An Early Cost-Utility Model of mRNA-Based Therapies for the Treatment of Methylmalonic and Propionic Acidemia in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Novel messenger RNA (mRNA)-based therapies, currently in development, are emerging as a promising potential treatment modality for a broad range of life-threatening and life-limiting inherited liver diseases, including methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) and propionic acidemia (PA). However, owing in part to their complexity, they are likely to come at considerable financial cost to healthcare systems. The objective of this research was to synthesize available evidence on the costs and clinical consequences associated with MMA and PA for the purpose of exploratory economic evaluation of novel mRNA-based therapies using an early cost-utility model from the United Kingdom payer perspective. METHODS: A Markov model was constructed to simulate the costs and outcomes associated with novel mRNA therapies, compared with a combination of dietary management and organ transplantation (standard of care) among hypothetical cohorts of new-born patients with MMA and PA. Key model drivers were identified, and a price threshold analysis was performed to estimate value-based price ranges for future mRNA therapies given willingness-to-pay thresholds for orphan diseases. RESULTS: mRNA therapy was associated with an additional 5.7 and 1.3 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained per patient lifetime among patients with MMA and PA, respectively. Key drivers of cost-effectiveness were relative improvement in utility among patients who receive mRNA-based therapy and transplantation, and the cost of mRNA therapy. Assuming a willingness to pay range of £100,000-£300,000 per QALY gained, the model demonstrated mRNA therapy to be cost-effective in MMA and PA at an annual treatment cost of £70,452-£94,575 and £31,313-£36,695, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of a strong evidence base in MMA and PA, this model provides a useful tool to estimate the cost-effectiveness, and inform value-based pricing, of new mRNA-based therapies. Our analyses also identified areas for research that will have the greatest value in reducing uncertainty in future health economic evaluations of such treatments.

Treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization among patients with alopecia areata: A real-world chart review in South Korea.

Alopecia areata (AA) is a clinically heterogeneous, immune-mediated, non-scarring hair loss disorder. This real-world chart review sought to characterize treatment patterns and healthcare resource use among patients with severe AA in South Korea. A web-based chart review of 40 dermatologists was conducted in which the medical charts of 151 adult patients diagnosed with severe AA between May 2019 and April 2021 were reviewed. Anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, healthcare resource use, and clinical outcomes were extracted from the date of severe disease diagnosis until the date of data collection (September-November 2022). Sixty-six percent of patients were diagnosed with severe disease at initial presentation, while 34% were re-classed to severe during the disease course. Mean estimated patient age at the time of diagnosis of severe AA was 37.1 (range 22-68) years. Fifty-three percent of patients were male. Most patients (93.4%) received pharmacological treatment for their condition; 45.5% received ≥2 lines of treatment with a mean duration of 24 months. First-line treatment discontinuation due to lack of efficacy occurred in 46.0% of cases. Hair regrowth occurred in 71.0% of patients, 59.2% of whom experienced major regrowth (≥60%) during the follow-up period. Median (95% confidence interval) time to regrowth was 13.7 (11.0-20.6) months. Treatment visit rates per person-year ranged from two (phototherapy) to 10 (topical treatment), dermatologist visits occurred at a rate of 12.9 per person-year and 6.0% of patients were hospitalized due to alopecia areata. The majority of hospitalizations were related to treatment and occurred in patients who received pulse systemic corticosteroid therapy. The patient and economic burden of AA in South Korea is high and there remains a critical unmet need among patients with severe AA with respect to the effectiveness of commonly used treatment strategies.

Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Utilization in Patients With HR+/ HER2- Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in a Real-World Setting in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to understand current treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) of women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (advanced breast cancer [ABC]) in Taiwan overall and within the subgroup of patients who were postmenopausal women with no previous systemic therapy in the ABC setting. METHODS: A chart review of anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and HRU was conducted via an online physician survey including 118 patient charts from women ≥ 18 years old with hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth receptor negative ABC, diagnosed between 2015 and 2017. RESULTS: The mean age of all patients was 56.6 years (range 29-83). Among the 118 patients, the most common first-line systemic therapy group after diagnosis of ABC was endocrine-based therapy (39.0%) or endocrine therapy (ET) plus chemotherapy (ChT) combinations (38.1%). In the postmenopausal subgroup (n = 56), ET-based therapy was the most common (44.6%). Oncologist visits, at annual rate of 9.20 (95% confidence interval 8.81-9.60), and hospitalizations, at annual rate of 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.96-1.22), were key drivers of HRU. Of the 118 patients, the 72 with at least one ChT agent in their first-line regimen had an annual hospitalization rate of 1.4 versus 0.45 admissions compared with the 46 patients on first-line ET-based therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Current treatment patterns suggest an unmet need for new medications that lead to reduction in high rate of ChT use. Results can inform future evaluations of new ABC treatments that estimate the health economic impact of their adoption in Taiwan.

