs high C-peptide, p = 0.04) and only occurred at night. In a population-based cohort with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, self-reported hypoglycaemia was twice as frequent in those with rCP < 200 pmol/l (OR 2.0, p < 0.001) and the rate of episodes resulting in loss of consciousness or seizure was five times higher (OR 5.0, p = 0.001). The relationship between self-reported hypoglycaemia and C-peptide was similar in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Low rCP is associated with increased glucose variability and hypoglycaemia in patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes and represents a practical, stable and inexpensive biomarker for assessment of hypoglycaemia risk.
Asunto(s)
Péptido C/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Hipoglucemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemia/metabolismo , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Péptido C/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/sangre , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , MasculinoRESUMEN
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of mortality in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet a significant proportion of the disease burden cannot be accounted for by conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertension occurs in majority of people with T2DM, which is substantially more frequent than would be anticipated based on general population samples. The impact of hypertension is considerably higher in people with diabetes than it is in the general population, suggesting either an increased sensitivity to its effect or a confounding underlying aetiopathogenic mechanism of hypertension associated with CVD within diabetes. In this contribution, we aim to review the changes observed in the vascular tree in people with T2DM compared to the general population, the effects of established anti-diabetes drugs on microvascular outcomes, and explore the hypotheses to account for common causalities of the increased prevalence of CVD and hypertension in people with T2DM.
Asunto(s)
Sistema Cardiovascular/fisiopatología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Microcirculación , Animales , Sistema Cardiovascular/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Cardiovascular/patología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Angiopatías Diabéticas/epidemiología , Angiopatías Diabéticas/prevención & control , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Hipertensión/prevención & control , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Microcirculación/efectos de los fármacos , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Guidelines suggest setting individualised targets for glycaemic control in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes, despite no evidence. We aimed to assess the feasibility of setting and achieving individualised targets over 24 weeks along with conventional HbA1c reduction using vildagliptin versus placebo. METHODS: In this multinational, double-blind, 24 week study, we enrolled drug-naive or inadequately controlled (glycosylated haemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] ≥7·0% to ≤10·0%) patients with type 2 diabetes aged 70 years or older from 45 outpatient centres in Europe. Investigators set individualised treatment targets on the basis of age, baseline HbA1c, comorbidities, and frailty status before a validated automated system randomly assigned patients (1:1) to vildagliptin (50 mg once or twice daily as per label) or placebo. Coprimary efficacy endpoints were proportion of patients reaching their investigator-defined HbA1c target and HbA1c reduction from baseline to study end. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01257451, and European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials database, number 2010-022658-18. FINDINGS: Between Dec 22, 2010, and March 14, 2012, we randomly assigned 139 patients each to the vildagliptin and placebo groups. 37 (27%) of 137 patients in the placebo group achieved their individualised targets by education and interactions with the study team alone and 72 (52·6%) of 137 patients achieved their target in the vildagliptin group (adjusted odds ratio 3·16, 96·2% CI 1·81-5·52; p<0·0001). This finding was accompanied by a clinically relevant 0·9% reduction in HbA1c from a baseline of 7·9% with vildagliptin and a between-group difference of -0·6% (98·8% CI -0·81 to -0·33; p<0·0001). The overall safety and tolerability was similar in the vildagliptin and placebo groups, with low incidence of hypoglycaemia and no emergence of new safety signals. INTERPRETATION: This study is the first to introduce and show the feasibility of using individualised HbA1c targets as an endpoint in any type 2 diabetes population. Individualised glycaemic target levels are achievable with vildagliptin without any tolerability issues in the elderly type 2 diabetes population. FUNDING: Novartis Pharma AG.
