RESUMEN
The United States persists in combatting the opioid epidemic. Collectively, researchers should be in search of evidence-based solutions. One such could be an appropriate screening tool to determine a patient's risk of opioid misuse. The screening tool should be transparent, provide high specificity, be validated across a variety of healthcare settings, and be a guided clinical decision-making tool to avoid weaponizing an opioid risk score. We should shift our focus from the number of opioid prescriptions dispensed to appropriateness of each prescription. We should be aware of utilizing non-opioid therapy options. In addition, healthcare providers should be knowledgeable of opioid misuse resources in their area to avoid practicing defensively, while instead concentrating their efforts on patients' best interests. The patients' dignity should be upheld through empathetic care from healthcare providers. We need to reduce the stigma surrounding opioid use, and ensure patient safety with one, cohesive, validated, opioid risk assessment tool.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Farmacia , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
Home care clients have safety barriers related to medication storage, disposal, and safe use of opioids. Limited research is available regarding medication safety initiatives in the home care setting. This study evaluates a medication safety initiative, linked with opioid misuse and overdose prevention screening, for home care clients with different levels of service. Training and screening tools designed for community pharmacies by the Opioid & Naloxone Education (ONE) Program were modified for use by home health nurses. All new admits to the home health services were screened for medication storage, medication disposal, and use of pain medications. Patients taking opioids were screened for opioid-specific risks. Interventions based on screening results included education, provision of medication lock boxes, drug disposal packets, and/or naloxone. Most home care clients (85%) are properly storing their medication and 38% were not properly disposing unused medications. Higher levels of care had greater pain medication needs, including the provision of naloxone. This study demonstrates the opportunity to incorporate medication safety screening into nursing home health visits.
Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Naloxona/efectos adversos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Dolor , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Public health professionals around the country faced significant challenges responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reflecting on their experience is an essential element in making sense of their experience and learning from it. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this qualitative study was to (1) describe the lived experiences of public health professionals working during the COVID-19 pandemic, (2) discuss the effectiveness of a guided reflection exercise to help public health professionals process these experiences, and (3) provide lessons learned and best practices to inform preparation for a future infectious disease pandemic. DESIGN: Qualitative focus group study design. SETTING: This activity was conducted at a Midwestern state public health professional meeting. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight public health professionals self-selected to participate in this study. RESULTS: Five themes were elicited in this analysis, including Communication, Leadership and Collaboration, Data Management, Community Relationships, and Resources and Planning. In addition, public health professionals reported numerous lessons learned, including the need for more leadership from the state government, the conflicted response of their communities, and the benefits of community solidarity where it was present. CONCLUSIONS: This article provides a detailed account of public health workers' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. It also provides lessons learned that will help public health workers lead more effectively in the future. Guided reflection on a traumatic professional experience can assist participating individuals in making sense of their experience and learning important lessons from it.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Salud Pública , Pandemias/prevención & control , Personal de Salud , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Background: Pharmacist stigma via examination of social distance preference and negative attitudes toward persons who misuse opioids is prevalent and may lower the quality of care provided to patients. Few studies have previously extended beyond the immediate post-intervention period to examine stigma change. Methods: This longitudinal cohort study utilized a pre-survey administered before the training program, a post-survey immediately upon completion of the training program, and a delayed post-survey, administered 12 months after the training program. Co-primary outcomes were changes in social distance scale (SDS) total score from baseline to post-survey and from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included change in SDS question scores and change in negative attitudes. One hundred eighty-seven of the 1211 eligible pharmacists in the state completed the training. Matched responses of forty-four pharmacists who completed all three surveys were examined. Results: The mean total SDS score was significantly lower in the immediate post-training survey than the pre-training mean (14.75 vs. 16.57, p = .000). The 12 months mean total SDS score was also significantly lower than the pre-training mean (15.32 vs. 16.57, p = .017). Significant changes in negative attitudes from baseline to post-survey and from baseline to 12 months were seen. Conclusion: Stigma reduction components integrated into opioid training decreased pharmacist social distance preference and negative attitudes toward patients who misuse opioids immediately after the training and, most notably, were sustained for 12 months.