A cost comparison of benralizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab in patients with severe asthma: A US third-party payer perspective.

BACKGROUND: Clinical trials and real-world evidence (RWE) studies of biologics have demonstrated reduced exacerbations, decreased use of oral corticosteroids (OCS), and improvements in daily symptoms and health-related quality of life in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA). OBJECTIVE: To compare direct health care costs associated with biologic use for the treatment of SEA from a US third-party payer perspective. METHODS: We developed a cost-minimization model to compare costs and cost offsets associated with 3 biologics-benralizumab, mepolizumab, and dupilumab-for 2- and 4-year periods. The model relied on longitudinal data from clinical trials to inform the primary (base case) analysis cost comparison and RWE study data, in a separate scenario, to compare costs in nonclinical trial settings. Primary model outcomes included exacerbations (including hospitalizations), OCS-dependent years (including associated complications), and total direct health care biologic costs. Results were calculated at the per patient and population level (per 1,000 patients). Sensitivity analyses with key model parameters were performed. RESULTS: Benralizumab had the lowest total biologic costs per patient for both the 2- and 4-year periods. Over 4 years, the marginal cost difference in total biologic costs per patient was $23,061 lower for benralizumab vs mepolizumab and $17,242 lower for benralizumab vs dupilumab. The 4-year population level analysis of benralizumab vs mepolizumab revealed $4.8 million in marginal cost offsets due to 582 fewer exacerbations and 153 fewer OCS-dependent years and a marginal total cost savings of $27.9 million per 1,000 patients for benralizumab. The 4-year population level analysis of benralizumab vs dupilumab revealed $2.3 million in marginal cost offsets due to 291 fewer exacerbations and 64 fewer OCS-dependent years and marginal total cost savings of $19.5 million per 1,000 patients for benralizumab. RWE data were available for a 2-year cost comparison scenario of benralizumab vs mepolizumab, which showed similar results to the base case analysis. Sensitivity analyses varying assumptions on key model parameter estimates confirmed results, with benralizumab having lower total direct health care costs in all scenarios tested, and showed that model results were most sensitive to changes in biologic costs and exacerbation reduction rates. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving benralizumab had higher nonbiologic cost offsets because of reductions in exacerbations and OCS-dependent years, leading to greater cost savings for third-party payers compared with patients receiving mepolizumab or dupilumab. Taken together with biologic costs, benralizumab presents greater savings in health care costs for payers than patients with SEA who use mepolizumab or dupilumab. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by AstraZeneca (Cambridge, UK). Drs Xu, Chung, Genofre, and Katial are or were AstraZeneca employees at the time this research was conducted and may be shareholders of AstraZeneca. Ms Schaefer and Dr Szende are employees of Labcorp Drug Development, which received funding from AstraZeneca to perform this research.

Treatment Patterns, Clinical Outcomes and Health Care Resource Utilisation in Patients with EGFR-mutated Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Real-World Study in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: Despite the dynamic treatment landscape for EGFR mutant-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRm+ mNSCLC), most of the earlier studies have focused on US or Western populations. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of South Korean patients with EGFRm+ mNSCLC. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult patients with EGFRm+ mNSCLC who received systemic treatment between January-2019 and June-2019. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients were included from 21 hospitals, with a median follow-up of 15.6 months. Median age was 65.0 years, 22% had central nervous system metastasis, and 57% and 38% had exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R, respectively. Among 144 patients (89%) who received first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, afatinib was most the common (44%), followed by gefitinib (28%) and erlotinib (13%). First-line chemotherapy was more common when an EGFR-mutation was detected after versus before first-line treatment initiation (31% vs 5%). Discontinuation of first-line treatment was mostly due to disease-progression (81%) and toxicity (7%). Among 58 (78%) patients who received second-line treatment, osimertinib was the most common (40%). Most (60%) patients reported ≥1 Grade ≥3 adverse event during first-line treatment. Following initiation of first-line treatment, physician visits and chest X-rays were the most frequent healthcare utilisation events. Rates of emergency-room visits and hospitalization were 12% and 16%, respectively, with a mean length-of-stay of 10.4 days. At 12 months, overall survival rate was 95%, and numerically worse for patients with exon 21 versus 19 mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Characteristics and clinical outcomes of Korean patients with EGFRm+ mNSCLC in real-world practice were comparable to those observed in clinical trials. As osimertinib was not reimbursed for first-line treatment before study completion, further investigation is warranted to explore evolving treatment practice.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Health-Resource Utilization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Following Failure of Sorafenib: A Retrospective Chart Review of 127 Patients in South Korea.

