Final analyses of the prospective controlled trial on the efficacy of uracil and tegafur/leucovorin as an adjuvant treatment for stage II colon cancer with risk factors for recurrence using propensity score-based methods (JFMC46-1201).

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC) has not been well established. Using propensity score matching, we previously reported that the 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was significantly higher in patients treated with uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin (UFT/LV) against surgery alone. We report the final results, including updated 5-year overall survival (OS) rates and risk factor analysis outcomes. METHODS: In total, 1902 high-risk stage II CC patients with T4, perforation/penetration, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma/mucinous carcinoma, and/or < 12 dissected lymph nodes were enrolled in this prospective, non-randomized controlled study based on their self-selected treatment. Oral UFT/LV therapy was administered for six months after surgery. RESULTS: Of the 1880 eligible patients, 402 in Group A (surgery alone) and 804 in Group B (UFT/LV) were propensity score-matched. The 5-year DFS rate was significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (P = 0.0008). The 5-year OS rates were not significantly different between groups. The inverse probability of treatment weighting revealed significantly higher 5-year DFS (P = 0.0006) and 5-year OS (P = 0.0122) rates in group B than in group A. Multivariate analyses revealed that male sex, age ≥ 70 years, T4, < 12 dissected lymph nodes, and no adjuvant chemotherapy were significant risk factors for DFS and/or OS. CONCLUSION: The follow-up data from our prospective non-randomized controlled study revealed a considerable survival advantage in DFS offered by adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT/LV administered for six months over surgery alone in individuals with high-risk stage II CC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs031180155 (date of registration: 25/02/2019), UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000007783 (date of registration: 18/04/2012).

Human metaphase II oocytes with narrow perivitelline space have poor fertilization, developmental, and pregnancy potentials.

PURPOSE: To analyze the fertilization, developmental, and pregnancy potentials in oocytes with narrow perivitelline space. METHODS: Perivitelline space (PVS) of oocytes was evaluated at the time of ICSI, and those without sufficient PVS were judged as oocytes with narrow PVS (NPVS oocytes), and those with sufficient PVS formation were judged as oocytes with non-narrow PVS (non-NPVS oocytes). The analysis included 634 NPVS oocytes from 278 cycles and 12,121 non-NPVS oocytes from 1698 cycles. The fertilization and developmental potentials of NPVS and non-NPVS oocytes were compared by calculating odds ratios using a mixed-effects logistic regression model. We also compared the embryo transfer outcomes of those used for single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer after developing into the blastocyst stage. RESULTS: NPVS oocytes had higher odds ratios for degeneration (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.555; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.096-2.206; p = 0.0133) and 0PN (aOR, 1.387; 95% CI, 1.083-1.775; p = 0.0095), resulting in a lower 2PN rate (aOR, 0.761; 95% CI, 0.623-0.929; p = 0.0072). Even embryos with confirmed 2PN had lower odds ratios for cleavage (aOR, 0.501; 95% CI, 0.294-0.853; p = 0.0109) and blastocyst development (Gardner criteria; CC-AA) rates (aOR, 0.612; 95% CI, 0.476-0.788; p = 0.0001). Blastocysts developed from NPVS oocytes had significantly lower odds ratios for clinical pregnancy (aOR, 0.435; 95% CI, 0.222-0.854; p = 0.0156) than those developed from non-NPVS oocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Oocytes with NPVS have low fertilization and developmental potential, as well as low likelihood of pregnancy.

