Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in 2954 COVID-19 Adult Survivors: A Comprehensive Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have utilized MRI to determine the extent to which COVID-19 survivors may experience cardiac sequels after recovery. PURPOSE: To systematically review the main cardiac MRI findings in COVID-19 adult survivors. STUDY TYPE: Systematic review. SUBJECTS: A total of 2954 COVID-19 adult survivors from 16 studies. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), parametric mapping (T1-native, T2, T1-post (extracellular volume fraction [ECV]), T2-weighted sequences (myocardium/pericardium), at 1.5 T and 3  T. ASSESSMENT: A systematic search was performed on PubMed, Embase, and Google scholar databases using Boolean operators and the relevant key terms covering COVID-19, cardiac injury, CMR, and follow-up. MRI data, including (if available) T1, T2, extra cellular volume, presence of myocardial or pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and left and right ventricular ejection fraction were extracted. STATISTICAL TESTS: The main results of the included studies are summarized. No additional statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: Of 1601 articles retrieved from the initial search, 12 cohorts and 10 case series met our eligibility criteria. The rate of raised T1 in COVID-19 adult survivors varied across studies from 0% to 73%. Raised T2 was detected in none of patients in 4 out of 15 studies, and in the remaining studies, its rate ranged from 2% to 60%. In most studies, LGE (myocardial or pericardial) was observed in COVID-19 survivors, the rate ranging from 4% to 100%. Myocardial LGE mainly had nonischemic patterns. None of the cohort studies observed myocardial LGE in "healthy" controls. Most studies found that patients who recovered from COVID-19 had a significantly greater T1 and T2 compared to participants in the corresponding control group. DATA CONCLUSION: Findings of MRI studies suggest the presence of myocardial and pericardial involvement in a notable number of patients recovered from COVID-19. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 3.

Acute pericarditis: A peculiar manifestation of common variable immune deficiency.

Common variable immune deficiency (CVID) is known as the most prevalent symptomatic inborn error of immunity associated with autoimmune and inflammatory complications in addition to recurrent infections. In this study, we investigated the prevalence of acute pericarditis as a complication in the past medical history of 337 CVID patients. We found five patients (1.5%) that had experienced acute pericarditis, and described the medical history of three patients.

Predictors of MACE following PPCI in patients with a prior history of CABG.

BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests patients undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PPCI) who have a prior history of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) are more likely to experience adverse cardiac events compared to patients without prior CABG. We aimed to study risk factors of one-year Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) in patients undergoing PPCI with a prior history of CABG. METHODS: Patients with a history of CABG undergoing PPCI on Saphenous Vein Graft (SVG) were contacted one year after PPCI. One-year follow-up sought MACE, death, and cardiovascular hospitalisation. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included in this study of which 66 were followed-up. Within the one-year follow-up, 6 (8.7%) patients were hospitalised due to cardiovascular causes, and 20 (29%) developed MACE. Patients with prior PCI had a significantly higher one-year MACE rate compared to others. Among patients undergoing pre-dilation, patients who experienced MACE had a significantly higher pre-dilation diameter. Moreover, patients experiencing MACE had a significantly lower Ejection Fraction (EF). According to logistic regression models, prior PCI, pre-dilation, and EF were predictors of one-year MACE. Furthermore, The EF was an independent predictor of one-year MACE. CONCLUSION: Higher pre-dilation diameter might be associated with a higher one-year MACE rate in patients undergoing PPCI on SVG with a prior history of CABG. Additionally, EF was an independent predictor of one-year MACE.

Immature Platelet Fraction and Acute Coronary Syndrome; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Immature Platelet Fraction (IPF) is a measure of the proportion of reticulated platelets (RPs) to all platelets in circulation. IPF may have both prognostic and diagnostic values in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). This study aims to comprehensively summarize the diagnostic utility of IPF levels in patients with ACS, specifically focusing on its ability to differentiate between different subtypes of ACS. Methods: We conducted a systematic search in online databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar up to March 4th 2024, to identify relevant studies. The random-effect model, employing inverse variance for mean differences (MD) and Mantel-Haenszel methods for odds ratios (OR) were utilized to combine the data. Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) appraisal tool was employed to assess the quality of included studies. Results: Our systematic review contains 15 articles with a total sample size of 2,030 ACS patients. Pooled analysis revealed significant differences in IPF levels of ACS patients compared to healthy controls (MD (95%CI): 2.85 (0.86, 4.85), P-value = 0.004) and stable angina patients (MD (95%CI): 0.58 (0.23, 0.92), P-value < 0.001). Subgroup comparisons within ACS patients demonstrated higher IPF levels in myocardial infarction (MI) vs. unstable angina (UA) (MD (95%CI): 1.81 (0.41, 3.22), P-value = 0.01), ST elevation MI (STEMI) vs. non-ST elevation (NSTEMI) ACS (MD (95%CI): 0.74 (0.31, 1.17), P-value < 0.001), and NSTEMI vs. UA (MD (95% CI): 1.07 (0.24, 1.90), P-value = 0.01). Conclusion: IPF levels could increase in patients with ACS, particularly during the acute phase of STEMI. This suggests that IPF may be a useful biomarker for early diagnosis of ACS. Additionally, IPF levels may help differentiate between ACS subtypes.

Cross-cultural validity of the Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life questionnaire in the quality of life survey after pulmonary embolism: A Persian-speaking cohort.