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Farmacéuticos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a public health epidemic. People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk for transmitting and contracting HCV. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention at a federally qualified health center in the US Midwest to improve HCV screening rates among PWID. METHODS: A prospective quality improvement initiative was conducted to increase the proportion of PWID screened for HCV. Inclusion criteria consisted of being seen by a primary care provider from April 16, 2019, through February 28, 2020, being aged 18 years or older, and confirmation of intravenous drug use. PWID status was confirmed by reviewing electronic health records. The multifaceted intervention consisted of educational sessions for the health care team and workflow changes. We analyzed the proportion of patients screened preintervention and postintervention by using χ2 tests. RESULTS: Of 742 patients who met the inclusion criteria, the proportion of PWID screened preintervention was 59.6% (n = 329) and the proportion of PWID screened postintervention was 65.1% (n = 283), increasing the screening rate by 5.5 percentage points. A χ2 test of homogeneity indicated a significant relationship between the preintervention and postintervention periods, and screening outcomes (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This multifaceted intervention to increase HCV screening resulted in a modest increase in the proportion of PWID screened. Consistent and health care system-wide screening approaches are needed to optimize the potential of HCV treatment and cure options now available.
Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Hepatitis C/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C/prevención & control , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa , Femenino , Hepacivirus/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , North Dakota/epidemiología , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
Background: Health professionals may stigmatize and prefer social distance from patients with opioid misuse, leading to poorer quality of care provided. The degree to which pharmacists prefer social distance from patients with opioid misuse and opioid use disorder (OUD) is not known. Methods: Pharmacists (n = 187) completed a survey comprised of demographics, attitudinal, and Social Distance Scale (SDS) questions based on a vignette patient who displayed opioid misuse. SDS question responses and total scores (maximum of 30; higher scores representing great preference for social distance) were tallied and associations with attitudes and demographics were examined. Results: Mean SDS total score was 16.32 (range 9-23). More than 59% of respondents had an SDS score >15, indicating overall lack of willingness to interact with the vignette patient. Females had a higher mean SDS score vs male pharmacists (16.58 vs. 15.36, respectively; p = 0.023). Pharmacists were more likely to prefer social distance from the vignette patient in personal situations (i.e. renting a room) than work-related interactions (i.e. providing patient education). Pharmacists with >10 years of experience, those without personal experience with a substance use disorder, those who strongly agreed that patients with OUD require excessive time and effort, and those who agreed that some people lack self-discipline to use prescription pain medication without becoming addicted had significantly higher SDS scores than pharmacists without these characteristics. Conclusions: Pharmacists expressed significant preference for social distance indicating stigmatization of patients with opioid misuse. Pharmacists were comfortable performing pharmacy tasks with patients with opioid misuse, but were less comfortable forming therapeutic relationships, an important tenet of patient-centered care. Efforts are needed to examine contributions to social distance preferences and implement measures to reduce them. Targeting of pharmacists with >10 years' experience and without personal experience with OUD may also be most beneficial.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Farmacéuticos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Estigma Social , EstereotipoRESUMEN
Community pharmacists assist patients to manage disease and prevent complications. Despite the enormous challenge the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has dealt to the health care system, community pharmacists have maintained the delivery of critical health services to communities, including those most at risk for COVID-19. Community pharmacists are in a key position to deliver priority pandemic responses including point-of-care testing for chronic disease management, vaccinations, and COVID-19 testing.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/organización & administración , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Pandemias/prevención & control , Farmacéuticos , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Rol Profesional , Adulto , COVID-19 , Niño , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , VacunaciónRESUMEN
High prevalence of diabetes and prediabetes has emerged as a concern in China. The Pathway to Health Program was designed to prevent type 2 diabetes onset in prediabetic women in a north China urban community. This process evaluation of a randomized controlled trial analysed participant surveys at the 6- and 12-month assessment times, participant weekly logs, class attendance records and post-study participant focus group results. The reported levels of participant engagement in physical activity (PA)-related behaviors were higher than diet-related behaviors at the 6-month assessment. The engagement in both PA- and diet-related behaviors declined during the 6-month follow-up period. Step counts from the participants' pedometers indicated an increase in PA in the first 6 months of the intervention. Study participants expressed high levels of satisfaction with the intervention and increased their scores on diabetes-related knowledge. Conflicts with work and family responsibilities were the main barriers for missing health lessons, likely contributing to minimal weight loss. There was good fidelity in program implementation. Intensive lifestyle modification programs are difficult to sustain once the program is complete. A more structured 6-month follow-up phase may have provided needed support to enable participants to maintain their lifestyle changes.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Estado Prediabético/epidemiología , Adulto , China , Dieta , Ejercicio Físico , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Conducta Social , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe components fundamental to the process of linking pharmacy to the delivery of public health services in a sustainable way. SUMMARY: Pharmacists deliver public health services with varying frequency. A literature review was conducted to create a set of fundamental links necessary for pharmacists to deliver public health services in a sustainable way. The service needed to be in alignment with public health priorities, be incorporated in the pharmacy curriculum, have postgraduate training opportunities, have a policy or legal platform supporting the service, and have a business model for financial sustainability. Immunization delivery was identified as an exemplary public health service delivered by pharmacists. Additional services evaluated were tobacco cessation counseling, transitions of care, hypertension screening, and substance abuse counseling. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists are well positioned to provide public health services. Although pharmacists can offer these services, their delivery is variable because of unclearly defined links in the process necessary for their implementation. This article identifies actionable steps to establish sustainable methods for community pharmacists to deliver public health services.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/organización & administración , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Rol Profesional , Salud Pública , Competencia Clínica , Consejo/organización & administración , Humanos , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Inmunización , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pharmacists have contributed to improved population health through the delivery of public health services, but their contributions often go unrecognized within the larger health care system. OBJECTIVES: To determine pharmacist perceptions of their contributions to the 10 essential services of public health and to compare those contributions among pharmacists in Iowa, North Dakota, and Manitoba. METHODS: Licensed pharmacists in Iowa, North Dakota, and Manitoba were sent an online survey of their perceived level of achievement of the 10 essential services of public health. RESULTS: A total of 649 pharmacists completed the survey. The 3 essential services that scored the highest overall were enforce laws and regulations that protect health and ensure safety, inform and educate people about health issues, and participate in ongoing training beyond continuing education requirements. Contributions of pharmacists to the 10 essential services of public health were previously evaluated by frequency of citation in the published literature. There was relative agreement between what was reported in the literature and what was determined by survey. One exception was "enforce laws and regulations that protect health and ensure safety," which was rarely reported in the literature but was reported in the survey to be the most frequently delivered service. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist contributions to improved population health should be reported with the use of the 10 essential services of public health. This will increase recognition of pharmacist contributions and better align the disciplines of pharmacy and public health. In particular, pharmacists should consider ways to increase their level of involvement in the community and in partnership with other health care professionals.
