Effect of Compound Muscle Action Potential After Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Normalization on Anesthetic Fade of Intraoperative Transcranial Motor-Evoked Potential.

PURPOSE: Anesthetic fade refers to the time-dependent decrease in the amplitude of the intraoperative motor-evoked potential. It is thought to be caused by the accumulation of propofol. The authors examined whether normalization by the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) after peripheral nerve stimulation could compensate for anesthetic fade. METHODS: In 1,842 muscles in 578 surgeries, which did not exhibit a motor-neurologic change after the operation, the motor-evoked potential amplitude was normalized by the CMAP amplitude after peripheral nerve stimulation, and the CMAP amplitude and operation times were analyzed. RESULTS: The amplitudes of both motor-evoked potential and CMAP increased over time after peripheral nerve stimulation because of the disappearance of muscle-relaxant action. Especially, after peripheral nerve stimulation, CMAP significantly increased from the beginning to the end of the operation. Anesthetic fade in transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring seemed to occur at more than 235 minutes of surgery based on the results of a receiver operating characteristic analysis of the operation time and relative amplitudes. Although the mean amplitude without CMAP normalization at more than 235 minutes was significantly lower than that at less than 235 minutes, the mean amplitude with normalization by CMAP after peripheral nerve stimulation at more than 235 minutes was not significantly different from that at less than 235 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: Compound muscle action potential after peripheral nerve stimulation normalization was able to avoid the effect of anesthetic fade. Anesthetic fade was seemed to be caused by a decrease in synaptic transmission at the neuromuscular junction because of propofol accumulation by this result.

Cutoff Points, Sensitivities, and Specificities of Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potential Monitoring Determined Using Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although intraoperative motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring is widely performed during neurosurgical operations, evaluating its results is controversial. STUDY AIMS: The cutoff point of MEP monitoring should be determined not only to predict but also to prevent postoperative neurologic deficits. MATERIAL AND METHODS: MEP monitoring was performed during 484 neurosurgical operations for patients without definitive preoperative motor palsy including 325 spinal operations, 102 cerebral aneurysmal operations, and 57 brain tumor operations, all monitored by transcranial stimulation, and 34 brain tumor operations monitored under direct cortical stimulation. To exclude the effects of muscle relaxants on MEP, the compound muscle action potential (CMAP), measured immediately after transcranial stimulation or direct cortical stimulation at supramaximal stimulation of the peripheral nerve, was used for normalization. The cutoff points, sensitivity, and specificity of MEP recorded during neurosurgery were examined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses and categorized according to the type of operation and stimulation. RESULTS: In spinal operations under transcranial stimulation, amplitude reduction of 77.9% and 80.6% as cutoff points for motor palsy with and without CMAP normalization, respectively, provided a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 96.8% and 96.5%. In aneurysmal operations under transcranial stimulation, cutoff points of 70.7% and 69.6% offered specificities of 95.2% and 95.7% with and without CMAP normalization, respectively. The sensitivities for both were 100%. In brain tumor operations under direct stimulation, cutoff points were 83.5% and 86.3% with or without CMAP normalization, respectively, and the sensitivity and specificity for both were 100%. CONCLUSION: An amplitude decrease of 80% in brain tumor operations, 75% in spinal operations, and 70% in aneurysmal operations should be used as the cutoff points.

Motor evoked potential mapping and monitoring by direct brainstem stimulation. Technical note.

Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) by direct brainstem stimulation were generated during 12 neurosurgical operations performed in five posterior fossa tumors, six vertebrobasilar aneurysms, and an arachnoid cyst. The anterior aspect of the brainstem was exposed using a subtemporal approach (in six cases), a presigmoid approach (one case), or a lateral suboccipital approach (five cases). A train of five monopolar 5 to 25 mA pulses was then applied, and MEPs were recorded from the extremities. Motor evoked potentials were recorded in all patients (four mappings and seven monitorings) except in a 12-year-old child who underwent surgery for a posterior cerebral artery aneurysm. Although he experienced postoperative motor palsy, the aneurysm ruptured before electrodes could be placed. Two patients with postoperative motor palsy, one with a clival meningioma and one with a basilar trunk aneurysm, had shown significant decreases in MEP amplitude and even complete disappearance of MEPs during intraoperative brainstem stimulation. Motor evoked potentials elicited by direct brainstem stimulation seem to be an accurate neurophysiological monitoring method during operations around the anterior and lateral aspects of the brainstem.

Compensation of intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring by compound muscle action potential after peripheral nerve stimulation.

