Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 6(6): e1674, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22724029

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alternative treatments for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) are required in East Africa. Paromomycin sulphate (PM) has been shown to be efficacious for VL treatment in India. METHODS: A multi-centre randomized-controlled trial (RCT) to compare efficacy and safety of PM (20 mg/kg/day for 21 days) and PM plus sodium stibogluconate (SSG) combination (PM, 15 mg/kg/day and SSG, 20 mg/kg/day for 17 days) with SSG (20 mg/kg/day for 30 days) for treatment of VL in East Africa. Patients aged 4-60 years with parasitologically confirmed VL were enrolled, excluding patients with contraindications. Primary and secondary efficacy outcomes were parasite clearance at 6-months follow-up and end of treatment, respectively. Safety was assessed mainly using adverse event (AE) data. FINDINGS: The PM versus SSG comparison enrolled 205 patients per arm with primary efficacy data available for 198 and 200 patients respectively. The SSG & PM versus SSG comparison enrolled 381 and 386 patients per arm respectively, with primary efficacy data available for 359 patients per arm. In Intention-to-Treat complete-case analyses, the efficacy of PM was significantly lower than SSG (84.3% versus 94.1%, difference = 9.7%, 95% confidence interval, CI: 3.6 to 15.7%, p = 0.002). The efficacy of SSG & PM was comparable to SSG (91.4% versus 93.9%, difference = 2.5%, 95% CI: -1.3 to 6.3%, p = 0.198). End of treatment efficacy results were very similar. There were no apparent differences in the safety profile of the three treatment regimens. CONCLUSION: The 17 day SSG & PM combination treatment had a good safety profile and was similar in efficacy to the standard 30 day SSG treatment, suggesting suitability for VL treatment in East Africa. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: www.clinicaltrials.govNCT00255567.


Asunto(s)
Gluconato de Sodio Antimonio/administración & dosificación , Antiprotozoarios/administración & dosificación , Leishmaniasis Visceral/tratamiento farmacológico , Paromomicina/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , África Oriental , Gluconato de Sodio Antimonio/efectos adversos , Antiprotozoarios/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Quimioterapia Combinada/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paromomicina/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg ; 104(11): 706-12, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20870258

RESUMEN

In sub-Saharan Africa, visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is treated with either Pentostam(TM) (sodium antimony gluconate) or generic sodium stibogluconate (SSG), except in Uganda where Glucantime(®) (meglumine antimoniate) has been in use for at least a decade. Between January 2008 and February 2009, 54 Ethiopian VL patients were treated with Glucantime. The medical charts of these patients were reviewed to assess the effectiveness and safety profile of Glucantime in a routine healthcare setting. None of the patients from south Ethiopia (n=24) and 46.4% of the patients from north Ethiopia (n=30) were HIV co-infected. At completion of treatment (Day 31), cure rates were 78.6% (95% CI 59.0-91.7%) in north Ethiopia and 100% (95% CI 85.8-100%) in south Ethiopia. Thirty-three non-serious and six serious adverse events (two pancreatitis, one renal failure and three deaths) were observed in 26 patients. One-third of the non-serious adverse events were due to biochemical pancreatitis. During treatment, a case-fatality rate of 10.0% in north Ethiopia and 0.0% in south Ethiopia was noted. These data show that Glucantime can be as effective as Pentostam or SSG in HIV-negative patients. The data also point to clinical pancreatitis as a safety concern, especially in patients with HIV co-infection.


Asunto(s)
Antiprotozoarios/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por VIH , Leishmaniasis Visceral/tratamiento farmacológico , Meglumina/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Organometálicos/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Antiprotozoarios/efectos adversos , Niño , Comorbilidad , Etiopía/epidemiología , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Humanos , Leishmaniasis Visceral/epidemiología , Masculino , Meglumina/efectos adversos , Antimoniato de Meglumina , Compuestos Organometálicos/efectos adversos , Pancreatitis/inducido químicamente , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Renal/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA