Response to an exercise intervention after endometrial cancer: differences between obese and non-obese survivors.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to describe baseline differences between obese and non-obese endometrial cancer survivor in anthropometrics, exercise behavior, fitness, heart rate and blood pressure, and quality of life, and to analyze whether the effect of a home-based exercise intervention on these outcomes differed for obese and non-obese participants. METHODS: One hundred post-treatment Stage I-IIIa endometrial cancer survivors participated in a single arm 6month study in which they received a home-based exercise intervention. Cardiorespiratory fitness, anthropometrics, and exercise behavior were measured every two months, and quality of life (QOL) and psychological distress were measured at baseline and 6months. RESULTS: Adjusting for potential confounders, at baseline obese survivors had poorer cardiorespiratory fitness (p=.002), higher systolic blood pressure (p=.018), and lower physical functioning (p<.001) and ratings of general health (p=.002), and more pain (p=.037) and somatization (.002). Significant improvements were seen in exercise behavior, resting heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and multiple QOL domains over the course of the intervention. Obese survivors had less improvement in exercise behavior and cardiorespiratory fitness than non-obese survivors, but there were no differences with regard to improvements in QOL and stress. CONCLUSIONS: Home based exercise interventions are beneficial to endometrial cancer survivors, including those whose BMI is in the obese range. While obese survivors have lower levels of physical activity and fitness, they experienced similar activity, fitness, quality of life and mental health benefits. Exercise should be encouraged in endometrial cancer survivors, including those who are obese.

A systematic review of the gut microbiome, metabolites, and multi-omics biomarkers across the colorectal cancer care continuum.

The gut microbiome and the microbial metabolome contribute to treatment efficacy and treatment outcomes across the cancer care spectrum. This study systematically reviewed the existing literature between 2007 to March 2022 to elucidate the role of gut microbiota-metabolite biomarkers in colorectal cancer (CRC) care and treatment-related outcomes. Using Covidence, all studies identified were screened by title and abstract, followed by a full-text review using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and data extraction. We analysed 13 non-experimental and 9 experimental CRC studies and found that, usually, the α-diversity of the gut microbiome and short-chain fatty acids decreased in CRC patients, while amino acids (e.g. glutamate) increased in CRC patients. Correlations between specific gut microbial taxa and metabolites were identified, with amino acids, fatty acids, and glycerol positively associated with certain gut microbes. Interventions promoting gut microbes and microbial metabolites associated with better health outcomes (e.g. Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, butyric acid, and bile acid) can potentially promote treatment efficacy and improve cancer care outcomes. Gut microbial metabolism should be integrated into targeted cancer interventions for CRC patients, given the confirmed role of the gut microbiome and metabolome pathways across the CRC care continuum.