It is often difficult to evaluate the results of transcranial motor-evoked potential (TCMEP) monitoring in patients under general anesthesia because these results are strongly affected by anesthetics and muscle relaxants. To exclude effects of muscle relaxants on TCMEP, compound muscle action potential (CMAP) by supramaximum stimulation of the median nerve immediately after transcranial stimulation (300 to 600 V) was recorded in 70 neurosurgical operations. A relative amplitude index (RAI) was defined as the amplitude of TCMEP after the operative procedure divided by the amplitude of TCMEP before the operative procedure. The RAI was calculated and was compensated by the amplitude of CMAP in 141 limbs. In 12 limbs of 7 patients with postoperatively progressed motor paresis, the compensated RAI was less than 0.2. The compensated RAI in all other 129 limbs of 63 patients without postoperative motor palsy was more than 0.2. These results suggest that compensation of TCMEP monitoring by CMAP is an easy and accurate method for removing the effects of muscle relaxants in TCMEP.

Biopsy of brain stem glioma using motor-evoked potential mapping by direct peduncular stimulation and individual adjuvant therapy. Case report.

A 23-year-old man presented with a brain stem glioma manifesting as a 6-month history of right hemiparesis and diplopia. Serial magnetic resonance imaging showed an intrinsic diffuse brain stem glioma that gradually localized to the left cerebral peduncle after initial adjuvant therapy. Surgery was performed through a left subtemporal transtentorial approach under motor-evoked potential (MEP) mapping by direct peduncular stimulation. The lateral aspect of the midbrain was exposed, a train of five bipolar 25 mA pulses was applied, and MEPs recorded from the extremities. MEPs were only recorded from the left extremities even with left cerebral peduncular stimulation. Partial resection of the tumor was safely performed, with slight temporary neurological worsening. The histological diagnosis was anaplastic astrocytoma. Individual adjuvant therapy based on the results of real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction of O6-methylguanine-deoxyribonucleic acid methyltransferase achieved an almost complete tumor response. Surgery under pyramidal tract mapping and intensive postoperative adjuvant therapy resulted in a good outcome despite the presence of a generally intractable intrinsic brain stem glioma.

Intraoperative monitoring during decompression of the spinal cord and spinal nerves using transcranial motor-evoked potentials: The law of twenty percent.

Motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring was performed during 196 consecutive spinal (79 cervical and 117 lumbar) surgeries for the decompression of compressive spinal and spinal nerve diseases. MEP monitoring in spinal surgery has been considered sensitive to predict postoperative neurological recovery. In this series, transcranial stimulation consisted of trains of five pulses at a constant voltage (200-600 V). For the normalization of MEP, we recorded compound muscle action potentials (CMAP) after peripheral nerve stimulation, usually on the median nerve at the wrist 2 seconds before or after each transcranial stimulation of the motor area, for all operations. The sensitivity and specificity of MEP monitoring was 100% and 97.4%, respectively, or 96.9% with or without CMAP compensation (if the threshold of postoperative motor palsy was defined as 20% relative amplitude rate [RAR]). The mean RAR after CMAP normalization, of the most affected muscle in the patient group with excellent postoperative results (recovery rate of a Japan Orthopedic Association score of more than 50%) was significantly higher than that in the other groups (p=0.0224). All patients with an amplitude increase rate (AIR) with CMAP normalization of more than 20% achieved neurological recovery postoperatively. Our results suggest that if the RAR is more than 20%, postoperative motor palsy can be avoided in spinal surgery. If the AIR with normalization by CMAP after peripheral nerve stimulation is more than 20%, neurological recovery can be expected in spinal surgery.

Sensitivity and specificity in transcranial motor-evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgical operations.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative transcranial motor-evoked potential (TCMEP) monitoring is widely performed during neurosurgical operations. Sensitivity and specificity in TCMEP during neurosurgical operations were examined according to the type of operation. METHODS: TCMEP monitoring was performed during 283 neurosurgical operations for patients without preoperative motor palsy, including 121 spinal operations, 84 cerebral aneurysmal operations, and 31 brain tumor operations. Transcranial stimulation at 100-600 V was applied by screw electrodes placed in the scalp and electromyographic responses were recorded with surface electrodes placed on the affected muscles. To exclude the effects of muscle relaxants on TCMEP, compound muscle action potential (CMAP) by supramaximal stimulation of the peripheral nerve immediately after transcranial stimulation was used for compensation of TCMEP. RESULTS: In spinal operations, with an 80% reduction in amplitude as the threshold for motor palsy, the sensitivity and specificity with CMAP compensation were 100% and 96.4%, respectively. In aneurysmal operations, with a 70% reduction in amplitude as the threshold for motor palsy, the sensitivity and specificity with CMAP compensation were 100% and 94.8%, respectively. Compensation by CMAP was especially useful in aneurysmal operations. In all neurosurgical operations, with a 70% reduction in amplitude as the threshold for motor palsy, the sensitivity and specificity with CMAP compensation were 95.0% and 90.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative TCMEP monitoring is a significantly reliable method for preventing postoperative motor palsy in both cranial and spinal surgery. A 70% reduction in the compensated amplitude is considered to be a suitable alarm point in all neurological operations.