Asunto(s)
Adamantano/análogos & derivados , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Pirrolidinas/administración & dosificación , Adamantano/administración & dosificación , Adamantano/efectos adversos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Masculino , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Medicina de Precisión , Pirrolidinas/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , VildagliptinaRESUMEN
The UK Research Excellence Framework (REF) is an assessment of the quality of research carried out in UK Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), performed in 7-year cycles. The outcome impacts the rankings and funding of UK HEIs, which afford the exercise high priority. Much of what REF measures is known to be biased against academics with protected characteristics: for example, women and ethnic minority researchers are less likely to win grants or be published in prestigious journals. Despite changes to REF since 2014, the risk remains that the process might amplify well-recognised existing disparities. The BMA Women in Academic Medicine and Medical Academic Staff Committee carried out a survey of UK clinical academics' experiences of REF2021. The data indicated the persistence of activities previously characterised as 'extremely harmful' in Research England-commissioned work, affecting up to 10% of clinical academics. While acknowledging the limitations of the data, women appeared to be disproportionately affected.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Grupos Minoritarios , Humanos , Femenino , Inglaterra , Ejercicio Físico , Cuerpo MédicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The delivery of COVID-19 vaccines was successful in reducing hospitalizations and mortality. However, emergence of the Omicron variant resulted in increased virus transmissibility. Consequently, booster vaccination programs were initiated to decrease the risk of severe disease and death among vulnerable members of the population. This study aimed to estimate the effects of the booster program and alternative vaccination strategies on morbidity and mortality due to COVID-19 in the UK. METHOD: A Susceptible-Exposed-Infectious-Recovered (SEIR) model was used to assess the impact of several vaccination strategies on severe outcomes associated with COVID-19, including hospitalizations, mortality, National Health Service (NHS) capacity quantified by hospital general ward and intensive care unit (ICU) bed days, and patient productivity. The model accounted for age-, risk- and immunity-based stratification of the UK population. Outcomes were evaluated over a 48-week time horizon from September 2022 to August 2023 considering the actual UK autumn 2022/spring 2023 booster campaigns and six counterfactual strategies. RESULTS: The model estimated that the autumn 2022/spring 2023 booster campaign resulted in a reduction of 18,921 hospitalizations and 1463 deaths, compared with a no booster scenario. Utilization of hospital bed days due to COVID-19 decreased after the autumn 2022/spring 2023 booster campaign. Expanding the booster eligibility criteria and improving uptake improved all outcomes, including averting twice as many ICU admissions, preventing more than 20% additional deaths, and a sevenfold reduction in long COVID, compared with the autumn 2022/spring 2023 booster campaign. The number of productive days lost was reduced by fivefold indicating that vaccinating a wider population has a beneficial impact on the morbidities associated with COVID-19. CONCLUSION: Our modelling demonstrates that the autumn 2022/spring 2023 booster campaign reduced COVID-19-associated morbidity and mortality. Booster campaigns with alternative eligibility criteria warrant consideration in the UK, given their potential to further reduce morbidity and mortality as future variants emerge.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Long COVID can include impaired cognition ('brain fog'; a term encompassing multiple symptoms) and mental health conditions. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate their prevalence and to explore relevant factors associated with the incidence of impaired cognition and mental health conditions. METHODS: Searches were conducted in Medline and PsycINFO to cover the start of the pandemic until August 2023. Included studies reported prevalence of mental health conditions and brain fog in adults with long COVID after clinically-diagnosed or PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. FINDINGS: 17 studies were included, reporting 41,249 long COVID patients. Across all timepoints (3-24 months), the combined prevalence of mental health conditions and brain fog was 20·4% (95% CI 11·1%-34·4%), being lower among those previously hospitalised than in community-managed patients(19·5 vs 29·7% respectively; p = 0·047). The odds of mental health conditions and brain fog increased over time and when validated instruments were used. Odds of brain fog significantly decreased with increasing vaccination rates (p = ·000). CONCLUSIONS: Given the increasing prevalence of mental health conditions and brain fog over time, preventive interventions and treatments are needed. Research is needed to explore underlying mechanisms that could inform further research in development of effective treatments. The reduced risk of brain fog associated with vaccination emphasizes the need for ongoing vaccination programs.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome Post Agudo de COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
The importance of integrated care for complex, multiple long term conditions was acknowledged before the COVID pandemic but remained a challenge. The pandemic and consequent development of Long COVID required rapid adaptation of health services to address the population's needs, requiring service redesigns including integrated care. This Delphi consensus study was conducted in the UK and found similar integrated care priorities for Long COVID and complex, multiple long term conditions, provided by 480 patients and health care providers, with an 80% consensus rate. The resultant recommendations were based on more than 1400 responses from survey participants and were supported by patients, health care professionals, and by patient charities. Participants identified the need to allocate resources to: support integrated care, provide access to care and treatments that work, provide diagnostic procedures that support the personalization of treatment in an integrated care environment, and enable structural consultation between primary and specialist care settings including physical and mental health care. Based on the findings we propose a model for delivering integrated care by a multidisciplinary team to people with complex multisystem conditions. These recommendations can inform improvements to integrated care for complex, multiple long term conditions and Long COVID at international level.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/terapia , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Masculino , Femenino , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Política de Salud , Técnica Delphi , Consenso , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , PandemiasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Refractory angina is the occurrence of clinical symptoms despite maximal therapy. We investigated associations between microvascular function, atherosclerotic burden, and clinical symptoms in subjects with CAD. METHODS: Skin microvascular response to heating and ischemia was assessed in 167 male volunteers by laser Doppler fluximetry; 82 with CAD on maximal therapy and 85 with no known CAD (noCAD). CAC scores, carotid IMT, and femoral IMT were measured and symptoms were scored using the Rose angina questionnaire. RESULTS: Patients with CAD had poorer microvascular response to heating (114[95% CI 106-122]au CAD vs. 143[134-153]au no CAD; p < 0.0001) and ischemia (42[38-46]au CAD vs. 53[78-58]au. noCAD; p = 0.001). Thirty-eight percent of the noCAD group had elevated CAC scores. There were no associations between markers of atherosclerosis and microvascular function. Forty-two percent of the CAD group had refractory angina. This was associated with impaired microvascular function compared to those with elevated CAC scores but no symptoms (109 [95-124]au vs. 131[122-140]au; p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Men with symptomatic CAD have poorer microvascular function compared to individuals without CAD. Microvascular function does not correlate with atherosclerosis, but is impaired in individuals with refractory angina. Microvascular dysfunction may play a role in the symptomatology of angina.