Correlation between recurrence-free survival and overall survival after upfront surgery for resected colorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: The role of recurrence-free survival (RFS) as a valid surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in patients who underwent upfront surgery for colorectal liver metastases remains uncertain. The aim of the study was to compare the two survival measures in a nationwide cohort of upfront resected colorectal liver metastasis. METHODS: Data from patients with colorectal liver metastases without extrahepatic metastases who underwent curative surgery for liver metastases were retrieved from the Japanese nationwide database (data collection 2005-2007 and 2013-2014). RFS, OS, and survival after recurrence were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The correlation (ρ) between RFS and OS was assessed using the rank correlation method combined with iterative multiple imputation, to account for censoring. As a secondary analysis, the correlation was evaluated according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. In sensitivity analysis, the pairwise correlation between RFS and OS was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 2385 patients with colorectal liver metastases were included. In the primary analysis, there was a moderately strong correlation between RFS and OS (ρ = 0.73, 95 per cent c.i. 0.70 to 0.76). The strength of the correlation was similar regardless of the adjuvant treatment regimen (oxaliplatin plus 5-fluorouracil: ρ = 0.72, 0.67 to 0.77; 5-fluorouracil alone: ρ = 0.72, 0.66 to 0.76; observation: ρ = 0.74, 0.69 to 0.78). The mean(s.d.) pairwise correlation coefficient between 3-year RFS and 5-year OS was 0.87(0.06). CONCLUSION: In surgically treated patients with colorectal liver metastases, there was a moderately strong correlation between RFS and OS, which was unaffected by the treatment regimen. Further validation using a trial-level analysis is required.

Prospective observational study of the efficacy of oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin for stage II colon cancer with risk factors for recurrence using propensity score matching (JFMC46-1201).

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II colon cancer (CC) has not been well established. We compared the effects of surgery with and without oral uracil and tegafur plus leucovorin (UFT/LV) in patients with high-risk stage II CC, adjusting for potential risk factors. METHODS: We enrolled patients with histologically confirmed stage II colon adenocarcinoma with at least one of the following conditions: T4 disease, perforation/penetration, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma/mucinous carcinoma, or < 12 dissected lymph nodes. Patients chose to be non-randomized or randomized to undergo surgery alone (NR-Group S or R-Group S) or surgery followed by 6 months of UFT/LV (NR-Group U or R-Group U). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) after adjusting for previously reported risk factors using propensity score matching (1:2) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) in the non-randomized arm. RESULTS: Overall, 1,902 (98%) and 36 (2%) patients were enrolled in the non-randomized and randomized arms, respectively. There were too few patients in the randomized arm and these were therefore excluded from the analysis. Of the 1,902 patients, 402 in NR-Group S and 804 in NR-Group U were propensity score-matched. The 3-year DFS rate (95% confidence interval) was significantly higher in NR-Group U (80.9% [77.9%-83.4%]) than in NR-Group S (74.0% [69.3%-78.0%]) (hazard ratio, 0.64 [0.50-0.83]; P = 0.0006). The 3-year overall survival rate was not significantly different between NR-Group S and NR-Group U. Significantly higher 3-year DFS (P = 0.0013) and overall survival (P = 0.0315) rates were observed in NR-Group U compared with NR-Group S using IPTW. CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT/LV showed a significant survival benefit over surgery alone in patients with high-risk stage II CC characterized by at least one of the following conditions: T4 disease, perforation/penetration, poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma/mucinous carcinoma, or < 12 dissected lymph nodes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials: jRCTs031180155 (date of registration: 25/02/2019) (UMIN Clinical Trials Registry: UMIN000007783 , date of registration: 18/04/2012).

Management of inguinal lymph node metastases from rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma.

AIM: The surgical treatment of inguinal lymph node (ILN) metastases secondary to anorectal adenocarcinoma remains controversial. This study aimed to clarify the surgical treatment and management of ILN metastasis according to its classification. METHODS: This retrospective, multi-centre, observational study included patients with synchronous or metachronous ILN metastases who were diagnosed with rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma between January 1997 and December 2011. Treatment outcomes were analysed according to recurrence and prognosis. RESULTS: Among 1181 consecutively enrolled patients who received treatment for rectal or anal canal adenocarcinoma at 20 referral hospitals, 76 (6.4%) and 65 (5.5%) had synchronous and metachronous ILN metastases, respectively. Among 141 patients with ILN metastasis, differentiated carcinoma, solitary ILN metastasis and ILN dissection were identified as independent predictive factors associated with a favourable prognosis. No significant difference was found in the frequency of recurrence after ILN dissection between patients with synchronous (80.6%) or metachronous (81.0%) ILN metastases. Patients who underwent R0 resection of the primary tumour and ILN dissection had a 5-year survival rate of 41.3% after ILN dissection (34.1% and 53.1% for patients with synchronous and metachronous ILN metastases, respectively, P = 0.55). CONCLUSION: The ILN can be appropriately classified as a regional lymph node in rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma. Moreover, aggressive ILN dissection might be effective in improving the prognosis of low rectal and anal canal adenocarcinoma with ILN metastases; thus, prophylactic ILN dissection is unnecessary.