BACKGROUND: European, US, Asian and Korean treatment guidelines all recommend sorafenib as first-line systemic therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, due to the emergence of several new treatments, post-sorafenib treatment patterns in real-world clinical practice are less well understood. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to characterize current treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) in patients with HCC following the failure of first-line sorafenib in a real-world setting in Korea. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A chart review was conducted in 127 HCC patients who received systemic therapy or best supportive care following failure of first-line systemic treatment with sorafenib (2016-2018). Anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and survival were abstracted by 37 physicians in Korea. RESULTS: The mean (range) age of patients was 60 (37-79) years; 63 patients had low alpha-fetoprotein (AFP < 400 ng/mL), 64 patients had high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL). Post-sorafenib, 64 (50%) patients had systemic therapy. Regorafenib, used by 54 (84%) patients in second-line, and nivolumab monotherapy, by ten (56%) patients in third-line, were the most common therapies. Hepatologist visits and hospitalizations, at an average rate of 6.89 (95% CI 6.37-7.45) and 2.24 (95% CI 1.95-2.57) per patient-year, respectively, were the key contributors of HRU. The median overall survival (95% CI) from discontinuation of sorafenib was 13.0 (9.8-20.7), 6.5 (5.0-9.5) and 9.5 (6.7-12.3) months in the low AFP, high AFP and overall group, respectively. CONCLUSION: This real-world evidence research on treatment patterns reflected current clinical guidelines and highlighted fast progressing nature and continuing high mortality in HCC, especially among the high AFP group, underlying a need for new treatments that can lengthen survival. Results from this real-world chart review, together with existing clinical trial data, can inform future evaluations of new HCC treatments that estimate their health economic impact in Korea.

Treatment Patterns and Health Resource Utilization in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Failure of Sorafenib in Real-World Setting in Taiwan.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to characterize current treatment patterns and healthcare resource utilization (HRU) observed among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after the failure of sorafenib in real-world setting in Taiwan. METHODS: A chart review was conducted in 130 patients; the inclusion criteria were patients with HCC who were aged 20 years or older and had received systemic therapy or best supportive care after failure of first-line systemic treatment with sorafenib between 2016 and 2018. Anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment pathways, and survival were abstracted. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 61.7 years (range 27-84); of these 130 patients, 103 (79%) were male, 81 (62%) had high alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (≥400 ng/mL), and 96 (78.0%) were deceased at the time of data abstraction. After sorafenib therapy, 60 patients (46%) received systemic therapy, including nivolumab monotherapy (42%) and chemotherapy (25%). Oncologist visits at a semiannual per-patient rate of 3.7 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.4-4.0) and hospitalizations at rate of 1.1 (95% CI 1.0-1.3) were the key contributors to HRU. Semiannual per-patient hospitalization rate was 1.3 (95% CI 1.1-1.5) in the high-AFP group. Median survival from discontinuation of sorafenib was 6.9 months (95% CI 5.9-9.0). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world evidence research on treatment patterns reflected substantial HRU consistent with the severity of HCC, particularly in the high-AFP group. Findings highlighted continuing high mortality in HCC, underlying a need for new treatments that can lengthen survival. Results can inform future evaluations of new HCC treatments that estimate the health economic impact of their adoption in Taiwan.

Real world evidence study on treatment patterns and health resource utilization in patients with HR+/HER2- locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer in Korea.

Objective: To understand current treatment patterns and health care resource utilization (HRU) of women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (advanced breast cancer; ABC) in Korea overall and within patients who had progressed with prior endocrine therapy (as first-line treatment for metastatic disease) and patients with no prior systemic treatment (for advanced disease). Methods: A chart review was conducted in 109 patients (women ≥ 18 years old with HR+/HER2- ABC diagnosed between 2015 and 2017) from 11 hospitals. Anonymized data on patient characteristics, treatment patterns and HRU was abstracted. Results: Mean (range) age of all patients was 57.5 (40-81) years. Overall, the most common first-, second- and third-line systemic therapy after diagnosis of ABC were letrozole ± palbociclib (51%), endocrine therapy (ET)±everolimus (42%) or chemotherapy (ChT) (39%), and ChT (68%), respectively. In patients progressed with ET (n = 33) and those with no prior systemic treatment (n = 52), the most common first-line treatments were letrozole (82%) and letrozole + palbociclib (42%), respectively. The percentage of patients with at least one grade 3 or higher adverse event during first-line therapy was 93.1% vs 39.2% in patients on a ChT based regimen (N = 29) vs. ET (N = 74). Overall, oncologist visits, at an annual rate of 9.27 (95% CI: 8.87, 9.69) visits per month, and hospitalizations, with an annual rate of 0.44 (95% CI: 0.36, 0.54), and mean (SD) length of stay of 14.3 (10.32) days, were the key drivers of HRU. Conclusions: These findings on real world HRU reflected clinical guidelines and severity of ABC. Results can inform future evaluations of new ABC treatments that estimate the health economic impact of their adoption in Korea.

Socio-demographic indicators of self-reported health based on EQ-5D-3L: A cross-country analysis of population surveys from 18 countries.

Background: Generic health-related quality of life instruments, such as the EQ-5D, are increasingly used by countries to monitor population health via general population health surveys. Our aim was to demonstrate analytic options to measure socio-demographic differences in self-reported health using the EuroQol Group's archive of EQ-5D-3L population surveys that accumulated over the past two decades. Methods: Analyses captured self-reported EQ-5D-3L data on over 100,000 individuals from 18 countries with nationally representative population surveys. Socio-demographic indicators employed were age, sex, educational level and income. Logistic regression odds ratios and the health concentration index methodology were used in the socio-demographic analysis of EQ-5D-3L data. Results: Statistically significant socio-demographic differences existed in all countries (p < 0.01) with the EQ VAS based health concentration index varying from 0.090 to 0.157 across countries. Age had generally the largest contributing share, while educational level also had a consistent role in explaining lower levels of self-reported health. Further analysis in a subset of 7 countries with income data showed that, beyond educational level, income itself had an additional significant impact on self-reported health. Among the 5 dimensions of the EQ-5D-3L descriptive system, problems with usual activities and pain/discomfort had the largest contribution to the concentration of overall self-assessed health measured on the EQ VAS in most countries. Conclusion: The EQ-5D-3L was shown to be a powerful multi-dimensional instrument in the analyses of socio-demographic differences in self-reported health using various analytic methods. It offered a unique insight of inequalities by health dimensions.

Assessment of rituximab-abbs, a biosimilar, and rituximab outcomes in patients with CLL or NHL: A real-world UK study.

BACKGROUND: Rituximab (chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody) treatment is approved for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Rituximab-abbs (first biosimilar approved in 2017) is expected to significantly reduce healthcare economic burden due to lower acquisition costs. This non-interventional, non-comparative study assessed real-world effectiveness and tolerability of rituximab-abbs and rituximab in treatment-naive patients with CLL or NHL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Via an online physician survey, 46 UK-registered hematologists and oncologists retrospectively reported on randomly selected patients aged ≥18 years with CLL or NHL with rituximab-abbs or rituximab as first-line immunotherapy. Overall, 201 patient charts were examined across 4 cohorts: rituximab-abbs in CLL, rituximab-abbs in NHL, rituximab in CLL, rituximab in NHL. RESULTS: Demographic profiles across cohorts were similar. Most patients (94 %-100 %) received combination therapy (rituximab-abbs or rituximab mainly with chemotherapy). For both treatments, overall response rate (94 %-98 %) and 1-year overall survival (98 %-100 %) were very high for patients with CLL or NHL. Most common serious adverse events were neutropenia, fatigue, anemia and infusion reactions. The majority of patients (54 %-66 %) did not experience a grade ≥3 adverse event. Healthcare resource utilization was similarly high across cohorts, driven by diagnostic testing, oncologist office visits, and day-case hospital admissions; many patients required supportive medical therapies. Mean annual savings of ∼£1000/patient driven by acquisition costs occurred with rituximab-abbs versus rituximab, administration costs were similar. CONCLUSION: Rituximab-abbs and rituximab demonstrated similar effectiveness and tolerability in treating CLL and NHL in routine UK clinical practice and demonstrate the utility of the biosimilar as a cost-saving alternative treatment.

