Evaluation of a proximal block site and the use of nerve-stimulator-guided needle placement for posterior tibial nerve block.

BACKGROUND: Posterior tibial nerve (PTN) block has traditionally been performed in the para-medial malleolar area without nerve stimulator (NS) guidance. The PTN can also be blocked proximally (7 cm) above the medial malleolus in the subfascial plane between the flexor hallucis longus and flexor digitorum longus tendons. In this study we compared the frequency of successful PTN block at the traditional distal (D) site (2 cm above the medial malleolus) with and without NS guidance. We also compared block success and latency at the D site versus the proximal (P) block site. METHODS: Subjects were randomized to P-NS (n = 45), D-NS (n = 45), or D without NS (n = 45). Levobupivacaine 0.625%, 0.15 mL/kg was used for all blocks. Pinprick sensory anesthesia was evaluated in the distribution of the medial plantar, lateral plantar, and medial calcaneal nerves. PTN block was considered successful if surgical anesthesia was achieved in all PTN distributions. RESULTS: The frequency of successful PTN block was greater for D-NS (100%) and P-NS (93.5%), compared with D (73.3%) (P = 0.02). Median latency to complete block was less for D-NS (8 min, 95% CI 7-9 min) than D (20 min, 95% CI 13-26 min) (P < 0.01) and P-NS (15 min, 95% CI 12-18 min) (P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: NS-guided needle placement improves the success and decreases the latency to onset of complete PTN block at the D site. The P approach to PTN block may be a useful alternative to the traditional D site approach, particularly in patients with restricted access to the D site.

Anesthetic and recovery profiles of lidocaine versus mepivacaine for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing outpatient orthopedic arthroscopic procedures.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare isobaric lidocaine and mepivacaine in outpatient arthroscopic surgery. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. SETTING: Ambulatory surgery center affiliated with an academic tertiary-care hospital. PATIENTS: 84 adult, ASA physical status 1, 2, and 3 ambulatory patients, age 18-70 years, undergoing arthroscopic knee surgery. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomized to receive a combination spinal-epidural anesthetic using 80 mg of either isobaric 2% mepivacaine or isobaric 2% lidocaine. Patients also received a femoral 3-in-1 block with 0.5% bupivacaine applied to the affected extremity. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic data and level and duration of the block were recorded. The use of supplemental epidural anesthesia was noted along with frequency of bradycardia, hypotension, and episodes of nausea and vomiting. Duration of block and times to ambulation and voiding were recorded. Delayed variables, including fatigue, difficulty urinating, back pain, and transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) were obtained. MAIN RESULTS: No demographic differences were noted between groups, and surgical duration was similar. Satisfactory anesthesia was achieved in all cases, with no differences noted in hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, or vomiting. Onset of sensory and motor block was similar. Duration of block before epidural supplementation was 94 ± 21 minutes with lidocaine versus 122 ± 23 minutes for mepivacaine (P < 0.011). Times to ambulation and voiding were longer in patients receiving mepivacaine but did not affect PACU stay. Twenty-four and 48-hour recovery was similar with no TNS symptoms reported. CONCLUSION: No major differences were noted between lidocaine and mepivacaine spinal anesthesia. Time to ambulation and voiding were longer in patients who received mepivacaine as was time to first dose of epidural catheter. Neither group had TNS symptoms. Lidocaine and mepivacaine are both appropriate spinal anesthetics for ambulatory orthopedic lower extremity procedures.

Neurologic sequelae after interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder/upper arm surgery: the association of patient, anesthetic, and surgical factors to the incidence and clinical course.