Asunto(s)
Angina de Pecho , Aterosclerosis , Microcirculación , Piel/irrigación sanguínea , Anciano , Angina de Pecho/sangre , Angina de Pecho/etiología , Angina de Pecho/patología , Angina de Pecho/fisiopatología , Aterosclerosis/sangre , Aterosclerosis/complicaciones , Aterosclerosis/patología , Aterosclerosis/fisiopatología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/sangre , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/patología , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piel/metabolismo , Piel/patologíaAsunto(s)
Fracturas Óseas/inducido químicamente , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/efectos adversos , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Análisis por Apareamiento , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The role of microcirculatory dysfunction is increasingly being recognized in the etiopathogenesis of cardiovascular disease. Whilst the importance of detailed mechanistic studies to determine the exact nature of these disturbances is without question, it was large-scale population-based studies that first identified the associations between deranged microvascular perfusion, autoregulation or structure, and subsequent target organ damage. This is the subject of considerable studies to establish whether there is a causal effect in either direction, or simply represents shared risk factors, although it is most likely to be a complex combination of bidirectional interactions. The techniques for investigating microcirculatory function have evolved almost exponentially over the last 75 years: So too have the strategies for investigation. Current epidemiological studies are focusing on attempting to untangle the inter-relationship between risk factors and pathological mechanisms to attempt to determine whether these represent therapeutic targets or simple markers of unmeasured risk. We plan to review the techniques used for these population-based studies, the advances made, and the clinical implications derived.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Microcirculación , Anciano , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/patología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/fisiopatología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/terapia , Humanos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a condition with increasing disease burden. Prevalence of HFpEF is increasing, reflecting an increasingly elderly and comorbid population, as well as reinforcing the need for more treatments for this disease. The pathophysiology of HFpEF is complex. Some inflammatory processes seen in HFpEF are shared with diabetes mellitus (DM) and there is an association seen between the two conditions. It is therefore no wonder that treatments for diabetes may have some effect on heart failure outcomes. Current treatment strategies in HFpEF are limited, with treatments focusing on symptom control rather than morbidity or mortality benefit. However, there are now promising results from the EMPEROR-Preserved study that show significantly reduced cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure (HHF) in patients taking empagliflozin, compared to those taking placebo. These results indicate a promising future for sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors in HFpEF. The ongoing DELIVER trial (investigating the use of dapagliflozin in HFpEF) is awaited but could provide further evidence of support for SGLT2 inhibitors in HFpEF. With hospital admissions for HFpEF increasing in the UK, the economic impact of treatments that reduce HHF is vast. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently added SGLT2 inhibitors to their guidelines for treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) following DAPA-HF and EMPEROR-Reduced trials and we suggest that similar changes be made to guidelines to support the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of HFpEF in upcoming months.