Cost effectiveness of benralizumab for severe, uncontrolled oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma in Sweden.

Aim: We investigated cost effectiveness of benralizumab vs. standard of care (SOC) plus oral corticosteroids (OCS) for patients with severe, eosinophilic OCS-dependent asthma in Sweden.Materials and methods: A three-state, cohort-based Markov model of data from three Phase III benralizumab clinical trials (ZONDA [NCT02075255], SIROCCO [NCT01928771], and CALIMA [NCT01914757]) was used to assess the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of benralizumab vs. SOC plus OCS. Health outcomes were estimated in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The model included costs and disutilities associated with extrapolated OCS-related adverse events. Patients with severe asthma were defined as those receiving OCS ≥5 mg/day.Results: Benralizumab demonstrated a cost-effectiveness ratio vs. SOC plus OCS of 2018 Swedish Kronor (SEK) 366,855 (€34,127) per QALY gained, based on increases of 1.33 QALYs and SEK 488,742 (€45,344) per patient. Benralizumab treatment costs contributed most to incremental costs. The probability of benralizumab's being cost-effective with willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds between SEK 429,972 (€40,000) and SEK 752,452 (€70,000) ranged from 75% to 99%.Limitations: Potential limitations of these analyses include the use of combined data from three different clinical trials, a one-way sensitivity analysis that did not include mortality and transition estimates, and Observational & Pragmatic Research Institute (OPRI) data from the UK as a proxy of the Swedish health care system.Conclusions: The results of these analyses demonstrate that benralizumab has a high probability of being cost-effective compared with SOC plus OCS for a subgroup of patients with severe, eosinophilic asthma receiving regular OCS treatment and may support clinicians, payers and patients in making treatment decisions.

Valuation of transfusion-free living in MDS: results of health utility interviews with patients.

BACKGROUND: This study measured how myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients value transfusion independence (TI), reduced transfusions (RT) and transfusion-dependence (TD) using health utility assessment methodology. METHODS: 47 MDS patients were interviewed, US (n = 8), France (n = 9), Germany (n = 9) and the UK (n = 21), to elicit the utility value of TI, RT and TD. Health states were developed based on literature; patient forum discussions; and were validated by a hematologist. Face-to-face interviews used the feeling thermometer Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the Time Trade-Off (TTO) method to value the health states on a 0 (dead) to 1 (perfect health) scale. Socio-demographic, clinical, and quality-of-life (EQ-5D) characteristics were surveyed to describe the patient sample. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The mean age was 67 years (range: 29-83); 45% male, 70% retired; 40% had secondary/high school education, or higher (32%), and 79% lived with family, a partner or spouse, or friends. The mean time from MDS diagnosis was 5 years (range:1-23). Most patients (87%) received previous transfusions and 49% had received a transfusion in the last 3 months. Mean EQ-5D index score was 0.78; patients reported at least some problem with mobility (45%), usual activities (40%), pain/discomfort (47%), and anxiety/depression (34%). Few patients had difficulty understanding the VAS (n = 3) and TTO (n = 4) exercises. Utility scores for TI were higher than for RT (0.84 vs. 0.77; p < 0.001) or TD (0.84 vs. 0.60; p < 0.001). Three patients rated TD worse than dead. Corresponding VAS scale scores were 78 vs. 56; (p < 0.001), and 78 vs. 31 (p < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSION: Patients value TI, suggesting an important role for new treatments aiming to achieve greater TI in MDS. These results can be used in preference-based health economic evaluation of new MDS treatments, such as in future cost-utility studies.

RWE Framework: An Interactive Visual Tool to Support a Real-World Evidence Study Design.