A randomized controlled trial of surgery and postoperative modified FOLFOX6 versus surgery and perioperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type resectable colorectal liver metastases: EXPERT study.

PURPOSE: To clarify the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for the patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM), we conducted a multicenter randomized phase III trial to compare surgery followed by postoperative FOLFOX regimen with perioperative FOLFOX regimen plus cetuximab in patients with KRAS wild-type resectable CLM. METHODS: Patients who had KRAS wild-type resectable CLM having one to eight liver nodules without extrahepatic disease were randomly assigned to the postoperative chemotherapy group, wherein up-front hepatectomy was performed followed by 12 cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6, and the perioperative chemotherapy group (experimental), wherein six cycles of preoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab were performed followed by hepatectomy and six cycles of postoperative modified FOLFOX6 plus cetuximab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS: There were 37 patients in postoperative chemotherapy group and 40 patients in the perioperative chemotherapy group who were analyzed. Baseline characteristics were well-balanced between groups. The PFS and overall survival (OS) showed no significant difference (PFS, hazard ratio 1.18 [95% confidence interval 0.69-2.01], P = 0.539: OS, 1.03 [0.46-2.29], P = 0.950). In the postoperative chemotherapy group, 35.1% had a 3-year PFS, and 86.5% had a 3-year OS. Meanwhile, in the perioperative chemotherapy group, 30.0% had a 3-year PFS, and 74.4% had a 3-year OS. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in survival found between the group of the perioperative chemotherapy plus cetuximab and that of the postoperative chemotherapy in the cohort of our study. The study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000007787).

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-containing medium treatment after thawing improves blastocyst-transfer outcomes in the frozen- thawed blastocyst-transfer cycle.

PURPOSE: To determine whether granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF)-containing medium could improve embryo-transfer outcomes in frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer. METHODS: Patients who underwent frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (430 women, aged 30-39 years, 566 cycles) were analyzed. Frozen-thawed blastocysts were cultured in GM-CSF-containing medium or control medium for 3-5 h, followed by transfer to the uterus. The embryo-transfer outcomes in the two groups were measured and compared, and a propensity score matching (1:1) method was used to balance the differences in baseline characteristics. We analyzed 213 matched samples. RESULTS: In patients who underwent frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer with GM-CSF, the percentage of human chorionic gonadotropin-positive cases, biochemical pregnancies, clinical pregnancies, ongoing pregnancies, and live birth rates was 60.6%, 7.98%, 52.6%, 42.9%, and 40.9%, respectively, as compared with 45.1%, 3.29%, 41.8%, 31.1%, and 30.5%, respectively, for the control groups. The rates of human chorionic gonadotropin positivity (odds ratio [OR]: 1.87, 95% confidence interval: [CI]: 1.27-2.75), biochemical pregnancy (2.55, 1.04-6.29), clinical pregnancy (1.54, 1.05-2.27), ongoing pregnancy (1.64, 1.13-2.41), and live birth (1.67, 1.14-2.45) were significantly higher in the GM-CSF group than the control group. The incidence of pregnancy loss (22.3% vs. 27.0%) did not significantly differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: The use of a GM-CSF-containing medium for blastocyst-recovery culture improved the live birth rate as a result of increased implantation rate in the frozen-thawed blastocyst-transfer cycle. The use of GM-CSF-containing medium following blastocyst thawing could be an effective choice for improving the blastocyst-transfer outcomes.