We determined the incidence, distribution, and resolution of neurologic sequelae and the association with anesthetic, surgical, and patient factors after single-injection interscalene block (ISB) using levobupivacaine 0.625% with epinephrine 1:200,000 in subjects undergoing shoulder or upper arm surgery, or both, in 693 consecutive adult patients. After a standardized ISB, assessments were made at 24 and 48 h and at 2 and 4 wk for anesthesia, hypesthesia, paresthesias, pain/dysesthesias, and motor weakness. Symptomatic patients were monitored until resolution. Subjects reporting pain or discomfort >3 of 10 and those with motor or extending sensory symptoms received diagnostic assessment. Six-hundred-sixty subjects completed 4 wk of follow-up. Fifty-eight neurologic sequelae were reported by 56 subjects. Symptoms were sensory except for two cases of motor weakness (lesions identified distant from the ISB site). Thirty-one sequelae with likely ISB association were reported by 29 subjects, including 14 at the ISB site, 9 at the distal phalanx of thumb/index finger, 7 involving the posterior auricular nerve, and 1 clinical brachial plexopathy. Sequelae not likely associated with the ISB were reported by 27 subjects with symptoms reported in the median (n = 9) and ulnar (n = 4) nerves, surgical neuropraxias (n = 12), and motor weakness (n = 2). Symptoms resolved spontaneously (median 4 wk; range, 2-16 wk) except in the two patients with motor weaknesses and the patient with clinical brachial plexopathy, who received therapeutic interventions. Variables identified as independent predictors of neurologic sequelae likely related to ISB were paresthesia at needle insertion and ISB site pain or bruising at 24 h. In contrast, surgery preformed in the sitting position, as well as ISB site bruising, was identified as a predictor of neurologic sequelae not likely related to ISB. In conclusion, neurologic sequelae after single-injection ISB using epinephrine mainly involve transient minor sensory symptoms.

Ondansetron and dolasetron provide equivalent postoperative vomiting control after ambulatory tonsillectomy in dexamethasone-pretreated children.

UNLABELLED: In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, we compared the incidence of emesis and 48-h recovery profiles after a single dose of preoperative ondansetron versus dolasetron in dexamethasone-pretreated children undergoing ambulatory tonsillectomy. One-hundred-forty-nine children, 2-12 yr old, ASA physical status I and II, completed the study. All children received standardized perioperative care, including premedication, surgical and anesthetic techniques, IV fluids, analgesics, and rescue antiemetic medications. Patients were randomized to receive ondansetron 0.15 mg/kg, maximum 4 mg (Group 1); dolasetron 0.5 mg/kg, maximum 25 mg (Group 2); or saline placebo (Group 3) IV before the initiation of surgery. In addition, all patients received dexamethasone 1 mg/kg (maximum 25 mg). Rescue antiemetics were administered for two or more episodes of retching/vomiting. The incidence of retching/vomiting before home discharge did not differ between the ondansetron and dolasetron groups and was significantly less frequent compared with the placebo group (10%, Group 1; 8%, Group 2; 30%, Group 3). Similar results were obtained at 24-48 h after discharge (6%, Groups 1 and 2; 18%, Group 3). The need for rescue antiemetics administered after the second retching/vomiting episode was significantly less in Groups 1 (4%) and 2 (6%) compared with Group 3 (22%) before home discharge. The complete response rate, defined as no retching/vomiting and no antiemetic for 48 h, was significantly increased in Groups 1 (76%) and 2 (74%) compared with Group 3 (44%). The antiemetic efficacy of prophylactic ondansetron and dolasetron was comparable in dexamethasone-pretreated children undergoing ambulatory tonsillectomy. IMPLICATIONS: The efficacy of a single dose of prophylactic ondansetron versus dolasetron in conjunction with dexamethasone was studied on posttonsillectomy retching/vomiting and 48-h recovery in children 2-12 yr old. Compared with placebo, ondansetron and dolasetron produced comparable reductions in the incidence of retching/vomiting and the need for rescue antiemetics.