OBJECTIVES: Real-world evidence (RWE) is essential for the development of pharmaceutical and medical technologies and informs treatment-related decisions by regulatory agencies, payers, healthcare providers, and patients. Given that planning RWE studies present diverse challenges, we developed the RWE Framework, a concise, visual, interactive tool designed to align multidisciplinary stakeholders toward common goals and encourage a methodical approach to RWE study planning. METHODS: A search of published literature and internet-based resources was performed to identify guidance on RWE study planning with decision and/or visual aids. A conceptual framework for a study design tool was developed based on best practices for RWE studies, enhanced with an infographic design, and refined by multidisciplinary input from RWE researchers. RESULTS: The searches confirmed an unmet need for a concise tool to support a broad range of RWE study designs: only two sources with decision/visual aids were identified. The novel RWE Framework comprises sequential decision steps with instructions to guide users through consideration of research objectives, product approval status, study setting, outcomes of interest, data availability in routine practice, need for primary data collection and/or randomization, study type and methodology, and applicable regulatory standards. Pilot testing using case studies of pharmaceutical assets demonstrated the utility of RWE Framework and applicability for use in team environments. CONCLUSIONS: The RWE Framework is a novel, concise, visual, and interactive tool to inform RWE study planning. It addresses a broad range of real-world study types and research objectives and was found to enhance RWE decision-making by multidisciplinary teams. Further validation is warranted.

Evaluation of pain relief treatment and timelines in emergency care in six European countries and Australia.

PURPOSE: Inadequate relief of pain is common in prehospital and hospital emergency department (ED) settings. We investigated pain treatments and timelines in patients receiving pre-hospital and hospital ED care to provide insight into potential approaches to reduce the burden of trauma-related pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational, retrospective chart review, patients had received emergency care for musculoskeletal trauma injuries and analgesic treatment for moderate-to-severe pain in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Spain or Sweden. As inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane (LDM) is used extensively in Australia but was not widely available in Europe at the time of this analysis, data from Australia were collated to provide insight into the potential utility of this analgesic in Europe. The primary endpoint was time to administration of first pain relief treatment following arrival of paramedic/ED care. RESULTS: Randomly selected physicians (n=189) collated data from 856 patients (Europe: n=585; Australia: n=271) via an online survey. Time to first pain relief treatment varied between countries and was significantly longer across Europe versus Australia (mean [SD] 38.1 [34.7] vs 29.9 [35.5] mins; P=0.0017). Patients from Australia who received LDM experience a shorter mean (SD) time to first pain treatment following arrival of emergency care versus patients who received other analgesics (propensity score matched [n=85] per group: 21.7 [24.2] vs 39.1 [43.0] mins; P=0.0013). Across all countries, mean (SD) time to first analgesic was shorter when treatment was administered by paramedics versus hospital ED staff (15.7 [14.7] vs 49.1 [38.4] mins). CONCLUSIONS: While there was a large variation in analgesia timelines across countries, mean times are shorter in Australia compared with Europe overall. In Australia, use of LDM was associated with a significantly shorter time from emergency assistance to first pain treatment compared with non-LDM treatments. Further studies are needed to investigate the utility of LDM in Europe.

The inequity of informal payments for health care: the case of Hungary.

As in most countries of Central and Eastern Europe, informal payments have been a characteristic feature of the Hungarian health care system both during and since the demise of Soviet type socialist rule. Although informal payments continue to be so characteristic in the region, little empirical evidence exists on their scope or working. As far as equity is concerned, it has sometimes been suggested that physicians play a 'Robin Hood' role and subsidise the poor at the expense of the rich. With the aid of an interview survey of a representative sample of the Hungarian population, we examine the distribution of the burden of informal payments across income groups. Results indicate that informal payments are a highly regressive way of funding health care, with Kakwani progressivity indices of -0.38, -0.39, -0.35 and -0.36 for GP, outpatient specialist, hospital, and total care, respectively. The finding that people with lower income pay proportionally more for public health care through informal payments underlines the emptiness of the 'Robin Hood' claims and the need for reform.

Psychometric and utility-based measures of health status of asthmatic patients with different disease control level.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the relationship between asthma control level and health-related QOL (HR-QOL), and to understand the role of various psychometric and utility-based methods in studying this relationship. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-eight consecutive adult outpatients and inpatients at four sites participated in the study. Physicians identified the level of disease control according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) classification system. Patients filled in three different HR-QOL questionnaires (EuroQol 5-D [EQ-5D], Short-Form 36-item health survey [SF-36], and St George's Respiratory Questionnaire [SGRQ]) and a direct time trade-off question. The Short Form-6D (SF-6D) was used to derive utility values from SF-36 data. RESULTS: All patient-reported evaluation methods could discriminate between patients with different disease control levels, and both generic and disease-specific instruments strongly correlated to each other. The magnitude of differences in HR-QOL between groups with different disease control levels was clinically meaningful. All three HR-QOL measures reflected a relationship between disease control level and HR-QOL, but the actual pattern of the relationship depended on the instrument used. Utilities gained from the EQ-5D index, compared with the SF-6D index, had higher values in the patient group with the best disease control and lower values in the patient group with poor disease control. CONCLUSION: When choosing an instrument to measure the health status of asthmatic patients in clinical studies, the severity range of the study population should be considered. Researchers might prefer to use the EQ-5D in asthma patients with severe disease or poor disease control and the SF-6D in patients with mild disease or good disease control.

