[Clinicopathological Evaluation of Preoperative Chemotherapy Containing S-1 as a Treatment for Patients with Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma during Waiting Time for Surgery].

BACKGROUND: In our department, patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma(OSCC)received preoperative chemotherapy containing S-1 to prevent the growth and dissemination of tumors during the waiting time before definitive surgery. We retrospectively evaluated the usefulness of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and five patients comprising stages T1(26), T2(64), T3(7), and T4(8 cases)were enrolled in this study from July 2001 to June 2013. In principle, patients were administered S-1(80mg/m / 2/day, days 1-14)and followed by a drug holiday(days 15-21), continuing until 1 week before surgery. RESULTS: The median administration period was 14 days(256 days). Ninety-eight patients underwent definitive surgery, but 7 patients who revealed clinical CR underwent only biopsy and showed histological CR. The histological responses of all patients were CR(24), PR(22), and NC(59), and the response rate was 43.8%. Almost all adverse effects were Grade 1 or 2, except 1 case of neutropenia(Grade 3)and 1 case of urticaria(Grade 3). The 5-year overall survival rates were 86.7% in all cases, 95.3% in CR/PR cases, and 79.7% in NC cases. CONCLUSION: Preoperative S-1 administration during the waiting time was a safe and very effective method and was considered beneficial for patients with OSCC.

Incidence of antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: A multicenter retrospective epidemiological study in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan.

Background/purpose: The incidence of medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw is increasing worldwide, mostly due to the use of antiresorptive agents (ARAs) such as bisphosphonate (BP) and denosumab (Dmab). However, the proportion of BP-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) and Dmab-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (DRONJ) among all ARA-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) cases is not clear; this hinders appropriate treatment, recurrence-prevention planning, and avoidance of unnecessary Dmab withdrawal. Moreover, the causative drug administered at each disease stage remains unknown. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study of patients with ARONJ who visited oral and maxillofacial surgery departments at hospitals in Hyogo Prefecture, Japan, over 3 years to classify and compare patient characteristics with those having BRONJ and DRONJ. We sought to identify the proportion of DRONJ in ARONJ. Materials and methods: After excluding stage 0 patients, 1021 patients were included (471 high-dose; 560 low-dose). ARA treatment for bone metastases of malignant tumors and multiple myeloma was considered high dose, while that for cancer treatment-induced bone loss and osteoporosis was low dose. Results: Low doses of BP and Dmab accounted for >50% patients; the results differed from those in other countries. DRONJ accounted for 58% and 35% of high-dose and low-dose cases, respectively. Stage 3 ARONJ cases comprised 92 (19.5%) low-dose BRONJ, 39 (20.1%) high-dose BRONJ, 24 (30%) low-dose DRONJ, and 68 (24.5%) high-dose DRONJ. Eighty-nine patients who received switch therapy were divided into BRONJ or DRONJ, but there was no difference in the ratio of each stage compared to the non-switch therapy. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to clarify the proportion of BRONJ and DRONJ cases, causative drug, and its doses by disease stages. DRONJ accounted for approximately 30% of the ARONJ, approximately 60% of which was due to high doses.