The morphokinetics algorithm based on data from day 5 blastocyst transfer (KIDScoreD5 version 3) is also useful for embryo selection in day 6 blastocyst transfer.

Purpose: To analyze whether the morphokinetics algorithm based on data from day 5 blastocyst transfer (KIDScoreD5 version 3) can predict the pregnancy rate of both day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Methods: The relationship between KIDScoreD5 and clinical pregnancy rate was evaluated using the Cochran-Armitage test and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: A positive correlation was observed between the KIDScoreD5 value and clinical pregnancy rate for both day 5 (p = 0.0003) and day 6 blastocysts (p = 0.0019) using the Cochrane-Armitage test. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of KIDScoreD5 for clinical pregnancy was 0.627 (0.575-0.677, p < 0.0001) for day 5 blastocysts and 0.685 (0.571-0.780, p = 0.0009) for day 6 blastocysts. The combined analysis of both day 5 and day 6 blastocysts also showed an AUC of 0.680 (0.636-0.720, p < 0.0001), suggesting that it is possible to select embryos that are more likely to result in pregnancy. Conclusions: KIDScoreD5 could predict pregnancy not only in day 5 blastocysts but also in day 6 blastocysts. When both day 5 and day 6 blastocysts are vitrified, embryo selection by KIDScoreD5 is possible with a high prediction ability of pregnancy.

[A Case of Transverse Colon Cancer Undergoing Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy after Distal Gastrectomy with Billroth â ¡ Reconstruction].

A 79-year-old man was diagnosed with transverse colon cancer who had a history of distal gastrectomy and antecolic Billroth Ⅱ(B-Ⅱ)reconstruction for duodenal ulcer. We performed laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Surgical findings indicated that the tumor was located in the center of the transverse colon. After we performed mobilization of right colon and lymph node dissection, we performed mobilization of left colon and we peeled off those adhesions with the jejunal limb and transverse colon mesentery. Then, we resected transverse colon and removed right hemicolon. We reconstructed a functional end-to-end anastomosis on the ventral side of the jejunal limb. The patient was discharged without complications on the 10th postoperative day. In post B-Ⅱ reconstruction cases, we can perform laparoscopic colectomy safely with preoperative CT confirmation and adequate colon mobilization.

Characteristics and Prognostic Factors of Bone Metastasis in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Because bone metastasis from colorectal cancer is rare, there are little available data regarding such cases. OBJECTIVE: The study aim was to identify the prognostic factors and characteristics associated with survival in colorectal cancer patients with bone metastasis. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study from a prospectively collected database. SETTINGS: The study took place in a multidisciplinary, high-volume tertiary cancer center in Japan. PATIENTS: Examined were records from 104 consecutive patients treated between 2004 and 2015 for bone metastasis from colorectal cancer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was overall survival. RESULTS: The spine was the most common site of bone metastasis from colorectal cancer. Right colon cancer correlated significantly with long bone metastasis (p = 0.046), whereas left colon cancer correlated significantly with spinal bone metastasis (p = 0.034). Liver metastasis was also significantly correlated with spinal bone metastasis (p = 0.036). The median interval between the primary therapy for colorectal cancer and the metachronous diagnosis of bone metastasis was 20.0 months (quartile 1 to quartile 3, 9.0-46.5 mo). The median survival time from diagnosis of bone metastasis from colorectal cancer was 5.0 months (95% CI, 4.0-9.0 mo), and the 1-year survival rate was 30.0% (95% CI, 21.1%-39.4%). Multivariate analysis revealed that ≥2 extra-bone metastatic organs, hypercalcemia, and pathologic fractures were independent poor prognostic factors (p < 0.001, 0.001, and 0.033). The number of extra-bone metastatic organs correlated with prognosis. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective, nonrandomized design, as well as selection bias and performance at a single institute. CONCLUSIONS: The location of colorectal cancer correlates significantly with the site of bone metastasis; the prognosis of patients with bone metastasis from colorectal cancer is very poor, and the significant prognostic factors are number of extra-bone metastatic organs, hypercalcemia, and pathologic fractures. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A589.

