RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To describe pathways of care and referral to paediatric rheumatology from onset of first symptom (noticed by the patient or their family) to diagnosis for children and young people diagnosed with localized scleroderma (LS) or juvenile SSc (jSSc). METHODS: Retrospective case note audit of patients under paediatric rheumatology care who presented during January 2005-January 2010. Data included disease subtype, sex, age at key points in the referral pathway and health care professional (HCP) contact. All patient and HCP data were pseudo-anonymized in accordance with good clinical practice. RESULTS: Data were from eight UK centres that saw 89 cases: 62 females, 26 males; 73 LS, 16 jSSc. Median time from first symptom to first HCP review was 4 (range 0-72) months (LS) and 1 (range 0-50) month (jSSc). Median time from first symptom to paediatric rheumatology review was 15 (range 1-103) months (LS) and 7 (range 0-50) months (jSSc). Median time from first HCP review to first paediatric rheumatology review was 11 (range 0-103) months (LS) and 2 (range 0-10) months. First HCP seen (74%) was usually a general practitioner. The referring HCP to paediatric rheumatology was usually a dermatologist (56%) for LS. Median time from first symptom to diagnosis was 13 (range 1-102) months (LS) and 8 (range 1-50) months (jSSc). CONCLUSION: A prolonged interval occurs from first symptom to definitive diagnosis, which may adversely affect outcome. There is a need to raise awareness of this rare diagnosis and facilitate earlier recognition.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Diagnóstico Precoz , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud , Esclerodermia Localizada/terapia , Esclerodermia Sistémica/terapia , Adolescente , Edad de Inicio , Niño , Preescolar , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Morbilidad/tendencias , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esclerodermia Localizada/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Localizada/epidemiología , Esclerodermia Sistémica/diagnóstico , Esclerodermia Sistémica/epidemiología , Factores de Tiempo , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Outcome data in pediatric plasma exchange, especially in nonrenal indications are scarce. We aimed to evaluate its role and outcome in our patients. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study of children admitted in the year 2016 to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit requiring plasma exchange for nonrenal indications was undertaken. Plasma exchange was given as adjunctive therapy along with primary treatment for the disease concerned. Demographic and clinical data were studied, and descriptive statistical analysis was carried out. RESULTS: Ten children underwent plasma exchange during this 1-year period with a male: female ratio of 3:2 and a mean age of 10 years (range 3-16 years). The indications were acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (n = 2), acute neuromyelitis optica (n = 1), catastrophic antiphospholipid antibody syndrome secondary to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) (n = 1), severe SLE with cerebritis/hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) (n = 2), severe dengue sepsis with HLH/multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (n = 2), and thrombotic microangiopathy secondary to snake bite envenomation (n = 2). All received either 1.5 or 2 times plasma volume exchange (mean sessions - 4, range = 1-6). The mean duration of stay in hospital was 17.2 days (range = 3-40 days), and follow-up was 78 days (range = 3-180 days), with the majority of children (8/10, 80%) survived from the catastrophic illness at the time of discharge. Two children (2/10, 20%) succumbed due to the disease per se in severe dengue sepsis in one and enterobacteriaceae sepsis (hospital-acquired pneumonia) in another. CONCLUSION: Plasma exchange was found to be beneficial as complementary therapy in a critical care setting, especially for nonrenal indications.