RESUMEN
As the UK, together with numerous countries in the world, moves towards a new phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need to be able to predict trends in sufficient time to limit the pressure faced by the National Health Service (NHS) and maintain low hospitalisation levels. In this study, we explore the use of an epidemiological compartmental model to devise a periodic adaptive suppression/intervention policy to alleviate the pressure on the NHS. The proposed model facilitates the understanding of the progression of the specific stages of COVID-19 in communities in the UK including: the susceptible population, the infected population, the hospitalised population, the recovered population, the deceased population, and the vaccinated population. We identify the parameters of the model by relying on past data within the period from 1 October 2020 to 1 June 2021. We use the total number of hospitalised patients and the fraction of those infected who are being admitted to hospital to develop adaptive policies: these modulate the recommended level of social restriction measures and realisable vaccination target adjustments. The analysis over the period 1 October 2020 to 1 June 2021 demonstrates our periodic adaptive policies have the potential to reduce the hospitalisation by 58% on average per month. In a further prospective analysis over the period August 2021 to May 2022, we analyse several future scenarios, characterised by the relaxation of restrictions, the vaccination ineffectiveness and the gradual decay of the vaccination-induced immunity within the population. In addition, we simulate the surge of plausible variants characterised by an higher transmission rate. In such scenarios, we show that our periodic intervention is effective and able to maintain the hospitalisation rate to a manageable level.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Modelos Epidemiológicos , Política de Salud , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Medicina Estatal , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
While glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), such as semaglutide, are among the most effective drugs for treating people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), they are clinically under-utilised. Until recently, the only route for semaglutide administration was via subcutaneous injection. However, an oral formulation of semaglutide was recently licensed, with the potential to address therapy inertia and increase patient adherence to treatment, which is essential in controlling blood glucose and reducing complications. The availability of oral semaglutide provides a new option for both clinicians and patients who are reluctant to use an injectable agent. This has been of particular importance in addressing the challenge of virtual diabetes care during the COVID-19 pandemic, circumventing the logistical problems that are often associated with subcutaneous medication administration. However, there remains limited awareness of the clinical and economic value of oral semaglutide in routine clinical practice. In this article, we present our consensus opinion on the role of oral semaglutide in routine clinical practice and discuss its value in reducing the burden of delivering diabetes care in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period of chronic disease management.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Different methods to measure carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (CFPWV) may affect the measurements obtained and influence the association between CFPWV, cardiovascular risk factors and biomarkers of subclinical vascular health. The estimation of distance between the carotid and femoral artery measurement sites (the arterial path length) is particularly problematic. METHOD: We determined if CFPWV and equation-based estimates of CFPWV were influenced by arterial path length and if this affected the association of CFPWV with cardiovascular risk factors and subclinical vascular biomarkers. The CFPWV derived from the measurement of surface distance (CFPWV-D), arterial path length formula (CFPWV-F), and estimated CFPWV (ePWV) were obtained from 489 older adults (67.2â±â8.8 years). Macrovascular [carotid artery: lumen diameter (LD), inter-adventitial diameter (IAD), intima-media thickness (IMT) and total plaque area (TPA)] and microvascular [reactive hyperaemia index and urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR)] biomarkers were also measured. RESULTS: CFPWV-D was significantly greater than CFPWV-F [9.6 (8.0-11.2) vs. 8.9 (7.6-10.5) m/s, Pâ<â0.001], because of estimated path length being longer in CFPWV-D than CFPWV-F (495.4â±â44.8 vs. 465.3â±â20.6âmm, Pâ<â0.001). ePWV was significantly greater than both CFPWV-F and CFPWV-D [11.0 (10.0-12.2) m/s, Pâ<â0.001]. The three CFPWV methods were similarly associated with LD, IAD, IMT, TPA and UACR but not with cardiovascular risk factors. CONCLUSION: Different methods to measure CFPWV affect the derived measurement values and the association with cardiovascular risk factors but not the association with subclinical biomarkers of vascular health. These hitherto unreported observations are important considerations in experimental design, data interpretation and of particular importance, comparison between studies where CFPWV is measured.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Rigidez Vascular , Anciano , Biomarcadores , Presión Sanguínea , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Grosor Intima-Media Carotídeo , Velocidad de la Onda del Pulso Carotídeo-Femoral , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Análisis de la Onda del Pulso , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a serious, progressive condition associated with significant patient morbidity. Hypertension control and use of renin-angiotensin system blockers are the cornerstones of treatment for CKD. However, even with these treatment strategies, many individuals will progress towards kidney failure. Recently, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor clinical trials with primary renal endpoints have firmly established SGLT2 inhibition, in addition to standard of care, as an effective strategy to slow down the progression of CKD and reduce some of its associated complications. The emergence of this new clinical evidence supports the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in the management of CKD in people with and without diabetes. As licensing and guidelines for SGLT2 inhibitors are updated, there is a need to adapt CKD treatment pathways and for this class of drugs to be included as part of standard care for CKD management. In this article, we have used consensus opinion alongside the available evidence to provide support for the healthcare community involved in CKD management, regarding the role of SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical practice. By highlighting appropriate prescribing and practical considerations, we aim to encourage greater and safe use of SGLT2 inhibitors for people with CKD, both with and without diabetes.