The assessment of structural and functional test results for early detection of hydroxychloroquine macular toxicity.

PURPOSE: To assess structural (optical coherence tomography, fundus autofluorescence) and functional (contrast sensitivity and visual field) test results which were used for detecting early retinal changes in patients using oral hydroxychloroquine. METHODS: Patients using oral hydroxychloroquine for at least one year were divided into two groups according to the duration of drug use. Groups 1 and 2 consisted of patients with drug use for more than 5 years and 1-5 years, respectively. The drug-using groups were compared with the control group. The mean retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), central macular thickness (CMT), ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL), static 10-2 visual field, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging, and contrast sensitivity tests were performed and statistically compared between groups. RESULTS: Median and temporal quadrant RNFL thicknesses were found to be statistically significantly lower in the drug groups. In the drug groups, the GC-IPL sectoral and mean thicknesses were found to be statistically lower in all quadrants. Central macular thickness was also found to be similar in all three groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in visual field parameters. Macular FAF images were significantly higher in the drug users, but there was no significant difference between the three groups in foveal FAF images. Contrast sensitivity measurements were significantly lower in the drug groups than in the control group at all spatial frequencies except 6 and 18 cycles/degree. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of structural and functional tests in patients using hydroxychloroquine provides useful information in detecting early retinal changes.

Anterior segment complications after dexamethasone implantations:real world data.

PURPOSE: We aim to contribute to the literature in terms of treatment safety with our real world data by examining the anterior segment complications and follow-up results of patients who underwent dexamethasone implants in our clinic. METHODS: The records of patients treated with at least one intravitreal dexamethasone implant for various retinal diseases: diabetic macular edema (265 eyes), central retinal vein occlusion (45 eyes), retinal vein branch occlusion (91 eyes), postoperative cystoid macular edema (18 eyes), non-infectious uveitis (37 eyes) and other (14 eyes) between July 2013 and April 2020 were reviewed. RESULTS: After 925 injections were applied to 470 eyes of a total of 383 patients, the eyes were controlled during a mean follow-up of 24 months. No complications were detected in 328 eyes. Intraocular pressure (IOP) above 25 mmHg was detected in 97 eyes (20.6%) that had no previous history of ocular hypertension. Of these 97 eyes, 71 (73.1%) eyes with increased IOP were treated with topical monotherapy, 26 (26.8%) eyes were treated with topical combined therapy and 1 (1.03%) patient had glaucoma surgery. Cataracts requiring surgical intervention developed in 55 (%21.73) of 253 phakic eyes. Three patients have anterior chamber dislocation of dexamethasone, 1 patient was hospitalized with sterile endophthalmitis on the 7th day after the injection, and pars plana vitrectomy was performed. CONCLUSION: This study is the first long-term follow-up study in our country evaluating the safety of dexamethasone implant injections in various retinal diseases and presenting the first real world data. Cataract progression and increased IOP were found to be the most common side effects. We observed that the patient's diagnosis did not cause a statistically significant change in the observation of side effects. As a result of our findings, close follow-up of IOP after the injection of dexamethasone implants would be appropriate.