TM4SF5-mediated liver malignancy involves NK cell exhaustion-like phenotypes.

Aberrant extracellular matrix and immune cell alterations within the tumor microenvironment promote the pathological progression of liver carcinogenesis. Although transmembrane 4 L six family member 5 (TM4SF5) is involved in liver fibrosis and cancer, its mechanism avoiding immune surveillance during carcinogenesis remains unknown. We investigated how TM4SF5-mediated signaling caused immune evasion using in vitro primary cells and in vivo liver tissues from genetic or chemically induced mouse models. TM4SF5-transgenic and diethylnitrosamine (DEN)-induced liver cancer mouse models exhibited fibrotic and cancerous livers, respectively, with enhanced TM4SF5, pY705STAT3, collagen I, and laminin γ2 levels. These TM4SF5-mediated effects were abolished by TM4SF5 inhibitor, 4'-(p-toluenesulfonylamido)-4-hydroxychalcone (TSAHC). TM4SF5-dependent tumorigenesis involved natural killer (NK) cell exhaustion-like phenotypes including the reduction of NK cell number or function, which were blocked with TSAHC treatment. TM4SF5 expression in cancer cells downregulated stimulatory ligands and receptors for NK cell cytotoxicity, including SLAMF6, SLAMF7, MICA/B, and others. TM4SF5 suppression or inhibition reduced STAT3 signaling activity and recovered the receptor levels and NK cell surveillance, leading to reduced fibrotic and cancerous phenotypes, and longer survival. Altogether, these findings suggest that TM4SF5-mediated STAT3 activity for extracellular matrix modulation is involved in the progression of liver disease to HCC and that TM4SF5 appears to suppress NK cells during liver carcinogenesis.

Crosstalk between TM4SF5 and GLUT8 regulates fructose metabolism in hepatic steatosis.

OBJECTIVE: Transmembrane 4 L six family member 5 (TM4SF5) is likely involved in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, although its roles and cross-talks with glucose/fructose transporters in phenotypes derived from high-carbohydrate diets remain unexplored. Here, we investigated the modulation of hepatic fructose metabolism by TM4SF5. METHODS: Wild-type or Tm4sf5-/- knockout mice were evaluated via different diets, including normal chow, high-sucrose diet, or high-fat diet without or with fructose in drinking water (30% w/v). Using liver tissues and blood samples from the mice or hepatocytes, the roles of TM4SF5 in fructose-mediated de novo lipogenesis (DNL) and steatosis via a crosstalk with glucose transporter 8 (GLUT8) were assessed. RESULTS: Tm4sf5 suppression or knockout in both in vitro and in vivo models reduced fructose uptake, DNL, and steatosis. Extracellular fructose treatment of hepatocytes resulted in an inverse relationship between fructose-uptake activity and TM4SF5-mediated translocalization of GLUT8 through dynamic binding at the cell surface. Following fructose treatment, TM4SF5 binding to GLUT8 transiently decreased with translocation to the plasma membrane (PM), where GLUT8 separated and became active for fructose uptake and DNL. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, hepatic TM4SF5 modulated GLUT8 localization and activity through transient binding, leading to steatosis-related fructose uptake and lipogenesis. Thus, TM4SF5 and/or GLUT8 may be promising treatment targets against liver steatosis resulting from excessive fructose consumption.