Background: The Pulmonary Embolism Quality of Life (PEmb-QoL) questionnaire is the first disease-specific scale for assessing the quality of life in patients with a history of pulmonary embolism (PE). Objectives: To assess the cross-cultural validity and reliability of the disease-specific PEmb-QoL questionnaire. Methods: The Persian version was prepared through the forward and backward translation of the English questionnaire. Six months after the diagnosis of acute PE, consecutive Persian-speaking patients were asked to complete the PEmb-QoL, the generic 36-item Short Form (SF-36) questionnaires and undertake a 6-minute walk test (6MWT). Acceptability was assessed via item missing rate, reproducibility by the test-retest method, and internal consistency reliability by Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω coefficients. Convergence validity was assessed using the Spearman rank correlation between scores of PEmb-QoL, SF-36, and 6MWT. The questionnaire structure was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis. Results: Ninety-six patients with a confirmed diagnosis of PE completed the questionnaires. The Persian version of PEmb-QoL had good internal consistency (α = 0.95, 3-factor ω = 0.96), inter-item correlation (0.3-0.62), item-total correlation (0.38-0.71), reproducibility (test-retest ICC with 25 participants = 0.92-0.99), and good discriminant validity. Convergence validity was confirmed by the moderate-to-high correlations between PEmb-QoL and SF-36 scores, and a good correlation between the "limitation in daily activities" dimension of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire and 6MWT results. Exploratory factor analysis suggested a 3-component structure with functional (items 1h, 4b-5d, 6, 8, 9i, and 9j), symptoms (1b-h, 7, and 8), and emotional (5a, 6, and 9a-h) components. Conclusion: The Persian version of the PEmb-QoL questionnaire is valid and reliable for measuring the disease-specific quality of life in patients with PE.

Post-Pulmonary Embolism Impairment Six Months after Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Prospective Registry.

BACKGROUND: Little evidence is available on post-pulmonary embolism impairment (PPEI), a recently defined complication of pulmonary embolism (PE) encompassing dysfunctional clinical and imaging parameters. In the present study, we sought to evaluate its frequency with a focus on the main components. METHODS: In this prospective registry, we included patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute PE and focused on those with initial right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. Their baseline, pre-discharge, and 6 month follow-up clinical and imaging characteristics were recorded. The main study outcomes were incomplete RV functional recovery, exercise capacity limitations (based on the 6 minute walk test), and their combination, which defines PPEI, within six months of acute PE. RESULTS: Of 170 consecutive patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute PE, 123 accepted to participate in the follow-up study, of whom 87 had initial RV dysfunction. The 6 month rates of incomplete RV functional recovery, signs of an intermediate-to-high echocardiographic probability of PH, and exercise limitations were observed in 58.6, 32.1, and 45.9%, respectively. A total of 22 (25.2%; 95% CI 15.5-34.4%) patients had PPEI. The RV/LV ratio and the fractional area change on discharge after acute PE were more often impaired among patients with incomplete RV recovery, exercise limitations, and a high probability of PH at 6 months. In contrast, an initial impaired RV diastolic function indices appeared to characterize patients with a limited exercise capacity at 6 months. DISCUSSION: PPEI affects one fourth of patients surviving acute PE with half of them presenting with RV dysfunction or exercise limitations.

Atorvastatin versus Placebo in ICU Patients with COVID-19: Ninety-day Results of the INSPIRATION-S Trial.

BACKGROUND: In the INSPIRATION-S trial, atorvastatin versus placebo was associated with a nonsignificant 16% reduction in 30-day composite of venous/arterial thrombosis or death in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with COVID-19. Thrombo-inflammatory response in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) may last beyond the first 30 days. METHODS: This article reports the effects of atorvastatin 20 mg daily versus placebo on 90-day clinical and functional outcomes from INSPIRATION-S, a double-blind multicenter randomized trial of adult ICU patients with COVID-19. The main outcome for this prespecified study was a composite of adjudicated venous/arterial thrombosis, treatment with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), or all-cause mortality. Functional status was assessed with the Post-COVID-19 Functional Scale. RESULTS: In the primary analysis, 587 patients were included (age: 57 [Q1-Q3: 45-68] years; 44% women). By 90-day follow-up, the main outcome occurred in 96 (33.1%) patients assigned to atorvastatin and 113 (38.0%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-1.05, p = 0.11). Atorvastatin in patients who presented within 7 days of symptom onset was associated with reduced 90-day hazard for the main outcome (HR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.86, p interaction = 0.02). Atorvastatin use was associated with improved 90-day functional status, although the upper bound CI crossed 1.0 (ORordinal: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-1.01, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin 20 mg compared with placebo did not significantly reduce the 90-day composite of death, treatment with ECMO, or venous/arterial thrombosis. However, the point estimates do not exclude a potential clinically meaningful treatment effect, especially among patients who presented within 7 days of symptom onset (NCT04486508).

The Pragmatic Role of COVID-19 on the Thrombus Grade of Patients with Contemporary ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Limited data exist on the clinical outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods: This multicenter study, conducted in 6 centers in Iran, aimed to compare baseline clinical and procedural data between a case group, comprising STEMI patients with COVID-19, and a control group, comprising STEMI patients before the COVID-19 pandemic, and to determine in-hospital infarct-related artery thrombus grades and major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), defined as a composite of deaths from any cause (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular), nonfatal strokes, and stent thrombosis. Results: No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups regarding baseline characteristics. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) was performed in 72.9% of the cases and 98.5% of the controls (P=0.043), and primary coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 6.2% of the cases and 1.4% of the controls (P=0.048). Successful PPCI procedures (final TIMI flow grade III) were significantly fewer in the case group (66.5% vs 93.5%; P=0.001). The baseline thrombus grade before wire crossing was not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. The summation of thrombus grades IV and V was 75% in the case group and 82% in the control group (P=0.432). The rate of MACCEs was 14.5% and 2.1% in the case and control groups, respectively (P=0.002). Conclusion: In our study, the thrombus grade had no significant differences between the case and control groups; however, the in-hospital rates of the no-reflow phenomenon, periprocedural MI, mechanical complications, and MACCEs were statistically significantly higher in the case group.