Health care reform in six Central European countries. A focus on health economic requirements in the drug pricing and reimbursement processes.

This study gives an overview of the health care reform in six Central European countries after the transition from a central planning system to a regulated market economy. We focused on cost containment policies for drugs, especially the requirements for submitting health economic data in the pricing and/or reimbursement processes. The literature review was supplemented with a survey with decision makers at national health authorities in each country. The study covered Croatia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Slovenia. All countries had in common that health economic information was used in reimbursement rather than in pricing processes. Differences between the six countries were mainly variations in the relative importance of health economic data and the presence of explicit requirements and guidelines. Published health economic guidelines exist in two countries and one of the six countries applies a mandatory submission system for a selected range of new drugs. In most of the Central European countries it is more typical that authorities issue a brief list of required data for reimbursement submissions that include health economic information among other data. There is a generally widespread expectation towards more systematic and formalized requirements for health economic and outcomes research data appearing within the next 3-5 years in the region.

[Health-related quality of life of the Hungarian population]. / A magyar lakosság egészségi állapothoz kapcsolódó életminósége.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to measure the health-related quality of life of the Hungarian general population. The quality of life survey was part of the National Health Survey (Országos Lakossági Egészségfelmérés, OLEF) conducted in year 2000 on a representative sample of 5503 members of the general population. RESULTS: Showed that, among the five health-related quality of life dimensions measured by the EQ-5D questionnaire, pain/discomfort had the highest (38%) prevalence. More than 60% of the population over 60 years of age suffer from pain or discomfort. In international comparison, anxiety/depression also had high prevalence in Hungary when compared to other developed countries. More than third of the Hungarian adult population today is depressed or suffer from anxiety. The analysis also highlighted the important association between socio-economic factors and health-related quality of life. According to the applied model, older age, being female, lower education, and lower income are the main determinants of worse health-related quality of life. When quality of life is measured on a 0-100 scale, each additional life year is associated with a decrease of 0.4 units of quality of life, being female is associated with 3 units lower quality of life. Each 10,000 Ft increase in mean household income improves quality of life with 0.5 unit. People with higher education have 5 units higher quality of life than those below medium level education. CONCLUSION: Findings of this study provide important baseline data for future burden of illness, health economic, and health policy analyses in Hungary.

Medical resource utilization and associated costs in patients with ulcerative colitis in the UK: a chart review analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Limited evidence is available on the economic burden of ulcerative colitis (UC) in the UK, particularly relating to the impact of relapse frequency on direct medical costs. This study identifies and assesses medical resource utilization (MRU) and associated direct costs in mild and moderate UC patients in the UK. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients with mild-to-moderate UC diagnosed at least 1 year before the study was performed. From 33 general practitioner (GP) and 34 gastroenterologist sites, charts of the last three UC patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were reviewed. Descriptive statistics were calculated for MRU and 2011 costs (GB£) by number of relapses. RESULTS: The study population included 201 patients with a mean age of 39.9 years; 44% were women and the mean disease duration was 7.4 years. UC-related costs of each MRU category increased with the number of relapses. Comparing patients without relapse with those with more than two relapses, the mean annual UC-related costs were £14 versus £2556 for hospitalizations; £218 versus £988 for visits (including nurse, GP, specialist, and other visits); £21 versus £1303 for procedures; £17 versus £188 for diagnostics; and £1168 versus £6660 for all-cause total costs. Age, sex, and site of data reporting (GP vs. gastroenterologist) were not associated with MRU or costs. CONCLUSION: Patients with mild-to-moderate UC incurred considerable costs that increased markedly with the number of relapses. These findings support the importance of maintenance therapies in UC that reduce or prevent relapses. Quantifying the relationship between relapse rate and costs will inform future health economic studies.