Clinicopathological and molecular differences between right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancer in Japanese patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify clinicopathological features, frequencies of molecular biomarkers, and prognoses in Japanese colorectal cancer patients and compare them with right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colorectal cancer (LCRC). METHODS: We consecutively selected 575 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection from 2008 to 2011. RCC was located from the cecum to the transverse colon, and LCRC was located from the splenic flexure to the rectum. Frequencies of KRAS gene mutation, BRAF gene mutation, microsatellite instability (MSI), l18qLOH and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) were statistically analyzed between groups. RESULTS: Tumors were located in the RCC in 26.3% of patients and in the LCRC in 73.7%. Elderly patients, females and advanced diseases were significantly more frequent in the RCC group than in the LCRC group. However, venous invasion was significantly more frequent in LCRC than in RCC. Between groups, BRAF mutant type, KRAS mutant type, MSI and CIMP+ were significantly more frequent in RCC, whereas 18qLOH was significantly more frequent in LCRC. In overall survival, RCC demonstrated poor prognosis compared with LCRC; however, age, gender, stage, lymphatic invasion, KRAS status and BRAF status rather than tumor location were independent prognostic factors. In addition, the independent prognostic factors in RCC were different from those in LCRC in each stage. However, the consistency between OS and DFS was not observed in this study, excluding lymphatic invasion in LCRC. CONCLUSION: Comparing RCC with LCRC, RCC is different from LCRC in clinicopathological features, molecular biomarkers and prognostic factors in Japanese colorectal cancer patients. Since the proportions of molecular biomarkers of CRC in this study are different from Western CRCs, further studies are required to clarify the clinicopathological differences between Japanese CRCs and Western CRCs.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Japanese mortality due to colorectal cancer is on the rise, surpassing 49,000 in 2015. Many new treatment methods have been developed during recent decades. The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR Guidelines 2016) were prepared to show standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate disparities among institutions in terms of treatment, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment, and to deepen mutual understanding between health-care professionals and patients by making these Guidelines available to the general public. These Guidelines were prepared by consensus reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee, based on a careful review of the evidence retrieved by literature searches, and in view of the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice settings in Japan. Therefore, these Guidelines can be used as a tool for treating colorectal cancer in actual clinical practice settings. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. As a result of the discussions held by the Guideline Committee, controversial issues were selected as Clinical Questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories based on the consensus reached by the Guideline Committee members. Here we present the English version of the JSCCR Guidelines 2016.

Colorectal Cancer with BRAF D594G Mutation Is Not Associated with Microsatellite Instability or Poor Prognosis.

OBJECTIVE: BRAF D594G mutations in colorectal cancer patients are not clearly understood. We retrospectively investigated the clinicopathological features of colorectal cancers with BRAF D594G mutations. METHODS: We selected 908 colorectal cancer patients who underwent surgical resection from January 2008 to January 2013, and assessed BRAF, KRAS, microsatellite instability, and CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP). RESULTS: We detected BRAF D594G in 7 patients and BRAF V600E in 45 patients. The clinicopathological features of cancers with BRAF D594G mutation were similar to those with BRAF wild-type, but differed from those with BRAF V600E mutations. Regarding microsatellite instability status, 44.4% of cases with BRAF V600E mutations exhibited high microsatellite instability, compared to 14.3% of those with BRAF D594G mutations and 4.4% of those with BRAF wild-type. There were no CIMP-positive tumors in cancers with BRAF D594G mutations, whereas 67.8% of tumors with BRAF V600E mutations were CIMP-positive. In stage IV cancers, the survival rates of patients at 2 years were 8.5, 50.0, and 68.2% in the BRAF V600E mutation, BRAF D594G mutation, and BRAF wild-type groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Colorectal cancers with BRAF D594G mutations exhibit similar clinicopathological features, microsatellite instability status, and prognosis as those with BRAF wild-type.