Asunto(s)
Farmacias/estadística & datos numéricos , Farmacéuticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Pública/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Iowa , Masculino , Manitoba , Persona de Mediana Edad , North Dakota , Rol Profesional , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The purpose of the current study was to assess the frequency and distribution of the 9-Item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) among individuals with type 2 diabetes with and without depression. The current case-control study used electronic medical record data from two primary care institutions. The sample was divided into cases with coexisting depression and type 2 diabetes and controls without depression. Data included demographics, biomarkers, number of services delivered, and clinic visits in 2013. Similar PHQ-9 use was seen between unique primary care practices. However, less than one third of patients at either site received depression screening with the PHQ-9 in 2013. Male and older adult patients were less likely to receive assessment. Guideline ambiguity and lack of accountability in primary care practice has made the use of depression metrics arbitrary in diabetic populations at risk for depression. To assure adequate care provision, it is imperative that proven tools for assessing depressive symptoms are used.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Evaluación en Enfermería , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE To identify a pathway forward for practicing pharmacists in supporting public health initiatives by applying the five core competencies of public health. SUMMARY The pharmacist is well positioned to improve population health. Until now, increased impact of pharmacists has been based on the expansion of patient services rather than guided by a population approach to health. To increase their effectiveness and breadth of impact, pharmacists would benefit from applying the five core competencies of public health (social and behavioral science, health policy and administration, epidemiology, biostatistics, and environmental health sciences) to the practice of pharmacy. This article aims to explain how each of the core competencies applies to pharmacy practice and how pharmacists might apply public health skills in a more specific manner. CONCLUSION With increased clarity of the role of public health, and mastery of the five core competencies of public health, pharmacists can make unique and valuable contributions to the health of the public.
Asunto(s)
Servicios Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Salud Pública , Competencia Clínica , Humanos , Servicios Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Rol ProfesionalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Opioid and Naloxone Education (ONE) Program focuses on community pharmacy-based patient screening and interventions to improve population health with regard to opioid use. The purpose of this paper is to reevaluate the ONE Program performance using the RE-AIM model, in comparison to the review performed in 2019. METHODS: The program performance of the ONE Program was evaluated from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022 was evaluated using the five domains of the RE-AIM model. Reach was defined as the proportion of patients receiving opioid prescriptions who completed the screening. Efficacy was defined as the proportion of individuals identified as at risk who received a pharmacist intervention. Adoption was defined as the proportion of community pharmacies who enrolled in the ONE Program. Implementation was defined as the proportion of pharmacies that enrolled that provided at least five patient screenings. Maintenance was defined as the proportion of pharmacies that completed at least one screening three months. These results were compared against evaluation of the program from October 12, 2018 to June 1, 2019. RESULTS: Approximately 7.28 % of patients receiving opioid prescriptions were screened for risk of opioid misuse and accidental overdose (Reach). Of the patients screened, 97.4 % of patients at risk for opioid misuse or accidental overdose received a pharmacist-led intervention (Efficacy). Additionally, 49.6 % of the pharmacist that enrolled in the ONE Program completed at least five screenings (79 %) and of those, 86.4 % maintained the program three months later. CONCLUSIONS: In years four and five of implementation, the ONE Program demonstrated improvement in four of the five domains of the RE-AIM model compared to years one and two. However, Reach declined over time. This reevaluation has demonstrated the importance of longitudinal program assessment, and the possibility of improved program performance over time.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia , Naloxona , Antagonistas de Narcóticos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Farmacéuticos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Humanos , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Naloxona/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Servicios Comunitarios de Farmacia/organización & administración , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Farmacéuticos/organización & administración , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & control , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Sobredosis de Droga/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: North Dakota (ND) had the highest coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case and mortality rate in the United States for nearly 2 mo. This study aims to compare 3 metrics ND used to guide public health action across its 53 counties. METHODS: Daily COVID-19 case and death totals in North Dakota were evaluated using data from the COVID-tracker website provided by the North Department of Health (NDDoH). It was reported as: active cases per 10,000, tests administered per 10,000, and test positivity rate (the North Dakota health