Laparoscopic appendectomy in an outpatient setting.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the ability to perform laparoscopic appendectomy on an outpatient basis. DESIGN: Prospective study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2). SETTING: University ambulatory surgery center. PATIENTS: Forty-two consecutive patients. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic appendectomy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: After performing five laparoscopic appendectomies, three women required hospitalization. Thus a new multimodal protocol was implemented and admission and recovery times were monitored. After the new protocol was implemented, only 1 of 37 patients required hospitalization. Discharge times were similar to those for women undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy without appendectomy. CONCLUSION: With attention to surgical and anesthetic protocols, appendectomy can be performed at the time of gynecologic laparoscopy in an ambulatory setting without a significant delay in discharge.

Infragluteal-parabiceps sciatic nerve block: an evaluation of a novel approach using a single-injection technique.

UNLABELLED: Clinical use of the sciatic nerve block (SNB) has been limited by technical difficulties in performing the block using standard approaches, substantial patient discomfort during the procedure, or the need for two injections to block the tibial and peroneal nerves. In this report, we describe a single-injection method for SNB using an infragluteal-parabiceps approach, where the nerve is located along the lateral border of the biceps femoris muscle. SNB was performed in the prone or lateral decubitus position. The needle was positioned (average depth, 56 +/- 15 mm) to the point where plantar flexion (53%) or inversion (45%) of the ipsilateral foot was obtained at < or =0.4 mA. Levobupivacaine 0.625% with epinephrine (1:200:000) was administered at a dose of 0.4 mL/kg. The procedure was completed in 6 +/- 3 min. Discomfort during block placement was treated with fentanyl 50-100 microg in 24% of patients. Complete sensory loss and motor paralysis occurred in 92% of subjects at a median time of 10 (range, 5-25) min after injection. Compared with plantar flexion, foot inversion was associated with a more frequent incidence (86% versus 100%), and shorter latency for both sensory loss and motor paralysis of the peroneal, tibial, and sural nerves. There were no immediate or delayed complications. We conclude that the infragluteal-parabiceps approach to SNB is reliable, efficient, safe, and well tolerated by patients. IMPLICATIONS: Sciatic nerve block using the infragluteal-parabiceps approach produces sensory loss and motor paralysis after a single 0.4 mL/kg injection of levobupivacaine 0.625% with epinephrine (1:200,000) in >90% of patients. The approach is reliable, uses consistent soft-tissue landmarks, is not typically painful, and does not produce significant complications.

Nerve stimulator-assisted evoked motor response predicts the latency and success of a single-injection sciatic block.

Variable onset latency of single-injection sciatic nerve block (SNB) may result from drug deposition insufficiently close to all components of the nerve. We hypothesized that this variability is caused by the needle tip position relative to neural components, which is objectified by the type of evoked motor response (EMR) elicited before local anesthetic injection. One-hundred ASA I-II patients undergoing reconstructive ankle surgery received infragluteal-parabiceps SNB using 0.4 mL/kg (maximum 35 mL) of levobupivacaine 0.625%. The end-point for injection was the first elicited EMR: inversion (I), plantar flexion (PF), dorsiflexion (DF), or eversion (E) at 0.2-0.4 mA. The frequencies of the EMRs were: I 40%, PF 43%, E 14%, and DF 3%. SNB was considered complete if both tibial and common peroneal nerves were blocked and failed if either analgesia to pinprick was not observed at 30 min or anesthesia at 60 min. Patients with an EMR of I demonstrated shorter mean times (+/-95% confidence interval [CI]) to complete the block with 8.5 (95% CI, 6.2-10.8) min compared to 27.0 (95% CI, 20.6-33.4) min after PF (P < 0.001) and 30.4 (95% CI, 24.9-35.8) min after E (P < 0.001). No rescue blocks were required in group I compared with 24% (P = 0.001) and 71% (P < 0.001) of patients in groups PF and E, respectively. We conclude that EMR type during nerve stimulator-assisted single-injection SNB predicts latency and success of complete SNB because the observed EMR is related to the positioning of the needle tip relative to the tibial and common peroneal nerves.