Urinary N1, N12-diacetylspermine is a non-invasive marker for the diagnosis and prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and accurate prognostic risk assessment could improve patient outcome. We examined the significance of urinary N(1), N(12)-diacetylspermine (DiAcSpm) in the detection and prognostic stratification of NSCLC patients. METHODS: A DiAcSpm/cutoff ratio (DASr) was established for 260 NSCLC patients, 99 benign lung disease patients, and 140 healthy volunteers, using colloidal gold aggregation methods. The DASr was compared between patients and healthy controls, and the prognostic significance of DASr was examined. RESULTS: The median urinary DASr of NSCLC patients was significantly higher than that of healthy controls (0.810 vs 0.534, P<0.001). The DASr was higher in squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) patients than in adenocarcinoma patients (1.18 vs 0.756, respectively, P=0.039). An increased urinary DASr value was significantly associated with pathological stage, other histological invasive factors and unfavourable outcomes in patients with completely resected NSCLC. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that increased urinary DASr was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio=4.652, 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.092-10.35; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Urinary DASr was significantly increased in NSCLC, especially in SqCC. Urinary DASr was an independent poor prognostic indicator in patients with completely resected NSCLC. The DASr could be a useful biomarker for detecting malignancies and predicting prognosis.

Validation and Modification of the Japanese Classification System for Liver Metastases from Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: A Japanese multicenter study disclosed four prognostic indicators of colorectal cancer liver metastases: ≥5 hepatic tumors (HT), HT size > 5 cm, nodal status (N2) of primary cancer, and the presence of extrahepatic metastases (EM). The Japanese classification was then defined as Stage A, HT1 (≤4 lesions and ≤5 cm) and N0/1; Stage B, HT2 (≥5 lesions or >5 cm) and N0/1, or HT1 and N2; and Stage C, HT2 and N2, HT3 (≥5 lesions and >5 cm) with any N, or EM1 (presence of EM) with any HT/N. This study aimed to validate the prognostic reliability in a recent population and to develop a modified staging system that divided Stage C patients. METHODS: A total of 1185 patients diagnosed with liver metastases between 2007 and 2008 were enrolled in the study. According to the classification, 358, 257, and 570 patients were categorized as Stages A, B, and C, respectively. Stage C was further divided into two groups: Stage C-I, HT3 and N0/1, HT2 and N2, or HT1 and EM1; and Stage C-II, HT3 and N2, or HT2/3 and EM1. RESULTS: Cumulative overall survival curves for Stages A, B, and C were significantly different between each two stages (p < 0.0001, p < 0.0001). The modified system discriminated patients with a relatively better outcome (Stage C-I) from desperate patients (Stage C-II) (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The Japanese classification system was adequately validated in a recent population, and the modified system is useful in risk stratification of Stage C cases.

A multicenter phase II trial of mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab to treat liver-only metastases of colorectal cancer that are unsuitable for upfront resection (TRICC0808).