metric). The COVID-19 Response press conferences provided data for the Governor's metric. The Harvard model used daily new cases per 100,000. A chi-squared test was used to compare differences in these 3 metrics on July 1, August 26, September 23, and November 13, 2020. RESULTS: On July 1, no significant difference between the metrics was found. By September 23, Harvard's health metric indicated critical risk while ND's health metric was moderate risk, and the Governor's metric was still low risk. CONCLUSIONS: ND's and the Governor's metric underrepresented the risk of the COVID-19 outbreak in North Dakota. The Harvard metric reflected North Dakota's increasing risk; it should be considered as a national standard in future pandemics. PUBLIC HEALTH IMPLICATIONS: Model-based predictors could guide policy-makers to effectively control spread of infectious disease; proactive models could reduce risk of disease as it progresses in vulnerable communities.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Estados Unidos , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , North Dakota/epidemiología , Brotes de Enfermedades , Salud Pública , Pandemias/prevención & controlRESUMEN
Pharmacists tend to provide care to patients with psychiatric disorders less frequently than to other types of patients, yet patients with psychiatric disorders experience more drug-related problems and use more opioids than those without psychiatric disorders. The Opioid and Naloxone Education (ONE) program equipped pharmacists to screen for opioid misuse and overdose risk and to implement a set of interventions for any patient filling an opioid prescription. Patients with a psychiatric disorder (N=1,980; 24.1% of those screened) were significantly more likely to receive more than one intervention from a ONE program pharmacist than were those without a psychiatric disorder. The use of an objective screening tool and training in stigma reduction and nonjudgmental communication approaches, which are part of the ONE program process, deserve further exploration as ways to increase the frequency of pharmacist-provided education and other critical interventions for patients with psychiatric disorders.
Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Farmacéuticos , Antagonistas de Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Naloxona/uso terapéutico , Sobredosis de Droga/prevención & control , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , PrescripcionesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: During the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, mitigation measures were implemented on a state-by-state basis. Governors were responsible for establishing interventions appropriate for their states and the timing of implementation. This paper evaluated the association between the presence and timing of a mask mandate and the severity of the COVID-19 epidemic by state. METHODS: The states were divided into 3 categories based on when the governors of each state implemented a mask mandate: Early (mask mandate implemented between March 2020 and June 2020), Late (July 2020-December 2020), and Never (no mask mandate implemented). The rates of hospitalizations and mortality (per 100 000) were assessed at the different time points during the pandemic across these categories from March to December 2020. RESULTS: The mortality rates across all 3 groups were observed to be highest in the beginning and toward the end of the pandemic in 2020 with the peak observed in the Early group between April and May 2020. Also, the rates of hospitalization increased steadily across all groups. The Early mask group was comprised of 86.7% and 13.3% states with Democratic and Republican governors respectively, and no states in the Never category had Democratic governors. CONCLUSION: These results support the benefit of implementing a mask mandate to minimize the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of political affiliation of governors on that impact.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Gripe Humana , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pandemias , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective for this paper is to report on the utility of the Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) to identify patients at elevated risk for opioid misuse and deliver medication safety-related services to them. Patient characteristics based on ORT risk stratification are also described. METHODS: Data from patients screened from September 17, 2018 to May 12, 2021 were descriptively evaluated for distribution of ORT scores, characteristics of patients stratified by ORT score, and services delivered to patients based on ORT score. The ORT generates a score from 0 to 26, with scores of 0-3, 4-7, and 8 or higher representing low, moderate, and high risk of opioid use disorder, respectively. Based upon screening results, pharmacists provided patient-specific education and interventions. RESULTS: A total of 6,460 patients were evaluated. Low, moderate, and high ORT scores were found among 87.5, 8.2 and 3.9% of the patients receiving opioids, respectively. Males comprised 46.1% of the patients, and 27.7% of the patients had received a prior opioid prescription in the last 60 days. As a result of risk stratification, the pharmacist explained opioid use disorder to 18.8, 36.1, and 47.0% of patients with low, moderate and high ORT scores, respectively (p < .001). High ORT scores were significantly associated with the pharmacist introducing the patient to community support services (OR = 2.35), the pharmacist having contacted their provider (OR = 6.41), male gender (OR = 2.06), and having taken an opioid in the last 60 days (OR = 1.76). CONCLUSIONS: The ORT is a useful tool for opioid risk stratification of patients receiving opioid medications in the community pharmacy setting. Such stratification allows the pharmacist to provide individualized services to patients based on their risk profile.