BACKGROUND: A phase II clinical trial was conducted on colorectal cancer patients with only liver metastases (focal diameter exceeds 5 cm or the number of liver metastases is ≥5; H2·H3) to evaluate the liver resection rate and safety after 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6+bevacizumab (BV) therapy. METHODS: mFOLFOX6+BV therapy was applied for 6 cycles to the patients with H2·H3 liver only metastasis. Hepatectomy was considered after the sixth cycle as a rule, and was performed if possible. The primary endpoint was the curative hepatectomy rate (R0 resection rate). RESULTS: Forty-six patients were registered and 45 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. Of the 19 patients rated as unresectable before therapy, 18 completed 6 cycles of mFOLFOX6+BV therapy and subsequently underwent hepatectomy (16 were R0-resected). Of the 26 initially unresectable patients, 6 underwent hepatectomy (4 were RO-resected). The overall R0 resection rate was 44.4% (20/45). Chemotherapy-associated grade 3 or higher adverse events included neutrophil decreased (17.4%) and leukocyte decreased (8.7%), fatigue (6.5%) etc. Only hypertension (6.5%) and venous thromboembolism (2.2%) were BV-associated grade 3 or higher adverse events. Among the 25 patients who underwent hepatectomy, intraoperative/postoperative complications included grade 3 wound infections (2 cases), biloma, delayed wound healing and intraperitoneal abscess (each 1 case). CONCLUSIONS: In colorectal cancer patients with liver-only metastases, mFOLFOX6+ BV therapy yielded a high hepatectomy rate and a high percentage of initially unresectable and subsequently resectable cases. The chemotherapy associated adverse events and hepatectomy complications were both within acceptable ranges.

The SOFT trial: a Phase III study of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidine S-1 and oxaliplatin (SOX) plus bevacizumab as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

A combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil (FOLFOX) plus bevacizumab has been widely used for the first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine preparation that combines tegafur, a prodrug of 5-fluorouracil, with two modulators. Several studies of combination chemotherapy with oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) conducted in Asia have reported promising efficacy and safety in patients with mCRC, suggesting the potential to replace mFOLFOX6. The SOFT trial (JapicCTI-090699) was a randomized Phase III trial designed to evaluate the noninferiority of SOX plus bevacizumab to mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab in patients with mCRC. This review summarizes the drug concept of S-1 and the results of clinical trials of S-1 and SOX in CRC and presents an overview of the SOFT trial.

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of death in Japan, where it accounts for the largest number of deaths from malignant neoplasms among women and the third largest number among men. Many new methods of treatment have been developed during recent decades. The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR Guidelines 2014) have been prepared as standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate treatment disparities among institutions, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment, and to deepen mutual understanding among health-care professionals and patients by making these guidelines available to the general public. These guidelines have been prepared as a result of consensuses reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee on the basis of careful review of evidence retrieved by literature searches and taking into consideration the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice in Japan. They can, therefore, be used as a guide for treating colorectal cancer in clinical practice. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. As a result of the discussions of the Guideline Committee, controversial issues were selected as clinical questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories, on the basis of consensus reached by Guideline Committee members. Here we present the English version of the JSCCR Guidelines 2014.

Quality of surgery for stage III colon cancer: comparison between England, Germany, and Japan.

BACKGROUND: A number of studies have demonstrated that lymph node metastasis is a poor prognostic factor in colon cancer. Advances of surgical procedure have improved the outcomes of colon cancer treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the characteristics of surgery for stage III colon cancer between England, Germany, and Japan. METHODS: Using the data of patients with colon cancer from one English, one German, and two Japanese centers, the characteristics of clinicopathologic features were compared. Conventional surgery, complete mesocolic excision (CME) with central vascular ligation, and D3 lymph node dissection were performed in England, Germany, and Japan, respectively. RESULTS: Nineteen English, 26 German, and 60 Japanese patients were enrolled. There was no difference in tumor location, pT, and pN factors among the three groups. The length of resected bowel and the area of resected mesentery of the English and CME specimens were significantly greater than those of the D3 specimens (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively), whereas the length of the vascular tie to the bowel wall was similar between the CME and D3 specimens (P = 0.87), which was longer than that of the English specimens. The number of lymph nodes retrieved in the CME specimens was greatest among three groups (P < 0.0001), although the number of positive nodes was comparable (P = 0.64). The rates of mesocolic plane surgery in the English, CME, and D3 specimens were 47.4, 88.5, and 71.7 %, respectively (P = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: Three types of surgery for colon cancer differed in terms of the length of the resected bowel and the area of mesentery, although the length of the vascular tie to the bowel wall was similar between CME and D3 specimens. The high rates of mesocolic plane surgery were demonstrated in the CME and D3 specimens.